Jury: Samsung owes Apple one BILLION dollars

[Admiral Yi]

I'm conflicted here.  Should I side with the dirty foreigners, or the company that makes products for pretentious idiots?

How about judging the case on the merits?

[Neil]

I'm conflicted here.  Should I side with the dirty foreigners, or the company that makes products for pretentious idiots?

How about judging the case on the merits?

Because the case has no merits?

[Razgovory]

I'm conflicted here.  Should I side with the dirty foreigners, or the company that makes products for pretentious idiots?

How about judging the case on the merits?

I don't understand them.

[DontSayBanana]

I'm conflicted here.  Should I side with the dirty foreigners, or the company that makes products for pretentious idiots?

...in DirtyForeignerLand.  There's no real optimal solution here.

But yeah, it sounds like Apple's really stuck themselves out there.  Haven't leafed through anything formal yet, but it sounds like there's a good chance they'll not only lose an appeal by Samsung, but also lose a bunch of voided patents as well.

[Eddie Teach]

Fuck Apple.

[jimmy olsen]

Here is what the juror actually said to CNET:

'After we debated that first patent — what was prior art — because we had a hard time believing there was no prior art, that there wasn't something out there before Apple. In fact we skipped that one so we could go on faster. It was bogging us down

Shouldn't that be grounds for a mistrial?

[Barrister]

I'm conflicted here.  Should I side with the dirty foreigners, or the company that makes products for pretentious idiots?

...in DirtyForeignerLand.  There's no real optimal solution here.

But yeah, it sounds like Apple's really stuck themselves out there.  Haven't leafed through anything formal yet, but it sounds like there's a good chance they'll not only lose an appeal by Samsung, but also lose a bunch of voided patents as well.

Having lost at trial, I really have to disagree with "there's a good chance".

[Martinus]

Also, how in the world did this case end up being heard in Silicon Valley?

This is where the internet is located.

[Martinus]

Here is what the juror actually said to CNET:

'After we debated that first patent — what was prior art — because we had a hard time believing there was no prior art, that there wasn't something out there before Apple. In fact we skipped that one so we could go on faster. It was bogging us down

Shouldn't that be grounds for a mistrial?

I don't think so - unless having stupid, ignorant people on the jury is the grounds for mistrial. But then you should abolish popular juries altogether.

[Solmyr]

[Syt]

"Finally new buckets!"
Apple employees happy: the billions from Samsung arrive!

[Admiral Yi]

 

[Martinus]

Germans should stick to what they do best (heavy industry and genocide) and leave humour to other nations.

[Syt]

Like I'll accept judgment on what is funny and what isn't from a Pole. Or a supposed lawyer.

[Eddie Teach]

Like I'll accept judgment on what is funny and what isn't from a Pole. Or a supposed lawyer.

Poles and lawyers have lots of experience being involved in the telling of jokes.