News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

What does a TRUMP presidency look like?

Started by FunkMonk, November 08, 2016, 11:02:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

dps

Quote from: Malthus on July 16, 2019, 04:52:53 PM
Quote from: garbon on July 16, 2019, 04:38:48 PM
Interesting that Kellyanne isn't hiding from it being about race:

https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/national-international/Defending-Trump-White-House-Adviser-Kellyanne-Conway-Asks-a-Reporter-Whats-Your-Ethnicity-512794821.html
QuoteWhite House counselor Kellyanne Conway on Tuesday responded to questions about President Donald Trump's attacks on four congresswomen of color by asking a reporter about his heritage, NBC News reported.

Andrew Feinberg, a White House reporter for Breakfast Media, a website about politics and technology, asked Conway, "If the president was not telling these four congresswomen to return to their supposed countries of origin, to which countries was he referring?"

Conway paused and then asked him, "What's your ethnicity?"

"Why is that relevant?" Feinberg replied.

"Because I'm asking a question. My ancestors are from Ireland and Italy," Conway shot back.

So he should go back to Ireland and/or Italy?  :hmm:


If I had to go back to where my ancestors came from to get here, it would be Ireland.  Which is OK, 'cause that would also be one of my top choices anyway if I had to leave the US for some reason.

Malthus

Quote from: Valmy on July 17, 2019, 08:26:15 AM
When everybody gets moved to the Kenya/Tanzania area real-estate will be at a premium.

I'm putting my hotel in Olduvai Gorge! /Monopoly
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane—Marcus Aurelius

chipwich

#22967
Quote from: OttoVonBismarck on July 17, 2019, 09:38:44 AM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on July 16, 2019, 10:09:24 PM
Trump did not do a hostile takeover of the GOP.  In 2009, after a dream war hero candidate respected by all sides lost to a neophyte Senator with a funny muslimmy sounding name, the GOP establishment in its desperation hitched its wagon to the Tea Party movement, a toxic mixture of opportunistic would-be populists, straight-up racists, and large base of extreme "low information" voters.  The Tea Party, despite being anti-conservative (in the Burkean sense) at its core, was permitted to take over the GOP brand consensually. In parallel, the GOP media arm descended further into "fake news" - outright nutters like Alex Jones were given a patina of respectability; political shock jocks like Coulter or Ingraham were treated as serious purveyors of information; and once sorta/almost respectful news people like Dobbs or Carlson went full idiot.

The Tea Party's raw, racist id manifested itself in the ridiculous Birther movement. Most respectable Republicans with national ambitions stayed away.  Trump embraced it with fervor.  Whether he did so strategically can be questioned.  But it rebounded to his advantage in a mass, free-for-primary where volume counted more than substance. Trump was THE tea party candidate par excellence.  He encapsulated all the forces that the GOP elders willfully let loose in the foolish hope they could control it.  They couldn't.  Trump won because he is the Hegelian spirit of this iron age of American politics.

I mostly agree but I would emphasize that the degree to which it was "consensual" is hard to say. Ordinary traditional conservative voters like myself had little say in it, I continued to vote the way I always have. When the Tea Party came for Eric Cantor in my home district I put money and effort into supporting him--and he lost. That was sort of a watershed moment for me personally that the party elders who have been dancing this dance with the low information evangelicals and petty bigots for 40 years had lost control of the ship's rudder. A lot of traditional mainline so to speak Republicans were forced out of office and a lot of the party power brokers and money bundlers were faced with either embracing the new paradigm or making even harder choices. Personally I think we should have looked toward making harder choices, but it likely would have meant a lot more short term electoral losses. I do think the GOP is going to pay a far heavier "long term" price; but I'm also not sure by 2010 if there was any way to change direction at all. Whipping up the mob for a few generations isn't easily undone.

Have you considered that has something to do with moral failings in "traditional" conservatism?

Habbaku

What would you say the moral failings are in traditional conservatism?
The medievals were only too right in taking nolo episcopari as the best reason a man could give to others for making him a bishop. Give me a king whose chief interest in life is stamps, railways, or race-horses; and who has the power to sack his Vizier (or whatever you care to call him) if he does not like the cut of his trousers.

Government is an abstract noun meaning the art and process of governing and it should be an offence to write it with a capital G or so as to refer to people.

-J. R. R. Tolkien

alfred russel

Quote from: Habbaku on July 17, 2019, 02:22:26 PM
What would you say the moral failings are in traditional conservatism?

Insisting on the divine right of kings and hereditary privileges will leave the most vulnerable in society without an effective voice and little incentive to better themselves.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle.

I'm embarrassed. I've been making the mistake of associating with you. It won't happen again. :)
-garbon, February 23, 2014

chipwich

Quote from: Habbaku on July 17, 2019, 02:22:26 PM
What would you say the moral failings are in traditional conservatism?

Hatred of Children; thereby rebelling against God.

Hatred of the poor; thereby rebelling against God.

Starving those who sought refuge and were made prisoners; thereby rebelling against God.

Hated of The Natural Environment; thereby rebelling against God.

Eddie Teach

The Tea Partiers are in lockstep with the traditional conservatives on those issues. :mellow:
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

chipwich


Sophie Scholl

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on July 16, 2019, 10:09:24 PM
...In 2009, after a dream war hero candidate respected by all sides lost to a neophyte Senator with a funny muslimmy sounding name, the GOP establishment in its desperation hitched its wagon to the Tea Party movement, a toxic mixture of opportunistic would-be populists, straight-up racists, and large base of extreme "low information" voters.
While a nice narrative, the fact that Sarah Palin was said "dream war hero candidate"'s Vice President speaks volumes to me about how far the GOP had already sunk into its gambled upon hell even by that date.  The walls had been breached by the invited to camp outside deplorables and they were besieging the tower.  Now they've taken the whole tower except the top floor and even that is showing signs of surrendering.
"Everything that brought you here -- all the things that made you a prisoner of past sins -- they are gone. Forever and for good. So let the past go... and live."

"Somebody, after all, had to make a start. What we wrote and said is also believed by many others. They just don't dare express themselves as we did."

Razgovory

To some extant they've always been there.  Republicans made overtures to them back in the late 1970's and early 1980's.  They've somehow managed to rise to the top in the GOP because the Conservative movement collapsed during the Bush years.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

crazy canuck

Quote from: Razgovory on July 17, 2019, 04:18:54 PM
To some extant they've always been there.  Republicans made overtures to them back in the late 1970's and early 1980's.  They've somehow managed to rise to the top in the GOP because the Conservative movement collapsed during the Bush years.

The Economist article on the end of Conservatism is to the same effect - Conservatives courted the loons thinking they could be controlled.  Didn't quite work out that way. 

Berkut

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on July 16, 2019, 10:09:24 PM
Trump did not do a hostile takeover of the GOP.  In 2009, after a dream war hero candidate respected by all sides lost to a neophyte Senator with a funny muslimmy sounding name, the GOP establishment in its desperation hitched its wagon to the Tea Party movement, a toxic mixture of opportunistic would-be populists, straight-up racists, and large base of extreme "low information" voters.  The Tea Party, despite being anti-conservative (in the Burkean sense) at its core, was permitted to take over the GOP brand consensually. In parallel, the GOP media arm descended further into "fake news" - outright nutters like Alex Jones were given a patina of respectability; political shock jocks like Coulter or Ingraham were treated as serious purveyors of information; and once sorta/almost respectful news people like Dobbs or Carlson went full idiot.

The Tea Party's raw, racist id manifested itself in the ridiculous Birther movement. Most respectable Republicans with national ambitions stayed away.  Trump embraced it with fervor.  Whether he did so strategically can be questioned.  But it rebounded to his advantage in a mass, free-for-primary where volume counted more than substance. Trump was THE tea party candidate par excellence.  He encapsulated all the forces that the GOP elders willfully let loose in the foolish hope they could control it.  They couldn't.  Trump won because he is the Hegelian spirit of this iron age of American politics.

THis is a point I've been trying to beat into people for some time.

Trump did not pervert the Republican Party, Trump is exactly the candidate the Republican Party perverted itself into - he is the manifestation of a couple decades of Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

jimmy olsen

What a childish little bitch. The least he could do is commit to it. That "I know nothing about it" he tacked onto the end is some weak ass shit.

QuoteTrump on Rep. Omar before leaving White House: "There's a lot of talk about the fact that she was married to her brother. I know nothing about it."
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

PRC

Quote from: jimmy olsen on July 17, 2019, 07:04:19 PM
What a childish little bitch. The least he could do is commit to it. That "I know nothing about it" he tacked onto the end is some weak ass shit.

QuoteTrump on Rep. Omar before leaving White House: "There's a lot of talk about the fact that she was married to her brother. I know nothing about it."

"On both sides"... lots of talk of how Trump wants to bang his own daughter.

How is America going to get back to relative normalcy?

Monoriu

Quote from: PRC on July 17, 2019, 09:00:51 PM

How is America going to get back to relative normalcy?

By electing Joe Biden as the next president.