News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

May 2015 UK General Election Campaign.

Started by mongers, January 09, 2015, 03:44:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Admiral Yi

Quote from: Valmy on February 06, 2015, 02:47:49 PM
I guess I missed where I suggested the others didn't.  But more importantly the Hong Kongers asked for it and the others did not.

OK.  So anyone who asked for it should have gotten it, and it would have been a fucking disgrace if they hadn't?

Valmy

Quote from: Admiral Yi on February 06, 2015, 04:42:51 PM
Quote from: Valmy on February 06, 2015, 02:47:49 PM
I guess I missed where I suggested the others didn't.  But more importantly the Hong Kongers asked for it and the others did not.

OK.  So anyone who asked for it should have gotten it, and it would have been a fucking disgrace if they hadn't?

Yep.  Same as if we denied people in our territories American citizenship.  But in this case Hong Kong did not vote to join China, there was no anti-British independence movement, or anything that would justify denying them their request.  They were loyal to the British Empire and that loyalty should have been rewarded.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

The Brain

Why would the UK want large numbers of citizens living in Communist China?
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Valmy

Quote from: The Brain on February 06, 2015, 04:47:18 PM
Why would the UK want large numbers of citizens living in Communist China?

Spies.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

mongers

Quote from: Valmy on February 06, 2015, 04:45:04 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on February 06, 2015, 04:42:51 PM
Quote from: Valmy on February 06, 2015, 02:47:49 PM
I guess I missed where I suggested the others didn't.  But more importantly the Hong Kongers asked for it and the others did not.

OK.  So anyone who asked for it should have gotten it, and it would have been a fucking disgrace if they hadn't?

Yep.  Same as if we denied people in our territories American citizenship.  But in this case Hong Kong did not vote to join China, there was no anti-British independence movement, or anything that would justify denying them their request.  They were loyal to the British Empire and that loyalty should have been rewarded.

Why are you surprised, that's almost Thatcherism in tooth and claw. And Mono exemplifies it still further, he both worships her and endorses the ideology by crowing how he got citizenship and shows zero sympathy with those loyal Hong Kong residents who got nothing. 

Why so many Americans worship here I don't understand, I guess they didn't have first hand experience of her divisive policies and just swallow the mythologised soft focus neo-liberal econo-porn.
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

Admiral Yi

Quote from: mongers on February 06, 2015, 05:23:59 PM
Why so many Americans worship here I don't understand

Languish is a sacred place.  :pope:

Agelastus

"Come grow old with me
The Best is yet to be
The last of life for which the first was made."

Sheilbh

Quote from: Admiral Yi on February 06, 2015, 02:47:00 PM
Why did Hong Kongese deserve UK citizenship and other colonial subjects did not?  Hong Kongese were not the only ones to come under an unpleasant regime after being cut loose.
Other colonial subjects had citizenship. That's why West Indian migration in the 40s and 50s was such a big issue. It was very difficult to square the principles of 'Empire' with the unpopularity of tens of thousands of black West Indians arriving.

By the 70s we didn't have many colonies or dependant territories left.
Let's bomb Russia!

mongers

Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on February 06, 2015, 03:47:56 PM
Quote from: Gups on February 06, 2015, 12:59:39 PM
Quote from: Jacob on February 06, 2015, 12:27:33 PM

So what you're saying is that Cameron's election act is a shoddy piece of work?

Not just Shelf. There's pretty much unanimity that it's an awful Act which needs to be repealed/replace asap.

Quick fix. Just repeal the 2/3 majority provision which is a disgustingly unBritish provision no has absolutely no place in our constitution.

It is so unBritish that I find that I cannot really believe in it. No doubt it will be dispensed with whenever it is convenient.

Given that a sizeable majority of British Languishites don't like it and would be happy to see it repealed, I predict that'll never happen, might was well be written in stone.  <_<
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

Monoriu

#39
Quote from: Valmy on February 06, 2015, 11:02:38 AM
It was the 11th hour and the British Empire couldn't even do the right thing in its dying lurch.  Disappointing.  Hong Kong had been a loyal colony for over a century, it was the least they could do for them.

Actually, Thatcher did grant "the right to live in the UK" to a small number of HKers.  The rich, professionals, civil servants, people with ties with the UK etc.  Like 150,000 people out of 6 million.  Among them were my wife's parents  :bowler:

Admiral Yi

Quote from: Sheilbh on February 06, 2015, 06:24:49 PM
Other colonial subjects had citizenship. That's why West Indian migration in the 40s and 50s was such a big issue. It was very difficult to square the principles of 'Empire' with the unpopularity of tens of thousands of black West Indians arriving.

By the 70s we didn't have many colonies or dependant territories left.

Any West Indian that requests citizenship gets it?  Still now?

Sheilbh

#41
Quote from: Admiral Yi on February 06, 2015, 07:27:40 PM

Any West Indian that requests citizenship gets it?  Still now?
No, but when they were subjects of the British Empire. The governments in the 40s and the 50s had huge issues finding a way of restricting West Indian immigration in a way that wouldn't just institute a colour bar, which would go against the principle of being a British subject.

As independence increased the issue was how to deal with Commonwealth citizenship which was more manageable.

Edit: It was also a big issue of race relations as West Indians and other immigrants who'd been taught that they were British subjects were very quickly told by the British population that they weren't, that they were foreign and racially other. I think we've mostly moved on.
Let's bomb Russia!

Admiral Yi

Did Africans get the same terms as West Indians?

Sheilbh

Quote from: Admiral Yi on February 06, 2015, 08:04:36 PM
Did Africans get the same terms as West Indians?
I don't think so because they mostly had a legally different status than the West Indies (protectorates v crown colonies and dominions?). I think it's the same distinction that fucked the people of Hong Kong.
Let's bomb Russia!

Monoriu

We only really asked for it after Tian An Men.  The demand actually wasn't citizenship, but right of abode.  Like citizenship minus the vote.