Should we build a horde of rampaging killbots?

Started by jimmy olsen, April 15, 2015, 06:49:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Should we build armies of autonomous killbots?

Yes, it worked out fine for the Twelve Colonies of Kobol
12 (52.2%)
No, look how bad Skynet turned out
5 (21.7%)
We just need to program the killbots with a kill limit
6 (26.1%)

Total Members Voted: 22

The Brain

I'm fine with killbots as long as they're also sexbots.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Syt

Quote from: The Brain on April 18, 2015, 01:26:52 AM
I'm fine with killbots as long as they're also sexbots.

What if they're programmed with AI based on Battlefield players, so that they kill you first and then rape you?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

garbon

Quote from: grumbler on April 17, 2015, 07:58:58 PM
Quote from: Martinus on April 16, 2015, 02:46:50 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on April 15, 2015, 08:22:16 PM
Then perhaps it should be Languish that builds the killbot army. He who controls the killbots can never be a slave.

And the use of killer robots would require a unanimous decision in a Languish poll. Which means they will never be used.

Nonsense.  Include a jaron option (Jaron wopuld use them) and you'd get unanimity.
Hear, hear!
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

jimmy olsen

Quote from: Malthus on April 16, 2015, 07:40:32 AM
If you criminalize mass-murdering killbots, only criminals will have mass-murdering killbots.

You're absolutely right, thankfully the 2nd amendment protects the right of private citizens to build their own killbots. :smarty:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/drone-gun-connecticut_55af1016e4b0a9b94852f95b?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000052

QuoteConnecticut Teen Made A Drone That Fires A Semi-Automatic Handgun -- And Police Say It's Legal

"At this point, we can't find anything that's been violated."

A Connecticut teen has added a handgun to a drone, creating a weapon that can be fired remotely -- and police say it appears to be perfectly legal.

Austin Haughwout, 18, posted a clip online showing the drone firing four shots, which triggered a police investigation.

But police in Haughwout's hometown of Clinton say they can't find anything to charge him with.

"It would seem to the average person, there should be something prohibiting a person from attaching a weapon to a drone," Clinton Police Chief Todd Lawrie said in a statement cited by WTNH, the ABC affiliate in New Haven. "At this point, we can't find anything that's been violated."

At least one law enforcement expert believes reckless conduct charges could apply in this case. 

"What if the drone gets beyond the distance of the radio control?" Tom Fuentes, a former assistant director of the FBI, told CNN Wire. "Do we want drones out of control that could land who knows here? We could have a child pick up the drone, pick up the gun, and accidentally kill themselves."

Brett Haughwout, who is the teen's father, told WFSB, the CBS station in Hartford, that his son made the drone-weapon with help from his professor at Central Connecticut State University.

However, a professor at the university disputed that, telling the Hartford Courant that it was a "terrible idea."

"I discouraged him," Edward Moore, an assistant professor who teaches a class called Manufacturing Engineering Processes, told the paper. "I tried to give him the same advice I would give my kids." 

Haughwout's father told NBC Connecticut that the gun belongs to him and said his son did "extensive research" to ensure it didn't break any laws.

"Homemade multirotor with a semi-automatic handgun mounted on it," the description on YouTube reads. "Note: The length from the muzzle to the rear of the frame is over 26"."

The reference to the length may be an attempt to comply with federal law governing overall length of rifles, should the gun as modified be considered as such.

While local police say there may not be a law against the drone-gun, Haughwout may not be in the clear just yet. CNET reports that the FAA is also investigating.

"The FAA will investigate the operation of an unmanned aircraft system in a Connecticut park to determine if any Federal Aviation Regulations were violated," the agency told the website. "The FAA will also work with its law enforcement partners to determine if there were any violations of criminal statutes."

That comes as welcome news to at least one drone advocate.

"Drones should be used for good, not for evil," Peter Sachs, who is an attorney, told ABC News. "There are countless ways that drones can be useful. Using one as a remote-controlled weapon is not one of them, and I question the judgment of anyone who would attempt to do so."

Haughwout made headlines last year when he was allegedly assaulted by a woman who claimed he was using a drone to photograph her.

However, video showed that Haughwout was just taking aerial shots of the beach.

Andrea Mears, then 23, was charged with third-degree assault and breach of peace. However, the charges will be dropped if she completes two years of probation, according to the New York Post.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

Maximus

That thing's about as much a threat as the average person driving down the street.

jimmy olsen

Quote from: Maximus on July 22, 2015, 09:38:50 PM
That thing's about as much a threat as the average person driving down the street.
Pretty dangerous then!  :lol:
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point