News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

What does a TRUMP presidency look like?

Started by FunkMonk, November 08, 2016, 11:02:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

grumbler

Quote from: crazy canuck on November 15, 2017, 05:46:27 PM
Sure, but once the constitution was amended to include express rights surely even Grumbler would concede that the constitution could be used to protect those enumerated rights and further amending those rights would have some legal effect.  When he is one of his less pedantic moods that is.

Again with the strawman arguments.  :rolleyes:  Surely you, in one of your brief moments of intellectual honesty, will concede that what I say is my position is, in fact, my position.  Your re-statements of my position to have it be something other than of what I say it is doesn't reflect honesty. 

The US Constitution's Bill of Rights limits government action in regards to specific enumerated rights and also rights not enumerated.  That has always been my position, and you cannot have it.  Your assertion that basic rights can be amended ("further amending those rights") is incorrect.  The Constitution grants no power to amend rights.  Civil rights are, of course, a different matter.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

grumbler

Quote from: crazy canuck on November 15, 2017, 05:49:18 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 15, 2017, 03:23:50 PM
Apparently, CC believes that Americans had no rights between the Declaration of Independence and the establishment of the Constitution of the US.  :lol:

You are confusing what I think with your apparent belief that in a Parliamentary system rights are only given by Parliament.  It is hard to have an intelligent conversation with you when you are so belligerently ill informed.

In a sovereign parliament system parliament is sovereign.  It is bound by nothing, and people only have the rights it says they have.  You might want to research "parliamentary sovereignty."  Your belligerent ignorance is showing.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

crazy canuck

#15227
Quote from: grumbler on November 15, 2017, 06:35:05 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 15, 2017, 05:49:18 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 15, 2017, 03:23:50 PM
Apparently, CC believes that Americans had no rights between the Declaration of Independence and the establishment of the Constitution of the US.  :lol:

You are confusing what I think with your apparent belief that in a Parliamentary system rights are only given by Parliament.  It is hard to have an intelligent conversation with you when you are so belligerently ill informed.

In a sovereign parliament system parliament is sovereign. 

Yes, but you are ignoring the development of hundreds of years of common law in which rights were protected including the law developed by the courts of equity. 


grumbler

Quote from: crazy canuck on November 15, 2017, 06:59:42 PM
Yes, but you are ignoring the development of hundreds of years of common law in which rights were protected including the law developed by the courts of equity.
No, I am not. Common law does not trump statutes of parliament.  Statute law trumps common law. Here's an example from Australia, where parliament is sovereign (the same is trivially true in the US, but the US lacks a sovereign parliament):
QuoteIt is a well-established principle inherited from British constitutional law that parliament is sovereign or all powerful. This principle is controversial because, subject to constitutional limitations, it means that in theory parliament can make any law it wants to, even if it is contrary to what most people would regard as their basic rights...

The practical result of the principle of parliamentary sovereignty is that legislation prevails over common law. If there is a conflict between legislation and the common law, legislation will over-ride the common law.

http://www.hobartlegal.org.au/tasmanian-law-handbook/courts-lawyers-and-law/law/legislation/legislation-vs-common-law

Maybe you could take some extension courses from Australia to learn about the concept of parliamentary sovereignty?  You clearly need to be educated on topics like this, if you don't want to make an ass of yourself on languish.

that might be a pretty big "if," though...
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

CountDeMoney

Quote from: Barrister on November 15, 2017, 02:37:54 PM
Quote from: garbon on November 15, 2017, 02:32:12 PM
Testicles have their own quiet charm.

I do believe this is the first time in human history that those words have been put together in that particular order.

He's kinda got a point.  I mean, have you ever heard them clang when they're banged together?

grumbler

Quote from: CountDeMoney on November 15, 2017, 08:24:24 PM
He's kinda got a point.  I mean, have you ever heard them clang when they're banged together?

I've stopped noticing it when I walk.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

CountDeMoney

Quote from: grumbler on November 15, 2017, 08:28:37 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on November 15, 2017, 08:24:24 PM
He's kinda got a point.  I mean, have you ever heard them clang when they're banged together?

I've stopped noticing it when I walk.

As often as you've stood watch, I'm sure you don't hear the eight bells anymore.

crazy canuck

Quote from: grumbler on November 15, 2017, 08:21:44 PM
The practical result of the principle of parliamentary sovereignty is that legislation prevails over common law. If there is a conflict between legislation and the common law, legislation will over-ride the common law.
[/quote]

Oh my, where to start with someone who has perhaps a high school understanding of a more complex topic.

An example of how the law of equity intrudes on Parliamentary Supremacy is the law of foreclosure.   A statute passed by Parliament allows a bank to foreclose on a property owner who is in default of their mortgage.  But the law of equity intervenes to allow that property owner a grace period to redeem themselves and pay the amounts owing before the bank can actually take the property.

An example of how the common law qualifies Parliamentary Supremacy is the development of administrative law principles which requires statutory decision makers to conduct themselves in a procedural fair manner and if they fail to do so the Court will quash their decision.  Following on that example, Parliament has attempted to insulate its statutory decision makers by enacting legislation which expressly states that a Court cannot interfere with a decision.  But the Courts have simply interpreted those clauses as meaning some deference must be shown but not that the Court cannot interfere.

So, in short, your understanding of Parliamentary democracy would probably allow you to pass a high school civics class.  It might even qualify you to teach a high school course which touches on Parliamentary systems of government.  But that is about as far as it goes.

Oexmelin

As an aside, people who are interested in equity, the weight of common law in the making of American legal culture, may be interested in M. Crow, "Thomas Jefferson, Legal History and the Art of Recollection" (Cambridge, 2017).
Que le grand cric me croque !

grumbler

Quote from: crazy canuck on November 15, 2017, 10:11:05 PM
Oh my, where to start with someone who has perhaps a high school understanding of a more complex topic.

An example of how the law of equity intrudes on Parliamentary Supremacy is the law of foreclosure.   A statute passed by Parliament allows a bank to foreclose on a property owner who is in default of their mortgage.  But the law of equity intervenes to allow that property owner a grace period to redeem themselves and pay the amounts owing before the bank can actually take the property.

An example of how the common law qualifies Parliamentary Supremacy is the development of administrative law principles which requires statutory decision makers to conduct themselves in a procedural fair manner and if they fail to do so the Court will quash their decision.  Following on that example, Parliament has attempted to insulate its statutory decision makers by enacting legislation which expressly states that a Court cannot interfere with a decision.  But the Courts have simply interpreted those clauses as meaning some deference must be shown but not that the Court cannot interfere.

So, in short, your understanding of Parliamentary democracy would probably allow you to pass a high school civics class.  It might even qualify you to teach a high school course which touches on Parliamentary systems of government.  But that is about as far as it goes.

An even marginally competent lawyer could explain you why all of this is simply an evasion of the issue we were discussing.  Parliamentary statute trumps the common law, as I demonstrated.  Common law is procedural in applying statute law.  So, in short, your understanding of parliamentary sovereignty would get you, maybe, a C in my class (and that only because you did use some of the correct vocabulary).  As I suggested, you might want to inform yourself before further making a fool of yourself.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

dps

Yeah, the idea that common law trumps statute sounds like something that someone who lives in a civil law jurisdiction and actually knows nothing about common law would come up with.

Or someone confusing constitutional law with common law, which is a mistake I wouldn't expect out of a student in a 4th grade civics class.

Eddie Teach

You're giving 4th graders too much credit.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

DGuller

Maybe they have a very strong school system where dps is from.

jimmy olsen

Moore's lawyer was disbarred!  :lol:

https://twitter.com/grantstern/status/930951901348319232?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fforums.somethingawful.com%2Fshowthread.php%3Fthreadid%3D3821460%26userid%3D0%26perpage%3D40%26pagenumber%3D4758
QuoteTrenton Rogers Garmon was disbarred by the Alabama Bar Association in 2013

Garmon pretended to be a preacher in order to solicit legal work from the parents of a 13-year-old who recently died
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

jimmy olsen

What a creeper :wacko:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/two-more-women-describe-unwanted-overtures-by-roy-moore-at-alabama-mall/2017/11/15/2a1da432-ca24-11e7-b0cf-7689a9f2d84e_story.html?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.5717f8e7be3a
QuoteTwo more women describe unwanted overtures by Roy Moore at Alabama mall

By Stephanie McCrummen, Beth Reinhard and Alice Crites November 15 at 8:09 PM

Gena Richardson says she was a high school senior working in the men's department of Sears at the Gadsden Mall when a man approached her and introduced himself as Roy Moore.

"He said, 'You can just call me Roy,' " says Richardson, who says this first encounter happened in the fall of 1977, just before or after her 18th birthday, as Moore, then a 30-year-old local attorney, was gaining a reputation for pursuing young women at the mall in Gadsden, Ala. His overtures caused one store manager to tell new hires to "watch out for this guy," another young woman to complain to her supervisor and Richardson to eventually hide from him when he came in Sears, the women say.

Richardson says Moore — now a candidate for U.S. Senate — asked her where she went to school, and then for her phone number, which she says she declined to give, telling him that her father, a Southern Baptist preacher, would never approve.

A few days later, she says, she was in trigonometry class at Gadsden High when she was summoned to the principal's office over the intercom in her classroom. She had a phone call.

"I said 'Hello?'" Richardson recalls. "And the male on the other line said, 'Gena, this is Roy Moore.' I was like, 'What?!' He said, 'What are you doing?' I said, 'I'm in trig class.' "


Richardson says Moore asked her out again on the call. A few days later, after he asked her out at Sears, she relented and agreed, feeling both nervous and flattered. They met that night at a movie theater in the mall after she got off work, a date that ended with Moore driving her to her car in a dark parking lot behind Sears and giving her what she called an unwanted, "forceful" kiss that left her scared.

"I never wanted to see him again," says Richardson, who is now 58 and a community college teacher living in Birmingham. She describes herself as a moderate Republican and says she didn't vote in the 2016 general election or in this year's Republican Senate primary in Alabama.

Moore's campaign did not directly address the new allegations. In a statement, a campaign spokesman cast the growing number of allegations against Moore as politically motivated.

"If you are a liberal and hate Judge Moore, apparently he groped you," the statement said. "If you are a conservative and love Judge Moore, you know these allegations are a political farce."

Richardson, whose account was corroborated by classmate and Sears co-worker Kayla McLaughlin, is among four women who say Moore pursued them when they were teenagers or young women working at the mall — from Sears at one end to the Pizitz department store at the other. Richardson and Becky Gray, the woman who complained to her manager, have not previously spoken publicly. The accounts of the other two women — Wendy Miller and Gloria Thacker Deason — have previously been reported by The Washington Post.

Phyllis Smith, who was 18 when she began working at Brooks, a clothing store geared toward young women, said teenage girls counseled each other to "just make yourself scarce when Roy's in here, he's just here to bother you, don't pay attention to him and he'll go away.' "

The encounters described by the women occurred between 1977 and 1982, when Moore was single, in his early 30s and an attorney in Etowah County in northeastern Alabama. In October 1977, he was appointed deputy district attorney.

In all, The Post spoke to a dozen people who worked at the mall or hung out there as teenagers during the late '70s and early '80s and recall Moore as a frequent presence — a well-dressed man walking around alone, leaning on counters, spending enough time in the stores, especially on weekend nights, that some of the young women who worked there said they became uncomfortable.

Several of the women said they decided to share their accounts after reading a Post story last week in which four women said Moore pursued them as teenagers, including one who said she was 14 and Moore was 32 when he touched her sexually.

Since that story was published, another woman, Beverly Young Nelson, appearing with lawyer Gloria Allred, accused Moore of sexually assaulting her in his car when she was 16. A lawyer for Moore's campaign held a news conference on Wednesday to dispute Nelson's account, suggesting that a signature in her yearbook she said was Moore's might have been forged.

Moore has denied engaging in any kind of sexual misconduct. In an interview last week with Sean Hannity of Fox News, Moore did not rule out that he may have dated teenage girls when he was in his 30s, though he said he could not recall. Moore said he doesn't remember "ever dating any girl without the permission of her mother."

Moore has brushed off mounting calls from Republican leaders in Washington to end his campaign, saying the media and the GOP establishment are aligned against him. The reaction in Alabama, among voters and elected officials, has been more mixed.


President Trump has not gone as far as other Republican leaders, saying through press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders that Moore should drop out if the allegations are true. Trump ignored questions Wednesday from reporters asking if Moore should quit the race.

The sprawling Gadsden Mall opened in 1974 with a Sears at one end, a Pizitz department store at the other, a movie theater in the middle and plenty of parking all around. It quickly became a social hub for teenagers.

By 1977, Moore had returned home from law school after attending the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and serving in Vietnam. It was around that time, people say, that he became a regular at the mall.

"It would always be on Friday or Saturday night," says Becky Gray, who was then 22 and working in the men's department of Pizitz. "Parents would drop kids off, let them roam the mall. Well, he started coming up to me."

She says Moore kept asking her out and she kept saying no.

"I'd always say no, I'm dating someone, no, I'm in a relationship," says Gray, now 62, a retired teacher and a Democrat who supports Moore's opponent in the Senate race. "I thought he was old at that time. Anyone over 22 was just old."

Gray says he was persistent in a way that made her uncomfortable. She says he lingered in her section, or else by the bathroom area, and that she became so disturbed that she complained to the Pizitz manager, Maynard von Spiegelfeld. Gray says he told her that it was "not the first time he had a complaint about him hanging out at the mall." Von Spiegelfeld has since died, according to a relative.

Pizitz is also where Deason told The Post last week that Moore asked her out when she was 18 and working behind the jewelry counter.

Beyond Pizitz was a long corridor of shops, including Brooks, which sold rabbit fur coats and fashions geared toward young women. Smith, the one-time Brooks employee, says she was probably 19 when Moore began coming into the store, which she says employed many teenage girls. She remembers him being alone and had the strong impression he wasn't looking to shop.


"I can remember him walking in and the whole mood would change with us girls," says Smith, 59, who lives in Gadsden and says she is a Democrat. "It would be like we were on guard. I would find something else to do. I remember being creeped out."

Smith says Moore never approached her personally, but she saw him chatting with other young clerks, and that she would tell new hires to "watch out for this guy." She says that occasionally, one of the store managers would have to deal with bounced checks, which meant going to the district attorney's office where Moore worked. She says the managers would "draw straws" to decide who had to go talk to him about the cases.

"It was just sort of a dreadful experience," she says.

At the center of the mall was a photo booth, where Wendy Miller earlier told The Post her mother worked. Miller said she hung out there with her mom when she was 16 and that Moore repeatedly asked her out on dates, which her mother forbade. Miller's mother, Martha Brackett, confirmed her account.

****

At the other end of the mall was Sears, where Richardson says she was among a clique of Gadsden High girls who worked at the store during their senior year.

Richardson, whose maiden name is Burgess, was assigned to the men's section, and her friend and classmate McLaughlin worked at the cosmetics and jewelry counter at the front of the store with a view down the long mall corridor.

"I could see when he came in," says McLaughlin, whose maiden name was Shirley and who says that she and Richardson usually worked evening shifts on the weekends. "He didn't really talk to me, he was over there visiting with Gena a lot. And that got to be a pattern."

McLaughlin says she told her friend to stay away from Moore. "I hate to say this, but Gena was like my little sister. She was raised by a Southern Baptist preacher and a little naive. So I'd let her know: 'Here he comes.' "


When Richardson met Moore she says he introduced himself as an attorney, and says she found it odd that he asked her to call him "Roy."

"That was strange in the first place, because of the way we were always taught to call someone Mr. or Mrs.," she says.

When he asked for her number, she says that she told him, "No, my dad is so strict. Mm-mm. No." She and McLaughlin both say they talked about Moore after that, with McLaughlin telling her friend, "You can't go out with him. He's old."

It was a few days later, Richardson says, when she was called out of her trigonometry class.

Richardson says she was startled, thinking maybe her dad was calling, and that when she realized it was Moore, "I felt like every person in that office was staring at me."

"At that point, he said, 'Would you like to go out some time?' " recalls Richardson, who says she described the call right afterward to McLaughlin, who confirmed the account. "I said, 'Well, I can't talk right now.' And being so naive, and so not worldly, I said, 'I'll be at work Friday or Saturday.'"


The next Friday or Saturday night, she says, he came in to Sears and asked her out again and she again told him, "Look, my dad is so strict."

She recalls Moore suggesting that they meet for a late movie after she got off work. She says she called her parents and told them she was going out with friends.

Instead, she says she met Moore at the movie theater. She says she can't remember what they saw, but she remembers clearly what happened after. She says it was cold and Moore offered to drive her to her car, which was more than a football field's distance away in a parking area behind Sears. She says he parked by her car and began chatting with her, and she says she told him again about her dad.

"I just explained to him that my dad's a minister, and you know, I just can't sneak around because that's wrong," she recalls. "So I thanked him and started to get out and he grabbed me and pulled me in and that's when he kissed me.


"It was a man kiss — like really deep tongue. Like very forceful tongue. It was a surprise. I'd never been kissed like that," she says. "And the minute that happened, I got scared then. I really did. Something came over me that scared me. And so I said, 'I've got to go, because my curfew is now.' "

She says she got out of the car and into her own.

Richardson and McLaughlin say they talked about it afterward, and when Moore came into Sears after that, McLaughlin would warn her friend so she could hide in the back of the store. "I would call and say he's coming this way," McLaughlin says. "She would go to the back. She was uncomfortable."

Richardson says she never spoke to Moore again. She says she first told her father about the incident on Wednesday.
She says she never told her mother, who is deceased.

"All these years, I thought that was an isolated incident," Richardson says. "Now, as a mother and a grandmother, it just makes me physically sick. I realize that it didn't just happen to me."
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point