For Mart
http://news.yahoo.com/north-carolina-may-compensate-sterilization-victims-153231783.html
QuoteNorth Carolina should compensate the surviving victims of the state's forced sterilization program, the Governor's Eugenics Compensation Task Force recommended on Monday.
The task force also said the state should pay for mental health services for the fewer than 2,000 of the nearly 7,600 residents forcibly sterilized from 1929 to 1974 who are believed to be still alive.
The preliminary report did not settle on an amount for financial damages. The task force said it had discussed providing between $20,000 and $50,000 to each verified living victim and recognized an "urgent need" to move forward.
The task force acknowledged that "no amount of money can replace or give value to what has been done to nearly 7,600 people -- men, women, boys, girls, African Americans, whites, American Indians, the poor, undereducated, and disabled -- who our state and its citizens judged, targeted, and labeled 'morons,' 'unfit,' and 'feebleminded.'"
If payments are ultimately approved, North Carolina would become the first state to do more than apologize for forced sterilizations, which were popular in the United States during the 1930s, the task force said.
At one time, more than 30 states had eugenics programs, but most were abolished after World War II, the report said.
A final report is due in six months. Democratic Governor Beverly Perdue, who created the five-member task force in March, had no comment on Monday on the recommendations.
Spokeswoman Chrissy Pearson said Perdue looked forward to reviewing the newly issued report.
"North Carolina's Eugenics Board program produced the majority of its sterilizations after World War II, resulting in North Carolina having more surviving victims than other states," the report said.
During the peak years between July 1946 and June 1968, women and girls accounted for 85 percent of the state's sterilization victims, who also included boys and girls as young as 10, the report said.
In a presentation in April, statistician Don Akin said the majority of those sterilized under the North Carolina's program prior to the 1950s were white females.
Akin said sterilizations peaked in the 1950s, with nearly 3,000 performed in that decade. Another 1,600 sterilizations were performed during the 1960s, he added.
There was a dramatic shift in the demographics of people sterilized after the 1950s, when the "vast majority ... were 'non-white' females," said Akin, who works for the State Center for Health Statistics.
Alberta paid out some very large sums of money to people forcibly sterilized in the 30s and 40s.
Once upon a time I guess "eugenics" wasn't a dirty word...
Quote from: Barrister on August 02, 2011, 11:58:40 AM
Alberta paid out some very large sums of money to people forcibly sterilized in the 30s and 40s.
Once upon a time I guess "eugenics" wasn't a dirty word...
Hell, it was considered a *progressive* idea at first. Oliver Wendell Holmes himself was apparently pretty fond of the it. See: Buck v. Bell
Quotesurviving victims of the state's forced sterilization program
Jesus, what did they use? A chainsaw?
Quote from: The Brain on August 02, 2011, 01:28:33 PM
Quotesurviving victims of the state's forced sterilization program
Jesus, what did they use? A chainsaw?
Hungry hedgehogs.
Quote from: Barrister on August 02, 2011, 11:58:40 AM
Once upon a time I guess "eugenics" wasn't a dirty word...
:yes: Hitler ruined it for everyone, that asshole. :mad:
The word "victims" is loaded. They should have said "patients" or "beneficiaries".
Quote from: Martinus on August 02, 2011, 02:14:29 PM
The word "victims" is loaded. They should have said "patients" or "beneficiaries".
If you're sterilized against your will I'm pretty sure the word "victim" is appropriate.
Quote from: Barrister on August 02, 2011, 02:17:05 PM
Quote from: Martinus on August 02, 2011, 02:14:29 PM
The word "victims" is loaded. They should have said "patients" or "beneficiaries".
If you're sterilized against your will I'm pretty sure the word "victim" is appropriate.
I don't know. Having kids is not a right. It's a chore.
Quote from: Martinus on August 02, 2011, 02:17:51 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 02, 2011, 02:17:05 PM
Quote from: Martinus on August 02, 2011, 02:14:29 PM
The word "victims" is loaded. They should have said "patients" or "beneficiaries".
If you're sterilized against your will I'm pretty sure the word "victim" is appropriate.
I don't know. Having kids is not a right. It's a chore.
No, they made it a right now.
Quote from: Martinus on August 02, 2011, 02:17:51 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 02, 2011, 02:17:05 PM
Quote from: Martinus on August 02, 2011, 02:14:29 PM
The word "victims" is loaded. They should have said "patients" or "beneficiaries".
If you're sterilized against your will I'm pretty sure the word "victim" is appropriate.
I don't know. Having kids is not a right. It's a chore.
So is Marriage, but that doesn't stop teh gays.
Quote from: Razgovory on August 02, 2011, 05:39:34 PM
So is Marriage, but that doesn't stop teh gays.
Good point. To be honest, I mainly support gay marriage out of spite. It pisses off the fundies.
Quote from: Martinus on August 03, 2011, 02:01:20 AM
Quote from: Razgovory on August 02, 2011, 05:39:34 PM
So is Marriage, but that doesn't stop teh gays.
Good point. To be honest, I mainly support gay marriage out of spite. It pisses off the fundies.
Spite is what keeps me going, day after day.
Quote from: Razgovory on August 03, 2011, 05:55:05 AM
Spite is what keeps me going, day after day.
Spite against whom?
Quote from: Martinus on August 03, 2011, 02:01:20 AM
Quote from: Razgovory on August 02, 2011, 05:39:34 PM
So is Marriage, but that doesn't stop teh gays.
Good point. To be honest, I mainly support gay marriage out of spite. It pisses off the fundies.
<_<
I support it out of the amount of joy those old couples get who originally lived during times when they often hid their sexuality from family, friends, and co-workers.