The Shooting Gallery: Police Violence MEGATHREAD

[CountDeMoney]

lol, Polish lawyers.


Marti's just enamored with the concept of racist Southern living, what with such fabulous gowns and matching parasols.  Oh, lace gloves!  I do declare! :flutter:

[mongers]

lol, Polish lawyers.


Marti's just enamored with the concept of racist Southern living, what with such fabulous gowns and matching parasols.  Oh, lace gloves!  I do declare! :flutter:

All he needs to do now is start pushing 2nd right to bear arms stuff, oh and buy a porsche.

[Razgovory]

And my position is simply: if you want to protest something, there are hundreds of more worthy causes than the police shooting an armed violent convict.

11B4whatever is right to call you out on this.  The fact is irrelevant, and it's unlikely the police even knew about it.  Now the choice to shoot may have been correct, I don't know.  If the man was indeed waving a firearm and constituted a danger to the public then the police may not have had a choice.  But prior convictions don't come into this.

[Berkut]

Incidentally, it's always interesting that every time the American public freaks out over police shooting, it turns out in the end that the victim is not so innocent as people originally thought.

Yeah, like that Tamir Rice convict.

[Berkut]

Incidentally, it's always interesting that every time the American public freaks out over police shooting, it turns out in the end that the victim is not so innocent as people originally thought.

Yeah, like that Tamir Rice convict.

Of course, then there was this felon and convict that people freaked out over who the police shot 5 times in the head and chest:



I mean, he was a 6 year old autistic first grader, but certainly not nearly as innocent as he looks.

[Malthus]

I mean, he was a 6 year old autistic first grader, but certainly not nearly as innocent as he looks.

Would you trust him with your Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles action figures? 

[Berkut]

Wow, Marty sure got quiet all of a sudden...

[mongers]

And my position is simply: if you want to protest something, there are hundreds of more worthy causes than the police shooting an armed violent convict.

11B4whatever is right to call you out on this.  The fact is irrelevant, and it's unlikely the police even knew about it.  Now the choice to shoot may have been correct, I don't know.  If the man was indeed waving a firearm and constituted a danger to the public then the police may not have had a choice. But prior convictions don't come into this.

I think this notion will have Marty stumped.

[CountDeMoney]

'I'm going to hit him': Dash-cam video shows officers tried to run over man before shooting him 14 times

This one has audio, so he can hear all 14 shots in their semi-automatic MAGAZINE-emptying wonder. 

[Syt]

'I'm going to hit him': Dash-cam video shows officers tried to run over man before shooting him 14 times

This one has audio, so he can hear all 14 shots in their semi-automatic MAGAZINE-emptying wonder.

"F— this guy," the officer says before aiming his police cruiser at the mentally ill homeless man that he and his partner had been sent out to confront. "I"m going to hit him."

"Okay, go for it. Go for it," his partner responds

Dafuq?

[garbon]

[CountDeMoney]

Hey, you can't have law and order without law and order.

[Razgovory]

Jesus Christ.

[Valmy]

Ok surely those guys will be sent to prison right?

[DGuller]

Maybe they were afraid someone else would steal the kill from them.