News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

US Budget Simulator

Started by jimmy olsen, June 29, 2014, 10:27:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jimmy olsen

Under my enlightened rule the US debt will decrease to 60% of GDP by 2028.

Though I will note that had there been an option I would have increased the number of ships in the navy. Of course, I would also have cut farm subsidies if that had been an option.

http://crfb.org/stabilizethedebt/#


Savings Relative to Current Law = $2.47 Trillion
QuoteChoose Your Path
Afghanistan

Eliminate War Funding After 2021 -$820B
Fully Repeal the Sequester $1,040B

Alter the Sustainable Growth Rate
Adopt Medicare Payment Advisory Commission Recommendations $100B

Defense, Diplomacy & Security

Cancel the Ground Combat Vehicle and Defer Development of the Long-Range Bomber -$50B
Maintain Current Army Levels $130B


Domestic Social & Economic Spending
Restart the NASA Moon Mission and Create a Moon Colony $250B
Enact Increased Transportation Funding $100B


Social Security
Include All New State and Local Workers -$90B

Health Care
Establish a Public Option in the Health Exchanges -$220B
Modernize Cost Sharing for Medicare -$160B
Require Manufacturers to Pay a Minimum Drug Rebate for Medicare Low-Income Beneficiaries -$170B
Enact Medical Malpractice Reform -$70B
Bundle Payments for Inpatient and Post-Acute Care -$70B
Replace Traditional Medicare with Premium Support -$380B

Revenue
Raise Tax Rates on Capital Gains and Dividends -$60B
Increase Excise Taxes on Alcohol -$80B
Impose a Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee -$70B
Restore 2009 Estate Tax Parameters -$150B
Enact Carbon Tax or Cap-and-Trade -$450B
Impose a 5.4% Surtax on Income Above $1 Million -$550B
Enact the Buffett Rule -$90B

Raise Social Security Payroll Tax Cap
Raise Cap to Cover 90% of Earnings -$550B

Tax Expenditures
Eliminate LIFO Accounting and Oil and Gas Preferences -$170B
Expand the EITC and Child Tax Credit $110B
Extend American Opportunity Tax Credit $80B
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

Ideologue

Does it let you go to an all-nuclear military and nationalize banks?

QuoteImpose a 5.4% Surtax on Income Above $1 Million -$550B

Ooh.  I'd buy that for a dollar.
Kinemalogue
Current reviews: The 'Burbs (9/10); Gremlins 2: The New Batch (9/10); John Wick: Chapter 2 (9/10); A Cure For Wellness (4/10)

Monoriu

I think the goals are far too modest.  You should not just aim to reduce the deficit.  The real goal is to generate a fiscal surplus, repay all the debt, then use the surplus to set up an investment fund, and use the proceeds of the fund to generate additional recurrent income.  That's what we do in HK. 

Siege

Quote from: Ideologue on June 29, 2014, 10:28:55 PM
Does it let you go to an all-nuclear military and nationalize banks?

QuoteImpose a 5.4% Surtax on Income Above $1 Million -$550B

Ooh.  I'd buy that for a dollar.

Why would you want to nationalize banks?
Since when have that aided the economy?


"All men are created equal, then some become infantry."

"Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't."

"Laissez faire et laissez passer, le monde va de lui même!"


The Brain

Quote from: Siege on June 29, 2014, 10:57:49 PM
Quote from: Ideologue on June 29, 2014, 10:28:55 PM
Does it let you go to an all-nuclear military and nationalize banks?

QuoteImpose a 5.4% Surtax on Income Above $1 Million -$550B

Ooh.  I'd buy that for a dollar.

Why would you want to nationalize banks?
Since when have that aided the economy?

It's the Jews, stupid.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Eddie Teach

To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

Razgovory

Quote from: Siege on June 29, 2014, 10:57:49 PM
Quote from: Ideologue on June 29, 2014, 10:28:55 PM
Does it let you go to an all-nuclear military and nationalize banks?

QuoteImpose a 5.4% Surtax on Income Above $1 Million -$550B

Ooh.  I'd buy that for a dollar.

Why would you want to nationalize banks?
Since when have that aided the economy?

1913
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

jimmy olsen

Quote from: Siege on June 29, 2014, 10:57:49 PM
Quote from: Ideologue on June 29, 2014, 10:28:55 PM
Does it let you go to an all-nuclear military and nationalize banks?

QuoteImpose a 5.4% Surtax on Income Above $1 Million -$550B

Ooh.  I'd buy that for a dollar.

Why would you want to nationalize banks?
Since when have that aided the economy?
Nobody said anything about nationalizing the banks.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

Darth Wagtaros

Quote from: jimmy olsen on June 30, 2014, 03:24:04 AM
Quote from: Siege on June 29, 2014, 10:57:49 PM
Quote from: Ideologue on June 29, 2014, 10:28:55 PM
Does it let you go to an all-nuclear military and nationalize banks?

QuoteImpose a 5.4% Surtax on Income Above $1 Million -$550B

Ooh.  I'd buy that for a dollar.

Why would you want to nationalize banks?
Since when have that aided the economy?
Nobody said anything about nationalizing the banks.
Ides did.
PDH!

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: Monoriu on June 29, 2014, 10:39:28 PM
I think the goals are far too modest.  You should not just aim to reduce the deficit.  The real goal is to generate a fiscal surplus, repay all the debt, then use the surplus to set up an investment fund, and use the proceeds of the fund to generate additional recurrent income.  That's what we do in HK.

Why would you want the government to do that?
Think for a moment what what happen if every country's government did the same thing.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

celedhring

Moreover, every country in the world should run a trade surplus.

Admiral Yi

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on June 30, 2014, 09:53:34 AM
Why would you want the government to do that?

Presumably to finance the retirement of an aging population.  Another use for a sovereign wealth fund  is to distribute natural resource wealth across generations.

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: Admiral Yi on June 30, 2014, 10:18:06 AM
Presumably to finance the retirement of an aging population.

Assuming that the government is assuming primary responsible for pensions, perhaps. But then why have 401k, etc. in the tax code?

QuoteAnother use for a sovereign wealth fund  is to distribute natural resource wealth across generations.

Yes.  But only an issue for a few countries.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

Admiral Yi

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on June 30, 2014, 10:29:57 AM
Assuming that the government is assuming primary responsible for pensions, perhaps. But then why have 401k, etc. in the tax code?

It still makes sense if the government has  any responsibility at all for pensions.

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: Admiral Yi on June 30, 2014, 10:32:25 AM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on June 30, 2014, 10:29:57 AM
Assuming that the government is assuming primary responsible for pensions, perhaps. But then why have 401k, etc. in the tax code?

It still makes sense if the government has  any responsibility at all for pensions.

That would only be true if one thinks that the government will be more effective in investing the surplus funds. Otherwise it would be a better idea to distribute the money back for the general population to invest and rely on higher path growth rates to finance the pension obligation.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson