Lulz, I guess Russia is in favor of intervention after all.
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/russian-anti-terror-troops-arrive-syria/story?id=15954363#.T2lxwtmb4dW
QuoteBy KIRIT RADIA (@KiritRadia_ABC) and RYM MOMTAZ
MOSCOW, Russia, March 19, 2012
A Russian military unit has arrived in Syria, according to Russian news reports, a development that a United Nations Security Council source told ABC News was "a bomb" certain to have serious repercussions.
Russia, one of President Bashar al-Assad's strongest allies despite international condemnation of the government's violent crackdown on the country's uprising, has repeatedly blocked the United Nations Security Council's attempts to halt the violence, accusing the U.S. and its allies of trying to start another war.
Now the Russian Black Sea fleet's Iman tanker has arrived in the Syrian port of Tartus on the Mediterranean Sea with an anti-terror squad from the Russian Marines aboard according to the Interfax news agency. The Assad government has insisted it is fighting a terrorist insurgency. The Russian news reports did not elaborate on the Russian troops' mission in Syria or if they are expected to leave the port.
The presence of Russian troops in Syria could be a "pretty obvious" show of support to the regime, according to Russian security expert Mark Galeotti.
"No one thinks of the Russians as anything but Assad's last friends," said Galeotti, professor of global affairs at New York University.
The Iman replaced another Russian ship "which had been sent to Syria for demonstrating (sic) the Russian presence in the turbulent region and possible evacuation of Russian citizens," the Black Sea Fleet told Interfax.
RIA Novosti, a news outlet with strong ties to the Kremlin, trumpeted the news in a banner headline that appeared only on its Arabic language website. The Russian embassy to the U.S. and to the U.N. had no comment, saying they have "no particular information on" the arrival of a Russian anti-terrorism squad to Syria.
Moscow has long enjoyed a cozy relationship with the Assad regime, to which it sells billions of dollars of weapons. In return Russia has maintained a Navy base at Tartus, which gives it access to the Mediterranean.
Last week Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Russia had no plans to send troops to Syria.
"As for the question whether I consider it necessary to confront the United States in Syria and ensure our military presence there... in order to take part in military actions -- no. I believe this would be against Russia's national interests," Lavrov told lawmakers, according to RIA Novosti.
Follow ABCNewsBlotter on Facebook
Russia's Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov denied reports that Russian special forces were operating inside Syria. He did say, however, that there are Russian military and technical advisors in the country.
U.S. State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland said the U.S. government had not heard of the reports of Russian troops in Syria and declined to comment.
Tim, yes, in favor of intervention on Assad's side. If those troops land to kill some civilians while the Turks move in to form their "buffer" things can get pretty ugly pretty fast.
Seriously, when reading Syria and the Middle East in general, I feel more and more like reading Balkan news from the 1910s
Wait, this is one squad? What is that, like 8 guys?
Quote from: Razgovory on March 21, 2012, 02:47:51 AM
Wait, this is one squad? What is that, like 8 guys?
yeah, well, even if an actual un-provoked incident is unlikely to happen, this is a very clear sign of support for Assad.
Quote from: Tamas on March 21, 2012, 02:56:09 AM
Quote from: Razgovory on March 21, 2012, 02:47:51 AM
Wait, this is one squad? What is that, like 8 guys?
yeah, well, even if an actual un-provoked incident is unlikely to happen, this is a very clear sign of support for Assad.
I wonder what they are supposed to do. If the Russians use SF the same way the US does, they could be used to train soldiers. Still, I would expect a few more.
Quote from: Tamas on March 21, 2012, 02:45:10 AM
Tim, yes, in favor of intervention on Assad's side.
Ah, duh. That's why I said "Lulz" in a sarcastic fashion.
Quote from: jimmy olsen on March 21, 2012, 03:02:20 AM
Quote from: Tamas on March 21, 2012, 02:45:10 AM
Tim, yes, in favor of intervention on Assad's side.
Ah, duh. That's why I said "Lulz" in a sarcastic fashion.
one may never know it with you :P
But thanks for opening all these news threads :hug:
Quote from: Tamas on March 21, 2012, 02:45:10 AM
Tim, yes, in favor of intervention on Assad's side. If those troops land to kill some civilians while the Turks move in to form their "buffer" things can get pretty ugly pretty fast.
Seriously, when reading Syria and the Middle East in general, I feel more and more like reading Balkan news from the 1910s
we have one advantage though... this time we can nuke the region until it's sterile.
Quote from: Tamas on March 21, 2012, 03:04:54 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on March 21, 2012, 03:02:20 AM
Quote from: Tamas on March 21, 2012, 02:45:10 AM
Tim, yes, in favor of intervention on Assad's side.
Ah, duh. That's why I said "Lulz" in a sarcastic fashion.
one may never know it with you :P
But thanks for opening all these news threads :hug:
Don't encourage him you bandwaggoning gypsy twat.
Sounds more like a security force for the ship. In other words, just a slow news day hype.
Serious repercussions? Who does the Security Council think they are? Russia is beyond their discipline.