News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Trump's Venezuela Vendetta

Started by Syt, December 17, 2025, 12:23:32 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

OttoVonBismarck

Losing Taiwan would be an irreplaceable loss--their chipmaking industry cannot be replicated elsewhere anywhere without a 15-20 year lag time, and China taking control of it would be a massive geostrategic loss for the U.S. that couldn't really be spun any other way.

Josquius

The Taiwanese chip industry is pretty firmly rigged to self destruct and I believe they are already working to replicate it elsewhere too.
Though yes, would be a disaster.
██████
██████
██████

Jacob

Quote from: Josquius on January 03, 2026, 04:05:06 PMThe Taiwanese chip industry is pretty firmly rigged to self destruct and I believe they are already working to replicate it elsewhere too.
Though yes, would be a disaster.

I wonder how susceptible to subversion the "rigged to self destruct" set-up is.

Syt

Quote from: Tamas on January 03, 2026, 12:54:24 PMExcept the press conference said she has agreed to run the country as US proxy. Who knows what's true. Most likely is that she IS in Russia and Trump and Putin are going to divide up the country.

AP says the vice president said on TV that she doesn't intend to take over since there's only one president, i.e. Maduro, and demanded his return. TV seems to show pro-Maduro content. There's reports of pro and anti Maduro protests.

So as of yet unclear how US intends to "run the country" for the moment.
We are born dying, but we are compelled to fancy our chances.
- hbomberguy

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

OttoVonBismarck

Yeah, the VP's comments put to rest the theory that she was in on this. It's still possible someone in the military broke and gave intel / helped facilitate Maduro being lightly defended. But unlikely there's going to be some quick Venezuelan capitulation to U.S. demands, which largely puts us back to where were before.

Trump could simply consider the arrest of Maduro his "win" and move on, but if he doesn't--there's not really an off ramp where he won't lose face if he keeps making demands and the VP / new government continue to defy him.

Bauer

Quote from: grumbler on January 03, 2026, 03:27:25 PM
Quote from: Bauer on January 03, 2026, 01:09:24 PMWhy would Russia even be in a position to bargain on Venezuela?  I think it's more likely this is an (attempted) return to America using Latin America as its backyard.

Trump's just-issued National Security Policy statement has this goal. MAGA wants to withdraw from the Indo-Pacific and NATO and focus on the Monroe Doctrine and overturning democracy in Europe.

That sounds like confirmation of what people have been saying about Trumps world view.  A return to a regional sphere of influence world.  Russia over Ukraine? China over Taiwan?

mongers

Quote from: mongers on December 17, 2025, 10:36:40 PMI think there's a significant chance trump will do this, try to topple Maduro.

My reasoning is, trumps in love with all things 1980s, when he felt he was in his prime, so he's deluded enough to think he can go one better than G.H.W.Bush and repeat an operation like the 1989 Panama invasion.

Incidentally the 36th anniversary of which is in about 48 hours time.  :hmm:

Well I was little bit off on the timing, but as Otto also mentioned it's useful to compare this adventure to Panama.

I guess there hasn't been much 'post-conflict' planning and they're just assuming a compliant state government will just appear in a similar way to Panama.
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

PJL

To me, this feels less like regime change and more like an extortion racket.

HVC

Quote from: PJL on January 03, 2026, 06:02:54 PMTo me, this feels less like regime change and more like an extortion racket.

But if you're going to extort someone don't they have to stay in power to provide the loot?
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

PJL

Quote from: HVC on January 03, 2026, 06:03:37 PM
Quote from: PJL on January 03, 2026, 06:02:54 PMTo me, this feels less like regime change and more like an extortion racket.

But if you're going to extort someone don't they have to stay in power to provide the loot?

They need to punish someone once in a while to prove their point that they're more than just barking regarding punishment.

Tonitrus

It would be macabrely funny if this ends up with another grand jury refusing to indict. 

Jacob

My initial thought was that this showed the world that the US can pull off a special operation regime change while Russia cannot.

... but if the US fails to enact an actual regime change then it might turn from a demonstration of power into an embarrassment after all.

Who are the local Venezuelan collaborators who will deliver the oil wealth to US firms?

Who on the US side have the expertise and plan to enact a post-Maduro order that aligns with US interests? The State Dep't? The CIA? The Office of the President? The US Armed Forces? Elon Musk?

There may be people waiting in the wings, and I'm sure there's no shortage of anti-regime emigrants, but can they actually make things happen?

It's still early days if course. We will see.

grumbler

Quote from: OttoVonBismarck on January 03, 2026, 03:58:18 PMLosing Taiwan would be an irreplaceable loss--their chipmaking industry cannot be replicated elsewhere anywhere without a 15-20 year lag time, and China taking control of it would be a massive geostrategic loss for the U.S. that couldn't really be spun any other way.

We may see it that way, but the MAGAts do not.  They think they can buy chips from China as easily as from Taiwan.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: Jacob on January 03, 2026, 07:17:59 PMMy initial thought was that this showed the world that the US can pull off a special operation regime change while Russia cannot.

... but if the US fails to enact an actual regime change then it might turn from a demonstration of power into an embarrassment after all.

It's a combination of extraordinary professionalism and capability at the operational and tactical level and complete amateur hour on the strategic level. 

It's starting to look like no one really gave serious thought about what happens after the operation, assuming total success. Hard to imagine that could be possible but increasingly difficult to understand otherwise. And perhaps not hard to imagine given the cast assembled at today's press conference: Hegseth, Rubio, Ratcliffe, Miller.
We have, accordingly, always had plenty of excellent lawyers, though we often had to do without even tolerable administrators, and seen destined to endure the inconvenience of hereafter doing without any constructive statesmen at all.
--Woodrow Wilson

OttoVonBismarck

Unlike in Trump 1, Trump 2 has made sure none who would ever speak negative about any Trumpian idea are anywhere near the seat of power. This idea would have been proposed, and no dissent or even "what about" would have occurred. In Trump 1 you would have at least had guys like Gen. McMaster saying "okay so what do we do once we get Maduro back and his Generals and his political allies still maintain all of the same policies?"

It is more government by Tweet mentality which dominates how Trump functions and, I suspect, how his mind truly works at an innate level.