She just lost a lot of male supporters. :lol:
Also, per CdM regulations I am required to note that Bachmann is batshit crazy.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/07/07/263476/breaking-bachmann-pledges-to-ban-pornography/
QuoteBREAKING: Bachmann pledges to ban pornography | Tonight, Michele Bachmann became the first presidential candidate to sign a pledge created by THE FAMiLY LEADER, an influential social-conservative group in Iowa. By signing the pledge Bachmann "vows" to "uphold the institution of marriage as only between one man and one woman" by committing herself to 14 specifics steps. The ninth step calls for the banning of "all forms" of pornography. The pledge also states that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk. You can read all the details of the pledge here.
I hesitated to defend Bachmann, because she's a batshit crazy non-Christian who went to a shit law school. But Jonathan Adler has no such scruples:
http://volokh.com/2011/07/08/did-bachmann-pledge-to-ban-pornography/
Perhaps both of you fuckwads could refrain from posting blog items. :)
You know, I say this a lot, but if they banned pornography (impossible, but let's say they did it), I'm actually pretty sure I would have to move to Canada. Or Mexico. Anywhere would be preferable.
The only blog you'll ever need.
http://hansmeister.blogspot.com/ (http://hansmeister.blogspot.com/)
Quote from: Scipio on July 09, 2011, 08:08:12 AM
I hesitated to defend Bachmann, because she's a batshit crazy non-Christian who went to a shit law school. But Jonathan Adler has no such scruples:
http://volokh.com/2011/07/08/did-bachmann-pledge-to-ban-pornography/
Although as one of the commentators pointed out, look at what it's being lumped in with. ""Pornography" is being lumped in with human trafficking, sex slavery, infanticide, prostitution, and abortion, all of which are serious crimes or the authors think they should be. The only other item on the list that's even questionable is "seduction into promiscuity."
Quote from: Ideologue on July 09, 2011, 08:44:24 AM
You know, I say this a lot, but if they banned pornography (impossible, but let's say they did it), I'm actually pretty sure I would have to move to Canada. Or Mexico. Anywhere would be preferable.
That is sad. That porno rules your life like that.
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 09, 2011, 09:00:08 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on July 09, 2011, 08:44:24 AM
You know, I say this a lot, but if they banned pornography (impossible, but let's say they did it), I'm actually pretty sure I would have to move to Canada. Or Mexico. Anywhere would be preferable.
That is sad. That porno rules your life like that.
I don't like to obey unjust laws, and I'm not a huge fan of jail.
Quote from: Faeelin on July 09, 2011, 08:56:55 AM
Quote from: Scipio on July 09, 2011, 08:08:12 AM
I hesitated to defend Bachmann, because she's a batshit crazy non-Christian who went to a shit law school. But Jonathan Adler has no such scruples:
http://volokh.com/2011/07/08/did-bachmann-pledge-to-ban-pornography/
Although as one of the commentators pointed out, look at what it's being lumped in with. ""Pornography" is being lumped in with human trafficking, sex slavery, infanticide, prostitution, and abortion, all of which are serious crimes or the authors think they should be. The only other item on the list that's even questionable is "seduction into promiscuity."
You know that "seduction into promiscuity" probably means telling kids they should not kill themselves for being gay, right?
Quote from: Scipio on July 09, 2011, 08:08:12 AM
I hesitated to defend Bachmann, because she's a batshit crazy non-Christian who went to a shit law school. But Jonathan Adler has no such scruples:
http://volokh.com/2011/07/08/did-bachmann-pledge-to-ban-pornography/
I don't know why they have to take a reach on something like this, considering she's made so many more concrete statements about batshit crazy stances she can be beaten up for.
Quote from: Martinus on July 09, 2011, 10:08:54 AM
Quote from: Faeelin on July 09, 2011, 08:56:55 AM
Quote from: Scipio on July 09, 2011, 08:08:12 AM
I hesitated to defend Bachmann, because she's a batshit crazy non-Christian who went to a shit law school. But Jonathan Adler has no such scruples:
http://volokh.com/2011/07/08/did-bachmann-pledge-to-ban-pornography/
Although as one of the commentators pointed out, look at what it's being lumped in with. ""Pornography" is being lumped in with human trafficking, sex slavery, infanticide, prostitution, and abortion, all of which are serious crimes or the authors think they should be. The only other item on the list that's even questionable is "seduction into promiscuity."
You know that "seduction into promiscuity" probably means telling kids they should not kill themselves for being gay, right?
Probably not.
Quote from: Ideologue on July 09, 2011, 09:57:27 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 09, 2011, 09:00:08 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on July 09, 2011, 08:44:24 AM
You know, I say this a lot, but if they banned pornography (impossible, but let's say they did it), I'm actually pretty sure I would have to move to Canada. Or Mexico. Anywhere would be preferable.
That is sad. That porno rules your life like that.
I don't like to obey unjust laws, and I'm not a huge fan of jail.
I think you'd survive without another installment of
Meatholes.
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 09, 2011, 10:45:48 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on July 09, 2011, 09:57:27 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 09, 2011, 09:00:08 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on July 09, 2011, 08:44:24 AM
You know, I say this a lot, but if they banned pornography (impossible, but let's say they did it), I'm actually pretty sure I would have to move to Canada. Or Mexico. Anywhere would be preferable.
That is sad. That porno rules your life like that.
I don't like to obey unjust laws, and I'm not a huge fan of jail.
I think you'd survive without another installment of Meatholes.
I don't think I'd want to stay if they outlawed rock music, either. -_-
Quote from: Ideologue on July 09, 2011, 08:44:24 AM
You know, I say this a lot, but if they banned pornography (impossible, but let's say they did it), I'm actually pretty sure I would have to move to Canada. Or Mexico. Anywhere would be preferable.
Most porn is from the US. I doubt the Russian woud be able to fill in the gap.
Wouldn't that be against the 1st amendment tho?
They take your guns, you take their pornos. It's the retardo way.
Quote from: Grey Fox on July 09, 2011, 10:53:31 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on July 09, 2011, 08:44:24 AM
You know, I say this a lot, but if they banned pornography (impossible, but let's say they did it), I'm actually pretty sure I would have to move to Canada. Or Mexico. Anywhere would be preferable.
Most porn is from the US. I doubt the Russian woud be able to fill in the gap.
Wouldn't that be against the 1st amendment tho?
That's why I said it was impossible.
Quote from: Ideologue on July 09, 2011, 10:53:11 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 09, 2011, 10:45:48 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on July 09, 2011, 09:57:27 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 09, 2011, 09:00:08 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on July 09, 2011, 08:44:24 AM
You know, I say this a lot, but if they banned pornography (impossible, but let's say they did it), I'm actually pretty sure I would have to move to Canada. Or Mexico. Anywhere would be preferable.
That is sad. That porno rules your life like that.
I don't like to obey unjust laws, and I'm not a huge fan of jail.
I think you'd survive without another installment of Meatholes.
I don't think I'd want to stay if they outlawed rock music, either. -_-
Let us talk more of your porn addiction. I will be your therapist, Tobias Funke.
My Card:
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fnardsinafrica.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F02%2Ftobias-funke.jpg&hash=3471b6b8d1b02f675bb088925dc6638877011612)
Dammit!
I keep reading this thread title as Batman pledges to ban pornography.
Quote from: Martinus on July 09, 2011, 10:08:54 AM
Quote from: Faeelin on July 09, 2011, 08:56:55 AM
Quote from: Scipio on July 09, 2011, 08:08:12 AM
I hesitated to defend Bachmann, because she's a batshit crazy non-Christian who went to a shit law school. But Jonathan Adler has no such scruples:
http://volokh.com/2011/07/08/did-bachmann-pledge-to-ban-pornography/
Although as one of the commentators pointed out, look at what it's being lumped in with. ""Pornography" is being lumped in with human trafficking, sex slavery, infanticide, prostitution, and abortion, all of which are serious crimes or the authors think they should be. The only other item on the list that's even questionable is "seduction into promiscuity."
You know that "seduction into promiscuity" probably means telling kids they should not kill themselves for being gay, right?
Wait... Are gay kids not supposed to kill themselves anymore?
Quote from: Neil on July 09, 2011, 11:45:17 AM
Wait... Are gay kids not supposed to kill themselves anymore?
They're supposed to have Nazi fetishes and to kill themselves and random classmates.
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 09, 2011, 10:57:48 AM
Let us talk more of your porn addiction. I will be your therapist, Tobias Funke.
:)
Quote from: Ideologue on July 09, 2011, 08:44:24 AM
You know, I say this a lot, but if they banned pornography (impossible, but let's say they did it), I'm actually pretty sure I would have to move to Canada. Or Mexico. Anywhere would be preferable.
Let's assume for the sake of argument they do. How would they go about it? It's rampant on the net, it would be impossible to block all the porn. And while arguably most porn is produced in the States, wouldn't take much to move the industry elsewhere.
Home pornos will increase.
Quote from: Josephus on July 09, 2011, 01:48:33 PM
Quote from: Ideologue on July 09, 2011, 08:44:24 AM
You know, I say this a lot, but if they banned pornography (impossible, but let's say they did it), I'm actually pretty sure I would have to move to Canada. Or Mexico. Anywhere would be preferable.
Let's assume for the sake of argument they do. How would they go about it? It's rampant on the net, it would be impossible to block all the porn. And while arguably most porn is produced in the States, wouldn't take much to move the industry elsewhere.
Since it would require a PRC-style police state, anyway, I'm pretty sure they could figure out a way, and then run me over with a tank.
Well, I'm not voting for her now, regardless of how entertaining she might be.
Quote from: Neil on July 09, 2011, 11:45:17 AM
Quote from: Martinus on July 09, 2011, 10:08:54 AM
Quote from: Faeelin on July 09, 2011, 08:56:55 AM
Quote from: Scipio on July 09, 2011, 08:08:12 AM
I hesitated to defend Bachmann, because she's a batshit crazy non-Christian who went to a shit law school. But Jonathan Adler has no such scruples:
http://volokh.com/2011/07/08/did-bachmann-pledge-to-ban-pornography/
Although as one of the commentators pointed out, look at what it's being lumped in with. ""Pornography" is being lumped in with human trafficking, sex slavery, infanticide, prostitution, and abortion, all of which are serious crimes or the authors think they should be. The only other item on the list that's even questionable is "seduction into promiscuity."
You know that "seduction into promiscuity" probably means telling kids they should not kill themselves for being gay, right?
Wait... Are gay kids not supposed to kill themselves anymore?
No, they are supposed to join a school choir practice.
Quote from: Tyr on July 09, 2011, 11:01:41 AM
Dammit!
I keep reading this thread title as Batman pledges to ban pornography.
And damn you! Since you posted this that happens to me every time I scan the page for updated threads!
Batman needs to loosen up.
Quotesocially conservative group has apologized for including a passage about slavery in a pledge it asked the Republican candidates to sign as a prerequisite for the group's endorsement in the presidential race.
Rep. Michele Bachmann had been the first GOP hopeful to sign "The Marriage Vow," which included in the introduction a section that lamented that "the Institution of Marriage in America is in great crisis."
56
Comments
Weigh InCorrections?
Gallery
Campaign 2012: Who's in and who's out?: Republicans are beginning to announce who will pursue a bid for the presidency.
More On This Story
'Marriage pledge' group apologizes for slavery reference
Bachmann signs marriage pledge
Read 'The Marriage Vow' signed by Bachmann, Santorum
Bachmann, husband temper views on gay rights
View all Items in this Story
One piece of evidence it offered was the claim that a black person born into slavery "was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA's first African-American president."
The suggestion that African American babies may have somehow been better off under slavery touched off sharp criticism from liberals and commentators, who noted that U.S. slaves had been forbidden from marrying and were often sold at auction and separated from their family members.
On Saturday, in a note forwarded to reporters by the Bachmann campaign, the group, the Family Leader, apologized for the reference.
"After careful deliberation and wise insight and input from valued colleagues we deeply respect, we agree that the statement referencing children born into slavery can be misconstrued," said Julie Summa, a spokeswoman for the Family Leader. "We sincerely apologize for any negative feelings this has caused, and have removed the language from the vow."
The primary goal of the document was to affirm "that ALL of us must work to strengthen and support families and marriages between one woman and one man," the statement said.
Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum also signed the pledge, which garnered headlines not only for the slavery passage but also because of its suggestion that homosexuality was not innate and may be a public health hazard. It also condemned pornography and demanded that signatories reject Sharia law.
Earlier Saturday, Bachmann spokeswoman Alice Stewart said that the Minnesota congresswoman had only endorsed the 14-point "candidate vow," which did not include the slavery passage.
However, the entire document was only four pages, including two pages of footnotes, and the slavery section was the first bullet point within the preamble.
The Family Leader is led by Bob Vander Plaats, an unsuccessful GOP candidate for governor in Iowa and a prominent Christian conservative leader in the state.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/conservative-marriage-pledge-group-apologizes-for-slavery-reference/2011/07/09/gIQANT3C6H_story.html?wprss=rss_politics
I was going to post this after I saw it on HuffPo, but then I realized it was mostly bs.
Only on Languish could a bullshit post written about a moronic blog entry create a thread with these legs! :lol:
'Grats to all who participated.