News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

The AI dooooooom thread

Started by Hamilcar, April 06, 2023, 12:44:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

garbon

Quote from: crazy canuck on October 08, 2025, 01:02:14 PM
Quote from: garbon on October 08, 2025, 12:14:28 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on October 08, 2025, 10:36:38 AMNext Garbon will be telling his child about Santa

At least that is a socially sanctioned lie.

And my impression is that if you ever did decide to become a parent, you would probably take the time to listen to your child talk about Thomas rather than handing the conversation over to some AI app.
:hug:
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

Savonarola

I was reading an article on a generative AI application for channel modeling with multiple nodes this morning and came across the practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance.  It's an algorithm designed to build consensus when not all nodes respond or some respond with faulty information.  It's derived from the Byzantine General's Problem first published in 1982 by Leslie Lamport, Robert Shostak, and Marshall Pease:

QuoteImagine that several divisions of the Byzantine army are camped outside an enemy city, each division commanded by its own general. The generals can communicate with one another only by messenger. After observing the enemy, they must decide upon a common plan of action. However, some of the generals may be traitors, trying to prevent the loyal generals from reaching an agreement. The generals must decide on when to attack the city, but they need a strong majority of their army to attack at the same time. The generals must have an algorithm to guarantee that (a) all loyal generals decide upon the same plan of action, and (b) a small number of traitors cannot cause the loyal generals to adopt a bad plan. The loyal generals will all do what the algorithm says they should, but the traitors may do anything they wish. The algorithm must guarantee condition (a) regardless of what the traitors do. The loyal generals should not only reach agreement, but should agree upon a reasonable plan.

I thought Languish would appreciate that for the sheer Byzantineness of the algorithm.
In Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace—and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock

Jacob

Let's hope the people supplying the algorithm to the generals aren't traitors.

Savonarola

Quote from: Jacob on October 09, 2025, 10:53:10 PMLet's hope the people supplying the algorithm to the generals aren't traitors.

The three people who formulated the original algorithm worked for Microsoft, so I'll let you draw your own conclusions. 

 ;)
In Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace—and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock

Josquius

Speaking of people working for M$....

You cannot view this attachment.
██████
██████
██████