Obama administration subpoenaed in Fort Hood probe

[jimmy olsen]

Interesting, I wonder what the administration is hiding?

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE63I6MA20100419

Obama administration subpoenaed in Fort Hood probe

(Reuters) - Two U.S. lawmakers subpoenaed the Obama administration on Monday for information sought in a congressional probe of last year's shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas, that left 13 soldiers dead and an Army psychiatrist charged with murder.

U.S.

Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Joe Lieberman, an independent, and Susan Collins, the panel's top Republican, took the action after the departments of Justice and Defense failed to provide the materials by Monday's deadline.

The two senators have been trying for months to obtain documents and be provided access to witnesses that they say are critical to their investigation of the shooting spree at Fort Hood in November that ended with 13 soldiers killed and dozens wounded.

An Army psychiatrist, Major Nidal Malik Hasan, has been charged by the military with 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted murder. The case drew heavy criticism after it became known Hasan had been in contact with an anti-American Muslim figure sympathetic to al Qaeda.

In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, who heads the Justice Department, and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Lieberman and Collins wrote: "It is impossible for us to avoid reaching the conclusion that the departments simply do not want to cooperate with our investigation."

"It is with great disappointment and reluctance that we have directed service of subpoenas to you which demand disclosure of the requested information by Monday, April 26, 2010," they added.

The Justice and Defense departments sent a letter last week to Lieberman and Collins saying that turning over the information could compromise the case against Hasan.

On Monday, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman told reporters, "We will obviously be reviewing it (the subpoenas) and determining the department's next steps."

"We will continue to cooperate with the committee in every way with that caveat, that single caveat, that whatever we provide does not impact on our ability to prosecute," Whitman said.

If the two departments stand firm and refuse to provide the requested information, they could end up facing a contempt of Congress citation and a court fight.

This could all provide an unwanted distraction for a White House already under election-year pressure on a number of fronts, including pressure to cut unemployment.

(Additional reporting by Adam Entous and Jeremy Pelofsky)

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

[HisMajestyBOB]

Interesting, I wonder what the administration is hiding?

His birth certificate. 

[Zanza]

Why does congress investigate that anyway? It's not like this case is particularly political. Can't they just leave it to the normal prosecutors?

[Razgovory]

Maybe Obama palled around with him as well.

[grumbler]

Why does congress investigate that anyway? It's not like this case is particularly political. Can't they just leave it to the normal prosecutors?

Congressional hearings are a means of convincing constituents that one is "doing something about the problem" without having to actually do anything.

The idea that "contempt of Congress" is a crime any more is absurd.  If it really was a crime, there would be only four-hundred-odd people outside of prison.

[Caliga]

Congressional hearings are a means of convincing constituents that one is "doing something about the problem" without having to actually do anything.

The idea that "contempt of Congress" is a crime any more is absurd.  If it really was a crime, there would be only four-hundred-odd people outside of prison.

[derspiess]

You guys are way too cynical about congressional hearings.  How else would we have been warned that Guam may capsize if it becomes overpopulated?

[Jaron]

The nerve of these "lawmakers" in grandstanding and trying to bring bad press to Obama.

[derspiess]

Well, what did the President know, and when did he know it???

[Ed Anger]

Well, what did the President know, and when did he know it???

He was in the study with the candlestick.

[Malthus]

Well, what did the President know, and when did he know it???

He was in the study with the candlestick.

If it was Clinton, I wouldn't touch that candlestick. 

[derspiess]

If it was Clinton, I wouldn't touch that candlestick. 

Or the lead pipe, for that matter.