News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

LOL, Wine law fun

Started by Ed Anger, January 03, 2010, 03:48:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

dps

Quote from: Viking on January 04, 2010, 10:19:10 AM
The Australians get called raciss when they limit people to buying only one sixpack or one bottle of wine/spirits per day.

What's the point?  Australians don't actually buy anything;  they just steal what they want.



;)

Malthus

I assume the purpose is not to regulate personal consumption, but rather importing/wholesaling hiding as personal consumption. 
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane—Marcus Aurelius

derspiess

Quote from: Malthus on January 04, 2010, 12:54:18 PM
importing/wholesaling hiding as personal consumption. 

Do people do that?  Is it profitable?  :unsure:
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

Malthus

Quote from: derspiess on January 04, 2010, 01:40:01 PM
Quote from: Malthus on January 04, 2010, 12:54:18 PM
importing/wholesaling hiding as personal consumption. 

Do people do that?  Is it profitable?  :unsure:

If there is a major price differential caused by tax or other local policies, I imagine it would be.

High taxation of booze is notorious. If taxes were higher in one state than another, one could easily make money importing directly from the manufacturer for "personal consumption" and then selling, if purchases for personal consumption were taxed at point of purchase.

Point is that attempting to tax such under the counter sales may be impossible (as is any attempt to count the number of bottles one buys per year). The real target is the seller/importer, as any large shipment is now in and of itself an offense.

I imagine this just makes it a bit harder, rather than making it impossible. 
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane—Marcus Aurelius

derspiess

Quote from: Malthus on January 04, 2010, 02:52:11 PM
High taxation of booze is notorious. If taxes were higher in one state than another, one could easily make money importing directly from the manufacturer for "personal consumption" and then selling, if purchases for personal consumption were taxed at point of purchase.

Selling to whom?
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall