Senators slam plan to make soldiers pay for service treatment

Started by Weatherman, March 12, 2009, 10:38:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Weatherman

QuoteWASHINGTON (CNN) -- Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki confirmed Tuesday that the Obama administration is considering a controversial plan to make veterans pay for treatment of service-related injuries with private insurance.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/10/veterans.health.insurance/index.html

Fail.

Neil

I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.

Tiamat

Why shouldn't veterans be required to pay for treatment with private health insurance? The cost of the Iraq War is substantial, but long term care of these individuals will lead to VA insolvency.

Weatherman

Quote from: Tiamat on March 12, 2009, 10:43:14 AM
Why shouldn't veterans be required to pay for treatment with private health insurance? The cost of the Iraq War is substantial, but long term care of these individuals will lead to VA insolvency.

We were able to do it after WW2, Korea, and Vietnam. Why should this be any different?

Tiamat

Quote from: Weatherman on March 12, 2009, 10:47:58 AM
Quote from: Tiamat on March 12, 2009, 10:43:14 AM
Why shouldn't veterans be required to pay for treatment with private health insurance? The cost of the Iraq War is substantial, but long term care of these individuals will lead to VA insolvency.

We were able to do it after WW2, Korea, and Vietnam. Why should this be any different?
They're going to live longer and the cost of medical care has risen dramatically over the past sixty years. If this plan is killed by the Congress, then I would expect severe rationing of VA resources in the future. I suppose that's how they'll force costs down...

Grey Fox

Only a complete nationalisation of the HC can save America now.
Colonel Caliga is Awesome.

KRonn

Wow, what a piece of fail this is. "Charging for service related injuries".

Berkut

I don't know, from where Obama sits and his level of experience and understanding of things military, I am sure it makes perfect sense for service members to pay for their own health care resulting from injuries serving the war machine.

We could save some more money by making them pay for their own ammo as well. This would not only remove some of the burden from the federal budget, freeing up money for more grants to ACORN and other groups doing *real* work, but would likely encourage them to be more careful in their use of firepower and perhaps even stop them from killing so many innocent victims of US imperialism.

After all, a bullet is no reset button!
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

viper37

Quote from: Berkut on March 12, 2009, 11:34:11 AM

We could save some more money by making them pay for their own ammo as well. This would not only remove some of the burden from the federal budget, freeing up money for more grants to ACORN and other groups doing *real* work, but would likely encourage them to be more careful in their use of firepower and perhaps even stop them from killing so many innocent victims of US imperialism.

After all, a bullet is no reset button!
apparently, many US Soldiers pay themselves for some piece of equipment, because the standard stuff is just not good.

Oh, and that idea is stupid.
I don't do meditation.  I drink alcohol to relax, like normal people.

If Microsoft Excel decided to stop working overnight, the world would practically end.

Syt

If a soldier is too stupid to stay out of a bullet's way then he should pay the treatment.

Also gives a whole new meaning to "He bought it."
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

grumbler

I must admit that it is fun to watch all the sturm und drang over a plan that does not exist yet.  Hell, we have a strawman argument that is more flecshed out than the "plan" being attacked!  :D
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

Berkut

Quote from: grumbler on March 12, 2009, 11:56:51 AM
I must admit that it is fun to watch all the sturm und drang over a plan that does not exist yet.  Hell, we have a strawman argument that is more flecshed out than the "plan" being attacked!  :D

Shush you, this is fun.
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

The Brain

One would think that a step away from the rampant Socialism of the military would be greeted more favorably here. But no.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

derspiess

Quote from: grumbler on March 12, 2009, 11:56:51 AM
I must admit that it is fun to watch all the sturm und drang over a plan that does not exist yet.  Hell, we have a strawman argument that is more flecshed out than the "plan" being attacked!  :D

So... people have to shut up about it until it's official policy?  ???
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

The Brain

Quote from: derspiess on March 12, 2009, 12:56:27 PM
Quote from: grumbler on March 12, 2009, 11:56:51 AM
I must admit that it is fun to watch all the sturm und drang over a plan that does not exist yet.  Hell, we have a strawman argument that is more flecshed out than the "plan" being attacked!  :D

So... people have to shut up about it until it's official policy?  ???

Do you even have to ask?
Women want me. Men want to be with me.