http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2012/01/06/19209436.html
QuoteTeen too hot for yearbook
Is dressing like a pole dancer protected under the human rights code?
One Colorado teen may try to find out after the editors of her high school yearbook pulled her racy photo.
In the shot, Sydney Spies, an 18-year-old dancer and aspiring model, is dressed in a flouncy yellow miniskirt with nothing for a top but a black shawl tied around her chest. The school's administrators refused to allow the sexy picture, she told the Durango Herald.
But the yearbook's editors said it was their decision — and it had nothing to do with her revealing ensemble.
"We are an award-winning yearbook. We don't want to diminish the quality with something that can be seen as unprofessional," Brian Jaramillo is quoted as saying in the report.
But Spies and her mother believe the school officials influenced the yearbook editors, who initially voted in favour of allowing the photo.
"I wanted my daughter to chose a different photo but she is 18 and doesn't always listen!" Miki Spies wrote on Facebook. "Some are upset (th)at the administration is strong-arming the students."
Sydney said the decision violates her right to freedom of expression, and she may challenge it.
Mom Miki wrote: "We'll get the ACLU involved if they censor."
Picture in the link doesn't look that bad. also, what's with the "Facebook/Ho" caption under the picture lol
"Facebook/Ho" :lol:
My take: publicity opportunity by "aspiring model" chick.
Too trashy for a yearbook. She'll have to wait until she wins a seat in the Canadian parliament.
This thread is bullshit w/o pics
Quote from: 11B4V on January 06, 2012, 02:09:52 PM
This thread is bullshit w/o pics
There's a pic in the link you lazy redneck fuck. Barely worth the effort.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 06, 2012, 02:11:59 PM
Quote from: 11B4V on January 06, 2012, 02:09:52 PM
This thread is bullshit w/o pics
There's a pic in the link you lazy redneck fuck. Barely worth the effort.
The lazy thread starter should have posted it..... :D
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstorage.canoe.ca%2Fv1%2Fdynamic_resize%2F%3Fsrc%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fcnews.canoe.ca%2FCNEWS%2FWorld%2F2012%2F01%2F06%2Fspies250.jpg%26amp%3Bsize%3D256x600%26amp%3Bquality%3D85&hash=875729d705fe1340480aa8651f8a57e362b6175f)
Nothing wrong with this. The world needs more strippers.
I thought this was about CdM locking my thread.
I'd cane it.
That's not a miniskirt. Also, not really that racy.
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on January 09, 2012, 02:04:20 PM
That's not a miniskirt. Also, not really that racy.
You need to compare and contrast with links of your own to prove your point. It is the Languish way.
Meh her yearbook photo should be a headshot.
Quote from: Valmy on January 09, 2012, 02:10:13 PM
Meh her yearbook photo should be a headshot.
:perv: oh wait, that's not what you meant.
Quote from: HVC on January 09, 2012, 02:24:33 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 09, 2012, 02:10:13 PM
Meh her yearbook photo should be a headshot.
:perv: oh wait, that's not what you meant.
Are you sure? :D
My cousin went off on facebook about the importance of editorial standards for yearbooks. :unsure:
She most certainly doesn't look highschool age.
Quote from: Tyr on January 10, 2012, 09:39:41 AM
She most certainly doesn't look highschool age.
:huh: What do 18 year olds look like in your country?
Quote from: Valmy on January 09, 2012, 02:10:13 PM
Meh her yearbook photo should be a headshot.
Are you Gay?
I wonder if the carpet matched the drapes?
Quote from: 11B4V on January 10, 2012, 10:34:55 AM
Are you Gay?
I am very pro-stripper but a hidebound traditionalist when it comes to yearbooks -_-
QuoteI wonder if the carpet matched the drapes?
Only if she had some dye left over ;)
Quote from: 11B4V on January 10, 2012, 10:34:55 AM
Quote from: Valmy on January 09, 2012, 02:10:13 PM
Meh her yearbook photo should be a headshot.
Are you Gay?
I wonder if the carpet matched the drapes?
i'm guessing hardwood floors :D
Quote from: HVC on January 10, 2012, 10:39:22 AM
Quote from: 11B4V on January 10, 2012, 10:34:55 AM
Quote from: Valmy on January 09, 2012, 02:10:13 PM
Meh her yearbook photo should be a headshot.
Are you Gay?
I wonder if the carpet matched the drapes?
i'm guessing hardwood floors :D
There it is. Right on the mark. I wouldnt bet against it. :lol:
Cool beans V., didnt mean it as an insult.
Quote from: 11B4V on January 10, 2012, 10:44:01 AM
Cool beans V., didnt mean it as an insult.
On this forum that would never be an insult...except when directed to Marty.
Cool beans? What is this, the Andy Griffith Show?
Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 10, 2012, 11:00:03 AM
Cool beans? What is this, the Andy Griffith Show?
Just for that...no cropping my quotes. :blurgh:
Quote from: 11B4V on January 10, 2012, 11:06:00 AM
Just for that...no cropping my quotes. :blurgh:
You're fixin' to get a paddlin' Opie.
Story goes on.
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2012/01/10/19224591.html
QuoteThe Colorado teen whose photo was too racy for her high school yearbook has had a second sexy photo rejected, and she's taken her fight for "freedom of expression" to the national airwaves.
Sydney Spies made headlines last week when the photo she submitted was deemed inappropriate by the Durango High School editorial board.
In the shot, the 18-year-old dancer and aspiring model is dressed in a flouncy yellow miniskirt with nothing for a top but a black scarf tied around her chest.
There was some debate as to who rejected the photo.
The yearbook's editors said it was their decision - and it had nothing to do with her revealing ensemble.
"We are an award-winning yearbook. We don't want to diminish the quality with something that can be seen as unprofessional," yearbook editor Brian Jaramillo was quoted as saying in the Durango Herald.
But Spies and her mother believe the school officials influenced the yearbook editors, who initially voted in favour of allowing the photo.
They hinted they might get the ACLU involved to defend against what they consider censorship.
"I'm a senior in high school trying to express my rights and make a difference in not only my school, but everywhere else in the world ... I want people to know that freedom of expression is essential and censoring yearbooks and people is wrong."
She appeared on the Today Show Monday and told host Matt Lauer the new photo, like the first one, is a true representation of her personality.
"I really honestly think that it describes who I am ... and I really do think it's artistic," she said. "I'm still hoping they might let me have that picture in there."
new pic
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcnews.canoe.ca%2FCNEWS%2FWorld%2F2012%2F01%2F10%2FQMI_SydneySpiesNew_248.jpg&hash=198ad20213791d128ea73b898891b1dc27b4a5d3)
first pic was better. looks like she has a mustach int he second one :lol: Either way i foresee a disappointing career in porn for her.
aka "I'm using the publicity to boost my modeling career."
i looked up some other photos becasue i'm bored and my work computer is being a bitch about reports. Anyway, this girl is not going to age well at all.
She does have a good looking nose, which is the indespensible building block of a pretty face.
Quote from: HVC on January 10, 2012, 12:37:25 PM
Anyway, this girl is not going to age well at all.
Somehow that makes her look slutier and hotter.
Quote from: Valmy on January 10, 2012, 12:47:39 PM
Quote from: HVC on January 10, 2012, 12:37:25 PM
Anyway, this girl is not going to age well at all.
Somehow that makes her look slutier and hotter.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.dailymail.co.uk%2Fi%2Fpix%2F2012%2F01%2F09%2Farticle-0-0F644BF500000578-301_634x336.jpg&hash=f518f112ea1003f950f586a20e7e7d3d1b719918)
"Yearbook Administration Team"
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.dailymail.co.uk%2Fi%2Fpix%2F2012%2F01%2F09%2Farticle-0-0F644C0A00000578-307_634x340.jpg&hash=58f590ae12091f8c45474d4754f3709bde634e9a)
She looks fairly common in those other shots. A 3 airbrushed as a 9?
TV ads 15 pounds.
Her face/rest of her isnt fat its just plain.
Some people just take good pictures. you don't have plain friend that for whatever reason look great in photos?
Quote from: crazy canuck on January 10, 2012, 03:00:58 PM
Her face/rest of her isnt fat its just plain.
Look at that nose in the second pic. That's a world class nose man.
Quote from: crazy canuck on January 10, 2012, 02:52:54 PM
She looks fairly common in those other shots. A 3 airbrushed as a 9?
:lol: She's not in the other shots. Just the TV one. And she doesn't look common in the TV shot (though, to be sure, it isn't as posed, and she certainly doesn't look dazzling).
The shot with the five people in it where "she looks fairly common" doesn't have her in it. That's another (indeed, common-looking) chick.
Quote from: crazy canuck on January 10, 2012, 03:00:58 PM
Her face/rest of her isnt fat its just plain.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.dailymail.co.uk%2Fi%2Fpix%2F2012%2F01%2F09%2Farticle-0-0F644BF500000578-301_634x336.jpg&hash=f518f112ea1003f950f586a20e7e7d3d1b719918)
That is plain? You realize she is not on the Yearbook team.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 10, 2012, 03:05:36 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on January 10, 2012, 03:00:58 PM
Her face/rest of her isnt fat its just plain.
Look at that nose in the second pic. That's a world class nose man.
You fixate on noses? What do you fuck chicks in the nostrils?
Quote from: Razgovory on January 10, 2012, 03:40:28 PM
You fixate on noses? What do you fuck chicks in the nostrils?
Please tell me what purpose this post is supposed to serve Raz.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 10, 2012, 03:42:27 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on January 10, 2012, 03:40:28 PM
You fixate on noses? What do you fuck chicks in the nostrils?
Please tell me what purpose this post is supposed to serve Raz.
You were mean to him once and he hasn't forgiven you :P
Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 10, 2012, 03:42:27 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on January 10, 2012, 03:40:28 PM
You fixate on noses? What do you fuck chicks in the nostrils?
Please tell me what purpose this post is supposed to serve Raz.
Part curiosity, part desire to top CdM's outlandish sexual imagery from earlier today.
Quote from: Razgovory on January 10, 2012, 03:47:07 PM
Part curiosity, part desire to top CdM's outlandish sexual imagery from earlier today.
No Raz, I have never fucked a chick in the nostrils. :-|
:console: There is still time.
Quote from: grumbler on January 10, 2012, 03:32:14 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on January 10, 2012, 02:52:54 PM
She looks fairly common in those other shots. A 3 airbrushed as a 9?
:lol: She's not in the other shots. Just the TV one. And she doesn't look common in the TV shot (though, to be sure, it isn't as posed, and she certainly doesn't look dazzling).
The shot with the five people in it where "she looks fairly common" doesn't have her in it. That's another (indeed, common-looking) chick.
:lol:
grumbler has low standards.
Quote from: crazy canuck on January 10, 2012, 04:33:10 PM
Its ok, not everyone can have high standards.
Why would I want them? I would hate to see a gloriously slutty hot blonde and think anything other than :perv:
My life would be a little darker.
Hmm, I wonder how much of a bitch has she been to some of those other kids in the Yearbook Administration Team.
Quote from: lustindarkness on January 10, 2012, 04:48:32 PM
Hmm, I wonder how much of a bitch has she been to some of those other kids in the Yearbook Administration Team.
he he
My guess is the brunette in the back row was the one yes vote.
Quote from: Valmy on January 10, 2012, 04:38:12 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on January 10, 2012, 04:33:10 PM
Its ok, not everyone can have high standards.
Why would I want them? I would hate to see a gloriously slutty hot blonde and think anything other than :perv:
My life would be a little darker.
I am not saying you should have them. You have self identified yourself as a person without high standards. As I said, that is fine. We cant all have them.