The Mystery of Missing Malaysia Airlines 370

[Caliga]

It's entering James Bond like territory.

If the plane turned south after west and headed out into the Indian Ocean it looks like it may have been within range of: Diego Garcia 

[lustindarkness]

It's entering James Bond like territory.

If the plane turned south after west and headed out into the Indian Ocean it looks like it may have been within range of: Diego Garcia 

You better not be accusing the seabees we have there.

[Caliga]

As can be plainly seen from my emoticons, I was accusing three ninjas, a guy in a Tommy helmet, and a rabbi.

[Phillip V]

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/16/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-flight.html

[Grinning_Colossus]

The Australian Jindalee radar network would have picked up a large jet heading south (they can supposedly detect a cessna taking off in Jakarta). The Chinese would also have picked it up if it entered their airspace, but they'd be much less likely to tell anyone about it. It's looking more and more likely that it went toward Turkestan.

[alfred russel]

I know that there is a lot that doesn't make much sense, but would the two most likely outcomes be:

--there was an attempted hijacking, that led to transponders being turned off and the aircraft reoriented, but for whatever reason (perhaps due to a fight) the cockpit was incapacitated and the plane flew on a straight line into the Indian Ocean and crashed,

or

--the plane was hijacked and made a run for the south of Africa or the islands off the east african coast.

If that blip in the Indian Ocean is accurate, I can't imagine a flight path taking it around India or Pakistan without anyone noticing. Plus there are so many military assets around and off the coast of the horn of africa I figure the same.

[jimmy olsen]

Wouldn't most of India's military assets be in the West near Pakistan? Would it be possible to fly through eastern Indian and then cross the Himalayas and take advantage of the mountains to avoid detection?

[jimmy olsen]

I find the laxness of the Indians in particular to be staggering!

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/15/us-malaysia-airlines-defence-idUSBREA2E0JT20140315

Malaysian plane saga highlights air defense gaps

By Peter Apps and Frank Jack Daniel

LONDON/NEW DELHI Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:20pm EDT

(Reuters) - Whatever truly happened to missing Malaysian Airlines flight MH370, its apparently unchallenged wanderings through Asian skies point to major gaps in regional - and perhaps wider - air defenses.

More than a decade after al Qaeda hijackers turned airliners into weapons on September 11, 2001, a large commercial aircraft completely devoid of stealth features appeared to vanish with relative ease.

On Saturday, Malaysia's Prime Minister Najib Razak said authorities now believed the Boeing 777 flew for nearly seven hours after disappearing early on March 8. Either its crew or someone else on the plane disabled the on-board transponder civilian air traffic radar used to track it, investigators believe.

It appears to have first flown back across the South China Sea - an area of considerable geopolitical tension and military activity - before overflying northern Malaysia and then heading out towards India without any alarm being raised.

The reality, analysts and officials say, is that much of the airspace over water - and in many cases over land - lacks sophisticated or properly monitored radar coverage.

Analysts say the gaps in Southeast Asia's air defenses are likely to be mirrored in other parts of the developing world, and may be much greater in areas with considerably lower geopolitical tensions.

"Several nations will be embarrassed by how easy it is to trespass their airspace," said Air Vice Marshal Michael Harwood, a retired British Royal Air Force pilot and ex-defense attache to Washington DC. "Too many movies and Predator (unmanned military drone) feeds from Afghanistan have suckered people into thinking we know everything and see everything. You get what you pay for. And the world, by and large, does not pay."

"TOO EXPENSIVE"

Air traffic systems rely almost entirely on on-board transponders to detect and monitor aircraft. In this case, those systems appear to have been deactivated around the time the aircraft crossed from Malaysian to Vietnamese responsibility.

At the very least, the incident looks set to spark calls to make it impossible for those on board an aircraft to turn off its transponders and disappear.

Military systems, meanwhile, are often limited in their own coverage or just ignore aircraft they believe are on regular commercial flights. In some cases, they are simply switched off except during training and when a threat is expected.

That, one senior Indian official said, might explain why the Boeing 777 was not detected by installations on India's Andaman and Nicobar Islands, an archipelago which its planes were searching on Friday and Saturday, or elsewhere.

"We have many radar systems operating in this area, but nothing was picked up," Rear Admiral Sudhir Pillai, chief of staff of India's Andamans and Nicobar Command, told Reuters. "It's possible that the military radars were switched off as we operate on an 'as required' basis."

Separately, a defense source said that India did not keep its radar facilities operational at all times because of cost. Asked what the reason was, the source said: "Too expensive."

"SOMEONE ELSE'S PROBLEM"

Worries over revealing defense capabilities, some believe, may have slowed cooperation in the search for flight MH370, particularly between Malaysia and China. Beijing has poured military resources into the search, announcing it was deploying 10 surveillance satellites and multiple ships and aircraft. It has been critical of Malaysia's response.

While Malaysian military radar does appear to have detected the aircraft, there appear to have been no attempts to challenge it - or, indeed, any realization anything was amiss.

That apparent oversight, current and former officials and analysts say, is surprising. But the incident, they say, points to the relatively large gaps in global air surveillance and the limits of some military radar systems.

"It's hard to tell exactly why they did not notice it," says Elizabeth Quintana, senior research fellow for air power at the Royal United Services Institute in London. "It may have been that the aircraft was flying at low level or that the military operators were looking for other threats such as fast jets and felt that airliners were someone else's problem."

Current and former officials say that - hopefully, at least - such an incident would be detected much faster in North American or European airspace. There, military and civilian controllers monitor radar continuously on alert for possible hijacks or intruders.

The sudden failure of a transponder, they say, would itself prove a likely and dramatic cause for concern.

"I can't think of many situations in which one would actually need to switch them off," said one former Western official on condition of anonymity.

U.S. and NATO jets periodically scramble to intercept unidentified aircraft approaching their airspace, including a growing number of Russian long-range bombers.

In some other areas, it is simply not seen as worth maintaining a high level of alert - or radar coverage itself may not even exist.

"NOTHING MUCH HAPPENS AT NIGHT"

Investigators now say they believe MH370 may have turned either towards India and Central Asia or - perhaps more likely, given the lack of detection - taken a southern course towards the Antarctic. That would have been an effectively suicidal flight, the aircraft eventually running out of fuel and crashing.

The waters of the southern Indian Ocean and northern Southern Ocean are among the most remote on the planet, used by few ships and overflown by few aircraft.

Australian civilian radar extends only some 200 km (125 miles) from its coast, an Australian official said on condition of anonymity, although its air defense radar extends much further. Australia's military could not be reached for comment on Saturday and if it did detect a transponder-less aircraft heading south, there is no suggestion any alarm was raised.

U.S. military satellites monitor much of the globe, including some of the remotest oceans, looking primarily for early warning of any ballistic missile launch from a submarine or other vessel.

After the aircraft's initial disappearance a week ago, U.S. officials said their satellites had detected no signs of a mid-air explosion. It is unclear if such systems would have detected a crash landing in the southern Indian Ocean.

On India's Andaman Islands, a defense official told reporters he saw nothing unusual or out of place in the lack of permanent radar coverage. The threat in the area, he said, was much lower than on India's border with Pakistan where sophisticated radars are manned and online continuously.

At night in particular, he said, "nothing much happens".

"We have our radars, we use them, we train with them, but it's not a place where we have (much) to watch out for," he said. "My take is that this is a pretty peaceful place."

[Grinning_Colossus]

Well, you know... Indonesia isn't about to launch an air raid on Madras, and if any country can make the argument that the money could be better spent elsewhere, it's India.

[jimmy olsen]

Well, you know... Indonesia isn't about to launch an air raid on Madras, and if any country can make the argument that the money could be better spent elsewhere, it's India.

They have an unstable neighbor armed with nuclear weapons.

[Grinning_Colossus]

I doubt that they turn off their radar stations on the Pakistani border. 

[alfred russel]

Wouldn't most of India's military assets be in the West near Pakistan? Would it be possible to fly through eastern Indian and then cross the Himalayas and take advantage of the mountains to avoid detection?

I really have no idea about any of this stuff, but if the plane flew on a straight line through the himalayas from where it is on that map it would go through a huge chunk of india. Sort of the heart of the country. Also, how do you use the mountains to avoid detection? Fly between them? That doesn't seem plausible for a 777,

[grumbler]

Also, how do you use the mountains to avoid detection? Fly between them? That doesn't seem plausible for a 777,

Mountains return radar signals, and so create a lot of something called "ground return."  To get rid of it, operators disable returns from the lower lobes of the air search radar in that sector of the radar scan.  Anything flying low enough to stay in lose lower lobes won't be detected, even if they are (somewhat) above the height of the mountains.

The better argument against is the one you point out: how does the plane cross these densely-populated areas at altitudes low enough to avoid radar detection by civilian air traffic control radars and yet not be detected from the ground?  A commercial airliner at a coupla thousand feet is pretty noticeable, by noise if nothing else.

[Caliga]

I like this theory I saw on a blog:

I believe the two iranians on false passports hijacked the plane, turned off all tracking devices and flew at low altitude to a remote part of the pakistan/iran/afganistan area and landed the plane there. I believe they intend to use the plane as a weapon in the future. The plane easily had enough fuel to get to Iran. They carry at least 10% more fuel that what is required to reach the intended destination for safety reasons.... Also - The Iranian who purchased the two tickets was supposedly called Ali Kazam - which in my opinion is cryptic for alakazam - which basically means the same as abracadabra - in other words, they are playing with us saying he is a magician pulling off a feat of magic cunning or pulling the wool over our eyes

[The Brain]

About as solid as evolution.