Police should have let him catch them. <_<
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30136615/
QuoteWar hero helps nab suspects in dog killing
Labrador retriever had been given to him to help heal after Afghan combat
msnbc.com staff and news service reports
updated 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
HUNTSVILLE, Texas - A highly decorated Navy SEAL who found his beloved yellow Labrador retriever shot dead outside his home helped capture the alleged gunmen following a high-speed chase through three counties.
Marcus Luttrell stayed on the line with a 911 operator as he tried to catch the fleeing suspects during the 40-mile chase that reached speeds of over 100 mph.
"I told them, 'You need to get somebody out here because if I catch them I'm going to kill them,'" Luttrell said he told the operator, the Houston Chronicle reported.
Story continues below ↓advertisement | your ad here
Police stopped the three suspects and charged two men with cruelty to a non-livestock animal. The driver of the vehicle was cited for not having a license.
There are at least five area dog killings in recent months that could be linked to the case, said Texas Ranger Steven Jeter.
Lone survivor of Taliban attack
Luttrell was awarded the Navy Cross for combat heroism in 2006. He is the lone SEAL team member to survive a June 2005 firefight with the Taliban in Afghanistan and was given a puppy to help him heal after he returned from the war. He named it Dasy as an acronym for his SEAL team members lost in that battle.
Luttrell told the Houston Chronicle on Wednesday that he had heard a gunshot on the night of April 1, checked on his mom inside the house and then went outside where he saw Dasy.
"I could tell she tried to get away because there was a blood trail," Luttrell said. "When I saw she was dead, the only thing that popped into my head was, 'I've got to take these guys out.'"
Luttrell was recovering from surgery, but when he spotted a suspicious car parked nearby, he crawled under a fence and snuck up on the strangers, aiming a 9mm pistol at them from about 25 yards away.
He didn't fire, however, and as the car left, he ran to his pickup and launched the high-speed chase. His pickup couldn't keep up with the car, but police eventually stopped the suspects.
Luttrell said he confronted the men. "I was like, 'Which one of you guys killed my dog?'" he said. "They started talking smack."
"I did everything right; I didn't do anything wrong," he said. "Make sure everyone knows they cold-bloodily murdered."
Now in 'middle of nowhere'
"Marcus is trained to do certain things; he fell back on his training," Jeter, the Texas Ranger, said, adding, "I wouldn't advocate to the general public to do what he has done — to follow them at that rate of speed."
In his phone interview, Luttrell said he had left his Huntsville home and was in "the middle of nowhere."
He added that Dasy's killing was a huge setback in his life.
"I was trying to talk myself out of being who I am," he told the Chronicle. "Talking to myself about not doing the one thing I am good at."
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Killing a dog is not murder.
Quote from: Scipio on April 09, 2009, 08:39:36 PM
Killing a dog is not murder.
Though killing an ex-Seal's dog that helped him recover from the loss of his entire company deserves murder.
Quote from: Scipio on April 09, 2009, 08:39:36 PM
Killing a dog is not murder.
Most dogs are more likable than most people.
Quote from: Queequeg on April 09, 2009, 08:47:49 PM
Quote from: Scipio on April 09, 2009, 08:39:36 PM
Killing a dog is not murder.
Though killing an ex-Seal's dog that helped him recover from the loss of his entire company deserves murder.
Talk about your non-sequitur. If a killing is justified, it is, by definition, not murder.
Quote from: Scipio on April 09, 2009, 09:02:09 PM
Talk about your non-sequitur. If a killing is justified, it is, by definition, not murder.
Come on lawyer-man, even the village idiot (me) knows that "justified" just means "had a motive."
Quote from: DontSayBanana on April 09, 2009, 09:12:22 PM
Quote from: Scipio on April 09, 2009, 09:02:09 PM
Talk about your non-sequitur. If a killing is justified, it is, by definition, not murder.
Come on lawyer-man, even the village idiot (me) knows that "justified" just means "had a motive."
Not at all. No. Not bya fuckin' long shot.
Quote from: Scipio on April 09, 2009, 09:02:09 PM
Quote from: Queequeg on April 09, 2009, 08:47:49 PM
Quote from: Scipio on April 09, 2009, 08:39:36 PM
Killing a dog is not murder.
Though killing an ex-Seal's dog that helped him recover from the loss of his entire company deserves murder.
Talk about your non-sequitur. If a killing is justified, it is, by definition, not murder.
Disagree.
Quote from: Darth Wagtaros on April 09, 2009, 09:13:05 PMNot at all. No. Not bya fuckin' long shot.
Self-defense is an exception, but even then, that's not universal. Either you're wrong, or there's a lot of revenge killers on death row to whom we owe apologies.
Quote from: Barrister on April 09, 2009, 09:19:20 PM
Quote from: Scipio on April 09, 2009, 09:02:09 PM
Quote from: Queequeg on April 09, 2009, 08:47:49 PM
Quote from: Scipio on April 09, 2009, 08:39:36 PM
Killing a dog is not murder.
Though killing an ex-Seal's dog that helped him recover from the loss of his entire company deserves murder.
Talk about your non-sequitur. If a killing is justified, it is, by definition, not murder.
Disagree.
"Murder is when a man of sound memory, and of the age of discretion, unlawfully killeth within any country of the realm any reasonable creature in rerum natura under the King's peace, with malice aforethought, either expressed by the party or implied by law, so as the party wounded, or hurt, etc. die of the wound or hurt, etc. within a year and a day after the same." Sir Edward Coke
I direct your attention to the phrase "unlawfully killeth." Unlawfully here means, without legal justification. Ergo, a killing of another even with malice aforethought that is done with justification is not murder.
Manslaughter is not murder. Justifiable homicide is not murder. Negligent homicide is not murder. Many killings are not murder.
Alright. Nice save, Scip, but it's still your non sequitur now. You win on definition, but only by splitting hairs, because you left out the word "intentional" when it was obviously what was in question. AFAIK, "justifiable homicide" only covers "authorized use of deadly force" and "reasonable self defense." The former doesn't cover personnel that are off-duty or not active, and the latter isn't universally recognized.
But you can't murder an animal, right?
Meat is murder.
So is beating it. :pope:
Quote from: Lucidor on April 10, 2009, 12:24:33 AM
But you can't murder an animal, right?
Can't, or won't?
Quote from: DontSayBanana on April 09, 2009, 09:43:06 PM
Alright. Nice save, Scip, but it's still your non sequitur now. You win on definition, but only by splitting hairs, because you left out the word "intentional" when it was obviously what was in question. AFAIK, "justifiable homicide" only covers "authorized use of deadly force" and "reasonable self defense." The former doesn't cover personnel that are off-duty or not active, and the latter isn't universally recognized.
WTF are you talking about? I'm talking about murder.
Quote from: garbon on April 10, 2009, 12:36:04 AM
Meat is murder.
If meat is murder, then murder is delicious.
How can CdM not have posted in this thread yet?
Bastards for killing the dog; frigging losers. And given the reason why this guy had the dog, it's all the more annoying.
Quote from: Caliga on April 10, 2009, 06:49:02 AM
If meat is murder, then murder is delicious.
Irrelevant much?
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 10, 2009, 08:12:56 AM
How can CdM not have posted in this thread yet?
Dog killing. If somebody edited the title to "cat" killing, he'd be all over this. :contract:
Quote from: DontSayBanana on April 10, 2009, 09:50:24 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 10, 2009, 08:12:56 AM
How can CdM not have posted in this thread yet?
Dog killing. If somebody edited the title to "cat" killing, he'd be all over this. :contract:
That's Raciss! :mad:
Quote from: DontSayBanana on April 10, 2009, 09:50:24 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 10, 2009, 08:12:56 AM
How can CdM not have posted in this thread yet?
Dog killing. If somebody edited the title to "cat" killing, he'd be all over this. :contract:
Meh, he should've waxed them when he had the chance. Good luck finding a jury that would convict him.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on April 10, 2009, 05:21:06 PM
Meh, he should've waxed them when he had the chance. Good luck finding a jury that would convict him.
Is true. Generally, you get the Cross by barely being ineligible for The Medal. The defense would just have to read the citation, and the jury wouldn't leave the box before rendering the not-guilty verdict.