No, not katmai's gullet/Neil's ego/CdM's love life/etc., I'm talking about the galatic kind:
QuoteCAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. —
Scientists have found the biggest black holes known to exist - each one 10 billion times the mass of our sun.A team led by astronomers at the University of California, Berkeley, discovered the two gigantic black holes in clusters of elliptical galaxies more than 300 million light years away. That's relatively close on the galactic scale.
"They are monstrous," Berkeley astrophysicist Chung-Pei Ma told reporters. "We did not expect to find such massive black holes because they are more massive than indicated by their galaxy properties. They're kind of extraordinary."
The previous black hole record-holder is as large as 6 billion suns.
In research released Monday by the journal Nature, the scientists suggest these black holes may be the leftovers of quasars that crammed the early universe. They are similar in mass to young quasars, they said, and have been well hidden until now.
The scientists used ground-based telescopes as well as the Hubble Space Telescope and Texas supercomputers, observing stars near the black holes and measuring the stellar velocities to uncover these vast, invisible regions.
Black holes are objects so dense that nothing, not even light, can escape. Some are formed by the collapse of a super-size star. It's uncertain how these two newly discovered whoppers originated, said Nicholas McConnell, a Berkeley graduate student who is the study's lead author. To be so massive now means they must have grown considerably since their formation, he said.
Most if not all galaxies are believed to have black holes at their center. The bigger the galaxy, it seems, the bigger the black hole.
Quasars are some of the most energized and distant of galactic centers.
The researchers said their findings suggest differences in the way black holes grow, depending on the size of the galaxy.
Ma speculates these two black holes remained hidden for so long because they are living in quiet retirement - much quieter and more boring than their boisterous youth powering quasars billions of years ago.
"For an astronomer, finding these insatiable black holes is like finally encountering people nine feet tall whose great height had only been inferred from fossilized bones. How did they grow so large?" Ma said in a news release. "This rare find will help us understand whether these black holes had very tall parents or ate a lot of spinach."
Oxford University astrophysicist Michele Cappellari, who wrote an accompanying commentary in the journal, agreed that the two newly discovered black holes "probably represent the missing dormant relics of the giant black holes that powered the brightest quasars in the early universe."
One of the newly detected black holes weighs 9.7 billion times the mass of the sun. The second, slightly farther from Earth, is as big or even bigger.
Even larger black holes may be lurking out there. Ma said that's the million-dollar question: How big can a black hole grow?
The researchers already are peering into the biggest galaxies for answers.
"If there is any bigger black hole," Ma said, "we should be able to find them in the next year or two. Personally, I think we are probably reaching the high end now. Maybe another factor of two to go at best."
Question. In this article the words "large" and "massive" are being used interchangeably. Since we all know that these aren't actually the same thing, how *big* are these black holes? The article seems to indicate how *massive* they are but what are their diameters?
Science as competition. Only in America.
Quote from: fahdiz on December 06, 2011, 04:12:14 PM
Question. In this article the words "large" and "massive" are being used interchangeably. Since we all know that these aren't actually the same thing, how *big* are these black holes? The article seems to indicate how *massive* they are but what are their diameters?
For a nonrotating black hole, 2(2Gm/c^2). For the 9.7 billion solar mass/1.84 X 10^40 kg black hole, their event horizons would be 5.44 X 10^13m, or about a fiftieth of a light year, across.
Did it by hand and by a Schwarzchild radius calculator to be sure.
The black hole itself is of course not this large. I'm not sure we understand black hole physics enough to accurately say how large the mass beyond the event horizon is. Maybe we do. I don't know. This took twenty minutes already.
Edit: except oops, got the last step wrong. :lol: Fixed.
I have heard that in Russian colloquial, "black hole" means, literally, "asshole". That must make literal translations of articles like this entertaining. :D
I saw one at Taco Bell today.
Quote from: Ideologue on December 06, 2011, 05:31:38 PM
Quote from: fahdiz on December 06, 2011, 04:12:14 PM
Question. In this article the words "large" and "massive" are being used interchangeably. Since we all know that these aren't actually the same thing, how *big* are these black holes? The article seems to indicate how *massive* they are but what are their diameters?
For a nonrotating black hole, 2(2Gm/c^2). For the 9.7 billion solar mass/1.84 X 10^40 kg black hole, their event horizons would be 5.44 X 10^13m, or about a fiftieth of a light year, across.
Did it by hand and by a Schwarzchild radius calculator to be sure.
The black hole itself is of course not this large. I'm not sure we understand black hole physics enough to accurately say how large the mass beyond the event horizon is. Maybe we do. I don't know. This took twenty minutes already.
Edit: except oops, got the last step wrong. :lol: Fixed.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
And you opted for law school instead of a physics degree...why, again?
Numerous reasons. Useless liberal arts background. Desire to improve society. Misunderstanding of the value/versatility of a law degree. Willingness of schools to profit on such misunderstanding. Psychological grip of the sunk cost fallacy upon myself and loved ones.
That said, it's not like that would require a physics degree to figure out. Just 'rithmetic.
Quote from: Ideologue on December 06, 2011, 06:01:08 PM
That said, it's not like that would require a physics degree to figure out. Just 'rithmetic.
Of course. It's the fact that you're willing to do it on your free time - for an internet forum :D - that begs the question.
I am muy hard worker. You need lawn care, senor? I pick up leaves. Es otono. I pick up leaves, senor. Muy beautiful leaves.
Man, I just realized, that would be pretty racist if I weren't Hispanic.
Quote from: Ideologue on December 06, 2011, 06:11:23 PM
I am muy hard worker. You need lawn care, senor? I pick up leaves. Es otono. I pick up leaves, senor. Muy beautiful leaves.
:lol:
Seems like some of the budgets of a dozen or so nations are rather massive black holes also.... ;)
You know what was a terrible flick? Event Horizon. Like the inevitable trajectory of matter near a black hole, not even Sam Neill could escape that movie's suck.
that movie terrified me when it cam eout. like taoally terrifed me.
Quote from: Darth Wagtaros on December 06, 2011, 06:40:28 PM
that movie terrified me when it cam eout. like taoally terrifed me.
It terrified me too, though perhaps not for the same reasons...
It was pretty bad, but The Black Hole was worse. :D
the scene when the zombie spacers was revealed freaked me out as a child. As did the mad doctor being imprisoned in maximillion in the hellscape.
Quote from: Ed Anger on December 06, 2011, 05:53:17 PM
I saw one at Taco Bell today.
Great, now I want a chalupa. But I have to eat this vegetable pasta shit for dinner. THANKS JERK. :mad:
Quote from: fahdiz on December 06, 2011, 05:55:08 PM
:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
And you opted for law school instead of a physics degree...why, again?
Yeah, that's something I don't understand about Hunter. Science is his natural home. He likes it, he should try to make that his job. He's still young, he could always go back to school. Ide would probably make a good aerospace engineer. He would have to explain to his colleagues why he has a stiffy all the time while at work, but beyond that it's a natural fit.
Quote from: fahdiz on December 06, 2011, 05:55:08 PM
And you opted for law school instead of a physics degree...why, again?
If you think it's hard getting a job with a law degree, just imagine getting into a field where the only way you can get a job is to get somebody else fired, in a country that is turning its back on science.
I grasp concepts well (which is why I did ok in law school), but I'm really not very adept at math. Compared to your average human, maybe, but that's nothing to brag about.
I mean, I didn't even build my computer without some help (although in fairness that help consisted entirely of my friend informing me that I didn't have the memory cards in the slot all the way, as you are apparently supposed to slam them in there like the motherboard was Sasha Grey's throat).
I'm also not young anymore, by any standard metric. :(
You are younger then me, ergo you are young.
Agreed. He is an annoying young wippersnapper.
You're only as old as you feel.
I'm 73.
Quote from: Ideologue on December 06, 2011, 06:01:08 PM
Numerous reasons. Useless liberal arts background. Desire to improve society. Misunderstanding of the value/versatility of a law degree. Willingness of schools to profit on such misunderstanding. Psychological grip of the sunk cost fallacy upon myself and loved ones.
That said, it's not like that would require a physics degree to figure out. Just 'rithmetic.
:lol: Awesome.
Desire to improve society, so you got the one degree that is invariably destructive to society?
Quote from: Neil on December 06, 2011, 09:08:38 PM
Desire to improve society, so you got the one degree that is invariably destructive to society?
Yea, does not compute.
Ide, the ability and willingness to work hard is at least as useful as exceptional math talent in getting a science degree.
Quote from: fahdiz on December 06, 2011, 04:12:14 PM
Question. In this article the words "large" and "massive" are being used interchangeably. Since we all know that these aren't actually the same thing, how *big* are these black holes? The article seems to indicate how *massive* they are but what are their diameters?
It's used interchangeably because for a black hole the size is strictly related to its mass. So the larger a black hole is the more massive it is and vice versa.
That said, the area of effect of a black hole is much larger than its "physical" size.
THANKS FAHDIZ.
Quote from: DontSayBanana on December 06, 2011, 07:32:10 PM
It was pretty bad, but The Black Hole was worse. :D
I AM GOING TO PRETEND YOU DIDN'T SAY THAT
Quote from: Neil on December 06, 2011, 09:08:38 PM
Desire to improve society, so you got the one degree that is invariably destructive to society?
In short, his law degree is one big black hole. Fitting thread.
And I've been spaghettified, you damned quasi-boomer.
I hope The Muse sues.
Quote from: Martinus on December 07, 2011, 09:38:05 AM
I hope The Muse sues.
Which one? I sure hope it's Polyhymnia.
Quote from: fahdiz on December 07, 2011, 11:42:36 AM
Quote from: Martinus on December 07, 2011, 09:38:05 AM
I hope The Muse sues.
Which one? I sure hope it's Polyhymnia.
Given the thread, wouldn't Urania be more appropriate? ;)
Quote from: Malthus on December 06, 2011, 05:37:53 PM
I have heard that in Russian colloquial, "black hole" means, literally, "asshole". That must make literal translations of articles like this entertaining. :D
:hmm: I've never heard that one.
Quote from: Martinus on December 07, 2011, 09:38:05 AM
I hope The Muse sues.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xsp3_a-PMTw&ob=av2e (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xsp3_a-PMTw&ob=av2e) :punk: