News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Victoria 2

Started by Liep, August 19, 2009, 02:04:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Caliga

CAL'S TWO CENTS

1.  If Johan is going to make posts like that one, someone needs to kindly ask him from refraining from posting at all, aside from announcing new patches.

2.  Nice to see OHGamer is still a pile of dog shit. :)
0 Ed Anger Disapproval Points

grumbler

It is rather astonishing how thoroughly Paradox has managed to squander the enormous good will they had accumulated with their early releases.  Up through HoI2, I pretty much bought everything they made, knowing that (1) they would fix any problems, and (2) that their design philosophy was enough like my playing philosophy that even a somewhat broken game would still be fun.

Nowadays, I view them with considerable suspicion, both o the grounds that I don't know if they will fix broken games, and I don't know if the design will be fun even if they do.  I got EU3 complete on sale, and that's been it.

That's quite a change.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

Josquius

Remember when languish had a rule about not slagging off paradox forum folk? :D
██████
██████
██████

Caliga

Quote from: Tyr on December 14, 2009, 08:09:40 AM
Remember when languish had a rule about not slagging off paradox forum folk? :D
:huh:
0 Ed Anger Disapproval Points

Josephus

Quote from: Tyr on December 14, 2009, 08:09:40 AM
Remember when languish had a rule about not slagging off paradox forum folk? :D

That's a bit like the church making  a rule to not slag homos. :lmfao: :lmfao:
Civis Romanus Sum<br /><br />"My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world." Jack Layton 1950-2011

Jaron

I recall we had a rule about not criticizing paradox mods or their decisions a long time ago. I think the reasoning was we didnt want this to become the forum people ran to and complain when they got banned. Whoever was admin at the time wanted good relations with Paradox and didnt want this place to become another tomatocow or something.
Winner of THE grumbler point.

Valmy

Quote from: Tyr on December 14, 2009, 08:09:40 AM
Remember when languish had a rule about not slagging off paradox forum folk? :D

It made sense at the time.  Now only a minority of the people here still care about Paradox or their games if they ever did.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Caliga

Oh wait, yes that does sound familiar.  :blush:
0 Ed Anger Disapproval Points

Ed Anger

Stay Alive...Let the Man Drive

Vricklund

Quote from: Josephus on December 13, 2009, 04:23:06 PM
Quote from: Barrister on December 13, 2009, 04:13:22 PM
I'll agree that "because I said so" is poor public relations, as is banning discussion of a game mechanic.

That being said I could care less what one particular POP is called.  In particular if the concern is that it might seem out of place in an ahistorical 19th century communist state I couldn't give one wet fart.

Sometimes the proper response from a game company *is* to simple ignore what a few hardcore fans demand.

Agreed in principle. That said, we're talking about one line of programming code to make the game a bit more realistic. The whinger is right. If Nation=Secular than Clerics=Scholars.

So simple even an arts major can do :-)
I don't care what they call it. In old Victoria the base ideology of your clergy pops was socialist in nations with equity as national value. No one seemed to mind then and I don't think any mod ever "fixed" it. The whole issue is obviously blown out of proportion. But then again, it wouldn't be the paradox forum if it wasn't.

The map is still ugly though. :)

Razgovory

Quote from: Jaron on December 14, 2009, 08:48:50 AM
I recall we had a rule about not criticizing paradox mods or their decisions a long time ago. I think the reasoning was we didnt want this to become the forum people ran to and complain when they got banned. Whoever was admin at the time wanted good relations with Paradox and didnt want this place to become another tomatocow or something.

Thank God for that.

I've stuck with Paradox longer then most.  I actually enjoy EUIII, but I honestly can't see anything good coming from a remake of a game that didn't work right after another game that doesn't work.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

jimmy olsen

Quote from: Vricklund on December 14, 2009, 09:03:10 AM
Quote from: Josephus on December 13, 2009, 04:23:06 PM
Quote from: Barrister on December 13, 2009, 04:13:22 PM
I'll agree that "because I said so" is poor public relations, as is banning discussion of a game mechanic.

That being said I could care less what one particular POP is called.  In particular if the concern is that it might seem out of place in an ahistorical 19th century communist state I couldn't give one wet fart.

Sometimes the proper response from a game company *is* to simple ignore what a few hardcore fans demand.

Agreed in principle. That said, we're talking about one line of programming code to make the game a bit more realistic. The whinger is right. If Nation=Secular than Clerics=Scholars.

So simple even an arts major can do :-)
I don't care what they call it. In old Victoria the base ideology of your clergy pops was socialist in nations with equity as national value. No one seemed to mind then and I don't think any mod ever "fixed" it. The whole issue is obviously blown out of proportion. But then again, it wouldn't be the paradox forum if it wasn't.

The map is still ugly though. :)
There were Christian Socialists that were quite far to the left economically, it's not implausible that their thinking could have gained a bigger following. Atheist Marxist clergy is something else though.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

jimmy olsen

Quote from: Razgovory on December 14, 2009, 09:05:00 AM
Quote from: Jaron on December 14, 2009, 08:48:50 AM
I recall we had a rule about not criticizing paradox mods or their decisions a long time ago. I think the reasoning was we didnt want this to become the forum people ran to and complain when they got banned. Whoever was admin at the time wanted good relations with Paradox and didnt want this place to become another tomatocow or something.

Thank God for that.

I've stuck with Paradox longer then most.  I actually enjoy EUIII, but I honestly can't see anything good coming from a remake of a game that didn't work right after another game that doesn't work.
I really like Victoria, I guess I'm in the minority.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

PDH

Quote from: jimmy olsen on December 14, 2009, 10:20:05 AM
I really like Victoria, I guess I'm in the minority.
You are a dirty 'Rican
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth.
-Umberto Eco

-------
"I'm pretty sure my level of depression has nothing to do with how much of a fucking asshole you are."

-CdM

Syt

Quote from: grumbler on December 14, 2009, 08:06:55 AM
It is rather astonishing how thoroughly Paradox has managed to squander the enormous good will they had accumulated with their early releases.  Up through HoI2, I pretty much bought everything they made, knowing that (1) they would fix any problems, and (2) that their design philosophy was enough like my playing philosophy that even a somewhat broken game would still be fun.

Nowadays, I view them with considerable suspicion, both o the grounds that I don't know if they will fix broken games, and I don't know if the design will be fun even if they do.  I got EU3 complete on sale, and that's been it.

That's quite a change.

I have to agree, though it took me longer to come around (EU:Rome). While it used to be a given that P'dox games were dodgy at release but would be fixed quickly, it's now a given to wait for an expansion or two and their patches. The attitude displayed by the devs doesn't help much, either.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.