Let's just say I'm dubious on how effective this will be.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/22/education/22educ.html
QuoteObama to Propose New Reading and Math Standards
By SAM DILLON
Published: February 21, 2010
WASHINGTON — In a proposed change to the No Child Left Behind law, the Obama administration would require states to adopt new academic standards to qualify for federal money from a $14 billion program that concentrates on impoverished students, the White House said Sunday.
The proposal, part of the administration's recommendations for a Congressional overhaul of the law, would require states to adopt "college- and career-ready standards" in reading and mathematics.
The current law, signed by President George W. Bush in 2002, requires states to adopt "challenging academic standards" in reading and math to receive federal money for poor students under the program known as Title I, but leaves it up to states to decide what qualifies as "challenging."
The result was that states set their standards at widely varied levels, some as rigorous as those used in high-performing countries like Japan, but others at far lower levels that lay out at best, mediocre expectations for their students.
"Because economic progress and educational achievement go hand in hand, educating every American student to graduate prepared for college and success in a new work force is a national imperative," the White House said in a statement. "Meeting this challenge requires that state standards reflect a level of teaching and learning needed for students to graduate ready for success in college and careers."
President Obama was scheduled to announce the proposal in a meeting on Monday with governors who are gathered in Washington for the annual winter meeting of the National Governors Association.
Since last year, 48 states have been collaborating to write common standards in math and reading, coordinated by the governors' group and with the encouragement of the White House. Texas and Alaska decided not to participate in that state-led effort.
The common-standards effort has produced a draft, and earlier this month Kentucky became the first state to approve the substitution of the new standards for the state's own standards in the two subjects.
How successful or quickly the governors, legislatures, state boards of education and other authorities in other states will be in agreeing on adoption of the new standards is not clear.
"In better aligning the law to support college- and career-ready standards," the White House statement said, its proposed rewrite of the No Child Left Behind law would "require all states to adopt and certify that they have college- and career-ready standards which may include common standards developed by a state-led consortium, as a condition of qualifying for Title I funding."
The four Democratic and Republican leaders of the House education committee announced last week that they were working together on the latest overhaul of the law.
In its 2011 budget request earlier this month, the White House said it hoped to replace the law's much-criticized school rating system, known as adequate yearly progress, with a new accountability system.
Quote from: jimmy olsen on February 22, 2010, 12:57:33 AM
Let's just say I'm dubious on how effective this will be.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/22/education/22educ.html
Of course you are. Is there anything he could do that you wouldn't be dubious of? :rolleyes:
Is was a shitty law from the start; god forbid he does anything to change that.
Quote from: sbr on February 22, 2010, 01:08:09 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on February 22, 2010, 12:57:33 AM
Let's just say I'm dubious on how effective this will be.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/22/education/22educ.html
Of course you are. Is there anything he could do that you wouldn't be dubious of? :rolleyes:
Is was a shitty law from the start; god forbid he does anything to change that.
C'mon timmay just think how much better your spelling might have been if this had been active!
Quote from: sbr on February 22, 2010, 01:08:09 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on February 22, 2010, 12:57:33 AM
Let's just say I'm dubious on how effective this will be.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/22/education/22educ.html
Of course you are. Is there anything he could do that you wouldn't be dubious of? :rolleyes:
Is was a shitty law from the start; god forbid he does anything to change that.
He should just get rid of the law, it's crap.
Is it because I is black?
:bleeding:
A waste of time. He should be federalizing education.
Quote from: Neil on February 22, 2010, 08:58:14 AM
A waste of time. He should be federalizing education.
Indeed. Why we leave education in the hands of the least competent public officials is beyond me.
Quote from: jimmy olsen on February 22, 2010, 01:15:46 AM
He should just get rid of the law, it's crap.
And yet it actually seems to be a law and goal that both Republicans and Democrats can co-operate on, which, if I believed everything I'd heard over the last year or so, I should consider to be impossible.
I have no personal aquaintance with this law, but what's the problem with attempting to set a minimum expected level of achievement for the average pupil?
Quote from: Razgovory on February 22, 2010, 09:21:16 AM
Quote from: Neil on February 22, 2010, 08:58:14 AM
A waste of time. He should be federalizing education.
Indeed. Why we leave education in the hands of the least competent public officials is beyond me.
We don't. They aren't federalized yet.
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on February 22, 2010, 01:09:56 PM
We don't. They aren't federalized yet.
:lol:
I think Raz was eluding to the horrific nightmare that is the local school board.... if so, he's correct to generally label them "[in]competent".
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on February 22, 2010, 01:09:56 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on February 22, 2010, 09:21:16 AM
Quote from: Neil on February 22, 2010, 08:58:14 AM
A waste of time. He should be federalizing education.
Indeed. Why we leave education in the hands of the least competent public officials is beyond me.
We don't. They aren't federalized yet.
:mad:
Quote from: Caliga on February 22, 2010, 01:28:25 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on February 22, 2010, 01:09:56 PM
We don't. They aren't federalized yet.
:lol:
I think Raz was eluding to the horrific nightmare that is the local school board.... if so, he's correct to generally label them "[in]competent".
I hope he was alluding.
Today, still wanted by the schoolboard. he survives by hiding in a basement. If you have a problem...if no one else can help...and if you can find him...maybe you can hire...Raz.
Arne Duncan's been doing some interesting things with funding so far. Don't know enough about this though.
Quote from: frunk on February 22, 2010, 02:38:52 PM
Today, still wanted by the schoolboard. he survives by hiding in a basement. If you have a problem...if no one else can help...and if you can find him...maybe you can hire...Raz.
Hmm tough choice the A-Team or Raz.
The A-Team never kills anybody, wimps.