News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

The future of the work force

Started by CountDeMoney, July 16, 2013, 05:09:17 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Admiral Yi

Did you address unemployment and stagnating wages?  I can't tell what you're trying to say in that middle paragraph.

MadImmortalMan

If our national firm can print, then why should it do anything else? I don't get that bit.
"Stability is destabilizing." --Hyman Minsky

"Complacency can be a self-denying prophecy."
"We have nothing to fear but lack of fear itself." --Larry Summers

Admiral Yi

Quote from: MadImmortalMan on July 16, 2013, 10:24:25 PM
If our national firm can print, then why should it do anything else? I don't get that bit.

I believe Ide is referring to the ability of independent central banks to inflate away national debts.

Ideologue

It's Europe big problem.  The other problem being idled capacity.

As for the unemployment, there would be a idle class.  They'd live, if not tremendously well, but in some comfort.

Indeed, this would be as important to capitalism as it would be to a centrally planned economy, cf. Milton Freidman.  In both cases, it liberalizes the labor market, in the sense that it frees potential workers from the biological necessity of a wage.  As a side benefit, wages would have to remain competitive with doing nothing.

We already have an idled class.  It'll only get larger.  Time to embrace it.

Working should always be the superior choice, but not the only choice.  Failure to perform adequately would have much the same consequences as present, eventually resulting in permanently being removed from the labor market.  The difference is that this transition would not be as potentially catastrophic, and marginal labor market participants could give up with more dignity instead of depressing wages for people who don't suck.
Kinemalogue
Current reviews: The 'Burbs (9/10); Gremlins 2: The New Batch (9/10); John Wick: Chapter 2 (9/10); A Cure For Wellness (4/10)

Admiral Yi

OK, so 40 million people on permanent disability.

How about stagnating wages?  How does your centrally planned economy take care of that?

Josquius

In Europe its the liberal countries which are running into trouble.
The socialist north is doing pretty well.
██████
██████
██████

Admiral Yi

Quote from: Tyr on July 17, 2013, 01:04:49 AM
In Europe its the liberal countries which are running into trouble.
The socialist north is doing pretty well.

:huh:

You're talking about madcap libertarian Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal?

Valmy

Quote from: Admiral Yi on July 16, 2013, 06:36:09 PM
There are a few workers' paradises left in the world that one could probably emigrate to if one wished.

Sweden being in the European Union certainly makes that possibility greater...true.

But of course one would have to tolerate the weather and always night winters and obnoxious accents.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Valmy

Quote from: Admiral Yi on July 17, 2013, 01:16:47 AM
Quote from: Tyr on July 17, 2013, 01:04:49 AM
In Europe its the liberal countries which are running into trouble.
The socialist north is doing pretty well.

:huh:

You're talking about madcap libertarian Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal?

I think he is talking about Britain and friends.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

The Brain

Quote from: Valmy on July 17, 2013, 08:15:13 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on July 16, 2013, 06:36:09 PM
There are a few workers' paradises left in the world that one could probably emigrate to if one wished.

Sweden being in the European Union certainly makes that possibility greater...true.

But of course one would have to tolerate the weather and always night winters and obnoxious accents.

Which accents might that be?
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Barrister

Quote from: The Brain on July 17, 2013, 08:18:12 AM
Quote from: Valmy on July 17, 2013, 08:15:13 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on July 16, 2013, 06:36:09 PM
There are a few workers' paradises left in the world that one could probably emigrate to if one wished.

Sweden being in the European Union certainly makes that possibility greater...true.

But of course one would have to tolerate the weather and always night winters and obnoxious accents.

Which accents might that be?

Come on - even as a native Swede you must get annoyed by the constant "bork bork bork!" refrain.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

crazy canuck

Quote from: alfred russel on July 16, 2013, 09:09:03 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on July 16, 2013, 05:38:36 PM
Yeah, people needed servants before the invention of washing machines etc because it was hard long work to get the household chores done.

Those once hard to do tasks are as simple as pushing a button now.

To an extent, but I would like to have a team of people to cater to my families needs and keep my affairs in order.

Yes but there is a difference between want and need.  If it took 6 hours a day to do the laundry you and I would for sure be hiring some domestic help to do it otherwise it would not get done.  But with modern appliances domestic services are a luxury because we can do those chores easily ourselves and so we choose to spend our money on other things.

That is why I brought up the point of minimum wage laws.  The utility of domestic help in today's world would never be the same as it was back in the day when domestic servants were common.

garbon

Quote from: crazy canuck on July 17, 2013, 10:46:33 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on July 16, 2013, 09:09:03 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on July 16, 2013, 05:38:36 PM
Yeah, people needed servants before the invention of washing machines etc because it was hard long work to get the household chores done.

Those once hard to do tasks are as simple as pushing a button now.

To an extent, but I would like to have a team of people to cater to my families needs and keep my affairs in order.

Yes but there is a difference between want and need.  If it took 6 hours a day to do the laundry you and I would for sure be hiring some domestic help to do it otherwise it would not get done.  But with modern appliances domestic services are a luxury because we can do those chores easily ourselves and so we choose to spend our money on other things.

That is why I brought up the point of minimum wage laws.  The utility of domestic help in today's world would never be the same as it was back in the day when domestic servants were common.

Maybe though I can tell you that if I had to spend the roughly 2-3 hours at the laundromat doing my own laundry, it also wouldn't get done. That's why I have my guy downstairs who takes care of it.
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

alfred russel

Quote from: crazy canuck on July 17, 2013, 10:46:33 AM
Yes but there is a difference between want and need.  If it took 6 hours a day to do the laundry you and I would for sure be hiring some domestic help to do it otherwise it would not get done.  But with modern appliances domestic services are a luxury because we can do those chores easily ourselves and so we choose to spend our money on other things.

That is why I brought up the point of minimum wage laws.  The utility of domestic help in today's world would never be the same as it was back in the day when domestic servants were common.

So you agree there is the demand, the question is why isn't there the supply?

I would be willing to pay subsistence level wages (ie, minimum wage) to a couple of quality people in order to take care of ordinary day to day tasks (grocery shopping, driving, cooking, routine tasks such as basic banking, childcare, etc). The problem is that such quality people can not be hired for such low wages and be expected to stick around for any length of time. Such quality people have other opportunities that pay more and are more interesting.

That isn't true in much of the modern world--better opportunities for quality people often do not exist. Thus in many developing countries  it is still common for normal people to have full time domestic help. This type of situation would happen before we ended up with some dystopian level of permanent unemployed.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle.

I'm embarrassed. I've been making the mistake of associating with you. It won't happen again. :)
-garbon, February 23, 2014

crazy canuck

Quote from: alfred russel on July 17, 2013, 12:44:33 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on July 17, 2013, 10:46:33 AM
Yes but there is a difference between want and need.  If it took 6 hours a day to do the laundry you and I would for sure be hiring some domestic help to do it otherwise it would not get done.  But with modern appliances domestic services are a luxury because we can do those chores easily ourselves and so we choose to spend our money on other things.

That is why I brought up the point of minimum wage laws.  The utility of domestic help in today's world would never be the same as it was back in the day when domestic servants were common.

So you agree there is the demand, the question is why isn't there the supply?

How did you get my agreement that there is a demand out of that  :huh:   Nobody in their right mind would spend money on that kind of luxury item when there are so many more pressing demands on household income.