Wikipedia is down, so lets all use Conservapedia.

Started by Razgovory, January 18, 2012, 06:23:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3
User actions

fhdz

#30
January 19, 2012, 01:19:30 PM
QuoteThat opposing same-sex marriage is justified and point to decriminalized interracial marriage bans as proof.

:unsure:
and the horse you rode in on

Razgovory

#31
January 19, 2012, 01:42:44 PM
Quote from: fahdiz on January 19, 2012, 01:19:30 PM
QuoteThat opposing same-sex marriage is justified and point to decriminalized interracial marriage bans as proof.

:unsure:

You have to remember to put the words "Liberals deny" in front of it.  It doesn't make it true, but sentence makes a bit more sense.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

fhdz

#32
January 19, 2012, 01:45:15 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on January 19, 2012, 01:42:44 PM
You have to remember to put the words "Liberals deny" in front of it.  It doesn't make it true, but sentence makes a bit more sense.

My :unsure: was about why the author of this statement would even bring interracial marriage into it. Wouldn't it have been a lot less leading - and a lot less racist-seeming - to simply say "Liberals deny that opposing same-sex marriage is justified"?
and the horse you rode in on

Valmy

#33
January 19, 2012, 01:45:42 PM
Quote from: Syt on January 19, 2012, 12:56:34 PM
QuoteThat state run health care has lead to Islamic terrorism in Britain, and would do so in the US.

:tinfoil:

State run health care kills people as well IIRC.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

fhdz

#34
January 19, 2012, 01:48:26 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 19, 2012, 01:45:42 PM
Quote from: Syt on January 19, 2012, 12:56:34 PM
QuoteThat state run health care has lead to Islamic terrorism in Britain, and would do so in the US.

:tinfoil:

State run health care kills people as well IIRC.

Death panels :wub: :wub:
and the horse you rode in on

MadImmortalMan

#35
January 19, 2012, 01:53:46 PM
I'd like to see the reasoning behind that. I assume it's got something to do with the Scotland airport incident?
"Stability is destabilizing." --Hyman Minsky

"Complacency can be a self-denying prophecy."
"We have nothing to fear but lack of fear itself." --Larry Summers

Ideologue

#36
January 19, 2012, 03:11:31 PM
Quote from: fahdiz on January 19, 2012, 01:45:15 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on January 19, 2012, 01:42:44 PM
You have to remember to put the words "Liberals deny" in front of it.  It doesn't make it true, but sentence makes a bit more sense.

My :unsure: was about why the author of this statement would even bring interracial marriage into it. Wouldn't it have been a lot less leading - and a lot less racist-seeming - to simply say "Liberals deny that opposing same-sex marriage is justified"?

I think it's just awkwardly worded.  The meaning, as I take it, is "Liberals believe that banning same-sex marriage is morally analogous, and just as morally wrong, as banning miscegenation; we all agree that interracial marriage bans are evil (of course we do why would you believe otherwise you liberal scum?), but they are totally different things!"
Kinemalogue
Current reviews: The 'Burbs (9/10); Gremlins 2: The New Batch (9/10); John Wick: Chapter 2 (9/10); A Cure For Wellness (4/10)

Martinus

#37
January 19, 2012, 04:07:46 PM
Quote from: Ideologue on January 19, 2012, 03:11:31 PM
Quote from: fahdiz on January 19, 2012, 01:45:15 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on January 19, 2012, 01:42:44 PM
You have to remember to put the words "Liberals deny" in front of it.  It doesn't make it true, but sentence makes a bit more sense.

My :unsure: was about why the author of this statement would even bring interracial marriage into it. Wouldn't it have been a lot less leading - and a lot less racist-seeming - to simply say "Liberals deny that opposing same-sex marriage is justified"?

I think it's just awkwardly worded.  The meaning, as I take it, is "Liberals believe that banning same-sex marriage is morally analogous, and just as morally wrong, as banning miscegenation; we all agree that interracial marriage bans are evil (of course we do why would you believe otherwise you liberal scum?), but they are totally different things!"

Of course they are not analogous. You can't have mixed race mongrels born out of gay marriages so there's no compelling reason to ban them. :unsure:

Viking

#38
January 19, 2012, 04:20:06 PM
Quote from: Tamas on January 19, 2012, 04:28:36 AM
Quote from: Viking on January 19, 2012, 04:28:11 AM
I checked out Mitt Romney's article on Conservapedia. Nothing about the 2012 campaign.

So it's a full coverage?

I suppose Andy Schlafly is too busy teaching high school and is waiting until Romney wins (or not) to declare him a true conservative (or not) when it comes to removing Obama.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Razgovory

#39
January 19, 2012, 05:51:19 PM
Quote from: Ideologue on January 19, 2012, 03:11:31 PM
Quote from: fahdiz on January 19, 2012, 01:45:15 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on January 19, 2012, 01:42:44 PM
You have to remember to put the words "Liberals deny" in front of it.  It doesn't make it true, but sentence makes a bit more sense.

My :unsure: was about why the author of this statement would even bring interracial marriage into it. Wouldn't it have been a lot less leading - and a lot less racist-seeming - to simply say "Liberals deny that opposing same-sex marriage is justified"?

I think it's just awkwardly worded.  The meaning, as I take it, is "Liberals believe that banning same-sex marriage is morally analogous, and just as morally wrong, as banning miscegenation; we all agree that interracial marriage bans are evil (of course we do why would you believe otherwise you liberal scum?), but they are totally different things!"

This was my guess, but I could be off base.  The one about George Bush and Hurricane Katrina is so badly worded that I think it means the opposite of what they meant it to say.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Camerus

#40
January 19, 2012, 06:04:41 PM
Heh, "Conservapedia" is just in the same anti-social, pseudo-intellectual vein as any hardcore racist website.  Fucks like him are opposed to the liberating fruits of human progress of the past, oh, 350 years of human history.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3
User actions