Filibusters, Supermajorities and the Constitution

Started by jimmy olsen, January 11, 2010, 08:36:51 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Eddie Teach

As a general rule, I like filibusters. Gridlock is good.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 11, 2010, 08:56:49 AM
How odd the NYT didn't publish this article when the Democrats were in the minority and filibustered a billion judicial nominees.

First of all, it is an op-ed by an outsider, not an article.
Second of all, judicial nominations are unique; it is a separate branch of government, and the appointments are lifetime and irrevocable.
We have, accordingly, always had plenty of excellent lawyers, though we often had to do without even tolerable administrators, and seen destined to endure the inconvenience of hereafter doing without any constructive statesmen at all.
--Woodrow Wilson

KRonn

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on January 11, 2010, 10:43:00 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 11, 2010, 08:56:49 AM
How odd the NYT didn't publish this article when the Democrats were in the minority and filibustered a billion judicial nominees.

First of all, it is an op-ed by an outsider, not an article.
Second of all, judicial nominations are unique; it is a separate branch of government, and the appointments are lifetime and irrevocable.
I think Minsky is trying to filibuster this thread....    <_<



;)

Valmy

Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 11, 2010, 08:56:49 AM
How odd the NYT didn't publish this article when the Democrats were in the minority and filibustered a billion judicial nominees.

Sorta like how that now the Democrats are in power the Republicans are suddenly interested in limited government and preservation of State powers.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."