Middle East Will be Too Hot for Humans to Live by the End of the Century

[jimmy olsen]

Climate change is going to cause a lot of chaos and violence in the third world.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/27/science/intolerable-heat-may-hit-the-middle-east-by-the-end-of-the-century.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

'Intolerable' Heat May Hit the Middle East by the End of the Century

By JOHN SCHWARTZOCT. 26, 2015

By the end of this century, areas of the Persian Gulf could be hit by waves of heat and humidity so severe that simply being outside for several hours could threaten human life, according to a new study published Monday. Because of humanity's contribution to climate change, the authors wrote, some population centers in the Middle East "are likely to experience temperature levels that are intolerable to humans."

The dangerously muggy summer conditions predicted for places near the warm waters of the Gulf could overwhelm the ability of the human body to reduce its temperature through sweating and ventilation. That threatens anyone without air-conditioning — including the poor, but also those who work outdoors in professions like agriculture and construction.

The paper, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, was written by Jeremy S. Pal of the department of civil engineering and environmental science at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles and Elfatih A. B. Eltahir of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Previous studies had suggested that such conditions might be reached in the next 200 years. But the new research, which depends on detailed climate models that focus on regional topography and conditions, foresees a much shorter timeline.

The researchers resolve the old argument over whether the source of summer misery is the heat or the humidity by saying that it is both. They rely on a method of measuring atmospheric conditions known as wet-bulb temperature, which, while less well known and understood than the standard method of measuring temperatures, describes the extent to which evaporation and ventilation can lower an object's temperature.

If the wet-bulb temperature is 35 degrees Celsius (95 degrees Fahrenheit), that means that even a person drenched in sweat cannot cool off. Wet-bulb readings are not the same as the heat-index measurements used by the National Weather Service, Dr. Eltahir said. (This is the figure used by weather forecasters to say what a hot day "feels like" when the humidity is added.)

A wet-bulb measure of 35 degrees Celsius, he estimated, would roughly translate to a heat-index reading of 165 degrees Fahrenheit. Since even today's heat waves cause premature deaths by the thousands, mainly affecting very young, elderly and infirm people, the more extreme conditions envisioned in the new paper "would probably be intolerable even for the fittest of humans, resulting in hyperthermia" after six hours of exposure.

Erich M. Fischer, senior scientist at the Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science at the science and technical university ETH Zurich, and who was not involved with the new paper, explained the role of humidity.

"Anyone can experience the fact that humidity plays a crucial role in this in the sauna," he said. "You can heat up a Finnish sauna up to 100 degrees Celsius since it is bone dry and the body efficiently cools down by excessive sweating even at ambient temperatures far higher than the body temperature. In a Turkish bath, on the other hand, with almost 100 percent relative humidity, you want to keep the temperatures well below 40 degrees Celsius since the body cannot get rid of the heat by sweating and starts to accumulate heat."

As climate change causes temperatures to rise around the world, it should come as no surprise that the warm-water coasts in the Middle East could be the first to experience brutal combinations of heat and humidity. The conditions would not be constant, but spikes would become increasingly common.

A temperature that today would rank in the 95th percentile "becomes approximately a normal summer day" by the end of the century, the researchers said. Wet-bulb temperatures that even exceed the 35-degree threshold could be expected to occur once every 10 or 20 years, Dr. Eltahir said. "When they happen, they will be quite lethal," he said.

The research also raises the prospect of "severe consequences" for the hajj, the annual pilgrimage that draws roughly two million people to Mecca to pray outdoors from dawn to dusk. Should the hajj, which can occur at different times of the year, fall during the height of the summer, "This necessary outdoor Muslim ritual is likely to become hazardous to human health," the authors predicted.

If the nations of the world reduce their greenhouse-gas emissions, the authors concluded, the predicted disasters can be prevented — "Such efforts applied at the global scale would significantly reduce the severity of the projected impacts."

An essay published along with the new paper by Christoph Schär, of the Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science at ETH Zurich, said that the message of the new research is clear. "The threats to human health may be much more severe than previously thought, and may occur in the current century," he wrote.

A heat wave in July of this year got very close to the 35-degree wet-bulb threshold described by the authors, reaching 34.6 degrees. "It is credible that it will sometimes rise above 35 °C within this century," he wrote.

In an interview via email, Dr. Fischer said that he found the research "robust and noteworthy," though he said some uncertainties remain in the temperature measurements and the models. "Whether it exceeds or just gets close to the adaptability limit and for what period (which is probably quite relevant) may need further research," he wrote.

Steven Sherwood, a researcher whose work in 2010 suggested that parts of the world could become uninhabitable within 200 years if fossil-fuel burning continues unabated, said he saw no reason to doubt the results of the new study. However, he added that "we really need to learn how to improve these models" to build confidence in the results.

Still, he said he was startled by the prediction that many cities on the Persian Gulf coast could be essentially uninhabitable by the end of the century for those without air-conditioning. "That is truly shocking," he wrote in an email exchange, and added that he found it ironic, "given the region's importance in providing fossil fuels."

[DGuller]

  Maybe Birobidzhan would've been a better option after all.

[Jacob]

That's going to make the current refugee crisis look like nothing, if it comes to pass.

I mean, it's hard to argue "they should just stay in their own countries" if their own countries are uninhabitable. On the other hand, the population of the Middle East is orders of magnitude bigger than the current wave of emigrants from there.

And, of course, if global warming makes the place uninhabitable then the rest of the world will have some other problems as well.

[Tonitrus]

Craig T. Nelson was in that made-for-TV movie.  It had Americans overrunning the Canadian border. 

[alfred russel]

That's going to make the current refugee crisis look like nothing, if it comes to pass.

I mean, it's hard to argue "they should just stay in their own countries" if their own countries are uninhabitable. On the other hand, the population of the Middle East is orders of magnitude bigger than the current wave of emigrants from there.

And, of course, if global warming makes the place uninhabitable then the rest of the world will have some other problems as well.

It will be a more gradual evolution though. As the countries move toward uninhabitability there will be a series of crop failures, economic and enivronmental crises, and wars/civil unrest that cause people to leave over the next century. Maybe the current crisis is just the leading edge of a trend?

[Josephus]

That's really why the Muslims are leaving

[lustindarkness]

I bet they got a bunch of grant money for this study while all they needed to do was ask me. It's already too hot for humans there.

[Monoriu]

Do researchers really expect they can change people's behaviour with these predictions?  Oh, some far, far away place will become really miserable long after your death, so you better stop driving and using air-conditioning now.  This doesn't fly. 

[Admiral Yi]

Do researchers really expect they can change people's behaviour with these predictions?  Oh, some far, far away place will become really miserable long after your death, so you better stop driving and using air-conditioning now.  This doesn't fly.

People who have children presumably have a different perspective on the possibility of 200 million starving, desperate refugees showing up at their border.

[Tonitrus]

By the time this happens, Sweden will be a muslim state...so they can all go there.

[Monoriu]

Do researchers really expect they can change people's behaviour with these predictions?  Oh, some far, far away place will become really miserable long after your death, so you better stop driving and using air-conditioning now.  This doesn't fly.

People who have children presumably have a different perspective on the possibility of 200 million starving, desperate refugees showing up at their border.

Whose border?  European borders, probably.  Will those people show up at the Chinese or the US border?  Far less likely.

[Eddie Teach]

Whose border?  European borders, probably.  Will those people show up at the Chinese or the US border?  Far less likely.

After Europe is overrun.

[Valmy]

Whose border?  European borders, probably.  Will those people show up at the Chinese or the US border?  Far less likely.

No way people in Asia would go to a different place in Asia? Besides it is idiotic to suggest that problems will occur in the Middle East and nowhere else. The impacts will be disastrous right here in the USA.

So we know what is coming, why not use this to plan for the future? Did the Chinese government not do something to prevent their population bomb that was not due to actually impact anything for decades? So why not do the same here? I do not get your position it seeds needlessly and recklessly suicidal for no appreciable gain.

[HisMajestyBOB]

Do researchers really expect they can change people's behaviour with these predictions?  Oh, some far, far away place will become really miserable long after your death, so you better stop driving and using air-conditioning now.  This doesn't fly.

People who have children presumably have a different perspective on the possibility of 200 million starving, desperate refugees showing up at their border.

Unless they're of the 35% who don't believe climate change is happening, or the 41% who believe Jesus will return to Earth by 2050 and, presumably, rapture everyone thus making climate change a moot point.

[Monoriu]

Whose border?  European borders, probably.  Will those people show up at the Chinese or the US border?  Far less likely.

No way people in Asia would go to a different place in Asia? Besides it is idiotic to suggest that problems will occur in the Middle East and nowhere else. The impacts will be disastrous right here in the USA.

So we know what is coming, why not use this to plan for the future? Did the Chinese government not do something to prevent their population bomb that was not due to actually impact anything for decades? So why not do the same here? I do not get your position it seeds needlessly and recklessly suicidal for no appreciable gain.

If I were in front of a computer, playing a space 4x game known as Master of Planets, and I see a pop up saying, a global disaster will happen, and we need to build this, stop that etc to solve the problem, I will. 

But I am not.  I don't have control over the entire planet.  I am an insignificant office assistant, an individual.  My individual choices have no effect on the outcome whatsoever.  Even individual countries don't have much control over this.  I see a problem that is unsolvable.