So long, transistor: How the 'memristor' could revolutionize electronics

[jimmy olsen]

The singularity is upon us!

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/02/26/tech/mci-eth-memristor/index.html

So long, transistor: How the 'memristor' could revolutionize electronics

By Jacopo Prisco, for CNN

Updated 1545 GMT (2345 HKT) February 26, 2015

(CNN)—In 1971, a physicist conceptualized the existence of a fourth fundamental element in the electronic circuit, besides the three that were already in use at the time.

His name was Leon Chua and he believed -- for reasons of symmetry -- that an extra component could one day be constructed to join the resistor, the capacitor and the inductor.

He called it "memristor", a portmanteau of the words memory and resistor.

It took 37 years for our engineering abilities to catch up with that idea: the first memristor was built by Hewlett Packard in 2008.

And today, many researchers believe it could spark a revolution in computing.

From electrons to ions

Simply put, the memristor could mean the end of electronics as we know it and the beginning of a new era called "ionics".

The transistor, developed in 1947, is the main component of computer chips. It functions using a flow of electrons, whereas the memristor couples the electrons with ions, or electrically charged atoms.

In a transistor, once the flow of electrons is interrupted by, say, cutting the power, all information is lost. But a memristor can remember the amount of charge that was flowing through it, and much like a memory stick it will retain the data even when the power is turned off.

This can pave the way for computers that will instantly turn on and off like a light bulb and never lose data: the RAM, or memory, will no longer be erased when the machine is turned off, without the need to save anything to hard drives as with current technology.

But memristors have another fundamental difference compared with transistors: they can escape the boundaries of binary code.


Like a brain


Initially, the technology will be mostly used to create super-fast memory chips that contain more data and consume less energy. This alone would make regular computers much more powerful, but down the line, the memristor could also take on the processing.

Jennifer Rupp is a Professor of electrochemical materials at ETH Zurich, and she's working with IBM to built a memristor-based machine within the next two years.

Memristors, she points out, function in a way that is similar to a human brain: "Unlike a transistor, which is based on binary codes, a memristor can have multi-levels. You could have several states, let's say zero, one half, one quarter, one third, and so on, and that gives us a very powerful new perspective on how our computers may develop in the future," she told CNN's Nick Glass.

Such a shift in computing methodology would allow us to create "smart" computers that operate in a way reminiscent of the synapses in our brains.

Free from the limitations of the 0s and 1s, these more powerful computers would be able to learn and make decisions, ultimately getting us one step closer to creating human-like artificial intelligence.


So long, and thanks for all the code


Transistors are based on silicon, a rigid material whose properties are used to manage the flow of electrons, and thus information.

In 1975, Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Intel, formulated a famous law which states that the number of transistors in an electronic circuit doubles approximately every two years.

This has so far proven accurate and set the pace for the constant increase in computing power, but the trend might soon come to an end.

There is a physical limit to the number of transistors that we can pack on a chip, and we are already approaching the miniaturization threshold of this technology. It is inevitable that, one day, we will need to move away from silicon based computing.

The memristor technology is a candidate for this crucial step: "It could mean the end of the silicon era, giving us lower power consumption, the ability to compute more information, increased data storage and completely new logic patterns for our computers," says Rupp.

Memristors don't require a silicon layer and different materials can be used as a substrate. This could create a new class of microchips, that could eventually be integrated in everyday items such as windows, clothes or even coffee cups.


The race is on


After manufacturing the first ever memristor, Hewlett Packard has been working for years on a new type of computer based on the technology. According to plans, it will launch by 2020.

Simply called "The Machine", it uses "electrons for processing, photons for communication, and ions for storage."

"I think there is a race going on," says Rupp. "There is a strong driving force, but at the same time it's very important that there are players like HP, because they want to get to the market, show everyone that this is real."

At the moment, manufacturing costs are still high, but the benefits are worth it: "Memristors operate at a lower power consumption, with a faster speed, and with a higher volume density of information than anything we have based on silicon microchip transistors," Rupp told CNN.

Much like a particle in the realm of physics, the existence of the memristor was theorized long before we could actually build one.

Now that we have that capability to manufacture it, the "missing fourth element" of electronics -- despite its less than catchy name -- might be the key to many further human discoveries.

Read more from Make, Create, Innovate:

[Monoriu]

My biggest concern is, will Microsoft Windows run on the new machines?  In other words, are all the existing programmes obsolete? 

[Grey Fox]

Maybe, yes but that's nothing new. Existing programs become obsolete everyday.

[Eddie Teach]

Maybe, yes but that's nothing new. Existing programs become obsolete everyday.

Every obsolete program is an existential crisis for Mono. 

[Monoriu]

Maybe, yes but that's nothing new. Existing programs become obsolete everyday.

Every obsolete program is an existential crisis for Mono. 

Windows 7 replacing Windows Vista is great news.  It is only an existential crisis if Linux replaces Windows.

[jimmy olsen]

My biggest concern is, will Microsoft Windows run on the new machines?  In other words, are all the existing programmes obsolete?

Windows should run on them, but they'll be inevitibly be replaced by programs that utilize the much more advanced processing capabilities of the new machines.

[Monoriu]

My biggest concern is, will Microsoft Windows run on the new machines?  In other words, are all the existing programmes obsolete?

Windows should run on them, but they'll be inevitibly be replaced by programs that utilize the much more advanced processing capabilities of the new machines.

That programme is known as Windows 34

[Eddie Teach]

Windows porn?

[Liep]

Windows porn?

In Fifty Shades of Grey 2 Dakota Johnson is forced to use Windows ME.

[Ed Anger]

Windows porn?

In Fifty Shades of Grey 2 Dakota Johnson is forced to use Windows ME.

She's a bad girl. install Win98 from floppy disk you slut! Insert disk 22!

[Syt]

Still not as bad as playing Indy4 on 14 floppies on Commodore Amiga without HD. "Open door." - INSERT DISK 12. *loads* INSERT DISK 9 *loads* Indy walks to the door and opens it

[DontSayBanana]

Windows porn?

In Fifty Shades of Grey 2 Dakota Johnson is forced to use Windows ME.

But first, she has to format with a boot disk.  Format.com, FDisk.exe, and boot.ini FTW.

She's a bad girl. install Win98 from floppy disk you slut! Insert disk 22!

[Rex Francorum]

My biggest concern is, will Microsoft Windows run on the new machines?  In other words, are all the existing programmes obsolete?

And from my records/archives management point of view, I wonder about the ability to keep data from the transistor era computers and to be able to read it with that new technology. Well, that's the challenge when any new technology appears and replaces older one.

[Baron von Schtinkenbutt]

My biggest concern is, will Microsoft Windows run on the new machines?  In other words, are all the existing programmes obsolete?

And from my records/archives management point of view, I wonder about the ability to keep data from the transistor era computers and to be able to read it with that new technology. Well, that's the challenge when any new technology appears and replaces older one.

Not just that, but also concerns over the permanence of the media.  Magnetic media, particularly floppy disks and tapes, are notoriously susceptible to environmental damage.  Even with a device to read them, the data may be unretrievable mere decades after it was written.

[Siege]

And Timmay scores!!!!!!111111