Evidence Of NASA Airbrushing Lunar Base towers

[Siege]

This is awesome.

Problem is, that I can take a perfectly fine picture, airbrush a perfectly empty little space, and then claim that there was something there.

Can anyone here dig to the end of this, or independently confirm that these videos have been indeed relased by NASA with the airbrushed portions already in it?

http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html

[derspiess]

  Don't ever change, Siegie.

[grumbler]

It is the Nazi moon base.  A movie is coming out on this soon.

[Siege]

It is the Nazi moon base.

That's a scary thought.

[Norgy]

It is the Nazi moon base.  A movie is coming out on this soon.

A documentary, I bet.

Really, Siegy, I am not at all worried you're the first line of defence against terrorism. At all worried. No Siree.

[Siege]

It is the Nazi moon base.  A movie is coming out on this soon.

A documentary, I bet.

Really, Siegy, I am not at all worried you're the first line of defence against terrorism. At all worried. No Siree.

You don't have to worry.
I am in the First Line Of Offense Against Terrorism, not defence.

[Norgy]

 

[citizen k]

The residents of  Honeysuckle  Creek, Australia, actually saw a different broadcast to the rest of  the World. Just shortly before Armstrong stepped onto the Moons surface, a change could be seen where the picture goes from a stark black to a brighter  picture. Honeysuckle Creek stayed with the picture and although the voice  transmissions were broadcast from Goldstone, the actual film footage was  broadcast from Australia. As Una  watched Armstrong walking   on the surface of the  Moon she spotted a Coke bottle that was kicked in  the right hand side of the  picture. This was in the early hours of the morning  and she phoned her friends  to see if they had seen the same thing, unfortunately  they had missed it but  were going to watch the rebroadcast the next day.  Needless to say, the footage  had   been edited and the offending Coke bottle had been cut out of the film. But  several other viewers had seen the bottle and many articles appeared in The  West Australian newspaper.

[Grey Fox]

And you can see people in the Mars picture that lil rover took.

Aliens > Fake Landing.

[saskganesh]

Problem is, that I can take a perfectly fine picture, airbrush a perfectly empty little space, and then claim that there was something there.

really? you can hardly operate a computer.

[Neil]

And this is how you can tell that Siegebreaker is actually an Arab.  "OMG!  Conspiracy!"

[DontSayBanana]

First off, discount camera estimates. They're assuming the same atmospheric conditions as here on Earth. Ditto for the exhaust cloud; a lot of the exhaust plume's characteristics are determined by atmospheric conditions- I'd recommend double-checking that data with, say, a maker of skywriting equipment for planes.

As for the "coke bottle," considering size and resolution of TVs in 1969, I find it unlikely that any casual TV viewers could have positively IDed debris that small. At 480 scanlines for NTSC, 576 for PAL, considering Aldrin and Armstrong's heights, for one to be completely in the picture and shown kicking a bottle, it would have had to be only a couple pixels high- not nearly big enough to identify it.

As for whether it's touched up, NASA has admitted it has been, by the same crew that restored "Casablanca"; they actually erased the original tape: http://www.statesboroherald.com/news/article/18512/

[grumbler]

As for whether it's touched up, NASA has admitted it has been, by the same crew that restored "Casablanca"; they actually erased the original tape: http://www.statesboroherald.com/news/article/18512/

Strictly speaking, they didn't re-use the "original tapes" (which were the slowscan-only video tapes, recorded in Australia); they re-used the backup copies made of the camera feed that was coming in from Australia (ie the ones that included the telemetry data) .  At that time, they thought they still had the slowscan-only tapes.  Those, however, have been misplaced in the vast storage bureaucracy, straight out of Indiana Jones.

[Strix]

As for whether it's touched up, NASA has admitted it has been, by the same crew that restored "Casablanca"; they actually erased the original tape: http://www.statesboroherald.com/news/article/18512/

Strictly speaking, they didn't re-use the "original tapes" (which were the slowscan-only video tapes, recorded in Australia); they re-used the backup copies made of the camera feed that was coming in from Australia (ie the ones that included the telemetry data) .  At that time, they thought they still had the slowscan-only tapes.  Those, however, have been misplaced in the vast storage bureaucracy, straight out of Indiana Jones.

Of course, strictly speaking, they didn't erase the tapes. Who would do such a stupid thing and ADMIT to it. The fact that they can't find them just happens to coincide with an accusation that they erased them.

Personally, I think someone leaving NASA cleaned out their vaults. I had heard another story/rumor in the past that the original blueprints for the Saturn rockets were "misplaced" as well.

[Caliga]

Doesn't that kind of stuff happen all the time?  Alot of the original documents pertaining to the Jack the Ripper case 'vanished' from Scotland Yard, and IIRC at least some of them have since been returned by descendants of people who worked on the case.