This is a shocking case of how the whole of the British tabloid press vilified an innocent man and endangered any chance of him being able to get a fair trial:
Channel 4 news item here:
http://www.channel4.com/news/catch-up/display/playlistref/290711/clipid/290711_4ON_CONTEMPT_29 (http://www.channel4.com/news/catch-up/display/playlistref/290711/clipid/290711_4ON_CONTEMPT_29)
I'll see I can find a decent print article:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/mobile/uk-14342766 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/mobile/uk-14342766)
Quote
Daily Mirror and Sun fined over Jo Yeates stories
Two newspapers have been fined over their reporting of the inquiry into landscape architect Jo Yeates' killing.
The High Court fined the Daily Mirror £50,000 and the Sun £18,000 for being in contempt of court by "vilifying" early suspect Christopher Jefferies.
The attorney general said they had engaged in a "feeding frenzy". The Mirror has said it will appeal.
Mr Jefferies, who was innocent, also accepted an apology and "substantial" libel damages from eight newspapers.
His lawyer, Louis Charalambous, described his client as "satisfied" with the outcome.
'Witch-hunt'
"Christopher Jefferies is the latest victim of the regular witch-hunts and character assassinations conducted by the worst elements of the British tabloid media," he said.
Mr Jefferies is also pursuing a civil case against the police for wrongful arrest and false imprisonment, his legal team revealed.
It is thought to be the first time that media organisations have been found guilty of contempt with a story about a suspect who was not, ultimately, tried.
Attorney General Dominic Grieve welcomed the contempt judgement, which saw both newspapers liable for substantial costs.
"These two newspapers completely lost the plot, they engaged in a feeding frenzy over the new year period," he said.
He said it acted as "a reminder to the press that the Contempt of Court Act applies from the time of arrest".
The act aims to prevent potential jurors from becoming influenced by press and broadcast reports.
Miss Yeates vanished after returning to her basement flat in Bristol's Clifton area on 17 December.
Her body was found on a grass verge about three miles away on Christmas Day.
Mr Jefferies was arrested on suspicion of murder on 30 December but later released without charge.
Miss Yeates' neighbour, Dutch national Vincent Tabak, 33, has since admitted her manslaughter and awaits a murder trial.
However, some press coverage in the aftermath of Mr Jefferies' arrest was found to have cast doubt over his character.
Among the suggestions - all untrue - were that he was prone to invade the privacy of his tenants and had acted inappropriately with pupils when teaching.
The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, told the contempt hearing that two articles in the Mirror had "vilified" Mr Jefferies, painting him as an "eccentric loner".
Trial 'impossible'
They had asserted he had been involved in unacceptable sexual behaviour and was linked both to paedophile offences and a 1974 murder, he said.
"These articles would have provided Mr Jefferies with a serious argument that a fair trial would have been impossible," the judge added.
Likewise, the Sun had conveyed the impression Mr Jefferies was "a stalker, with an obsession with death".
The court said the publications could have affected the ability to gather evidence and establish identity.
Earlier, the Sun, Mirror, Sunday Mirror, Daily Mail, Daily Record, Daily Express, Daily Star and the Scotsman agreed a settlement with Mr Jefferies over his libel claims.
A separate hearing was told that the newspapers now accepted Mr Jefferies had nothing to do with Miss Yeates' death and had helped police as much as he could.
There was no basis to suggest, as some reports had done, that he had ever acted inappropriately with any pupil while a teacher, they conceded.
Mr Jefferies had taught English at Clifton College in Bristol for 34 years and was of good character, the court heard.
At the time of the media feeding frenzy the girls boyfriend, released statement defending the landlord and criticising the press.
Journalists are scum. Mockumentary at 11.
Along with politicians, salesmen, lawyers, and people who make mockumentaries.
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on July 29, 2011, 08:21:08 PM
Along with politicians, salesmen, lawyers, and people who make mockumentaries.
Especially cabinet salesmen.
I'll take a hundred cabinet salesmen over one mockumentarian. :bleeding:
The fines are pittance for tabloids like this. They settle out of court for millions - they probably spent more on one week lawyers's worth of fees. Is it impossible to give higher fines in the UK or is the judge an idiot?
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on July 29, 2011, 08:21:08 PM
Along with politicians, salesmen, lawyers, and people who make mockumentaries.
I don't know.
Salesmen and lawyers (except perhaps for the criminal court ones) rarely claim they act in the public interest or adopt some sort of vaunted ethos - they are just doing the job.
Only journalists and politicians claim they have public good at heart, which makes them doubly the scum.
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on July 29, 2011, 11:24:46 PM
I'll take a hundred cabinet salesmen over one mockumentarian. :bleeding:
Why do you hate Rob Reiner?
I suspect most journalists are just doing the job as well. Certainly the ones writing obits and interviewing celebrities are.
And of course, lawyers who deal with the press tend to adopt a vaunted ethos.
Quote from: Ideologue on July 30, 2011, 02:26:51 AM
Why do you hate Rob Reiner?
He gets a pass for making The Princess Bride.
Quote from: Martinus on July 30, 2011, 02:17:57 AM
The fines are pittance for tabloids like this. They settle out of court for millions - they probably spent more on one week lawyers's worth of fees. Is it impossible to give higher fines in the UK or is the judge an idiot?
By this time next week that will be worth several million dollars.
QuoteThe Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge
Lord Judge? What's with the superhero bs?
I remember being shocked at the vilification of this chap at the time. Essentially the press treated him as guilty because he is slightly eccentric. I'm not sure that the cops were without fault either, "let's arrest the odd guy and blame him".