Facebook Follies of Friends and Families

[Josquius]

Is the book French?

[The Minsky Moment]

That is three things.

I count four.
Fear, surprise, ruthless efficiency, and an almost fanatical devotion to Donald Trump.

[Darth Wagtaros]

"In Glock we Trust"

All others pay blood.

[Syt]

[Josquius]

There were no pipe bombs... But the pipe bombs weren't by trump supporters. If you want to talk about antifa pipe bombs then that's OK.

[Admiral Yi]

Were there really no pipe bombs?  I never heard that.

And I guess she means the cops who died were Trump supporters too?

[The Brain]

Dudes, she is listing lies.

[DGuller]

The cop who was hit with a fire extinguisher actually was a Trump supporter, though obviously one whose sense of duty did not leave him.

[Syt]

The cop who was hit with a fire extinguisher actually was a Trump supporter, though obviously one whose sense of duty did not leave him.

The first comment on the original post claims he died from a stroke due to a blood clot.

WAKE UP SHEEPLE

[katmai]

Were there really no pipe bombs?  I never heard that.

the pipe bombs were shown in video footage to have been placed between 7:30 and 8:30 pm on January 5th. She's a vile bitch.

[The Minsky Moment]

Were there really no pipe bombs?  I never heard that.

Because there were pipe bombs

She is saying there were no pipe bombs "placed on Jan 6" because the info is that they were placed the evening of Jan 5

This is the kind of argumentation these people engage in.

[alfred russel]

Pipe bombs being placed on January 5 vs. January 6 is relevant to refute an argument that a speech Trump gave on January 6 inspired a crowd to become violent.

[Jacob]

Pipe bombs being placed on January 5 vs. January 6 is relevant to refute an argument that a speech Trump gave on January 6 inspired a crowd to become violent.

True enough.

But if was whipping the crowd into a frenzy prior to Jan 6, and the Jan 6 was just the final "it's go time", then it doesn't really signify.

Is anyone arguing that Trump's call to insurrection went from zero to 100 on Jan 6, and nothing relevant happened prior?

[alfred russel]

Pipe bombs being placed on January 5 vs. January 6 is relevant to refute an argument that a speech Trump gave on January 6 inspired a crowd to become violent.

True enough.

But if was whipping the crowd into a frenzy prior to Jan 6, and the Jan 6 was just the final "it's go time", then it doesn't really signify.

Is anyone arguing that Trump's call to insurrection went from zero to 100 on Jan 6, and nothing relevant happened prior?

Nope.

But the fact that a bomb was planted prior to January 6 does seem to be a relevant defense fact.

[The Minsky Moment]

No it is not a relevant defense fact, it is the opposite.

No one ever claimed that the pipe bombs were placed DURING the insurrection; that would be absurd.

The belief was and always has been that the the bombs may have been placed beforehand to draw away police from the Capitol. 

That fits completely with the fact that they were initially planted the night before.