What does a TRUMP presidency look like?

[garbon]

It would be worrying if partisanship is ever compromised!

[Legbiter]

So anti-Hillary means pro putin? AWESOME.

SEND ME A BLONDE CHICK AGE 20, MR. PUTIN. MY LIFE FOR YOOOOOOOOOU!

Although watching the Dems mimic Glenn Beck circa 2010 is free entertainment.

[citizen k]

Anti-Hillary means not wanting to lose again in 2020.

Well I don't think there is any danger of her ever being nominated again.

That's what I thought in 2008. 

Here quotrd is another example of another stupid post by you.

And again, it's not stupid. You like Hillary and voted for her, I get it. You can disagree with my opinions, but when you call a comment stupid when it isn't you're just being petty and dare I say, a sore loser.

[garbon]

Anti-Hillary means not wanting to lose again in 2020.

Well I don't think there is any danger of her ever being nominated again.

That's what I thought in 2008. 

Here quotrd is another example of another stupid post by you.

And again, it's not stupid. You like Hillary and voted for her, I get it. You can disagree with my opinions, but when you call a comment stupid when it isn't you're just being petty and dare I say, a sore loser.

Anyone with a brain knew she would run in 2016. Joke fail.

[Tonitrus]

Paul Ryan is worried Trump will ditch the GOP to work with Democrats on healthcare

House Speaker Paul Ryan on Thursday suggested he was wary of a bipartisan approach to healthcare reform.

In an interview with "CBS This Morning," Ryan said he was concerned that if the House Republican conference didn't get a healthcare bill passed, President Donald Trump would move on and work with Democrats.

"What I worry about, Norah, is that if we don't do this, then he'll just go work with Democrats to try and change Obamacare, and that's hardly a conservative thing," Ryan told CBS reporter Norah O'Donnell.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/paul-ryan-trump-democrats-ahca-obamacare-2017-3?r=US&IR=T

Interesting. 

I would be highly amused if Trump did that and went back to his old-school single payer friendly position.

While in practical terms, that would likely get the bulk of Dems...unlikely there'd be enough Republican defectors.

[Berkut]

Paul Ryan is worried Trump will ditch the GOP to work with Democrats on healthcare

House Speaker Paul Ryan on Thursday suggested he was wary of a bipartisan approach to healthcare reform.

In an interview with "CBS This Morning," Ryan said he was concerned that if the House Republican conference didn't get a healthcare bill passed, President Donald Trump would move on and work with Democrats.

"What I worry about, Norah, is that if we don't do this, then he'll just go work with Democrats to try and change Obamacare, and that's hardly a conservative thing," Ryan told CBS reporter Norah O'Donnell.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/paul-ryan-trump-democrats-ahca-obamacare-2017-3?r=US&IR=T

Interesting. 

The most interesting part being that Ryan defines "conservative" as "Not working with Dems as a matter of principle".

Fucking tool.

[CountDeMoney]

Paul Ryan calls himself a "policy guy" but he really isn't--he's an ideologue at the most academic level.
What he wants is to use the budget as his own personal experiment in economic theory.  And yes, he is a tool.

[Legbiter]

I would be highly amused if Trump did that and went back to his old-school single payer friendly position.

On that note.

Trump's surprise: calls CBC's Cummings three times to strategize.

How serious is President Trump about drug prices? Democratic Rep. Elijah Cummings tells me that Trump has called him three times to follow up on their conversation at the White House earlier this month. And Trump's not just talking about letting Medicare negotiate drug prices, Cummings says. It's even worse for Republicans — because Trump is also talking about importing cheaper drugs from other countries.

https://www.axios.com/cummings-trump-wants-to-do-something-big-on-drug-prices-2335422337.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=organic&utm_term=healthcare&utm_content=textlong

Sounds like he's gonna go big on this.

[jimmy olsen]

Paul Ryan is worried Trump will ditch the GOP to work with Democrats on healthcare

House Speaker Paul Ryan on Thursday suggested he was wary of a bipartisan approach to healthcare reform.

In an interview with "CBS This Morning," Ryan said he was concerned that if the House Republican conference didn't get a healthcare bill passed, President Donald Trump would move on and work with Democrats.

"What I worry about, Norah, is that if we don't do this, then he'll just go work with Democrats to try and change Obamacare, and that's hardly a conservative thing," Ryan told CBS reporter Norah O'Donnell.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/paul-ryan-trump-democrats-ahca-obamacare-2017-3?r=US&IR=T

Interesting. 

I would be highly amused if Trump did that and went back to his old-school single payer friendly position.

While in practical terms, that would likely get the bulk of Dems...unlikely there'd be enough Republican defectors.

Bernie should send him a bill titled Medicare for All Generations & Ailments.

[grumbler]

Anti-Hillary means not wanting to lose again in 2020.

Well I don't think there is any danger of her ever being nominated again.

That's what I thought in 2008. 

Here quotrd is another example of another stupid post by you.

And again, it's not stupid. You like Hillary and voted for her, I get it. You can disagree with my opinions, but when you call a comment stupid when it isn't you're just being petty and dare I say, a sore loser.

Sorry, but you thinking she'd never get nominated after 2008 was just you not paying attention.

[Eddie Teach]

I figured he was being facetious.

[grumbler]

I figured he was being facetious.

Before he doubled down, so did I.

[Monoriu]

The next president should be a Clinton, Bush, Obama or Trump 

[Valmy]

seeing the Dems mimic Glenn Beck circa 2010 is free entertainment.

Well why wouldn't they? The Repubicans crushed them in 2010.

[Valmy]

The next president should be a Clinton, Bush, Obama or Trump 

What are we applying World Cup rules now?