DNA Sequencing Megathread! Neanderthals, Denisovans and other ancient DNA!

Started by jimmy olsen, November 03, 2013, 07:07:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

mongers

Quote from: Malthus on March 01, 2018, 02:25:47 PM
Quote from: grumbler on March 01, 2018, 02:01:25 PM
What's really interesting is that "the builders of Stonehenge" had to have been both groups of people, as the Beaker People replaced the Neolithic farmers in this scenario.  It's curious that the style of the place remained so consistent through a pretty complete turnover of builders.

Stonehenge seems to have been "built" over a very long period of time - with stones added on, taken away, moved. The original "Stonehenge" looked nothing like what it does today ... though I'm not sure exactly when in the building sequence the Beaker People came onto the scene, or whether it was associated with any particular stylistic variation: it could be that they were responsible for "Stonehenge III", when the big stones were erected. 

So it may be the case, depending on the dating, that the Beaker People built the "Stonehenge" we are familiar with - on the site of the earlier structures to be sure, incorporating some of their elements, but not all that similar to them ("Stonehenge II" was in fact built largely of wood; "Stonehenge I" was basically a ditch and a raised embankment, with some mysterious holes that could have had either timbers or stones).

In addition, its function may have changed. The "original" Stonehenge(s) was built by tribes with very little social stratification (evidenced in part by mass interment in ossuaries) and the "henge" may have been associated with their funerary rites; by contrast, the later "henge" was surrounded by individual barrows, with rich grave goods (indicating a high level of social stratification).

A plausible theory, though of course far from proven, is that the site gained a reputation for sanctity that later peoples sought to take advantage of, by building on the exact same spot, even if their religions weren't the same - maybe deliberately as a sign of dominance (there are lots of examples of this - for example, the Al Asqua Mosque built on the location of the Temple of Jerusalem).

Thank you an excellent, well laid out post and as you say, changes in the treatment of the dead is a key element in understanding the place. And for want of a better word, the rich ritual landscape around the stones highlights the importance of not just concentrating on the stones themselves.

You point about the possible later intentional domination of a site by another culture is interesting. Nearby is another possible example of this, between one hill fort and old Sarum (on the southern edge of the Stonehenge ritual landscape) is an area of Cranborne Chase littered with neolithic and later features, be those a cursus, long barrows, henges or bronze age burials/barrows.
Later the Romans build a road between these two hill forts and made a considerable effort to make the road noticeable more substantial as it crossed this ancient landscape, imagine a 'brand new' embanked Roman road crossing through and in some cases obliterating possibly still important religious / ritual sites and the message they might have been sending to the local inhabitants?   

As it is the Roman road soon fell into disuse, as it served relatively unimportant locations, but perhaps by then the point had been made?

"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

Caliga

Quote from: Admiral Yi on March 01, 2018, 05:53:09 PM
Maybe you've got some black Irish in you?
As in we are both connected via Celtiberian ancestry?  If that's what you meant the connection is way more recent (likely no later than the 1700s) to just be shared ancient ancestry.

If you mean the legend that some Irish people are descended from survivors of the Spanish Armada, I think that's been discredited, but maybe I'm wrong about that.
0 Ed Anger Disapproval Points

PDH

Quote from: Caliga on March 01, 2018, 09:06:25 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on March 01, 2018, 05:53:09 PM
Maybe you've got some black Irish in you?
As in we are both connected via Celtiberian ancestry?  If that's what you meant the connection is way more recent (likely no later than the 1700s) to just be shared ancient ancestry.

If you mean the legend that some Irish people are descended from survivors of the Spanish Armada, I think that's been discredited, but maybe I'm wrong about that.

The Spanish did get around in the Early Modern Period.  Maybe one was a mailman in the town where some ancestors lived?
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth.
-Umberto Eco

-------
"I'm pretty sure my level of depression has nothing to do with how much of a fucking asshole you are."

-CdM

Ed Anger

Stay Alive...Let the Man Drive

Admiral Yi

Quote from: Caliga on March 01, 2018, 09:06:25 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on March 01, 2018, 05:53:09 PM
Maybe you've got some black Irish in you?
As in we are both connected via Celtiberian ancestry?  If that's what you meant the connection is way more recent (likely no later than the 1700s) to just be shared ancient ancestry.

If you mean the legend that some Irish people are descended from survivors of the Spanish Armada, I think that's been discredited, but maybe I'm wrong about that.

Are you sure that if the point of chromosonal similarity is the 1700s there is no possibility that the family tree diverged earlier?  Fairly serious question.

derspiess

Quote from: Caliga on March 01, 2018, 02:40:11 PM
A guy who lives in Jaen, Spain contacted me via 23andme.  The end of our first chromosomes are identical indicating we are related.  Strange, since he is an ethnic Spaniard back as far as his geneaology research has taken him, and I have absolutely no documented Spanish ancestry.  23andme estimates we share a set of fourth great grandparents.  So, um yeah.  We are trying to figure out how we could possibly be relatives now. :hmm:  I wonder what the chances are that we just randomly matched on the stub of that chromosome?

That's pretty cool.  I just have a bunch of annoying Texans trying to contact me because OMG we're like 4th cousins and stuff.
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

Valmy

Quote from: derspiess on March 02, 2018, 09:43:07 AM
That's pretty cool.  I just have a bunch of annoying Texans trying to contact me because OMG we're like 4th cousins and stuff.

You never return my calls :weep:
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Eddie Teach

To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

jimmy olsen

Since this thread also has a lot of posts about geneology, I thought I'd put this here.

Click to see photos and maps.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/a-little-girl-in-toronto-lost-to-history-and-nowfound/article38198028/
Quote

A little girl in Toronto lost to history – and now found

Sleuthing public records puts a name to poignant image by Toronto's first official photographer

On May 15, 1913, the photographer Arthur Goss chronicled impoverished conditions in St. John's Ward, including this photo, of a girl standing beside a tumbled down house with the old city hall in the background, has fascinated for years. Using an old street map, assessment records and a genealogy service, she has been identified as Dorothy Cooperman, born in Kiev around 1902, died in Michigan in 1979.

On May 15, 1913, the photographer Arthur Goss chronicled impoverished conditions in St. John's Ward, including this photo, of a girl standing beside a tumbled down house with the old city hall in the background.

CHRIS BATEMAN

Special to The Globe and Mail 
Published March 2, 2018

Updated 1 day ago

The girl in the photo is facing the camera. She's wearing gloves, stout shoes and a long, button-up winter coat that reaches almost to her ankles. Her dark hair is tied back neatly.

She may be dressed smartly, but she is surrounded by terrible poverty. There's a pile of scrap wood and a run-down outdoor toilet to her left. The stucco of the house behind her is falling off, exposing the wood frame. The window behind her is covered by sheets.

Taken May 15, 1913, by Arthur Goss, the City of Toronto's first official photographer, the picture was part of a series examining living conditions in St. John's Ward, a densely populated and now largely vanished neighbourhood bordered by College, Queen and Yonge streets and University Avenue.

Known simply as the Ward, it was home to about 11,000 people in 1913, many of them new immigrants living in crowded tenements and rented rooms. A large number of Ward properties lacked running water, heating and proper sanitation, but newcomers could often afford little else.

Mr. Goss didn't record the girl's name, but her photo has since become well known. The juxtaposition of her surroundings with the towering, ornate presence of Old City Hall in the background tells a powerful story about struggle and inequality. If we could identify her, using details from the photo and its context, what else could we learn about the experience of newcomers to Canada in the early 20th century?

With Charles Hastings, the city's medical officer of health, Mr. Goss systematically documented the poorest parts of Toronto in the 1910s. In 1911, the pair published a landmark report that stunned civic officials, who had long ignored the poverty on their doorstep.

"The people of Toronto are living in a fool's paradise," Mr. Hastings told the Toronto Daily Star. "It is a common saying that half the world does not know how the other half lives. The truth is that one half not only does not know but does not want to know."

One type of housing Mr. Hastings singled out for criticism was "rear houses" – homes off the main street grid, accessible only by laneways. It was outside one of these that the girl in the winter coat was photographed.

The day the picture was taken was unseasonably cold – about 6 C – and overcast. Mr. Goss's sequential numbering of his negatives tells us he probably visited in the morning. The girl actually appears in two photos – the one by herself and another at the rear of the same row of houses with a younger boy.

Looking carefully, she appears to be about 10 or 11. The boy could be a brother. Judging by his height relative to her, he's about six or seven, which puts their years of birth at about 1903 and 1906, respectively.

Fixing the girl's precise location on a fire insurance map of Toronto printed in 1913 yields the first clues to her identity. There was a row of three wood-framed rear houses on the block immediately west of Old City Hall that year. The girl is standing roughly in the middle of lot 33, which contained about seven other homes.

The 1913 city directory unfortunately does not include the row of houses, because of their position off the street grid. Neither does the 1911 census of Elizabeth Street, conducted two years before Mr. Goss's picture was taken.

But the 1914 tax assessment record (made in 1913) yields an exciting breakthrough. It lists three properties at the rear of 21 Elizabeth St. The first is inhabited by a Louis Rudneck, a 25-year-old tailor who is a little too young to have a 10-year-old daughter. Next door is peddler Moses Steinberg, 64, who is probably too old. The third house is occupied by Morris Cooperman, a clothing presser.

The girl actually appears in two photos – the one by herself and another at the rear of the same row of houses with a younger boy, possibly a brother.

He gives his age as 30, making him about 20 when the girl in the photo would have been born.

Turning back to the 1911 census, the same Morris Cooperman is listed at the rear of 134 Centre Ave., which is now part of the Hospital for Sick Children site.

Unlike the tax assessment, which only records the (often male) head of the household, the census provides a complete list of the people at each house. In 1911, Mr. Cooperman was accompanied on Centre Avenue by his wife, Bessie, and five children: Jennie, 11, Dora, 9, David, 4, Sarah, 2, and Ida, 1. All but the three youngest were born in Russia. They give their religion as Jewish.

Dora – Dorothy – would have been 11 when Mr. Goss visited in 1913. David would have been six. Given their location and ages, these are almost certainly the children in the photographs.

Looking again at the picture of Dora alone, a mother and child can be seen in the far background – Bessie with Sarah or Ida, perhaps.

The life of Dorothy Cooperman suddenly comes into focus on the genealogy site Ancestry. A user related to the Coopermans through an in-law has sketched the key moments in Dorothy's life, from her birth in Kiev (then part of the Russian Empire) to her marriage, the births of her children and her death in 1979 in Oak Park, Mich., a suburb of Detroit.

After the Goss photo, according to the user, the Coopermans left Canada. Dorothy married Louis Statfield in Wayne, Mich., in 1921. A daughter, Ethel, followed in 1922. They would ventually have five kids together, one who passed away as recently as June, 2017.

The trajectory of the Cooperman family mirrors that of many immigrants to North America in the 1900s: Struggle and hardship that slowly softens as the generations pass. Thousands of Jews like them migrated from Russia in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, fleeing anti-Semitic violence and poverty. In Toronto, Mr. Cooperman, like many others, found work in the garment industry, but clearly struggled to make ends meet for his young family. Perhaps he believed Detroit offered more opportunities. That Dora remained there the rest of her life is evidence of that.

If we could magically fast forward through time, leaving the young Dora in her place in the photo, she would see the houses behind her quickly vanish – condemned and razed in the aftermath of Mr. Hastings and Mr. Goss's report.

From 1914 to the late 1950s, she would find herself standing behind one of the largest vaudeville theatres in the world, Shea's Hippodrome. Maybe, if she listened carefully, she could hear performances by Buster Keaton, Stan Laurel or the Marx Brothers through the walls.

The Hippodrome would come down with the rest of the block in 1956, replaced with a massive parking lot. A new City Hall would rise to her right, while the old one behind her would be threatened with and later saved from demolition.

In 2018, she would find herself in the middle of Nathan Phillips Square. The rectangular reflecting pool follows almost exactly the boundaries of the city lot that contained the Coopermans' house.

Left standing, their home would be under the pool's concrete arches, in the multicoloured glow of the Toronto sign, bathed in light.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

katmai

Quote from: Caliga on February 12, 2018, 12:57:30 PM


Also, 23andme thinks I am more British than German.  WRONG!
I got the same with results that came back today.  :ph34r:
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son

Tonitrus


Eddie Teach

Quote from: katmai on March 18, 2018, 07:39:55 PM
Quote from: Caliga on February 12, 2018, 12:57:30 PM


Also, 23andme thinks I am more British than German.  WRONG!
I got the same with results that came back today.  :ph34r:

Katmai: As Mexican as Mitt Romney
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

KRonn

Quote from: jimmy olsen on March 04, 2018, 07:35:38 PM
Since this thread also has a lot of posts about geneology, I thought I'd put this here.

Click to see photos and maps.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/a-little-girl-in-toronto-lost-to-history-and-nowfound/article38198028/

Interesting story here of how researchers were able to find the identity of the girl and her family, all the way from the early 1900s.

katmai

Quote from: Eddie Teach on March 19, 2018, 01:27:23 AM
Quote from: katmai on March 18, 2018, 07:39:55 PM
Quote from: Caliga on February 12, 2018, 12:57:30 PM


Also, 23andme thinks I am more British than German.  WRONG!
I got the same with results that came back today.  :ph34r:

Katmai: As Mexican as Mitt Romney
hmmm, think a bit more than that.
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son

Grinning_Colossus

Quis futuit ipsos fututores?