Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: Eddie Teach on April 08, 2010, 05:36:31 AM

Title: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Eddie Teach on April 08, 2010, 05:36:31 AM
Was playing on Sporcle, saw a quiz for top 2009 baby names. Here it is. :bleeding:

1. Aidin
2. Noah
3. Liam
4. Cayden
5. Ethan
6. Jackson
7. Landon
8. Jacob
9. Kaleb
10. Lucas
11. Braden
12. Benjamin
13. Gavin
14. Conner
15. Elijah
16. Oliver
17. Alexander
18. Owen
19. Gabriel
20. Logan
21. William
22. Tristen
23. Jaden
24. Cole
25. Asher
26. Jack
27. James
28. Chase
29. Nathan
30. Andrew
31. Elliot
32. Aaron
33. Colin
34. Greyson
Placement Name
35. Mason
36. Nicholas
37. Joshua
38. Dylan
39. Isaac
40. Matthue
41. Levi
42. Jasper
43. Zachary
44. Carter
45. Nathaniel
46. Evan
47. Sebastain
48. Dominick
49. Wyatt
50. Henry
51. Ryan
52. Michael
53. Luke
54. Emmett
55. Ian
56. Micah
57. Finn
58. Samuel
59. Adam
60. Xander
61. Daniel
62. Seth
63. Parker
64. Rider
65. Edward
66. Xavier
67. Max
68. Damien
Placement Name
69. Jonah
70. Miles
71. Adrain
72. Tyler
73. Christopher
74. Isaiah
75. Carson
76. Eli
77. Thomas
78. Holden
79. Hayden
80. David
81. Cameron
82. Joseph
83. Austin
84. Hunter
85. Colton
86. Brody
87. Blake
88. Rhys
89. Gage
90. Jonathan
91. Rylee
92. Joel
93. Brandon
94. Jude
95. Jason
96. Anthony
97. Nolan
98. Cooper
99. Maddox
100. John
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: CountDeMoney on April 08, 2010, 05:45:30 AM
Looks like a list of emo abstinence-porn vampires.



We named the dog Aidin.

Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Josquius on April 08, 2010, 05:48:01 AM
Liam is pretty much the only one of the top 10 which wouldn't have been beaten up when I was a kid.

I predict: a very succesful boxer in 3 decades time called Noah.

I must comment also:
Quote66. Xavier
:nerd:
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Valdemar on April 08, 2010, 06:18:11 AM
I fail to see what is wrong with Jacob, Lucas and Benjamin.

Hugely popluar names here every 10 or so years.

V
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Grey Fox on April 08, 2010, 06:23:07 AM
Except some lame spelling, what's wrong?
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Grallon on April 08, 2010, 06:36:25 AM
Not enough elven names in that list  <_<




G.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Caliga on April 08, 2010, 06:41:12 AM
Is that a list of US baby names?  If so, we seem to be suddenly obsessed with the Irish for some strange reason.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Eddie Teach on April 08, 2010, 06:48:15 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 08, 2010, 06:23:07 AM
Except some lame spelling, what's wrong?

The cutesy spelling and faux Gaelicisms are annoying but the main problem is the excessive trendiness. Earlier generations saw more gradual shifts in what names were popular and what names weren't. This generation has picked names that wouldn't have been recognized as such when it was born. It's also thrown most of the more traditional names by the wayside.

If you still need convincing, look at names 1, 4, 11, and 23(and to a lesser extent, 79).
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Grey Fox on April 08, 2010, 06:50:35 AM
I see.

It's not because we don't name our kids : Sifroid, Nazaire, Alfée that's it's all lame tho.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Admiral Yi on April 08, 2010, 07:00:29 AM
Who's doing all the Old Testament names?
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Caliga on April 08, 2010, 07:03:42 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on April 08, 2010, 07:00:29 AM
Who's doing all the Old Testament names?
:Joos
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Cerr on April 08, 2010, 07:03:54 AM
Ugh, misspelled versions of Aidan and Conor.

At least Liam isn't misspelled too. Never heard of any Americans named Liam. I wonder why that's become popular in the US. Maybe due to Liam Neeson.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: jimmy olsen on April 08, 2010, 07:20:56 AM
Quote from: Cerr on April 08, 2010, 07:03:54 AM
Ugh, misspelled versions of Aidan and Conor.

At least Liam isn't misspelled too. Never heard of any Americans named Liam. I wonder why that's become popular in the US. Maybe due to Liam Neeson.
I had a kid named Liam in my high school class.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Valdemar on April 08, 2010, 09:01:00 AM
Quote from: Caliga on April 08, 2010, 07:03:42 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on April 08, 2010, 07:00:29 AM
Who's doing all the Old Testament names?
:Joos

Esp. David and Jakob are quite popular here, has always been. Ofc so is Christian  :P

V
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: DisturbedPervert on April 08, 2010, 09:07:33 AM
How did they get this list?  Is it some kind of poll or actual birth records?  I'd think the top of the list would be dominated by Hispanic names.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Josquius on April 08, 2010, 09:15:03 AM
Quote from: Valdemar on April 08, 2010, 06:18:11 AM
I fail to see what is wrong with Jacob, Lucas and Benjamin.

Hugely popluar names here every 10 or so years.

V
Benjamin is a bit bleh but I suppose every Benjamin I've ever known just got Ben, which is fine and normal.
Jacob...is a bit too biblical. I don't know any of my age but I'm pretty sure my mam mentioned having some in her school; apparently old fashioned names are very much in fashion.
Lucas is just weird for a first name in the UK. Any kid unfortunate enough to have such a name will forever be branded Star Wars kid.

Number 6 is the big stand out weird one for me.
Jackson is a surname. As a first name its just bizzare. I'm familiar with Pollock but artists usually have odd names.
I wonder how many Jackson's have a dad called Jack though...
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: jimmy olsen on April 08, 2010, 09:39:43 AM
Quote from: Tyr on April 08, 2010, 09:15:03 AM
Quote from: Valdemar on April 08, 2010, 06:18:11 AM
I fail to see what is wrong with Jacob, Lucas and Benjamin.

Hugely popluar names here every 10 or so years.

V
Benjamin is a bit bleh but I suppose every Benjamin I've ever known just got Ben, which is fine and normal.
Jacob...is a bit too biblical. I don't know any of my age but I'm pretty sure my mam mentioned having some in her school; apparently old fashioned names are very much in fashion.
Lucas is just weird for a first name in the UK. Any kid unfortunate enough to have such a name will forever be branded Star Wars kid.

Number 6 is the big stand out weird one for me.
Jackson is a surname. As a first name its just bizzare. I'm familiar with Pollock but artists usually have odd names.
I wonder how many Jackson's have a dad called Jack though...
Jacob and Lucas are perfectly normal names.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Martinus on April 08, 2010, 11:01:53 AM
Well, the English version of Jacob is James - so Jacob should be less popular. Sorta like being English and naming your kid Piter instead of Peter.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 11:02:52 AM
I am so tired of baby names lists. :bleeding:
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Caliga on April 08, 2010, 11:07:57 AM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 11:02:52 AM
I am so tired of baby names lists. :bleeding:
Why can't it just be Bee Bee Junior?  :)
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Grey Fox on April 08, 2010, 11:13:19 AM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 11:02:52 AM
I am so tired of baby names lists. :bleeding:

Then stop holding on & let your wife make the choice.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 11:16:41 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 08, 2010, 11:13:19 AM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 11:02:52 AM
I am so tired of baby names lists. :bleeding:

Then stop holding on & let your wife make the choice.

If I didn't she'd probably pick a name off of that top ten list.  We must make a stand!  No Jackson, no Ethan, no Noah!

I believe we have settled on Matthew for a boy.  Girl is still unsettled.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Grey Fox on April 08, 2010, 11:17:33 AM
Good Name.

You need a proper queen name. Marguerite maybe?
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 11:20:03 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 08, 2010, 11:17:33 AM
Good Name.

You need a proper queen name. Marguerite maybe?

I tried to push Elizabeth, didn't get far.  Victoria is right out (my mom's name) or else I'd try that.   :bowler:
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Valdemar on April 08, 2010, 12:33:15 PM
Quote from: Tyr on April 08, 2010, 09:15:03 AM
Quote from: Valdemar on April 08, 2010, 06:18:11 AM
I fail to see what is wrong with Jacob, Lucas and Benjamin.

Hugely popluar names here every 10 or so years.

V
Benjamin is a bit bleh but I suppose every Benjamin I've ever known just got Ben, which is fine and normal.
Jacob...is a bit too biblical. I don't know any of my age but I'm pretty sure my mam mentioned having some in her school; apparently old fashioned names are very much in fashion.
Lucas is just weird for a first name in the UK. Any kid unfortunate enough to have such a name will forever be branded Star Wars kid.

Number 6 is the big stand out weird one for me.
Jackson is a surname. As a first name its just bizzare. I'm familiar with Pollock but artists usually have odd names.
I wonder how many Jackson's have a dad called Jack though...


Shrug, I don't think anyone here connects Jakob with he bible, my youngest i named Jakob, a number of school and study buddies have been Jakobs, so is our own Jacob, who is Danish.There are at least three Benjamins and Lukas in my sons classes or years at school..

V
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: MadImmortalMan on April 08, 2010, 12:34:19 PM
The is the embarrassment of my generation, frankly.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: katmai on April 08, 2010, 01:27:46 PM
Oh noes Jackson is now a common name.
Guess that is why meri now calls him jak.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Eddie Teach on April 08, 2010, 02:22:39 PM
Quote from: DisturbedPervert on April 08, 2010, 09:07:33 AM
How did they get this list?  Is it some kind of poll or actual birth records?  I'd think the top of the list would be dominated by Hispanic names.

Yeah, I'm curious about that as well, they didn't have a source, so it's possible it's not even an American list. Well, after some online searching it does look a lot like the other American lists I'm seeing, but haven't seen this exact list.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Jacob on April 08, 2010, 02:53:38 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on April 08, 2010, 02:22:39 PMYeah, I'm curious about that as well, they didn't have a source, so it's possible it's not even an American list. Well, after some online searching it does look a lot like the other American lists I'm seeing, but haven't seen this exact list.

The US census bureau has a list of name popularity.  It goes back as far as 1880, and can show as much as the top 1000 names.

In 1892, for example, the top ten names were:

Quote
1    John    Mary
2    William    Anna
3    James    Elizabeth
4    George    Margaret
5    Charles    Ruth
6    Frank    Florence
7    Joseph    Emma
8    Robert    Ethel
9    Harry    Helen
10    Henry    Clara

The 990th to 1000th most popular names were:

Quote
990     Duke    Letta
991     Eben    Libby
992     Ebert    Lilie
993     Edith    Love
994     Elden    Lular
995     Elige    Maurine
996     Ella            Maxie
997   Elwin    Millicent
998     Elzy    Mima
999     Encarnacion    Miranda
1000 Erick    Norine

Link here: http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/babynames/

It doesn't go beyond 2008 presently.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Eddie Teach on April 08, 2010, 03:28:27 PM
Oh, nice, the census list is much more reasonable.

Top 10 Names for 2008 Rank Male name Female name
1 Jacob Emma
2 Michael Isabella
3 Ethan Emily
4 Joshua Madison
5 Daniel Ava
6 Alexander Olivia
7 Anthony Sophia
8 William Abigail
9 Christopher Elizabeth
10 Matthew Chloe


Your 990-1000 list looks like it's alphabetized.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Malthus on April 08, 2010, 04:23:49 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 11:02:52 AM
I am so tired of baby names lists. :bleeding:

Maybe just ask us on Languish to do the naming. What could possibly go wrong with that?  :hmm:
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Eddie Teach on April 08, 2010, 04:27:14 PM
Name her Medea.  :)
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: MadImmortalMan on April 08, 2010, 04:41:48 PM
Or Circe.

:)
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Jacob on April 08, 2010, 04:44:34 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on April 08, 2010, 03:28:27 PMYour 990-1000 list looks like it's alphabetized.

Yeah.  Probably because they alphabetize the ones that have the same number of occurrences, so these are probably all at the minimum threshold for being included on the list.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Ed Anger on April 08, 2010, 04:49:29 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on April 08, 2010, 04:41:48 PM
Or Circe.

:)

I actually thought of the Furies during the naming process. Tisiphone to be exact.

Avenger of Murder? COOLEST CHICK NAME MEANING EVER.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Agelastus on April 08, 2010, 05:35:00 PM
I've always had a soft spot for "Briseis" if a name from Greek or Roman legends is called for.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Razgovory on April 08, 2010, 05:43:59 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on April 08, 2010, 04:41:48 PM
Or Circe.

:)

Or Women Number 2.  That way you won't mix'em up.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: CountDeMoney on April 08, 2010, 07:37:21 PM
Quote from: katmai on April 08, 2010, 01:27:46 PM
Oh noes Jackson is now a common name.

More Confederate romanticism bullshit.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Josquius on April 09, 2010, 06:26:00 AM
The UK, as I said old fashioned names are very in vogue. :bowler:

1   JACK
2   OLIVER
3   THOMAS
4   HARRY
5   JOSHUA
6   ALFIE
7   CHARLIE
8   DANIEL
9   JAMES
10   WILLIAM

1   OLIVIA
2   RUBY  (wow thats a old lady name)
3   EMILY
4   GRACE
5   JESSICA
6   CHLOE
7   SOPHIE
8   LILY
9   AMELIA
10   EVIE   (:bleeding: people watching too much Skins?)
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Caliga on April 09, 2010, 06:59:47 AM
Didn't some idiotic actress or singer or something name a kid Ruby recently?  Most people can't think for themselves and need TV to tell them what to do. :)
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Scipio on April 09, 2010, 07:13:45 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on April 08, 2010, 05:45:30 AM
Looks like a list of emo abstinence-porn vampires.



We named the dog Aidin.
And they can't even spell Aidan right.  Sheesh.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Caliga on April 09, 2010, 07:21:25 AM
There was some big news story here recently where a house caught on fire and the nanny saved a kid's life by literally running through fire to rescue him and suffering third degree burns in the process.  That kid's name was "Aden".

LOL is his brother named: Muscat
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Ed Anger on April 09, 2010, 09:29:15 AM
Quote from: Caliga on April 09, 2010, 07:21:25 AM
There was some big news story here recently where a house caught on fire and the nanny saved a kid's life by literally running through fire to rescue him and suffering third degree burns in the process.  That kid's name was "Aden".

LOL is his brother named: Muscat

One of the Gosselin brats is named Aaden or some such bulltshit. But I only watched a few shows to watch Jon murder Kate for nagging. IT NEVER HAPPENED.  :mad:
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Barrister on April 11, 2010, 07:30:49 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 11:16:41 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 08, 2010, 11:13:19 AM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 11:02:52 AM
I am so tired of baby names lists. :bleeding:

Then stop holding on & let your wife make the choice.

If I didn't she'd probably pick a name off of that top ten list.  We must make a stand!  No Jackson, no Ethan, no Noah!

I believe we have settled on Matthew for a boy.  Girl is still unsettled.

Names of the moment:

Matthew Charles (my, and my dad's middles names are Charles)
Kaitlin Grace (my wife's grandma's name was Grace)

discuss amongst yourselves.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Ed Anger on April 11, 2010, 07:31:50 PM
Kaitlin is nice.  :)
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Barrister on April 11, 2010, 07:33:27 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 11, 2010, 07:31:50 PM
Kaitlin is nice.  :)

Did you use Kaitlin for one of your 12 children?   :huh:
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Ed Anger on April 11, 2010, 07:35:47 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 11, 2010, 07:33:27 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 11, 2010, 07:31:50 PM
Kaitlin is nice.  :)

Did you use Kaitlin for one of your 12 children?   :huh:

My wife has the Y variant (Kaitlyn) for her name.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Barrister on April 11, 2010, 07:37:41 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 11, 2010, 07:35:47 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 11, 2010, 07:33:27 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 11, 2010, 07:31:50 PM
Kaitlin is nice.  :)

Did you use Kaitlin for one of your 12 children?   :huh:

My wife has the Y variant (Kaitlyn) for her name.

Ah. :)
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Eddie Teach on April 11, 2010, 07:59:27 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 11, 2010, 07:35:47 PM
My wife has the Y variant (Kaitlyn) for her name.

If true, you'll probably be getting a visit from Caliga sometime next week.  :lol:
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Agelastus on April 11, 2010, 08:01:08 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 11, 2010, 07:31:50 PM
Kaitlin is nice.  :)

I agree. It is a lovely sounding name.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Caliga on April 12, 2010, 05:17:22 AM
Quote from: Barrister on April 11, 2010, 07:30:49 PM
Kaitlin Grace (my wife's grandma's name was Grace)
My niece is named Lily Grace for the same reason.  :)
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Grey Fox on April 12, 2010, 06:06:29 AM
My (brand new) niece is name Lily Rose. Not for her Grandma.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: derspiess on April 12, 2010, 11:55:51 AM
I never thought "Tommy" would be so unique, but you never hear it being yelled at the playground unless I'm yelling at my kid.

Still kinda surprised the wife went along with "William Thomas", but then again I gave up on "Frederick William" and "William Tecumseh Sherman" :D
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Barrister on April 19, 2010, 12:06:14 PM
Apparently Matthew won't fly because it reminds my wife's father of someone.  :bleeding:

New names of the day (which are subject to change without notice up until the baby is born:

Abigail Grace
Timothy George (probably not George though)
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Ed Anger on April 19, 2010, 02:40:57 PM
Jeff George.  :)
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Barrister on April 19, 2010, 02:44:08 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 19, 2010, 02:40:57 PM
Jeff George.  :)

No.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Caliga on April 19, 2010, 02:53:20 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 19, 2010, 12:06:14 PM
Timothy
You might as well name him Taintothy. :(
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Ed Anger on April 19, 2010, 02:56:13 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 19, 2010, 02:44:08 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 19, 2010, 02:40:57 PM
Jeff George.  :)

No.

:lol:

Never trust a man with two first names.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Barrister on April 19, 2010, 03:06:36 PM
Quote from: Caliga on April 19, 2010, 02:53:20 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 19, 2010, 12:06:14 PM
Timothy
You might as well name him Taintothy. :(

I knew someone would suggest that.  :blurgh:

But you Cal?  You've typically even stood up for Tim, why would you suddenly throw him under the bus?  :(
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Eddie Teach on April 19, 2010, 03:09:04 PM
to get elected POLOT?
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Caliga on April 19, 2010, 03:10:46 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 19, 2010, 03:06:36 PM
But you Cal?  You've typically even stood up for Tim, why would you suddenly throw him under the bus?  :(
It's a joke dude.  Tim will know it's just good natured ribbing.  I've met him like five times in person... he's cool and yes I do vouch for him when people seriously attack him.
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Barrister on April 19, 2010, 03:11:34 PM
Quote from: Caliga on April 19, 2010, 03:10:46 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 19, 2010, 03:06:36 PM
But you Cal?  You've typically even stood up for Tim, why would you suddenly throw him under the bus?  :(
It's a joke dude.  Tim will know it's just good natured ribbing.  I've met him like five times in person... he's cool and yes I do vouch for him when people seriously attack him.

This is the second time today you seem to think I can't tell when you're joking.  Very curious.   :hmm:
Title: Re: Maybe the Baby Boomers weren't so bad
Post by: Caliga on April 19, 2010, 03:17:07 PM
Great, now my left eye is twitching again.  :mad: