Negro President causes increased number of Good ol' boys, Caligas

[derspiess]

The Southern Poverty Law Center isn't exactly a credible organization, famous for creating bogus reports in order to stimulate donations.

It's more credible than you, Hansie.

Eh, no.  Not these days.

[CountDeMoney]

The Southern Poverty Law Center isn't exactly a credible organization, famous for creating bogus reports in order to stimulate donations.

It's more credible than you, Hansie.

Eh, no.  Not these days.

Yeah, it is, derfuhrer.

[Razgovory]

The Southern Poverty Law Center isn't exactly a credible organization, famous for creating bogus reports in order to stimulate donations.

It's more credible than you, Hansie.

Eh, no.  Not these days.

Nothing destroys credibility in the eyes of GOPtard more then fighting racists.

[Jacob]

Eh, no.  Not these days.

What is your number one example that shows how little credibility the SLPC has?

[DGuller]

The Southern Poverty Law Center isn't exactly a credible organization, famous for creating bogus reports in order to stimulate donations.

It's more credible than you, Hansie.

To be fair, these days Baghdad Bob has more credibility than Hansie.

[Eddie Teach]

The Southern Poverty Law Center isn't exactly a credible organization, famous for creating bogus reports in order to stimulate donations.

It's more credible than you, Hansie.

Nah, Hans is:

[jimmy olsen]

I am intrigued that after a President wins a second term his party no longer has to worry about elections ever again and has dictatorial powers.

It's such nonsense.  I saw a line by some historian that was interesting that all great Presidents win a second term, yet no President's second term goes well.

What went wrong in Eisenhower's second term?

[DGuller]

I am intrigued that after a President wins a second term his party no longer has to worry about elections ever again and has dictatorial powers.

It's such nonsense.  I saw a line by some historian that was interesting that all great Presidents win a second term, yet no President's second term goes well.

What went wrong in Eisenhower's second term?

His heart muscle, for one.

[Sheilbh]

What went wrong in Eisenhower's second term?

I'm not sure.  It was just a line I read.  I think the point is that most Presidents achieve most of their legacy in the first term, the second term is just a way of confirming it and setting their version of history in place.

But, off the top of my head, isn't that when Khruschev makes arms deals with Nasser and containment in the Middle East is broken, lost Cuba and weren't the late 50s really bad in terms of civil rights beginning to ratchet up?  Also what did he achieve in his second term?

The interesting counter-example in my view is W.

[Razgovory]

I am intrigued that after a President wins a second term his party no longer has to worry about elections ever again and has dictatorial powers.

It's such nonsense.  I saw a line by some historian that was interesting that all great Presidents win a second term, yet no President's second term goes well.

What went wrong in Eisenhower's second term?

That U2 thing didn't go so well.  I think Ike really wanted to diffuse the cold war.  The U2 thing hurt that, though it may have been impossible.  Soviet leadership made it very difficult.  I think Khrushchev actually would have liked to diffuse the cold war as well, but he was a bumbler, and didn't think ahead.  His first instinct was to score points and make short term gains even if it meant compromising long term strategies.  Khrushchev might have returned Gary Powers without embarrassing the US for some kind of deal.  Hell, he could have let him go as a sign of good faith.  Such a gesture might have impressed the Americans, and opened the door to better relations.

[Neil]

The Southern Poverty Law Center isn't exactly a credible organization, famous for creating bogus reports in order to stimulate donations.

It's more credible than you, Hansie.

Well, it's not exactly cut and dried.  They do good work representing folks in court, but it's not like they're uniquely equipped to do so.  That said, I feel that some of their rhetoric is a bit overblown, and they're definitely something of a fundraising machine these days.  Still, at least they're of some actual benefit, rather than a shakedown machine like Sharpton and Jackson.  Still, it must be hard for them to know that their best days are behind them.  Where they once were slaying the Klan, now they're just whacking methheads.

Besides, you know how I feel about activists.

[Razgovory]

I think whacking methheads is a very noble pursuit.  Anyway, some needs to keep an eye on the Militias and tax protesters.   They're dangerous.

[garbon]

I think whacking methheads is a very noble pursuit.  Anyway, some needs to keep an eye on the Militias and tax protesters.   They're dangerous.

I'll whack 'em off.

[Siege]

It's only because he's black.  Everybody knows it, but nobody wants to admit it.

ZOMG IT WULD BE TEH SAME WITH A WHITE DUDE

No, no it wouldn't.  And you all know it.

I think is the opposite. All Obama have going for him is that he is black.
If he had been white he wouldn't be sitting on the White House.
We would have another Clinton, since we all know McCain can't win presidential elections.

[Razgovory]

It's only because he's black.  Everybody knows it, but nobody wants to admit it.

ZOMG IT WULD BE TEH SAME WITH A WHITE DUDE

No, no it wouldn't.  And you all know it.

I think is the opposite. All Obama have going for him is that he is black.
If he had been white he wouldn't be sitting on the White House.
We would have another Clinton, since we all know McCain can't win presidential elections.

You really don't pay attention, do you?