How long should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get behind bars?

Started by merithyn, July 10, 2013, 02:40:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Assuming he's found guilty *coughs*, how long should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get?

American - Death penalty
American - Life w/o parole
American - Life with possibility of parole
American - > 30 years, but not life
American - < 30 years
ROTW - Death penalty
ROTW - Life w/o parole
ROTW - Life with possibility of parole
ROTW - > 30 years, but not life
ROTW - < 30 years
Other - Share with the class, please

grumbler

Quote from: Martinus on May 16, 2015, 07:58:03 AM
Which one is emotional?

Sorry, don't have time to hand-hold the slower students while class is still in session.  See me after class for help working out which argument is based on emotion.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

alfred russel

Quote from: Martinus on May 16, 2015, 07:58:03 AM
Which one is emotional?

grumbler hasn't felt an emotion since seeing Alaric and the goths sack Rome. That killed his ability to feel emotions, though to be honest he had been emotionally stunted while surviving the destruction of the Roman fleet in a storm during the First Punic War. So many good men lost.

Since then he is like data in Star Trek, only able to guess what an emotion truly is.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle.

I'm embarrassed. I've been making the mistake of associating with you. It won't happen again. :)
-garbon, February 23, 2014

lustindarkness

Quote from: grumbler on May 16, 2015, 10:25:03 AM
Quote from: Martinus on May 16, 2015, 07:58:03 AM
Which one is emotional?

Sorry, don't have time to hand-hold the slower students while class is still in session.  See me after class for help working out which argument is based on emotion.

I watched a short film recently that started like that. The student, a young male is struggling with class. The teacher, a middle age female offers to help him after class. He does some work for extra credit. It was in a up and coming artist short film website, pornhub.
Grand Duke of Lurkdom

Neil

Isn't that old 'Killing them will just make them martyrs' thing the sort of thing that villains say in movies and TV as an excuse not to kill the heroes so that they can escape, regroup and then win?

If your argument is being used by Cobra Commander, you might want to take a second look at it.
I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.

celedhring

I'm against the DP on principle, and that's why I'd rather this man not be killed, but I don't get the "martyr" objection. It's not like muslim terrorists seem to have much trouble finding something to get riled about and try to kill us.

Martinus

Quote from: grumbler on May 16, 2015, 10:25:03 AM
Quote from: Martinus on May 16, 2015, 07:58:03 AM
Which one is emotional?

Sorry, don't have time to hand-hold the slower students while class is still in session.  See me after class for help working out which argument is based on emotion.

None of his posts seems to be based on emotion, so I am going to conclude that, as usual, you are talking out of your ass.

Eddie Teach

To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

grumbler

Quote from: celedhring on May 16, 2015, 12:15:44 PM
I'm against the DP on principle, and that's why I'd rather this man not be killed, but I don't get the "martyr" objection. It's not like muslim terrorists seem to have much trouble finding something to get riled about and try to kill us.

Being against the DP on principal is fine.  Saying that it is "fundamentally wrong for the state to put people to death" is emo.  Personally, I oppose the DP because I don't trust bureaucrats to properly implement it (yes, that argument could be used for imprisonment as well, but at least the latter is a recoverable error). 

The martyr objection is a valid one, I think.  I don't think that it is strong enough to overcome the benefits to the survivors and relatives of the victim of having justice served, but it certainly is a consideration.  Existing Muslim terrorists don't need martyrs, perhaps, but having martyrs helps recruiting.  It also helps motivate potential terrorists to go down fighting rather than surrender.  As I say, that's not strong enough IMO to counter the benefits of executing the guy, but it should be considered.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

grumbler

Quote from: Martinus on May 16, 2015, 02:24:19 PM
Quote from: grumbler on May 16, 2015, 10:25:03 AM
Quote from: Martinus on May 16, 2015, 07:58:03 AM
Which one is emotional?

Sorry, don't have time to hand-hold the slower students while class is still in session.  See me after class for help working out which argument is based on emotion.

None of his posts seems to be based on emotion, so I am going to conclude that, as usual, you are talking out of your ass.

That's okay by me.  I don't give a rat's ass what you conclude.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

dps

I say, the more terrorists we turn into martyrs, the better.

Razgovory

I think Grumbler is mistaking principle for emotion.  Whether or not he will be executed doesn't really matter much.  It'll just cost more.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Martinus

Quote from: Razgovory on May 16, 2015, 09:03:29 PM
I think Grumbler is mistaking principle for emotion.

Yeah, pretty much. Then again, he is devoid of both.

grumbler

Quote from: Martinus on May 17, 2015, 01:14:33 AM
Quote from: Razgovory on May 16, 2015, 09:03:29 PM
I think Grumbler is mistaking principle for emotion.

Yeah, pretty much. Then again, he is devoid of both.

Ooh!  A dogpile!  When Grallon joins, we will have the hat trick!
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

Barrister

I don't know if the "only making them martyrs" matches our experience 14+ years into the War on Terror.

As far as I can tell the dead terrorists aren't causing us any trouble.  No one seems to be venerating OBL these days.  It's the living ones that are causing problems - The Khalid Sheikh Mohammeds, the Omar Khadrs.  By being alive they continue to generate attention and to be a cause celebre.

Look, if one is morally opposed to the death penalty then I get that.  That's a moral discussion one can have.

But if you're going to accept that the state does have the ability to put someone to death, if you don't use that penalty on Tsarnaev I'm not sure when you ever would use that power.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

Zanza

I found it strange that they could just decide to try him under federal laws, apparently mainly so they can even go for the death penalty in Massachusetts and then pick a jury that is obviously not representative of the state as they excluded all those that are opposed to the death penalty, which is probably a sizeable proportion. I guess all of that is perfectly legal under American law, but it feels a bit like deliberately picking a jury to get a certain result instead of using what I would assume is the standard procedure for murder trials in Massachusetts.