DOOM!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34242705/ns/technology_and_science-science/
QuoteEarth could plunge into sudden ice age
Experts: 'Big Freeze' about 12,800 years ago happened within months
By Charles Q. Choi
Special to LiveScience
updated 3:03 p.m. ET Dec. 2, 2009
In the film, "The Day After Tomorrow," the world gets gripped in ice within the span of just a few weeks. Now research now suggests an eerily similar event might indeed have occurred in the past.
Looking ahead to the future, there is no reason why such a freeze shouldn't happen again — and in ironic fashion it could be precipitated if ongoing changes in climate force the Greenland ice sheet to suddenly melt, scientists say.
Starting roughly 12,800 years ago, the Northern Hemisphere was gripped by a chill that lasted some 1,300 years. Known by scientists as the Younger Dryas and nicknamed the"Big Freeze," geological evidence suggests it was brought on when a vast pulse of fresh water — a greater volume than all of North America's Great Lakes combined — poured into the Atlantic and Arctic Oceans.
This abrupt influx, caused when the glacial Lake Agassiz in North America burst its banks, diluted the circulation of warmer water in the North Atlantic, bringing this "conveyer belt" to a halt. Without this warming influence, evidence shows that temperatures across the Northern Hemisphere plummeted.
No time to react
Previous evidence from Greenland ice samples had suggested this abrupt shift in climate happened over the span of a decade or so. Now researchers say it surprisingly may have taken place over the course of a few months, or a year or two at most.
"That the climate system can turn on and off that quickly is extremely important," said earth system scientist Henry Mullins at Syracuse University, who did not take part in this research. "Once the tipping point is reached, there would be essentially no opportunity for humans to react."
For two years, isotope biogeochemist William Patterson at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada and his colleagues investigated a mud core — a tube of mud — taken from the ancient lake Lough Monreach in Ireland. Because this sediment was deposited slowly over time, each layer from this core effectively represents a snapshot of history, with slices just a half-millimeter thick presenting one to three months.
"Basically, I drive around in western Ireland looking for the right conditions — bedrock, vegetation and lake — to obtain the most complete record of climate," Patterson explained.
By looking at isotopes of carbon in each slice, the researchers could deduce how productive the lake was. When plants grow in lakes, they prefer carbon-12 to make up their organic tissue — that is, carbon atoms that have 12 protons and neutrons in total in their nucleus. This leaves the lake water with relatively more carbon-13. At the same time, oxygen isotopes give a picture of temperature — when animals or plants produce calcium carbonate, the ratio of oxygen-16 and oxygen-18 isotopes within are related to temperature.
At the start of the Younger Dryas, Patterson and his colleagues discovered temperatures and lake productivity dropped over the course of just a few years.
"It would be like taking Ireland today and moving it up to above the Arctic Circle, creating icy conditions in a very short period of time," Patterson said.
Their findings also suggest that it may have taken 100 to 200 years before the lake and climate recovered, rather than the decade or so that Greenland ice cores had indicated.
"This makes sense because it would take time for the ocean and atmospheric circulation to turn on again," Patterson said.
The discrepancies between the evidence from the mud core and the ice cores might be due to disturbances in how material flowed within the ice. "Sometimes there's melting, and you have percolation of material between layers, which can blur the records," Patterson explained. "We found a core that had not been disturbed even on a millimeter by millimeter basis, so the sediment had been layered in order since it was deposited."
Chilly future
Looking ahead to the future, Patterson said there was no reason why a big freeze shouldn't happen again.
"If the Greenland ice sheet melted suddenly it would be catastrophic," he said.
This kind of scenario would not discount evidence pointing toward global warming — after all, it leans on the Greenland ice sheet melting.
"We could say that global warming could lead to a dramatic cooling," Patterson told LiveScience. "This should serve as a further warning rather than a pass."
"People assume that we're political, that we're either pro-global-warming or anti-global-warming, when it's really neither," Patterson added. "Our goal is just to understand climate."
Patterson and his colleagues detailed their findings at the European Science Foundation BOREAS conference on humans in the Arctic, in Rovaniemi, Finland.
© 2009 LiveScience.com.
So if we nuke Greenland we can stop global warming?? :shifty:
There is no point worrying about something that I have no influence about.
Quote from: Monoriu on December 02, 2009, 07:56:55 PM
There is no point worrying about something that I have no influence about.
Why do you post stuff about your life then?
The Day After sucked on every level and I hope the people who wrote that piece of shit regre it the rest of hteir lives.
Quote from: Darth Wagtaros on December 02, 2009, 10:10:01 PM
The Day After sucked on every level and I hope the people who wrote that piece of shit regre it the rest of hteir lives.
not true.
i rather enjoyed the theme song :P
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Btha5HsA3M
plus, it is unintentionally funny in a few scenes
Quote from: Darth Wagtaros on December 02, 2009, 10:10:01 PM
The Day After sucked on every level and I hope the people who wrote that piece of shit regre it the rest of hteir lives.
I hope you mean The Day After Tomorrow and not The Day After.
Is this even news?, I mean that knowledge has been around here in Denmark, well since the early 90's. If something fucks up "the great conveyor belt" will a rapid cooling of the northern hemisphere happen, a new iceage, nothing new there as far as I can tell...
Quote from: Mr.Penguin on December 03, 2009, 04:05:07 AM
Is this even news?, I mean that knowledge has been around here in Denmark, well since the early 90's. If something fucks up "the great conveyor belt" will a rapid cooling of the northern hemisphere happen, a new iceage, nothing new there as far as I can tell...
Yeah, when I lived in Scotland my dad crushed my excitement at global warming by telling me that the cold waters would flood the Atlantic and we'd be colder than ever :(
Quote from: Mr.Penguin on December 03, 2009, 04:05:07 AM
Is this even news?, I mean that knowledge has been around here in Denmark, well since the early 90's. If something fucks up "the great conveyor belt" will a rapid cooling of the northern hemisphere happen, a new iceage, nothing new there as far as I can tell...
The news seems to be that the onset of the ice age would be quicker than previously anticipated.
Quote from: jimmy olsen on December 03, 2009, 05:04:10 AM
Quote from: Mr.Penguin on December 03, 2009, 04:05:07 AM
Is this even news?, I mean that knowledge has been around here in Denmark, well since the early 90's. If something fucks up "the great conveyor belt" will a rapid cooling of the northern hemisphere happen, a new iceage, nothing new there as far as I can tell...
The news seems to be that the onset of the ice age would be quicker than previously anticipated.
No not even that is news. Ever since they started to drill for ice core samples in the Greenland ice cap, has it been known that coming of an ice age, more often than not, is a rapid change, not a slow one...
Quote from: Mr.Penguin on December 03, 2009, 05:22:17 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on December 03, 2009, 05:04:10 AM
Quote from: Mr.Penguin on December 03, 2009, 04:05:07 AM
Is this even news?, I mean that knowledge has been around here in Denmark, well since the early 90's. If something fucks up "the great conveyor belt" will a rapid cooling of the northern hemisphere happen, a new iceage, nothing new there as far as I can tell...
The news seems to be that the onset of the ice age would be quicker than previously anticipated.
No not even that is news. Ever since they started to drill for ice core samples in the Greenland ice cap, has it been known that coming of an ice age, more often than not, is a rapid change, not a slow one...
Read the damn article!
QuotePrevious evidence from Greenland ice samples had suggested this abrupt shift in climate happened over the span of a decade or so. Now researchers say it surprisingly may have taken place over the course of a few months, or a year or two at most.
A decade is increadibly quick on a geographic timescale, but a few months as now seems possible is just a blink in the eye.
Quote from: jimmy olsen on December 03, 2009, 05:27:39 AM
Quote from: Mr.Penguin on December 03, 2009, 05:22:17 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on December 03, 2009, 05:04:10 AM
Quote from: Mr.Penguin on December 03, 2009, 04:05:07 AM
Is this even news?, I mean that knowledge has been around here in Denmark, well since the early 90's. If something fucks up "the great conveyor belt" will a rapid cooling of the northern hemisphere happen, a new iceage, nothing new there as far as I can tell...
The news seems to be that the onset of the ice age would be quicker than previously anticipated.
No not even that is news. Ever since they started to drill for ice core samples in the Greenland ice cap, has it been known that coming of an ice age, more often than not, is a rapid change, not a slow one...
Read the damn article!
Mr. P. Posting before he has even read the relevant article? How is this even news?
So what I want to know is: will the Dutch and various Pacific people will be under water or not? Global warming is supposed to float them but if global warming causes a new ice age, did not the last ice age featured massive ice caps ergo lower sea level?
Quote from: jimmy olsen on December 03, 2009, 05:27:39 AM
Quote from: Mr.Penguin on December 03, 2009, 05:22:17 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on December 03, 2009, 05:04:10 AM
Quote from: Mr.Penguin on December 03, 2009, 04:05:07 AM
Is this even news?, I mean that knowledge has been around here in Denmark, well since the early 90's. If something fucks up "the great conveyor belt" will a rapid cooling of the northern hemisphere happen, a new iceage, nothing new there as far as I can tell...
The news seems to be that the onset of the ice age would be quicker than previously anticipated.
No not even that is news. Ever since they started to drill for ice core samples in the Greenland ice cap, has it been known that coming of an ice age, more often than not, is a rapid change, not a slow one...
Read the damn article!
QuotePrevious evidence from Greenland ice samples had suggested this abrupt shift in climate happened over the span of a decade or so. Now researchers say it surprisingly may have taken place over the course of a few months, or a year or two at most.
A decade is increadibly quick on a geographic timescale, but a few months as now seems possible is just a blink in the eye.
Still nothing new, just a conformation of what we already knew/feared...
Seriously, the only new thing in that article is that they now have fund conformation of the rapid cooling in Ireland...
Quote from: Tamas on December 03, 2009, 06:31:33 AM
So what I want to know is: will the Dutch and various Pacific people will be under water or not? Global warming is supposed to float them but if global warming causes a new ice age, did not the last ice age featured massive ice caps ergo lower sea level?
Global warming's an outdated phrase generally they prefer climate change because global warming suggests everyone heats up whereas we're not clear quite what'll happen. For example the expectation is that the far north of Scotland will get far, far colder and the south of England will become more warm and arid. All over the world local conditions will prevail and change rather than everyone will just get a little bit warmer.
Quote from: Syt on December 03, 2009, 01:45:07 AM
Quote from: Darth Wagtaros on December 02, 2009, 10:10:01 PM
The Day After sucked on every level and I hope the people who wrote that piece of shit regre it the rest of hteir lives.
I hope you mean The Day After Tomorrow and not The Day After.
I knew there was something wrong as I typed, but couldn't figure it out.
As a Canadian, I'm prepared for any such eventuality.
The important thing here is that Whister has had a record snow fall and I am going skiing on Saturday.
""If the Greenland ice sheet melted suddenly it would be catastrophic," he said. " :huh:
Indeed it would, but that is not going to happen, it simply takes a lot of time for such a thing as the Greenland icecap to melt.
The sudden discharge of Lake Agassiz was a special case; if a vast lake built-up in the interior of Greenland (over decades) and then suddenly breached into the ocean then the thing they are fussing about could happen.
They should have that sudden discharge looked at.
With the revelations of climategate, can we really trust the story that Tim posted?