News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Trump is a fascist.

Started by jimmy olsen, November 25, 2015, 10:18:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

In your opinion, is Trump a fascist?

Yes
9 (22%)
No
21 (51.2%)
It's more complicated than that because...
11 (26.8%)

Total Members Voted: 41

MadImmortalMan

There aren't any. Fascism is in the dustbin of history.
"Stability is destabilizing." --Hyman Minsky

"Complacency can be a self-denying prophecy."
"We have nothing to fear but lack of fear itself." --Larry Summers

alfred russel

Quote from: grumbler on November 28, 2015, 02:46:52 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:19:48 PM
Who are these "actual socialists"?

Those who call for social ownership of the means of production (as opposed to private ownership); you know, the ones who subscribe to the defining characteristic of socialism.

So you don't consider Hollande a socialist?
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle.

I'm embarrassed. I've been making the mistake of associating with you. It won't happen again. :)
-garbon, February 23, 2014

Grinning_Colossus

Certain European far-right parties like Golden Dawn, Jobbik, and the LDPR are clearly fascist. One could make a case for ISIS and North Korea, too.
Quis futuit ipsos fututores?

Valmy

Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:59:54 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 28, 2015, 02:46:52 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:19:48 PM
Who are these "actual socialists"?

Those who call for social ownership of the means of production (as opposed to private ownership); you know, the ones who subscribe to the defining characteristic of socialism.

So you don't consider Hollande a socialist?

Not really. Mitterrand nationalized a bunch of industries when he took power, that is a socialist.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Martinus

Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:59:54 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 28, 2015, 02:46:52 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:19:48 PM
Who are these "actual socialists"?

Those who call for social ownership of the means of production (as opposed to private ownership); you know, the ones who subscribe to the defining characteristic of socialism.

So you don't consider Hollande a socialist?

Definitely not. That's moronic. I have seen him trying to nationalise means of production. Chavez could be seen as socialist.

Josquius

To say socialists are only the extremists who demand a 100% Marx-defined socialist society tomorrow is like saying only the really far right hate filled tea party types are conservatives.
██████
██████
██████

Martinus

Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 03:01:39 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:59:54 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 28, 2015, 02:46:52 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:19:48 PM
Who are these "actual socialists"?

Those who call for social ownership of the means of production (as opposed to private ownership); you know, the ones who subscribe to the defining characteristic of socialism.

So you don't consider Hollande a socialist?

Not really. Mitterrand nationalized a bunch of industries when he took power, that is a socialist.

Wow, I would never see Mitterand as socialist. You Americans really have a distorted view.  :lol:

MadImmortalMan

Quote from: Martinus on November 28, 2015, 03:03:36 PM
Wow, I would never see Mitterand as socialist. You Americans really have a distorted view.  :lol:

Valmy spelled the man's name properly.  :P

Anyway, if a man calls himself one, people tend to take him at his word.  :lol:
"Stability is destabilizing." --Hyman Minsky

"Complacency can be a self-denying prophecy."
"We have nothing to fear but lack of fear itself." --Larry Summers

alfred russel

Quote from: Martinus on November 28, 2015, 03:01:51 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:59:54 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 28, 2015, 02:46:52 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:19:48 PM
Who are these "actual socialists"?

Those who call for social ownership of the means of production (as opposed to private ownership); you know, the ones who subscribe to the defining characteristic of socialism.

So you don't consider Hollande a socialist?

Definitely not. That's moronic. I have seen him trying to nationalise means of production. Chavez could be seen as socialist.

But he a member of a socialist party, that is (i think) in the socialist international, and (I think) is a party with a socialist tradition back over 100 years. Whether or not he meets the definition of a socialist from 100+ years ago, it seems he meets the modern day definition of one.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle.

I'm embarrassed. I've been making the mistake of associating with you. It won't happen again. :)
-garbon, February 23, 2014

Admiral Yi

I don't buy into the Yuro logic that one is not a true socialist until one advocates for, and pursues, the nationalization of all industry.  I see socialism as a contiuum.  One can be a little bit socialist and one can be very socialist.

Valmy

Quote from: Martinus on November 28, 2015, 03:03:36 PM
Wow, I would never see Mitterand as socialist. You Americans really have a distorted view.  :lol:

A distorted view is that nationalizing industries in socialism? Ok what is a non-distorted view of socialism then? :mellow:
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

grumbler

Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 28, 2015, 03:47:22 PM
I don't buy into the Yuro logic that one is not a true socialist until one advocates for, and pursues, the nationalization of all industry.  I see socialism as a contiuum.  One can be a little bit socialist and one can be very socialist.

True.  One can be a little bit socialist, and only desire to nationalize the "commanding heights of the economy," or one can be very socialist and desire to nationalize every means of production.

Social Democrats are not, generally speaking, socialists.  Sanders is a social democrat, whether he calls himself socialist or not.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

derspiess

"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

Habbaku

The medievals were only too right in taking nolo episcopari as the best reason a man could give to others for making him a bishop. Give me a king whose chief interest in life is stamps, railways, or race-horses; and who has the power to sack his Vizier (or whatever you care to call him) if he does not like the cut of his trousers.

Government is an abstract noun meaning the art and process of governing and it should be an offence to write it with a capital G or so as to refer to people.

-J. R. R. Tolkien

Tonitrus