News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Sports infrastructures and public funding?

Started by viper37, December 12, 2013, 02:30:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Should public funding be used for professional sports?

I think it's a great idea, sports teams offers value to any city
4 (16%)
Yes, but only for infrastructures (racetrack, stadium, arena, etc)
9 (36%)
No, under no circumstances
10 (40%)
I have no opinion
2 (8%)

Total Members Voted: 25

Voting closed: January 11, 2014, 02:30:40 PM

jimmy olsen

Quote from: viper37 on December 12, 2013, 02:30:40 PM

Besides, baseball is about the worst of the major sports franchise out there.  Wages are totally out of control, teams keep shuffling to where public funds are, and thanks to Jeffrey Loria, baseball popularity sank to a new low in the last years of the Expos.  I seriously doubt it can be revived enough to fill a 60 000 places stadium.
Most baseball stadiums today only usually have like 45,000 people.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

viper37

Quote from: derspiess on December 12, 2013, 05:01:11 PM
Quote from: viper37 on December 12, 2013, 03:59:31 PM
Quote from: derspiess on December 12, 2013, 03:29:57 PM
I don't like it, but it's the way things are these days. 
what you mean is that your Republican principles will go away to fund something you happen to like? :)

Not really.  It's just something cities or counties have to do in order to stay competitive these days.
So. any subsidy to any corporate entity for wich goal, as determined by a political party, is to increase the competitivity of the city or county is legitimate in your eyes?

Isn't that dangerously close to socialism?

If your government tells you health care insurance is a necessity to be competitive with the rest of the world, will you buy it?
I don't do meditation.  I drink alcohol to relax, like normal people.

If Microsoft Excel decided to stop working overnight, the world would practically end.

dps

Quote from: Tyr on December 12, 2013, 08:52:33 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on December 12, 2013, 08:50:41 PM
So you want them to do a cost/benefit, and for the benefit they put in however much they want.  :hmm:
I'm not a civil servant. I have no idea how important they think it is. They would have ways of justifying a number however.

The cost part is relatively easy (though a lot of government-funded projects end up running over budget), but the benefits really can only be calculated accurately in retrospect--beforehand, the financial benefits are basically a matter of the assumptions of whoever is doing the analaysis.  At best, it's a guess;  at worst, it's a reflection of someone's biases.

The Minsky Moment

Neil, Yi:

Neil's question is to the point.  Yes - competing leagues can be formed, but that is an enormous entry commitment because the new league most start off the bat with multiple franchises in multiple cities all offerring competitive talent.  In the present economic environment for sports it is probably an impossibility.   Note that no effort to form a competing league in major US sports has even got off the planning stage since the early 1980s.

What might be possible would be to form a new team in single city and then seek schedule games with regional rivals, even if on a exhibition basis.  But league rules prohibit that and the antitrust exemption prevents challenge under the Sherman Act as a restraint of trade.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

The Brain

America is incredibly Socialist about sports.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Admiral Yi

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on December 13, 2013, 01:15:27 PM
What might be possible would be to form a new team in single city and then seek schedule games with regional rivals, even if on a exhibition basis.  But league rules prohibit that and the antitrust exemption prevents challenge under the Sherman Act as a restraint of trade.

This doesn't sound like a stupendous advantage.

derspiess

Quote from: viper37 on December 12, 2013, 11:40:00 PM
So. any subsidy to any corporate entity for wich goal, as determined by a political party, is to increase the competitivity of the city or county is legitimate in your eyes?

No.

QuoteIsn't that dangerously close to socialism?

Not really.  Crony capitalism, maybe

QuoteIf your government tells you health care insurance is a necessity to be competitive with the rest of the world, will you buy it?

No.
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

Razgovory

It's only socialism if it goes to people that you don't like.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

viper37

Quote from: derspiess on December 13, 2013, 02:43:47 PM
Quote from: viper37 on December 12, 2013, 11:40:00 PM
So. any subsidy to any corporate entity for wich goal, as determined by a political party, is to increase the competitivity of the city or county is legitimate in your eyes?

No.

QuoteIsn't that dangerously close to socialism?

Not really.  Crony capitalism, maybe

QuoteIf your government tells you health care insurance is a necessity to be competitive with the rest of the world, will you buy it?

No.

Then it's only about sports.  If it's really about the economic value of the project, anything could be financed.
I don't do meditation.  I drink alcohol to relax, like normal people.

If Microsoft Excel decided to stop working overnight, the world would practically end.

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: Admiral Yi on December 13, 2013, 02:36:32 PM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on December 13, 2013, 01:15:27 PM
What might be possible would be to form a new team in single city and then seek schedule games with regional rivals, even if on a exhibition basis.  But league rules prohibit that and the antitrust exemption prevents challenge under the Sherman Act as a restraint of trade.

This doesn't sound like a stupendous advantage.

It's enormous. 
The ability to use contract to control league scheduling it what makes exclusive leagues possible.
If you look at the early history of baseball, the creation and strict enforcement of contractual scheduling rules by the centralized league authority is what made the initial major league monopoly possible.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

derspiess

Quote from: viper37 on December 13, 2013, 02:57:57 PM
Then it's only about sports.

Well yeah, professional sports is sort of a special case for me. 

QuoteIf it's really about the economic value of the project, anything could be financed.

I wasn't just talking about economics.  It's a part of the equation.  But for me having professional sports teams make a city more livable.
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

DGuller

Quote from: Admiral Yi on December 13, 2013, 02:36:32 PM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on December 13, 2013, 01:15:27 PM
What might be possible would be to form a new team in single city and then seek schedule games with regional rivals, even if on a exhibition basis.  But league rules prohibit that and the antitrust exemption prevents challenge under the Sherman Act as a restraint of trade.

This doesn't sound like a stupendous advantage.
:huh: That sounds like a humongous advantage, and I don't know anything about baseball.  There is a network effect in play here:  the value of the team is non-existent unless it has someone credible to play with.

Admiral Yi

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on December 13, 2013, 04:37:02 PM
It's enormous. 
The ability to use contract to control league scheduling it what makes exclusive leagues possible.
If you look at the early history of baseball, the creation and strict enforcement of contractual scheduling rules by the centralized league authority is what made the initial major league monopoly possible.

I guess I just don't see the huge profits to be gained by defecting from the cartel and scheduling a game against the Birmingham Stallions.  Who would want to watch that?

grumbler

Quote from: Admiral Yi on December 13, 2013, 05:07:14 PM
I guess I just don't see the huge profits to be gained by defecting from the cartel and scheduling a game against the Birmingham Stallions.  Who would want to watch that?
According to some, like author John U. Bacon, college football players are worth millions to their schools. Hire a team of them, and make the millions for yourself.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!