Quote from: Tonitrus on October 11, 2025, 10:16:27 AMAnd, of course, sex.
Quote from: Tamas on October 10, 2025, 12:29:54 PMQuote from: garbon on October 10, 2025, 09:02:29 AMQuote from: DGuller on October 10, 2025, 08:58:53 AMI wanted to read the news articles to find out more about this year's Nobel Peace Prize winner. One thing I learned about her is that she's not Trump. Still going through them to see if I can learn anything else.
I am very confused by the oh wow it wasn't Trump angle.
It is incredible how much everyone is under this guy's spell. As if there was even the remotest chance that a destructive aggressive asshole would get it.
Quote from: Duque de Bragança on October 11, 2025, 02:32:46 PMDiane Keaton, 79.
RIP
Quote from: grumbler on October 11, 2025, 11:42:30 AMQuote from: DGuller on October 11, 2025, 11:33:59 AMQuote from: grumbler on October 11, 2025, 10:53:56 AMQuoting can be misleading as well if done out of context. That's especially so for incoherent or rambling people who may require a very large context window for their quotes to be interpreted as intended.Quote from: Tonitrus on October 11, 2025, 10:11:49 AMI believe his "argument" was again being more about Tylenol than the circumcision itself...so that is kind of a mix of RFK nuttery and misleading reporting.
His statement was a direct one about circumcision, and an indirect one about Tylenol. The reporting is quoting him and so not misleading.
I am not sure what point you are making here. What do you believe RFK Jr intended us to take from his statement, and how can you tell that that is what he intended?
Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.