Wanna stack the Census in your city's favor? Count the prisoners!

[CountDeMoney]

Baltimore will gain residents in prison count shift
New Maryland law, first of its kind, tallies inmates as residents of last permanent address, not location of prison

For more than two decades, Rico Marzano called prison cells in Jessup and Cumberland his home.

But this year, the convicted murderer serving four consecutive life sentences will be recorded as a Baltimore resident, even though he won't step foot in his Frankford neighborhood any time soon.

Marzano and thousands of other Maryland inmates are being reclassified under a contentious law approved this month by Gov. Martin O'Malley that alters how prison populations are counted during the once-a-decade census.

Maryland became the first state to decide that inmates should be considered residents of the jurisdiction of their last permanent address, and not of the prisons where they are housed. The change came after the Census Bureau announced it would be providing states with detailed data about institutionalized groups such as the military and college students in time for redistricting efforts.

The decision has significant implications for Baltimore, which has been losing population for decades, and which produces as many as 6 in 10 of the state's 21,000 inmates.

Baltimore's official population could grow by 12,000 because of the new law, an increase that could help preserve the city's political clout when congressional and state legislative district lines are redrawn to reflect the 2010 census.

Urban-area lawmakers and civil rights activists lauded the move, calling it a proper solution to a history of inflated population in prison towns.

"There's enough people moved around to break how democracy works," said Peter Wagner, executive director of the Prison Policy Initiative, a nonprofit organization based in Massachusetts, who testified in favor of the Maryland law.

State Sen. Catherine Pugh, a Baltimore Democrat and lead sponsor of her chamber's version of the legislation, emphasized that the plan does not affect how much money the city and other jurisdictions will receive based on census counts. It only applies to the drawing of election district lines.

But the new program is being lambasted by officials in rural parts of the state that contain large prisons. They see a bald effort by Baltimore City and Prince George's County in particular to maintain and build power, at the expense of their communities.

"Baltimore City is trying to pad their numbers in the census, because they're scared they're going to lose representation," said Del. Kevin Kelly, a Democrat who represents Allegany County. "I don't see where the fairness is."

Kelly said the 4,500 state and federal inmates kept in Cumberland will cost the county money for years. The prisoners in his county are doing enough time to make them more a part of his communities than their hometowns, he said.

"When they have to be hospitalized, they're going to be treated in our hospitals," Kelly said. "My phones ring when the correctional officers are injured or worse, and I deal with the community concerns."

With Allegany losing residents, Kelly anticipates that the lines of his legislative district will shift when prisoners are excluded.

No apologies

Many Baltimore leaders make no apologies for the gains they'll see in population count and argue that many areas of the city are unfairly losing leverage.

"I don't think fairness and political power are mutually exclusive," said Sen. Verna L. Jones, a Baltimore Democrat, adding that the neighborhoods she represents in the city's central and southwest areas have lost enough population to jeopardize the interests of those remaining.

"It is about fairness, because you have these individuals who have families living in these communities, and because the lines are going to be redrawn, Baltimore might have been in danger of losing representation that we could not afford to lose," she said.

Opponents scoffed at the argument that prisoners' displacement from Baltimore is often temporary.

"To close your eyes and tap your shoes three times and pretend that they're going to be returning and that they are not in our jurisdiction is just disingenuous," said Del. Christopher Shank, a Republican who represents Washington County. The county is home to three correctional facilities in Hagerstown, with 6,000 inmates.

"It is a blatant power grab...and Baltimore City is looking at losing seats in the General Assembly because of its declining population," Shank added.

Losing representation

Baltimore's leaders have long sought ways to preserve the city's influence in Annapolis and Washington as its population declined.

The number of city residents peaked at nearly 950,000 in 1950 and has dropped every decade since, even as the population of the state has grown.

Recent figures show that the city lost about 14,000 residents between 2000 and 2008 and had a population of about 637,000.

Since 1974, each statewide reapportionment has cost the city at least one Senate district.

As recently as 2002, 10 of Maryland's 47 state senators represented all or part of Baltimore. In that year, Maryland's highest court threw out a plan that included Senate districts that crossed the city-county line, a redistricting plan created by then-Gov. Parris N. Glendening to preserve Baltimore's influence. That costs the city four of its senators.

Currently, six state senators represent Baltimore, and the inclusion of inmates could provide a buffer against a further loss. A state Senate district will contain about 120,000 residents after the next redistricting, up from about 112,000 now.

Other states are considering population rules similar to the one approved in Maryland.

In New York, some local lawmakers are pushing a plan to exclude prisoners from reapportionment drawings entirely.

"They play no part in our community," said Edward P. Welsh, a Republican county legislator from Utica. "They can't vote, they can't take part in the community, and I'm assuming they don't want to be here — so why are they being counted here?"

Some states are using the new census information differently. Kansas officials want to remove college students and military personnel from redistricting calculations.

Diversity on the Shore

In Somerset County on Maryland's Eastern Shore, officials hope the new rule leads to the election of the county's first-ever black county commissioner.

A prison built in the 1980s, they said, disrupted a settlement of a Voting Rights Act lawsuit intended to create a majority-minority county legislative district.

Though the county is 40 percent black, no black representative has ever been elected to office.

"It's been a long time coming. I believe that people in the county, both black and white, are ready for change," said Clarence Bell, who was the county's first black police chief.

Lawmakers said they were pleased that the new law could bring diversity to places like Somerset.

"I am so proud that Maryland did this, I think that it speaks highly of us," said Del. Joseline Pena-Melnyk, a Prince George's County Democrat who was a lead sponsor of the House legislation.

"It's really a civil rights issue, a fairness issue and an equality issue — plain and simple."

[Palisadoes]

What is the reasoning for this? As in... what is the perceived greater benefit of registering them at their last address? Is Obama's next idea to grant prisoners the right to vote?

[Ed Anger]

Great. First Mount Cody and Sergio Kindle and now extra gub'mint money.

[CountDeMoney]

Is Obama's next idea to grant prisoners the right to vote?

Sorry if you didn't catch the fine print, but it had nothing to do with Obama.

[Razgovory]

What is the reasoning for this? As in... what is the perceived greater benefit of registering them at their last address? Is Obama's next idea to grant prisoners the right to vote?

This is all explained in the article.

[grumbler]

Is Obama's next idea to grant prisoners the right to vote?

Sorry if you didn't catch the fine print, but it had nothing to do with Obama.

Of course it had to do with Obama; if not for the influence of the Antichrist, none of these men would have committed crimes, and so there would be no prisons to create this controversy.

[garbon]

I filled out my census but forgot to send it in.

[Palisadoes]

Sorry if you didn't catch the fine print, but it had nothing to do with Obama.

I was just unsure if it's the beginning of some proposal not yet outlined. It'd sure make such a reform easier.

This is all explained in the article.

I was too lazy to bother reading it all...

[Jaron]

I filled out my census but forgot to send it in.

This is a crime.

[garbon]

They sent me another form

[Queequeg]

How is this a bad thing?  Most of these prisoners would be coming from impoverished neighborhoods that probably need the funds more than the rural prison towns.

[Razgovory]

Lot more paperwork.

[citizen k]

Sorry if you didn't catch the fine print, but it had nothing to do with Obama.

I was just unsure if it's the beginning of some proposal not yet outlined. It'd sure make such a reform easier.

This is all explained in the article.

I was too lazy to bother reading it all...

Actually that's next on the agenda:

NAACP LDF Report Highlights Impact of Felon Disfranchisement Laws


NEW YORK, April 21 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Today, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF) released Free the Vote: Unlocking Democracy in the Cells and on the Streets, a report detailing the impact felon disfranchisement laws have on communities of color nationwide. 

"Securing the right to vote for the disfranchised - persons who have lost their voting rights as a result of a felony conviction - is the next phase of the voting rights movement," said Ryan P. Haygood, Co-Director of LDF's Political Participation Group. 

LDF's report details that more than 5.3 million Americans who have been convicted of a felony are denied access to the one fundamental right that is the foundation of all other rights.  Nearly 2 million, or 38%, of the disfranchised are African Americans.  Moreover,

    * A staggering 1.5 million Black males, or 13% of all African-American men in this country - and in some states up to one-third of the entire African-American male population - are denied the right to vote. 
    * Given current rates of incarceration, an astonishing one in three of the next generation of Black men will be disfranchised at some point during their lifetime.
    * In Alabama, one in three Black men have been disqualified from voting as a result of a felony conviction.
    * In Washington State, 24% of Black men, and 15% of the entire Black population, are denied their voting rights.
    * In New York, though Blacks and Latinos collectively comprise only 30% of the State's overall population, they represent an astonishing 87% of those denied the right to vote because of a felony conviction.


"Regrettably, more than a century after emancipation, and in the 45th anniversary year of the Voting Rights Act, increasing numbers of Blacks and Latinos nationwide are actually losing their right to vote each day, rather than experiencing greater access to political participation," continued Haygood.

[DontSayBanana]

Nice idea, but I have a hard time swallowing the concept that a Baltimore individual in year 23 of a 25-year sentence in Southern California should be counted with the Baltimore census.  Though, I can understand the one-or-two-year inmates affecting the census as being a problem.

Personally, I think it should be a grace period.  Incarcerated five years or less?  Use the previous address.  Incarcerated over 5?  Forget it.  The municipality's claiming paper people.

[Valmy]

It would seem to me a better use of the NAACP's time to work on reducing the number of black and Latinos committing felonies than trying to make sure felons can vote.