Quote
Heading for a double dip
Nobody in Washington or Wall Street wants to admit it, but the economy is leaning toward another plunge
By Robert Reich, Guest blogger / March 31, 2011
Why aren't Americans being told the truth about the economy? We're heading in the direction of a double dip – but you'd never know it if you listened to the upbeat messages coming out of Wall Street and Washington.
Consumers are 70 percent of the American economy, and consumer confidence is plummeting. It's weaker today on average than at the lowest point of the Great Recession.
The Reuters/University of Michigan survey shows a 10 point decline in March – the tenth largest drop on record. Part of that drop is attributable to rising fuel and food prices. A separate Conference Board's index of consumer confidence, just released, shows consumer confidence at a five-month low — and a large part is due to expectations of fewer jobs and lower wages in the months ahead.
Pessimistic consumers buy less. And fewer sales spells economic trouble ahead.
What about the 192,000 jobs added in February? (We'll know more Friday about how many jobs were added in March.) It's peanuts compared to what's needed. Remember, 125,000 new jobs are necessary just to keep up with a growing number of Americans eligible for employment. And the nation has lost so many jobs over the last three years that even at a rate of 200,000 a month we wouldn't get back to 6 percent unemployment until 2016.
But isn't the economy growing again – by an estimated 2.5 to 2.9 percent this year? Yes, but that's even less than peanuts. The deeper the economic hole, the faster the growth needed to get back on track. By this point in the so-called recovery we'd expect growth of 4 to 6 percent.
Consider that back in 1934, when it was emerging from the deepest hole of the Great Depression, the economy grew 7.7 percent. The next year it grew over 8 percent. In 1936 it grew a whopping 14.1 percent.
Add two other ominous signs: Real hourly wages continue to fall, and housing prices continue to drop. Hourly wages are falling because with unemployment so high, most people have no bargaining power and will take whatever they can get. Housing is dropping because of the ever-larger number of homes people have walked away from because they can't pay their mortgages. But because homes the biggest asset most Americans own, as home prices drop most Americans feel even poorer.
There's no possibility government will make up for the coming shortfall in consumer spending. To the contrary, government is worsening the situation. State and local governments are slashing their budgets by roughly $110 billion this year. The federal stimulus is ending, and the federal government will end up cutting some $30 billion from this year's budget.
In other words: Watch out. We may avoid a double dip but the economy is slowing ominously, and the booster rockets are disappearing.
So why aren't we getting the truth about the economy? For one thing, Wall Street is buoyant – and most financial news you hear comes from the Street. Wall Street profits soared to $426.5 billion last quarter, according to the Commerce Department. (That gain more than offset a drop in the profits of non-financial domestic companies.) Anyone who believes the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill put a stop to the Street's creativity hasn't been watching.
To the extent non-financial companies are doing well, they're making most of their money abroad. Since 1992, for example, G.E.'s offshore profits have risen $92 billion, from $15 billion (which is one reason it pays no U.S. taxes). In fact, the only group that's optimistic about the future are CEOs of big American companies. The Business Roundtable's economic outlook index, which surveys 142 CEOs, is now at its highest point since it began in 2002.
Washington, meanwhile, doesn't want to sound the economic alarm. The White House and most Democrats want Americans to believe the economy is on an upswing.
Republicans, for their part, worry that if they tell it like it is Americans will want government to do more rather than less. They'd rather not talk about jobs and wages, and put the focus instead on deficit reduction (or spread the lie that by reducing the deficit we'll get more jobs and higher wages).
I'm sorry to have to deliver the bad news, but it's better you know.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Robert-Reich-s-Blog/2011/0331/Heading-for-a-double-dip
Coupled with Wal-Mart's warnings of higher prices across the board coming soon...who knows.
Everytime there's an article saying one thing about the economy, there's another article saying the exact opposite. Cal's strategy: consult the Magic 8 Ball.
I'd rather watch Cramer and ignore 90% of it.
And this is a surprise ?
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 01, 2011, 01:21:28 PM
I'd rather watch Cramer and ignore 90% of it.
I watch him and often do the opposite of what he says. I love how he likes to look sideways into the camera and also not make eye contact with the person interviewing him (which is often that semi-hot Alix Steele chick). Cramer = worst liar ever.
But entertaining nonetheless. One day, he is going to slice his throat open playing with knives and swords.
Robert Reich is a Big Labor hack and will say anything to get more public spending.
Oh, is that who wrote this? :lol: I didn't notice that earlier. :blush:
Never listen to dwarves, unless said dwarf is Ronnie James Dio. :cool:
We're doomed...... :unsure:
Predicting a double-dip is way too played out. Who will be the first to predict a: triple dip?
I'll go on record now: I predict a quadruple dip.
I predict an infinite dip with the dips spaced 5-50 years apart.
Is it wrong that I can't read double dip without thinking of....the non-economic use of the term?
Quote from: Admiral Yi on April 01, 2011, 02:23:07 PM
I predict an infinite dip with the dips spaced 5-50 years apart.
Want to bet on it?
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on April 01, 2011, 02:20:30 PM
I'll go on record now: I predict a quadruple dip.
Do I hear 5? Five dips...
It'll wait until I buy some stocks.
And the company I buy stocks in will go bankrupt.
Even if it's Coca-Cola.
Maybe this is the new reality and the economy is never going to go back to where it was.
Quote from: Siege on April 04, 2011, 11:30:19 AM
Maybe this is the new reality and the economy is never going to go back to where it was.
I don't think that's mostly true, but there is something to that. Economy is not a zero-sum game, but it's more zero-sum than free market ideologues like to believe. Resources are limited, and other economies growing rapidly would push the resource prices permanently higher. US economy has benefited from cheap commodity prices, and the sharp spike in them would be a drag on our economy for some time. It would also be a drag on our quality of life.