Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: CountDeMoney on January 17, 2013, 11:15:47 PM

Poll
Question: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Option 1: Arnold votes: 13
Option 2: Sly votes: 10
Option 3: Bruce votes: 0
Title: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: CountDeMoney on January 17, 2013, 11:15:47 PM
All three have new movies coming out in the upcoming weeks, and all of them are showing some severe mileage on the tires.

Who looks his age the most?  Who doesn't?
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: katmai on January 17, 2013, 11:23:09 PM
Arnie or Sly.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: Razgovory on January 17, 2013, 11:29:45 PM
I'm going Arnie.  Politics has not been kind to him.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: Syt on January 17, 2013, 11:48:56 PM
Arnie, but he has nothing on Seagal.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.fd.uproxx.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fsteven-seagal-kimono-bluesman.jpg&hash=4d6dc0f9c81f90e4b18548135439cf92f5056bb2)
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: Josquius on January 18, 2013, 12:11:35 AM
Stallone would be the obvious initial answer....but consider he looked pretty worse for wear even back in the early 80s.
:hmm:
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: jimmy olsen on January 18, 2013, 12:24:16 AM
Quote from: Tyr on January 18, 2013, 12:11:35 AM
Stallone would be the obvious initial answer....but consider he looked pretty worse for wear even back in the early 80s.
:hmm:
Dude's incredibly jacked for a 66 year old man though, even taking into account the HGH and whatever else he's on.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: Martinus on January 18, 2013, 02:23:40 AM
Other:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Finanutshell.ca%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F01%2FMel-Gibson-Golden-Globes.jpg&hash=23132b8d453b87acfc9569f7a6a6ee0ef0f65306)
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: Maladict on January 18, 2013, 04:17:45 AM
Arnie. He looked and moved around like a geriatric in Expendables 2.
On a related note: give me back my 2 hrs and 10 euros  <_<
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: Phillip V on January 18, 2013, 05:27:59 AM
Need some recent comparison pictures.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: Brazen on January 18, 2013, 06:45:00 AM
Me :weep:

Bruce looks the same as ever, especially since he took the real man's approach to balding. Still got a mouth like a dog's arsehole though.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: merithyn on January 18, 2013, 09:44:50 AM
Quote from: Phillip V on January 18, 2013, 05:27:59 AM
Need some recent comparison pictures.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fm1.menly.fr%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F01%2FArnold-Schwarzenegger-Bruce-Willis.jpg&hash=ed33be4ecf1c08dad281638bf134a35c6b9f0fbd)
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: PDH on January 18, 2013, 09:47:45 AM
I'm not doing all that great as of late.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: Valmy on January 18, 2013, 09:53:34 AM
Frankly I think I would have been shocked in the 80s to know those guys would still be looking that decent in 30 years.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: sbr on January 18, 2013, 11:16:08 AM
Bruce still looks alright and the most natural (at least in Meri's picture).

Arnie looks like the plastic surgeon might have pulled just a touch too hard, though nothing compared to Bruce Jenner.

Sly looked better after the first 15 round with Apollo Creed.  What the hell happened to him?
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 18, 2013, 11:17:59 AM
Quote from: sbr on January 18, 2013, 11:16:08 AM
Sly looked better after the first 15 round with Apollo Creed.  What the hell happened to him?

36 years.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: Razgovory on January 18, 2013, 11:23:40 AM
Quote from: Syt on January 17, 2013, 11:48:56 PM
Arnie, but he has nothing on Seagal.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.fd.uproxx.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fsteven-seagal-kimono-bluesman.jpg&hash=4d6dc0f9c81f90e4b18548135439cf92f5056bb2)

Yikes.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: derspiess on January 18, 2013, 11:25:37 AM
Will Sasso's Seagal impersonation on MADTV was always great.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: jimmy olsen on January 18, 2013, 12:26:43 PM
Need shots of the biceps to compare, Arnold and Sly ain't famous for their faces.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: crazy canuck on January 18, 2013, 01:17:04 PM
Quote from: Maladict on January 18, 2013, 04:17:45 AM
Arnie. He looked and moved around like a geriatric in Expendables 2.
On a related note: give me back my 2 hrs and 10 euros  <_<

I had the misfortune of starting to watch that on the flight back from Australia. Thankfully I could change movies...
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 18, 2013, 01:47:48 PM
Dunno what you were expecting then.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: crazy canuck on January 18, 2013, 01:55:03 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 18, 2013, 01:47:48 PM
Dunno what you were expecting then.

I was expecting an action movie.  What I got in the beginning was some decent Jet Li action, then he drops out of a plane and apparantly exists the movie - cut to the worst dialogue in the history of even action movies.  At which point the replacement movie was found.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 18, 2013, 02:11:26 PM
If you're expecting an action movie, it delivers. If you're expecting decent dialogue, you probably didn't see the first one.  :hmm:

Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: CountDeMoney on January 18, 2013, 02:17:49 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on January 18, 2013, 12:26:43 PM
Need shots of the biceps to compare, Arnold and Sly ain't famous for their faces.

Depends on whether or not Arnold's had his bicep implants removed yet.  I know he got rid of his calf implants years ago.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: lustindarkness on January 18, 2013, 02:28:56 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 18, 2013, 02:17:49 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on January 18, 2013, 12:26:43 PM
Need shots of the biceps to compare, Arnold and Sly ain't famous for their faces.

Depends on whether or not Arnold's had his bicep implants removed yet.  I know he got rid of his calf implants years ago.
Huh? I know I am mostly out of the loop in most things, but I had never heard that before. Bicep implants?
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: The Brain on January 18, 2013, 02:30:12 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 18, 2013, 02:17:49 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on January 18, 2013, 12:26:43 PM
Need shots of the biceps to compare, Arnold and Sly ain't famous for their faces.

Depends on whether or not Arnold's had his bicep implants removed yet.  I know he got rid of his calf implants years ago.

Calf implants are so not hott.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: CountDeMoney on January 18, 2013, 02:34:30 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on January 18, 2013, 02:28:56 PM
Huh? I know I am mostly out of the loop in most things, but I had never heard that before. Bicep implants?

Been a rumor about him for years;  plastic implants placed under the muscle add definition.

http://bodybuildingimplants.com/bicep_implants/index.html

Shit's been around since the 70s, man.
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: crazy canuck on January 18, 2013, 02:47:08 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 18, 2013, 02:11:26 PM
If you're expecting an action movie, it delivers. If you're expecting decent dialogue, you probably didn't see the first one.  :hmm:

An action movie should not make an attempt at dialogue  :P
Title: Re: Who's looking the worse for wear?
Post by: merithyn on January 18, 2013, 09:55:53 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on January 18, 2013, 02:47:08 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 18, 2013, 02:11:26 PM
If you're expecting an action movie, it delivers. If you're expecting decent dialogue, you probably didn't see the first one.  :hmm:

An action movie should not make an attempt at dialogue  :P

Ahem. Die Hard? :contract: