Alabama Kidnapper Threatened to Kill Schoolchildren

Started by garbon, February 04, 2013, 11:20:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ed Anger

Stay Alive...Let the Man Drive

lustindarkness

Grand Duke of Lurkdom

DGuller


CountDeMoney

Quote from: DGuller on February 04, 2013, 08:21:00 PM
I guess they took my idea. :smarty:

Gassing them like a Chechnyan Ladies' Auxiliary Bridge Club?  No, I don't think they did.

Ed Anger

Stay Alive...Let the Man Drive

DGuller

Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 04, 2013, 08:42:50 PM
Quote from: DGuller on February 04, 2013, 08:21:00 PM
I guess they took my idea. :smarty:

Gassing them like a Chechnyan Ladies' Auxiliary Bridge Club?  No, I don't think they did.
Putting a hidden camera through the chute, silly.

Ed Anger

Stay Alive...Let the Man Drive

CountDeMoney

Quote from: DGuller on February 04, 2013, 08:48:48 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 04, 2013, 08:42:50 PM
Quote from: DGuller on February 04, 2013, 08:21:00 PM
I guess they took my idea. :smarty:

Gassing them like a Chechnyan Ladies' Auxiliary Bridge Club?  No, I don't think they did.
Putting a hidden camera through the chute, silly.

That's not a contingency plan.

DGuller


grumbler

Quote from: OttoVonBismarck on February 04, 2013, 06:23:02 PM
Actually CdM simply said you do not always have a contingency plan, he didn't say there was no contingency plan in this scenario. What he said was you wouldn't have a contingency plan if someone was in a reinforced underground bunker that couldn't easily be breached. I've seen no pictures or descriptions of this bunker. It could have had a door that any tactical team could blow through in seconds, or he could have rigged something that collapsed large amounts of earth over the entrance after going inside and the only real access would have been a long digging operation. He could have piled a half ton of sand bags behind the door, he could have piled a half ton of sand bags in front of the door and been monitoring the entrance. In those scenarios there's no way you get in without him knowing well in advance, and that means dead kid--and in such a scenario CdM is pretty much right. You may not have any contingency plan.

DG stated that "Of course you try to talk him out, that's done in every situation like that.  However, what you also have in every situation is a contingency plan to end the standoff forcefully if talking it out doesn't work."  That's exactly what happened, contrary to Seedy's argument that DG was watching too much TV.

The argument that you don't have a contingency plan if a contingency plan is difficult is also false, from my experience.  The contingency plan might not be one you look forward to implementing, and it may have a low probability of success, but you always prepare one (or, at least, I always did, and every competent commander and staff I knew always did, as well).  Standing around with your thumb up your ass because the problem is difficult was never an option in any organization I was a member of or led.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

Caliga

Quote from: grumbler on February 05, 2013, 07:44:15 AM
Standing around with your thumb up your ass because the problem is difficult was never an option in any organization I was a member of or led.
Were you ever in a union? :)
0 Ed Anger Disapproval Points

Grey Fox

So, was the camera in the toy car or one of the color pens?
Colonel Caliga is Awesome.

OttoVonBismarck

DG said you have a contingency plan in every situation, CdM said not necessarily every situation. "Exactly what happened" doesn't apply here, because DG made a universal claim and this is just one incident.

CountDeMoney

You're not going to win this one, Otto.  Once grumbler's got his jaw locked onto something, can't pry it off with a crowbar.   :D