News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

NCAA 2009

Started by Ed Anger, April 04, 2009, 01:36:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

CountDeMoney

Quote from: Berkut on October 31, 2009, 10:36:47 PM
Wow, I am not surprised that Oregon is beating USC at home, but the "take them out behind the woodshed and kick the shit out of them" treatment is rather unexpected.

Barkley is looking like a freshman, and the vaunted USC defense is looking like WSU.

Two things after that game:
1) Nothing pleases me more than Pete Carroll getting 392 yards rushed up his ass donkey-dick style.
2) I am now a Duck believer.  You're welcome, sbr.

katmai

Boise St is pretty darn happy with the Duck win as well.
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son

Berkut

And apparently the Pac-10 commissioner is going to meet with Blount to give him his blessing to allow Oregon to bring their #1 Thug back onto the field.
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

stjaba

#1113
Latest BCS standings:

1 Florida 8-0
2 Texas 8-0
3 Alabama 8-0
4 Iowa 9-0
5 Cincinnati 8-0
6 TCU 8-0
7 Boise State 8-0
8 Oregon 7-1
9 LSU 7-1
10 Georgia Tech 8-1
11 Penn State 8-1
12 USC 6-2
13 Pittsburgh 7-1
14 Utah 7-1
15 Houston 7-1
16 Ohio State 7-2
17 Miami (FL) 6-2
18 Arizona 5-2
19 Oklahoma State 6-2
20 California 6-2
21 Wisconsin 6-2
22 Notre Dame 6-2
23 Virginia Tech 5-3
24 Oklahoma 5-3
25 South Florida 6-2

CountDeMoney

No posting BCS standings without the actual point value, dammit.

MadBurgerMaker

Here you go Seedy. 

Order is Team, Harris Rank, USA Today Rank, Computer Rank, and BCS Average


1      Florida  0.9918
2 Texas 2 2 3 0.9227
3 Alabama 3 3 3 0.9166
4 Iowa 7 6 2 0.8407
5 Cincinnati 5 7 5 0.8033
6 TCU 6 4 6 0.8008
7 Boise State 4 5 8 0.7863
8 Oregon 8 8 7 0.7651
9 LSU 9 9 9 0.7121
10 Georgia Tech 11 11 10 0.6287
11 Penn State 10 10 12 0.6166
12 USC 12 13 11 0.5336
13 Pittsburgh 15 14 14 0.4401
14 Utah 16 16 13 0.4226
15 Houston 14 15 16 0.4209
16 Ohio State 13 12 21 0.3784
17 Miami, Fla. 17 17 16 0.3707
18 Arizona 21 19 16 0.2589
19 Oklahoma St 18 18 21 0.2179
20 California 22 23 15 0.2095
21 Wisconsin 24 22 19 0.1939
22 Notre Dame 20 21 23 0.1903
23 Virginia Tech 23 24 20 0.1559
24 Oklahoma    19 20 28 0.1494
25 South Florida 26 26 24 0.0786
26 BYU 25 25 26 0.0699
27 West Virginia 27 27 27 0.0246
28 Oregon State 38 43 25 0.0242
29 Texas Tech 28 28 28 0.0193
30 Auburn 29 29 28 0.0175
31 Clemson 30 30 28 0.0070
32 So Carolina 35 31 28 0.0046
33 Central Mich 31 34 28 0.0044
34 Idaho 32 32 28 0.0037
35 Tennessee 32 37 28 0.0028
36 Rutgers 35 37 28 0.0021
37 No Carolina 44 32 28 0.0020
38 Temple 34 40 28 0.0020
39 Boston Coll 41 35 28 0.0015
40 Navy 46 35 28 0.0011
41 Kansas 37 43 28 0.0011
42 Troy 38 40 28 0.0010
43 Duke 45 39 28 0.0008
44 Nebraska 40 43 28 0.0007
45 Mississippi 41 43 28 0.0004
45 Stanford 41 43 28 0.0004
47 Kansas St 46 40 28 0.0002
48 Arkansas 45 43 28 0.0001
49 Connecticut 46 43 28 0.0000
50 Washington 46 43 28 0.0000


http://cfn.scout.com/a.z?s=451&p=2&c=557949


katmai

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son

MadBurgerMaker

Quote from: katmai on November 01, 2009, 11:00:41 PM
Wooo UW is 50th!

:D  Yeah I copied all the way down, instead of stopping at 25, so I could include the Huskies.

Eddie Teach

They're overrated because they beat USC. ;)
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

katmai

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 01, 2009, 11:04:46 PM
They're overrated because they beat USC. ;)
beat * #18 Arizona & #34 Idaho, lost in OT to #22 Notre Dame & played #9 LSU tough :P

asterisk to appease throbby :P
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son

Eddie Teach

I notice you didn't bring up Stanford and Oregon.  :lol:

(Yeah, I looked up the Huskies' schedule -_-)
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

katmai

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 01, 2009, 11:15:59 PM
I notice you didn't bring up Stanford and Oregon.  :lol:

(Yeah, I looked up the Huskies' schedule -_-)

Well i didn't bring up the loss to ASU either (since they aren't ranked in that list ).

But yeah besides the blowouts vs Stanford and Oregon they have been in every game this year, better than i could have hoped after 0-12 team last year.
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son

sbr

Quote from: katmai on November 01, 2009, 11:41:48 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 01, 2009, 11:15:59 PM
I notice you didn't bring up Stanford and Oregon.  :lol:

(Yeah, I looked up the Huskies' schedule -_-)

Well i didn't bring up the loss to ASU either (since they aren't ranked in that list ).

But yeah besides the blowouts vs Stanford and Oregon they have been in every game this year, better than i could have hoped after 0-12 team last year.

The Huskies scare me; if they get the right coach, which may or may not be Sark, they should get very good again pretty quickly.  Hopefully they will lose Locker after this year.

sbr

Quote from: CountDeMoney on November 01, 2009, 06:49:07 AM
Quote from: Berkut on October 31, 2009, 10:36:47 PM
Wow, I am not surprised that Oregon is beating USC at home, but the "take them out behind the woodshed and kick the shit out of them" treatment is rather unexpected.

Barkley is looking like a freshman, and the vaunted USC defense is looking like WSU.

Two things after that game:
1) Nothing pleases me more than Pete Carroll getting 392 yards rushed up his ass donkey-dick style.
2) I am now a Duck believer.  You're welcome, sbr.

The Ducks have looked really good the last month.  Assuming something silly doesn't happen to put them in the Championship game I really like their chances to run the table and smack Iowa in the Rose Bowl and end up with a Top 5ish ranking.  I have no doubt they are now a better team than Boise State but that loss should keep them out of anything more than the Rose Bowl.

katmai

Quote from: sbr on November 02, 2009, 12:24:23 AM


The Huskies scare me; if they get the right coach, which may or may not be Sark, they should get very good again pretty quickly.  Hopefully they will lose Locker after this year.

I think Sark is on right track, and i'm hoping Jake comes back for one more year, but as all the "pundits" are touting him as best QB available it is iffy if comes back.

That would be a damn shame as  I think with another year of learning the pro system and his surrounding crew as juniors and sophmores I think they could contended for Pac-10 title.

If he does leave I'm curious to see if Ronnie Fouch or the incoming Nick Montana would step in.
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son