Duke Nukem: DELAYED

[Josquius]

They're threatening not to send review copies of their next game to people that gave it a bad review. 

lol.
The way they should be taking it: OK, next time we've really got to dig in and do better, lets show them we're better than mediocre!
The way they are taking it: Mwaaaaa, mommy! They said we did a bad game! I'm not playing with them anymore!


Once again however I must say I'm struck at how stupid video game reviews are. 50% should be a totally average, OK game....but in reality anything below 70% (i.e. 'rather good') and the claws come out.

[Razgovory]

And that game had Gary Coleman in it.

I still say his wife murdered him.

Find a copy of Postal 2 and you can murder him.  Or not.  It was a bad game.  I only played the Demo (which let you play for something like five minutes).

[Ed Anger]

gog.com has postal 2. which is fun until walking everywhere gets boring.

[Neil]

They're threatening not to send review copies of their next game to people that gave it a bad review. 

They supposedly fired the PR agency that made the tweet in question.

Yeah, but only for saying with words what is normally conveyed with a nod and a wink.  Ultimately, the gaming press is limited by the fact that the games industry doesn't really need them and in many cases doesn't really like them much either.