Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 10:41:11 AM

Title: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 10:41:11 AM
I just think it's important that we note that yesterday was the anniversary of the last dreadnought gun duel.  They finally got their fleet battle, and they fell victim to the crossing of the T.

Poor Japanese.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 10:41:55 AM
Every day is Swordfish Day.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 10:45:31 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 10:41:55 AM
Every day is Swordfish Day.
That's not even a little bit true.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 10:46:55 AM
Here, have a ring bayonet.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Viking on October 26, 2012, 11:21:38 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 10:46:55 AM
Here, have a ring bayonet.

:yeah:
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 11:33:43 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 10:46:55 AM
Here, have a ring bayonet.
Hopefully President Romney will downsize your citizenship.  That would create some shareholder value.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 11:37:45 AM
I'm white.  My citizenship is enshrined.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 11:39:40 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 11:37:45 AM
I'm white.  My citizenship is enshrined.
That's what you said about your job, too.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 11:40:55 AM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2Fb%2Fb5%2FFuso_Trial_Heading_Left.jpg%2F300px-Fuso_Trial_Heading_Left.jpg&hash=a2a9dca8b9de5d09d57d6215ab004e0e80043869)
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 11:41:21 AM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 11:39:40 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 11:37:45 AM
I'm white.  My citizenship is enshrined.
That's what you said about your job, too.

No, I didn't.  Nobody's job is safe in America, unless it's at the DMV.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 11:42:28 AM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aircraft-list.com%2Fkeywords%2FFairey_Swordfish%2FFairey_Swordfish_43.jpg&hash=2a6c040f275c65adf7f5d8f6ddc0ef6b22adfe06)

(https://lh3.ggpht.com/_1ByBUxFWGqI/TI5y7exSlII/AAAAAAAAAHw/KacyNtzz1Wg/s1600/taranto1.jpg)
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Viking on October 26, 2012, 11:54:24 AM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.zgapa.pl%2Fzgapedia%2Fdata_pictures%2F_uploads_wiki%2Fh%2FHohenfriedeberg.Attack.of.Prussian.Infantry.1745.jpg&hash=547daaabdcc1d8f3ac3cde5ef9bc106a1b9d1afe)
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 11:54:53 AM
Those are Italian dreadnoughts.  That's like arguing that the US is less advanced than Saudi Arabia based on Mississippi.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Viking on October 26, 2012, 12:10:59 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 11:54:53 AM
Those are Italian dreadnoughts.  That's like arguing that the US is less advanced than Saudi Arabia based on Mississippi.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fhotelshawaii.travel%2Fwiki%2Fimages%2Fc%2Fc0%2FJapanese_attack_Pearl_Harbour%2C_Dec.7%2C_1941.jpg&hash=e500ccf9948bfe979c74bde6bf85671c2fb2512e)

Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 12:36:54 PM
Another attack at anchor.  The aircraft seems to be only a useful weapon against a warship that isn't underway, or perhaps if you have massive numbers of aircraft.  Either way, the dreadnought is probably a more efficient use of materiel.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Fireblade on October 26, 2012, 12:40:21 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 12:36:54 PM
Another attack at anchor.  The aircraft seems to be only a useful weapon against a warship that isn't underway, or perhaps if you have massive numbers of aircraft.  Either way, the dreadnought is probably a more efficient use of materiel.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2F0%2F08%2FBattleship_Bismarck_burning_and_sinking_1941.jpg&hash=9b9ef5827bb0e29c3fc174d0e14d2f9422be84aa)
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 12:43:33 PM
Destroyed by dreadnoughts.  Sunk by torpedoes fired from a treaty cruiser.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Viking on October 26, 2012, 12:54:56 PM
USS Arizona 30,000 tons.
Nakajima Kate 2,5 tons.

One wonders if the Arizona is worth 1,200 torpedo bombers?
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 12:56:00 PM
Quote from: Viking on October 26, 2012, 12:54:56 PM
USS Arizona 30,000 tons.
Nakajima Kate 2,5 tons.

One wonders if the Arizona is worth 1,200 torpedo bombers?
Now take the carriers into account.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
I think a better argument would be the Yamato.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Viking on October 26, 2012, 01:04:54 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
I think a better argument would be the Yamato.
Sunk by air attack, in open water:
HMS Repulse, sunk by Japanese aircraft off Malaya, December 10 1941 with loss of 436 crew.

HMS Prince of Wales, sunk by Japanese aircraft off Malaya, December 10 1941 with loss of 327 crew.

Italian battleship Roma, sunk by Luftwaffe Fritz-X glider bombs on September 9, 1943 with loss of 1,353 crew.

INS Hiei, sunk by US Navy and USAF aircraft off of Guadalcanal, November 13, 1942 with loss of 188 crew.

INS Musashi, sunk by US Navy aircraft during the Battle of Leyte Gulf on October 24, 1944 with loss of over 1,000 crew.

INS Yamato, sunk by US air attacks off of Okinawa April 7, 1945 with loss of 2,475 men.

Greek battleship Kilkis, sunk by Germany Ju-87 bombers in the Salamis Channel on April 23, 1941.

Greek battleship Limnos, sunk by Germany Ju-87 bombers in the Salamis Channel on April 23, 1941.

HNLMS De Zeven Provincien was sunk by Japanese bombers off of Surabaya, February 18, 1942. Raised by the Japanese and used as a floating battery, then sunk by allied bombers in 1943.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 01:07:16 PM
Quote from: Viking on October 26, 2012, 01:04:54 PM
HNLMS De Zeven Provincien was sunk by Japanese bombers off of Surabaya, February 18, 1942. Raised by the Japanese and used as a floating battery, then sunk by allied bombers in 1943.

That just sounds so...violating.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:09:37 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
I think a better argument would be the Yamato.
Overwhelming attack from a numerically superior foe in an attack that was designed to fail?  What weapons system in the world could survive in those circumstances?
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 01:15:34 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:09:37 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
I think a better argument would be the Yamato.
Overwhelming attack from a numerically superior foe in an attack that was designed to fail?  What weapons system in the world could survive in those circumstances?

A superior one.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 01:16:14 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:09:37 PM
Overwhelming attack from a numerically superior foe in an attack that was designed to fail?  What weapons system in the world could survive in those circumstances?

Islam.

Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:16:54 PM
Quote from: Viking on October 26, 2012, 01:04:54 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
I think a better argument would be the Yamato.
Sunk by air attack, in open water:
HMS Repulse, sunk by Japanese aircraft off Malaya, December 10 1941 with loss of 436 crew.

HMS Prince of Wales, sunk by Japanese aircraft off Malaya, December 10 1941 with loss of 327 crew.

Italian battleship Roma, sunk by Luftwaffe Fritz-X glider bombs on September 9, 1943 with loss of 1,353 crew.

INS Hiei, sunk by US Navy and USAF aircraft off of Guadalcanal, November 13, 1942 with loss of 188 crew.

INS Musashi, sunk by US Navy aircraft during the Battle of Leyte Gulf on October 24, 1944 with loss of over 1,000 crew.

INS Yamato, sunk by US air attacks off of Okinawa April 7, 1945 with loss of 2,475 men.

Greek battleship Kilkis, sunk by Germany Ju-87 bombers in the Salamis Channel on April 23, 1941.

Greek battleship Limnos, sunk by Germany Ju-87 bombers in the Salamis Channel on April 23, 1941.

HNLMS De Zeven Provincien was sunk by Japanese bombers off of Surabaya, February 18, 1942. Raised by the Japanese and used as a floating battery, then sunk by allied bombers in 1943.
Repulse, the Greeks and De Zeven Provincien were not dreadnought battleships.  Yamato, Musashi and Prince of Wales were assaulted by overwhelming numbers with minimal support.  Roma was Italian and in poor condition due to the surrender and due to being Italian.  Hiei was a slowly steaming target due to the crippling damage it had taken in a gunfight, and even then it took continuous air attacks all day to sink her.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:24:39 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 01:15:34 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:09:37 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
I think a better argument would be the Yamato.
Overwhelming attack from a numerically superior foe in an attack that was designed to fail?  What weapons system in the world could survive in those circumstances?
A superior one.
Stricken as unresponsive.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: garbon on October 26, 2012, 01:25:38 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:24:39 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 01:15:34 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:09:37 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
I think a better argument would be the Yamato.
Overwhelming attack from a numerically superior foe in an attack that was designed to fail?  What weapons system in the world could survive in those circumstances?
A superior one.
Stricken as unresponsive.

I thought we opted for non-responsive.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:26:24 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 01:16:14 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:09:37 PM
Overwhelming attack from a numerically superior foe in an attack that was designed to fail?  What weapons system in the world could survive in those circumstances?
Islam.
Not a weapons system.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:27:18 PM
Quote from: garbon on October 26, 2012, 01:25:38 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:24:39 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 01:15:34 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:09:37 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
I think a better argument would be the Yamato.
Overwhelming attack from a numerically superior foe in an attack that was designed to fail?  What weapons system in the world could survive in those circumstances?
A superior one.
Stricken as unresponsive.
I thought we opted for non-responsive.
Probably a better wording in this situation, yes.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 01:28:39 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:26:24 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 01:16:14 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:09:37 PM
Overwhelming attack from a numerically superior foe in an attack that was designed to fail?  What weapons system in the world could survive in those circumstances?
Islam.
Not a weapons system.

The Sword of the Prophet most certainly is, infidel.

IT IS WORTH EVERYTHING IT IS WORTH NOTHING
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:31:44 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 01:28:39 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:26:24 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 01:16:14 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:09:37 PM
Overwhelming attack from a numerically superior foe in an attack that was designed to fail?  What weapons system in the world could survive in those circumstances?
Islam.
Not a weapons system.
The Sword of the Prophet most certainly is, infidel.

IT IS WORTH EVERYTHING IT IS WORTH NOTHING
Forwarded to Homeland Security.

Terror threat level:  Increased to Purple.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 01:33:16 PM
It'll get lost in the fusion center, buried under reports on bikers.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 01:38:13 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:24:39 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 01:15:34 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:09:37 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
I think a better argument would be the Yamato.
Overwhelming attack from a numerically superior foe in an attack that was designed to fail?  What weapons system in the world could survive in those circumstances?
A superior one.


Stricken as unresponsive.

Tell me then, how many aircraft carriers did the planes come from that sank the Yamato?
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: mongers on October 26, 2012, 01:38:22 PM
Quote from: Viking on October 26, 2012, 01:04:54 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
I think a better argument would be the Yamato.
Sunk by air attack, in open water:
HMS Repulse, sunk by Japanese aircraft off Malaya, December 10 1941 with loss of 436 crew.

HMS Prince of Wales, sunk by Japanese aircraft off Malaya, December 10 1941 with loss of 327 crew.

Italian battleship Roma, sunk by Luftwaffe Fritz-X glider bombs on September 9, 1943 with loss of 1,353 crew.

INS Hiei, sunk by US Navy and USAF aircraft off of Guadalcanal, November 13, 1942 with loss of 188 crew.

INS Musashi, sunk by US Navy aircraft during the Battle of Leyte Gulf on October 24, 1944 with loss of over 1,000 crew.

INS Yamato, sunk by US air attacks off of Okinawa April 7, 1945 with loss of 2,475 men.

Greek battleship Kilkis, sunk by Germany Ju-87 bombers in the Salamis Channel on April 23, 1941.

Greek battleship Limnos, sunk by Germany Ju-87 bombers in the Salamis Channel on April 23, 1941.

HNLMS De Zeven Provincien was sunk by Japanese bombers off of Surabaya, February 18, 1942. Raised by the Japanese and used as a floating battery, then sunk by allied bombers in 1943.

You list is rather diminished by the last three, two pre-dreadnought and a coastal defence ship; a total of 8-12in and 2-11in guns don't quite make a whole single dreadnought.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Malthus on October 26, 2012, 01:42:17 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on October 26, 2012, 10:46:55 AM
Here, have a ring bayonet.

Tut tut. A modern invention. Will never replace the good old plug bayonet!
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Zanza on October 26, 2012, 01:44:22 PM
Wasn't the Bismarck also disabled by an air attack before it was scuttled? And Tirpitz and Gneisenau were also disabled by air attacks.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:48:06 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 01:38:13 PM
Tell me then, how many aircraft carriers did the planes come from that sank the Yamato?
Not near my books, but Wiki says 11.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:51:43 PM
Quote from: Zanza on October 26, 2012, 01:44:22 PM
Wasn't the Bismarck also disabled by an air attack before it was scuttled? And Tirpitz and Gneisenau were also disabled by air attacks.
Bismarck had its steering gear damaged by air attack, which allowed the RN to catch it and destroy it (along with a nagging wound delivered by the Prince of Wales).  Tirpitz and Gneisenau were bombed at anchor by the RAF.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Threviel on October 26, 2012, 02:20:35 PM
Isn't the real problem of Dreadnoughts that they became too complex and difficult to build compared to carriers and planes? They were still useful at the end of the war, but too expensive and time consuming to build.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 02:33:00 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:48:06 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 01:38:13 PM
Tell me then, how many aircraft carriers did the planes come from that sank the Yamato?
Not near my books, but Wiki says 11.

I'm seeing 8 some of which are escort carriers  Against several Japanese ships.  It doesn't seem overwhelming odds unless carriers completely outclass battleships.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Ed Anger on October 26, 2012, 02:40:01 PM
Taffy 3 laughs at your toy boats.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 02:55:57 PM
Quote from: Threviel on October 26, 2012, 02:20:35 PM
Isn't the real problem of Dreadnoughts that they became too complex and difficult to build compared to carriers and planes? They were still useful at the end of the war, but too expensive and time consuming to build.
I would say that building a fleet carrier and a dreadnought were more or less equivalent.  Obviously you could build a plane or even a whole airgroup in a fraction of the time that it took to build a dreadnought, but the big carriers took a while, and unless you were doing a bad job of it were rather complex in their arrangements.  I suppose that you didn't have to worry about thick armour plates or large, unique naval guns when building a carrier.

Building time was not the reason that carriers replaced dreadnoughts.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 03:05:19 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 02:33:00 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:48:06 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 01:38:13 PM
Tell me then, how many aircraft carriers did the planes come from that sank the Yamato?
Not near my books, but Wiki says 11.
I'm seeing 8 some of which are escort carriers  Against several Japanese ships.  It doesn't seem overwhelming odds unless carriers completely outclass battleships.
Yamato was effectively alone.  IJN destroyers were pretty much useless against air attack and the Agano-class light cruisers weren't much better.  Read up on the Japanese 25-mm AA mount.

Either way, 8 against 1 and a little bit is massively outnumbered.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 03:06:52 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on October 26, 2012, 02:40:01 PM
Taffy 3 laughs at your toy boats.
No they don't.  Taffy 3 is scrap metal, whereas there are still dreadnoughts afloat.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Ed Anger on October 26, 2012, 03:12:25 PM
The Samuel B Roberts's name will echo through history. The shitstains in Kurita's force? Forgotten.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 03:13:41 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 03:05:19 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 02:33:00 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 01:48:06 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 01:38:13 PM
Tell me then, how many aircraft carriers did the planes come from that sank the Yamato?
Not near my books, but Wiki says 11.
I'm seeing 8 some of which are escort carriers  Against several Japanese ships.  It doesn't seem overwhelming odds unless carriers completely outclass battleships.


Yamato was effectively alone.  IJN destroyers were pretty much useless against air attack and the Agano-class light cruisers weren't much better.  Read up on the Japanese 25-mm AA mount.

Either way, 8 against 1 and a little bit is massively outnumbered.

So how many Yamatos would be required to win the day?
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 03:18:45 PM
Hard to say.  Then again, the Yamato might not be the best example, what with its defective armour, low-grade fire control and substandard AA weapons.  Damage control wasn't that great either.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 03:21:51 PM
Also it was hampered by it's inability to launch large numbers of airplanes from it's deck.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 03:22:51 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 03:21:51 PM
Also it was hampered by it's inability to launch large numbers of airplanes from it's deck.
How would that have helped?
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 03:25:48 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 03:22:51 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 03:21:51 PM
Also it was hampered by it's inability to launch large numbers of airplanes from it's deck.
How would that have helped?

They could have shot down the waves of airplanes that were attacking it.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 03:35:00 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 03:25:48 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 03:22:51 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 03:21:51 PM
Also it was hampered by it's inability to launch large numbers of airplanes from it's deck.
How would that have helped?
They could have shot down the waves of airplanes that were attacking it.
No they couldn't have.  The Japanese pilot corps that had been so much better than the USN equivalent had been decimated by then, and the IJN wasn't built to replace those pilots quickly.  Only the best of the best got to be pilots in the IJN, and so by the time they got around to the end of the war, they were putting poorly-trained and inexperienced kids in the air against the USN's veterans.

No, if you wanted to shoot down aircraft, you were better off with a proper AA suite and fire control.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: dps on October 26, 2012, 06:22:14 PM
Quote from: mongers on October 26, 2012, 01:38:22 PM
Quote from: Viking on October 26, 2012, 01:04:54 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on October 26, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
I think a better argument would be the Yamato.
Sunk by air attack, in open water:
HMS Repulse, sunk by Japanese aircraft off Malaya, December 10 1941 with loss of 436 crew.

HMS Prince of Wales, sunk by Japanese aircraft off Malaya, December 10 1941 with loss of 327 crew.

Italian battleship Roma, sunk by Luftwaffe Fritz-X glider bombs on September 9, 1943 with loss of 1,353 crew.

INS Hiei, sunk by US Navy and USAF aircraft off of Guadalcanal, November 13, 1942 with loss of 188 crew.

INS Musashi, sunk by US Navy aircraft during the Battle of Leyte Gulf on October 24, 1944 with loss of over 1,000 crew.

INS Yamato, sunk by US air attacks off of Okinawa April 7, 1945 with loss of 2,475 men.

Greek battleship Kilkis, sunk by Germany Ju-87 bombers in the Salamis Channel on April 23, 1941.

Greek battleship Limnos, sunk by Germany Ju-87 bombers in the Salamis Channel on April 23, 1941.

HNLMS De Zeven Provincien was sunk by Japanese bombers off of Surabaya, February 18, 1942. Raised by the Japanese and used as a floating battery, then sunk by allied bombers in 1943.

You list is rather diminished by the last three, two pre-dreadnought and a coastal defence ship; a total of 8-12in and 2-11in guns don't quite make a whole single dreadnought.

Limnos and Kilkis were barely even pre-dreadnoughts by that point.  One was a training ship, the other was essentially an accomodations hulk (forget which is which).
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 07:22:11 PM
I'm sure that the Germans tried to claim that they'd sunk battleships though.  That would, in Goering's mind, salve the pride of his service being outfought at every turn by the RN.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: 11B4V on October 26, 2012, 07:31:47 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 10:41:11 AM
I just think it's important that we note that yesterday was the anniversary of the last dreadnought gun duel.  They finally got their fleet battle, and they fell victim to the crossing of the T.

Poor Japanese.

Who cares.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 07:34:59 PM
Quote from: 11B4V on October 26, 2012, 07:31:47 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 10:41:11 AM
I just think it's important that we note that yesterday was the anniversary of the last dreadnought gun duel.  They finally got their fleet battle, and they fell victim to the crossing of the T.

Poor Japanese.
Who cares.
I do.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Ed Anger on October 26, 2012, 07:49:12 PM
Quote from: 11B4V on October 26, 2012, 07:31:47 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 10:41:11 AM
I just think it's important that we note that yesterday was the anniversary of the last dreadnought gun duel.  They finally got their fleet battle, and they fell victim to the crossing of the T.

Poor Japanese.

Who cares.

Raciss
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Kleves on October 26, 2012, 07:58:34 PM
Quote from: mongers on October 26, 2012, 01:38:22 PM
You list is rather diminished by the last three, two pre-dreadnought and a coastal defence ship; a total of 8-12in and 2-11in guns don't quite make a whole single dreadnought.
Where's the list of carriers sunk by dreadnoughts?
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 08:03:40 PM
Quote from: Kleves on October 26, 2012, 07:58:34 PM
Quote from: mongers on October 26, 2012, 01:38:22 PM
You list is rather diminished by the last three, two pre-dreadnought and a coastal defence ship; a total of 8-12in and 2-11in guns don't quite make a whole single dreadnought.
Where's the list of carriers sunk by dreadnoughts?
There are only two:  Gambier Bay and Glorious.

Fighting carriers isn't a dreadnought's job.  They are weapons of heirarchical warfare, and therefore fighting carriers was beneath them.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 08:07:19 PM
Mind you, if you want to only include dreadnoughts sunk by carrier aircraft, then the list of battleships sunk drops to two:  Yamato and Musashi.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Viking on October 26, 2012, 08:09:51 PM
Quote from: Neil on October 26, 2012, 08:03:40 PM
Quote from: Kleves on October 26, 2012, 07:58:34 PM
Quote from: mongers on October 26, 2012, 01:38:22 PM
You list is rather diminished by the last three, two pre-dreadnought and a coastal defence ship; a total of 8-12in and 2-11in guns don't quite make a whole single dreadnought.
Where's the list of carriers sunk by dreadnoughts?
There are only two:  Gambier Bay and Glorious.

Fighting carriers isn't a dreadnought's job.  They are weapons of heirarchical warfare, and therefore fighting carriers was beneath them.

in this case the dreadnoughts are below the carriers, many fathoms below the carriers.  :lmfao:
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Ed Anger on October 26, 2012, 08:15:02 PM
Anybody mention Incan torpedo boats yes?
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 26, 2012, 08:26:47 PM
Quote from: Viking on October 26, 2012, 08:09:51 PM
in this case the dreadnoughts are below the carriers, many fathoms below the carriers.  :lmfao:
Carriers sunk two draednoughts, and dreadnoughts sunk two carriers.  They seem equally effective.  Mind you, both submarines and carriers killed more carriers than dreadnoughts did.
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: jimmy olsen on October 27, 2012, 01:56:31 AM
You never commented on my Bismarck at Jutland thread Neil.  :(
Title: Re: Dreadnought Day
Post by: Neil on October 27, 2012, 09:35:11 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on October 27, 2012, 01:56:31 AM
You never commented on my Bismarck at Jutland thread Neil.  :(
:huh:  Yes I did.