Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: Syt on November 06, 2009, 06:55:19 AM

Poll
Question: Which infectious monster is coolest?
Option 1: Vampire votes: 17
Option 2: Werewolf votes: 15
Option 3: Zombie votes: 12
Option 4: Other votes: 1
Option 5: Jaron votes: 3
Title: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Syt on November 06, 2009, 06:55:19 AM
The coolest monsters are those that can not only kill you but can make you one of them.

So, which of the big 3 is coolest in movies, comics, games, books?

My vote goes of course to my brainless zombie friends. :)
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: CountDeMoney on November 06, 2009, 07:09:58 AM
Werewolves and lycans fucking rock.

"Werewolf?"
"There wolf."
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Darth Wagtaros on November 06, 2009, 07:11:09 AM
Vampires have been turned into emogoth Euro fags, to paraphrase James Woods.  Anything but them.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: DisturbedPervert on November 06, 2009, 07:16:37 AM
Vampires, as they have the best video game in Vampire Bloodlines.  The zombie chicks in L4D aren't nearly as fuckable as the club owner in Bloodlines.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Alatriste on November 06, 2009, 07:22:22 AM
Other. The Mummy (Boris Karloff's version, not the modern one)
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Syt on November 06, 2009, 07:26:26 AM
Quote from: Alatriste on November 06, 2009, 07:22:22 AM
Other. The Mummy (Boris Karloff's version, not the modern one)

Could he turn you into a Mummy? :unsure:
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Grey Fox on November 06, 2009, 07:27:14 AM
Mummies are the next thing!
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: The Larch on November 06, 2009, 07:27:41 AM
Vampires, at least they can talk. Speechless monsters are way less interesting.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: katmai on November 06, 2009, 10:24:45 AM
tie between the werewolves and the zombies for me.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 06, 2009, 10:30:06 AM
HAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWWOOOOOOOOWWW
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Josquius on November 06, 2009, 10:30:43 AM
Which monster is coolest? Vampires.
Which makes for the coolest movies? Zombies.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 06, 2009, 10:32:42 AM
Vampires get laid a lot more than Werewolves.  Zombies don't get laid at all.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Syt on November 06, 2009, 10:40:31 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 06, 2009, 10:32:42 AM
Zombies don't get laid at all.

"Porn of the Dead" and "Girls and Corpses Magazine" have convonced me otherwise.

Jack Nicholson/Michelle Pfeiffer was cool, though.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Valmy on November 06, 2009, 12:27:07 PM
I used to love Vampires but popular culture has taken them and made then a expo for teenage feelings of alienation...and there is nothing quit so uncool as teenagers and their alienation.

Werewolves are in man.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: BuddhaRhubarb on November 06, 2009, 12:35:35 PM
Despite the current ghey-ing up of Vampires, they are still to my mind the coolest. Werewolves are the most under-rated, and under utilized though. Zombies are a bit too everyman for me. Overdone, and more tired than the mockumentary.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Maximus on November 06, 2009, 12:49:27 PM
Meh, not a big fan of werewolves but at least they're alive. That which is dead should remain inanimate.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Faeelin on November 06, 2009, 01:22:48 PM
Eh, zombies are simply too silly. Wear a thick leather jacket and you'd be untouchable.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Barrister on November 06, 2009, 01:44:59 PM
The question is which monster is cooler.

Since I'm more a fan of the classic monsters, I realized that Boris Karloff (Frankenstein was the reanimated dead, so counts as a zombie) was much cooler than Bela Lugosi, who was cooler than Lon Chaney.

So in coolness, the order is zombies > vampires > werewolves.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Savonarola on November 06, 2009, 01:48:04 PM
Quote from: Barrister on November 06, 2009, 01:44:59 PM
The question is which monster is cooler.

Since I'm more a fan of the classic monsters, I realized that Boris Karloff (Frankenstein was the reanimated dead, so counts as a zombie) was much cooler than Bela Lugosi, who was cooler than Lon Chaney.

So in coolness, the order is zombies > vampires > werewolves.

Make sure you put the "Jr." after Lon Chaney; otherwise your statement is wrong.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Barrister on November 06, 2009, 01:50:16 PM
Quote from: Savonarola on November 06, 2009, 01:48:04 PM
Quote from: Barrister on November 06, 2009, 01:44:59 PM
The question is which monster is cooler.

Since I'm more a fan of the classic monsters, I realized that Boris Karloff (Frankenstein was the reanimated dead, so counts as a zombie) was much cooler than Bela Lugosi, who was cooler than Lon Chaney.

So in coolness, the order is zombies > vampires > werewolves.

Make sure you put the "Jr." after Lon Chaney; otherwise your statement is wrong.

Cheerfully noted.

You were the one I was worried was going to violently disagree with my assessment however of which actor was cooler...
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Razgovory on November 06, 2009, 01:51:14 PM
I like the medieval myths of werewolves the best (usually a person who makes a pact with the devil).  I dislike all the silly weaknesses for the monsters.  Vampires must be staked in the heart, werewolves must be hit with silver, zombies must be shot in the brain.  Most of these seem kinda silly to me.  Dracula was killed by having his head chopped off with a steel knife.  I really don't understand the zombie one.  Why the brain?  Also I never liked the infectious nature of the attacks on all of them.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Razgovory on November 06, 2009, 01:54:10 PM
Quote from: Barrister on November 06, 2009, 01:44:59 PM
The question is which monster is cooler.

Since I'm more a fan of the classic monsters, I realized that Boris Karloff (Frankenstein was the reanimated dead, so counts as a zombie) was much cooler than Bela Lugosi, who was cooler than Lon Chaney.

So in coolness, the order is zombies > vampires > werewolves.

You are right about Karloff the though.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Martinus on November 06, 2009, 02:06:43 PM
Vampires, of course.

Eternal youth, emo-ness and hot guys writhing in ecstasy whenever you suck them. What's not to like?
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Korea on November 06, 2009, 02:25:39 PM
Quote from: Martinus on November 06, 2009, 02:06:43 PM
Vampires, of course.

Eternal youth, emo-ness and hot guys writhing in ecstasy whenever you suck them. What's not to like?

:mmm:
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Savonarola on November 06, 2009, 02:27:23 PM
Quote from: Barrister on November 06, 2009, 01:50:16 PM
Cheerfully noted.

You were the one I was worried was going to violently disagree with my assessment however of which actor was cooler...

Lon Jr. has his moments, (I really like his role in "My Favorite Brunette") but he's clearly not in the same league as Bela Lugosi or Boris Karloff.  I could go either way with Lugosi or Karloff; Bela is obviously more suave, but Boris is far and away the better actor.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Korea on November 06, 2009, 02:27:36 PM
Zombies are way too gross and way too scary. Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy.

But vampires are cold, sexy, powerful, and immortal.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Syt on November 06, 2009, 02:55:49 PM
Quote from: Martinus on November 06, 2009, 02:06:43 PM
Vampires, of course.

Eternal youth, emo-ness and hot guys writhing in ecstasy whenever you suck them. What's not to like?

I read that as "writing in extacy". :lol:
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Razgovory on November 06, 2009, 03:02:07 PM
Quote from: Korea on November 06, 2009, 02:27:36 PM
Zombies are way too gross and way too scary. Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy.

But vampires are cold, sexy, powerful, and immortal.

Sexy in the in a necrophiliac type of way.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Korea on November 06, 2009, 03:06:58 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on November 06, 2009, 03:02:07 PM
Quote from: Korea on November 06, 2009, 02:27:36 PM
Zombies are way too gross and way too scary. Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy.

But vampires are cold, sexy, powerful, and immortal.

Sexy in the in a necrophiliac type of way.

Mmmhmm. :mmm:
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Valmy on November 06, 2009, 03:07:56 PM
Quote from: Martinus on November 06, 2009, 02:06:43 PM
Eternal youth, emo-ness and hot guys writhing in ecstasy whenever you suck them. What's not to like?

Looking eternally young?  Alright.

Being mentally a 15 year old for all eternity?  Lame.

Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: katmai on November 06, 2009, 03:09:03 PM
Quote from: Korea on November 06, 2009, 03:06:58 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on November 06, 2009, 03:02:07 PM


Sexy in the in a necrophiliac type of way.

Mmmhmm. :mmm:

:x
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Korea on November 06, 2009, 03:10:37 PM
Quote from: katmai on November 06, 2009, 03:09:03 PM
Quote from: Korea on November 06, 2009, 03:06:58 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on November 06, 2009, 03:02:07 PM


Sexy in the in a necrophiliac type of way.

Mmmhmm. :mmm:

:x
:D
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Valmy on November 06, 2009, 03:11:18 PM
Quote from: Korea on November 06, 2009, 03:06:58 PM
Mmmhmm. :mmm:

Make loooooove
Even if you're dead
You're body maybe cold, but it can still be hot in your bed.

Make loooooove
Don't be afraid
Just because your heart ain't beaten doesn't mean you can't get laid.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Malthus on November 06, 2009, 03:30:06 PM
Quote from: Korea on November 06, 2009, 02:27:36 PM
Zombies are way too gross and way too scary. Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy.

But vampires are cold, sexy, powerful, and immortal.

That's almost poetry.

Zombies are way too gross and way too scary,

Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy,

A Vampire is cool but he's probably a fairy;

So what's a poor girl to do?

;)

Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Martinus on November 06, 2009, 03:37:22 PM
Quote from: Malthus on November 06, 2009, 03:30:06 PM
Quote from: Korea on November 06, 2009, 02:27:36 PM
Zombies are way too gross and way too scary. Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy.

But vampires are cold, sexy, powerful, and immortal.

That's almost poetry.

Zombies are way too gross and way too scary,

Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy,

A Vampire is cool but he's probably a fairy;

So what's a poor girl to do?

;)

Well as far as we know, she went for a Hunter. :P
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Maximus on November 06, 2009, 03:41:40 PM
Quote from: Martinus on November 06, 2009, 02:06:43 PMWhat's not to like?
The fact that you're sucking on a corpse?
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Malthus on November 06, 2009, 03:46:45 PM
Quote from: Martinus on November 06, 2009, 03:37:22 PM
Quote from: Malthus on November 06, 2009, 03:30:06 PM
Quote from: Korea on November 06, 2009, 02:27:36 PM
Zombies are way too gross and way too scary. Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy.

But vampires are cold, sexy, powerful, and immortal.

That's almost poetry.

Zombies are way too gross and way too scary,

Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy,

A Vampire is cool but he's probably a fairy;

So what's a poor girl to do?

;)

Well as far as we know, she went for a Hunter. :P

:lol:
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Martinus on November 06, 2009, 04:41:16 PM
Quote from: Maximus on November 06, 2009, 03:41:40 PM
Quote from: Martinus on November 06, 2009, 02:06:43 PMWhat's not to like?
The fact that you're sucking on a corpse?

Uhm vampire suck on living humans.  :huh:
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Syt on November 06, 2009, 05:03:55 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 06, 2009, 03:07:56 PM
Quote from: Martinus on November 06, 2009, 02:06:43 PM
Eternal youth, emo-ness and hot guys writhing in ecstasy whenever you suck them. What's not to like?

Looking eternally young?  Alright.

Being mentally a 15 year old for all eternity?  Lame.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Froflrazzi.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F06%2Fcelebrity-pictures-twilight-cast-high-school.jpg%3Fw%3D492%26amp%3Bh%3D408&hash=8ca30f080d09908c0104175a9b483a682ce60dec)
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Razgovory on November 06, 2009, 05:30:18 PM
Quote from: Martinus on November 06, 2009, 04:41:16 PM
Quote from: Maximus on November 06, 2009, 03:41:40 PM
Quote from: Martinus on November 06, 2009, 02:06:43 PMWhat's not to like?
The fact that you're sucking on a corpse?

Uhm vampire suck on living humans.  :huh:

As opposed to feet.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: The Brain on November 06, 2009, 05:32:23 PM
Fewer gay zombies than gay vampires. Voted zombies. Werewolves are too niche.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Sophie Scholl on November 06, 2009, 06:50:03 PM
Werewolves/creatures, then vampires pre-recent awfulness, then zombies.  I guess I never really got zombies.  I've seen numerous movies involving them, but it's all just kind of meh.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Capetan Mihali on November 06, 2009, 07:09:39 PM
Werewolves, I suppose.   I have a few Anne Rice-obsessed gay male friends who staked out vampire territory, and I never got into zombies.  I guess in cod-psychoanalytic terms, zombies are the uncanny, and werewolves are the return of the repressed?
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: CountDeMoney on November 06, 2009, 07:13:04 PM
Quote from: Capetan Mihali on November 06, 2009, 07:09:39 PM
Werewolves, I suppose.   I have a few Anne Rice-obsessed gay male friends who staked out vampire territory, and I never got into zombies.  I guess in cod-psychoanalytic terms, zombies are the uncanny, and werewolves are the return of the repressed?

Werewolves are the inevitable response to the post-feminist world, allowing men to recapture their rightful place in the state of nature.  And plenty of doggie-style.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Sahib on November 06, 2009, 07:36:56 PM
I hate zombies with a passion because of the disgusting fixation of nerd masses, and Vampires are ghey.
I guess that lives werewolves for me.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Korea on November 06, 2009, 07:48:12 PM
Quote from: Malthus on November 06, 2009, 03:30:06 PM
Quote from: Korea on November 06, 2009, 02:27:36 PM
Zombies are way too gross and way too scary. Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy.

But vampires are cold, sexy, powerful, and immortal.

That's almost poetry.

Zombies are way too gross and way too scary,

Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy,

A Vampire is cool but he's probably a fairy;

So what's a poor girl to do?

;)

:lol: Beautiful.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Caliga on November 06, 2009, 07:59:44 PM
Quote from: Malthus on November 06, 2009, 03:30:06 PM
Zombies are way too gross and way too scary,

Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy,

A Vampire is cool but he's probably a fairy;

So what's a poor girl to do?

;)
Shack up with an evil rich Jew?
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: ulmont on November 06, 2009, 08:02:15 PM
Quote from: The Brain on November 06, 2009, 05:32:23 PM
Fewer gay zombies than gay vampires. Voted zombies. Werewolves are too niche.

Niche?  There are werewolf and shapeshifter myths all over the globe...   :huh:
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Neil on November 06, 2009, 08:14:42 PM
Quote from: Syt on November 06, 2009, 07:26:26 AM
Quote from: Alatriste on November 06, 2009, 07:22:22 AM
Other. The Mummy (Boris Karloff's version, not the modern one)

Could he turn you into a Mummy? :unsure:
Yes.   Mummy rot can turn you into a mummy.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: grumbler on November 06, 2009, 08:25:09 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on November 06, 2009, 07:13:04 PM
Werewolves are the inevitable response to the post-feminist world, allowing men to recapture their rightful place in the state of nature.  And plenty of doggie-style.
:lol: +1
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: CountDeMoney on November 06, 2009, 08:35:56 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 06, 2009, 08:25:09 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on November 06, 2009, 07:13:04 PM
Werewolves are the inevitable response to the post-feminist world, allowing men to recapture their rightful place in the state of nature.  And plenty of doggie-style.
:lol: +1

Well, at least that's how I see it.  :whistle:
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 06, 2009, 09:01:55 PM
Quote from: Martinus on November 06, 2009, 04:41:16 PM
Uhm vampire suck on living humans.  :huh:

And vice versa.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: dps on November 07, 2009, 12:45:45 AM
Quote from: Valmy on November 06, 2009, 12:27:07 PM
I used to love Vampires but popular culture has taken them and made then a expo for teenage feelings of alienation...and there is nothing quit so uncool as teenagers and their alienation.

The odd thing is, it used to be that werewolves were the angsty monsters, and vampires were simply evil.  That's how it should be, but now it's fucked up thanks to Anne Rice.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: jimmy olsen on November 07, 2009, 02:17:56 AM
Voted werewolves.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: The Brain on November 07, 2009, 04:50:54 AM
Quote from: ulmont on November 06, 2009, 08:02:15 PM
Quote from: The Brain on November 06, 2009, 05:32:23 PM
Fewer gay zombies than gay vampires. Voted zombies. Werewolves are too niche.

Niche?  There are werewolf and shapeshifter myths all over the globe...   :huh:

Yes, and unlike zombies or vampires basing an entire setting on some werewolves running around doesn't make as much sense. They are not in themselves sufficient to carry an entire setting in the same way zombies or vampires. They are too one-dimensional when compared to vampires and they don't bring the fear of total annihilation of humanity like zombies.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Martinus on November 07, 2009, 07:06:31 AM
Quote from: The Brain on November 07, 2009, 04:50:54 AM
Quote from: ulmont on November 06, 2009, 08:02:15 PM
Quote from: The Brain on November 06, 2009, 05:32:23 PM
Fewer gay zombies than gay vampires. Voted zombies. Werewolves are too niche.

Niche?  There are werewolf and shapeshifter myths all over the globe...   :huh:

Yes, and unlike zombies or vampires basing an entire setting on some werewolves running around doesn't make as much sense. They are not in themselves sufficient to carry an entire setting in the same way zombies or vampires. They are too one-dimensional when compared to vampires and they don't bring the fear of total annihilation of humanity like zombies.

Werewolf the Apocalypse sucked, true. :P
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Martinus on November 07, 2009, 07:08:37 AM
Quote from: Capetan Mihali on November 06, 2009, 07:09:39 PM
who staked out vampire territory
:D

Quotecod-psychoanalytic

:unsure:
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Martinus on November 07, 2009, 07:10:19 AM
Quote from: Syt on November 06, 2009, 07:26:26 AM
Quote from: Alatriste on November 06, 2009, 07:22:22 AM
Other. The Mummy (Boris Karloff's version, not the modern one)

Could he turn you into a Mummy? :unsure:

Most guys can turn chicks into mummies.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 07, 2009, 09:50:19 AM
Marty would need a doctor's help however.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Razgovory on November 07, 2009, 10:08:44 AM
Quote from: dps on November 07, 2009, 12:45:45 AM
Quote from: Valmy on November 06, 2009, 12:27:07 PM
I used to love Vampires but popular culture has taken them and made then a expo for teenage feelings of alienation...and there is nothing quit so uncool as teenagers and their alienation.

The odd thing is, it used to be that werewolves were the angsty monsters, and vampires were simply evil.  That's how it should be, but now it's fucked up thanks to Anne Rice.

I hate angsty monsters.  I don't really care for angsty people in general.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: syk on November 07, 2009, 10:28:58 AM
I've already liked vampires as a kid. Spooky, yet pitiful creatures with special powers and the hungry predator lurking right under the surface.
The current sissification of the genre is rather sad. I actually read the first Twilight book after someone recommended it to me.  :bleeding: I valiantly sat through it, until the bitter end hoping to find something worth reading.
The vampires I like best are White Wolf's Tzimisce. Kinski as Nosferatu is also hard to beat.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Razgovory on November 07, 2009, 02:30:54 PM
The only cool Vampire was Blacula.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Martinus on November 08, 2009, 07:34:43 AM
Quote from: syk on November 07, 2009, 10:28:58 AM
I've already liked vampires as a kid. Spooky, yet pitiful creatures with special powers and the hungry predator lurking right under the surface.
The current sissification of the genre is rather sad. I actually read the first Twilight book after someone recommended it to me.  :bleeding: I valiantly sat through it, until the bitter end hoping to find something worth reading.
The vampires I like best are White Wolf's Tzimisce. Kinski as Nosferatu is also hard to beat.

I watched Twilight recently. It was so painfully bad I really can't imagine why it has such a cult following. The fact that it has absolutely no plot notwithstanding, the vampires in it are a complete joke. "Oh, I am a superhuman with my only problem being that I look like I had bodyglitter in the direct sunlight". What a travesty. Vampires are cool because they are a tragic mix of superpowers and super-weaknesses. The "Twilight" "vampires" are just some Mary-Sue-ish childish fantasy. Gnnnngh.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Ed Anger on November 08, 2009, 08:26:41 AM
Quote from: Martinus on November 08, 2009, 07:34:43 AM
Quote from: syk on November 07, 2009, 10:28:58 AM
I've already liked vampires as a kid. Spooky, yet pitiful creatures with special powers and the hungry predator lurking right under the surface.
The current sissification of the genre is rather sad. I actually read the first Twilight book after someone recommended it to me.  :bleeding: I valiantly sat through it, until the bitter end hoping to find something worth reading.
The vampires I like best are White Wolf's Tzimisce. Kinski as Nosferatu is also hard to beat.

I watched Twilight recently. It was so painfully bad I really can't imagine why it has such a cult following. The fact that it has absolutely no plot notwithstanding, the vampires in it are a complete joke. "Oh, I am a superhuman with my only problem being that I look like I had bodyglitter in the direct sunlight". What a travesty. Vampires are cool because they are a tragic mix of superpowers and super-weaknesses. The "Twilight" "vampires" are just some Mary-Sue-ish childish fantasy. Gnnnngh.

IT IS FOR TEEN GIRLS. Jesus tapdancing Christ.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Brazen on November 08, 2009, 10:36:08 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on November 06, 2009, 07:13:04 PM
Quote from: Capetan Mihali on November 06, 2009, 07:09:39 PM
Werewolves, I suppose.   I have a few Anne Rice-obsessed gay male friends who staked out vampire territory, and I never got into zombies.  I guess in cod-psychoanalytic terms, zombies are the uncanny, and werewolves are the return of the repressed?

Werewolves are the inevitable response to the post-feminist world, allowing men to recapture their rightful place in the state of nature.  And plenty of doggie-style.
Someone needs to watch Ginger Snaps.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Korea on November 08, 2009, 12:26:10 PM
Quote from: Martinus on November 08, 2009, 07:34:43 AM
Quote from: syk on November 07, 2009, 10:28:58 AM
I've already liked vampires as a kid. Spooky, yet pitiful creatures with special powers and the hungry predator lurking right under the surface.
The current sissification of the genre is rather sad. I actually read the first Twilight book after someone recommended it to me.  :bleeding: I valiantly sat through it, until the bitter end hoping to find something worth reading.
The vampires I like best are White Wolf's Tzimisce. Kinski as Nosferatu is also hard to beat.

I watched Twilight recently. It was so painfully bad I really can't imagine why it has such a cult following. The fact that it has absolutely no plot notwithstanding, the vampires in it are a complete joke. "Oh, I am a superhuman with my only problem being that I look like I had bodyglitter in the direct sunlight". What a travesty. Vampires are cool because they are a tragic mix of superpowers and super-weaknesses. The "Twilight" "vampires" are just some Mary-Sue-ish childish fantasy. Gnnnngh.

The books, while still silly, are about a hundred times better than that travesty of a movie. ^_^
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Queequeg on November 08, 2009, 02:44:59 PM
Quote from: Korea on November 08, 2009, 12:26:10 PM

The books, while still silly, are about a hundred times better than that travesty of a movie. ^_^
The author is a Mormon.  I refuse to believe that.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Korea on November 08, 2009, 03:27:42 PM
Quote from: Queequeg on November 08, 2009, 02:44:59 PM
Quote from: Korea on November 08, 2009, 12:26:10 PM

The books, while still silly, are about a hundred times better than that travesty of a movie. ^_^
The author is a Mormon.  I refuse to believe that.

I don't think she's a very good mormon though.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Malthus on November 08, 2009, 03:31:51 PM
Quote from: Caliga on November 06, 2009, 07:59:44 PM
Quote from: Malthus on November 06, 2009, 03:30:06 PM
Zombies are way too gross and way too scary,

Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy,

A Vampire is cool but he's probably a fairy;

So what's a poor girl to do?

;)
Shack up with an evil rich Jew?

Nice, but I'd change the punctuation as follows:

QuoteZombies are way too gross and way too scary,

Werewolves are way too hot and way too hairy,

A Vampire is cool but he's probably a fairy;

So what's a poor girl to do?

Shack up with an evil rich Jew!

:D

Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 08, 2009, 03:35:01 PM
Evil rich Jew? Isn't that kind of like saying a pale, hairy Caucasian?
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Malthus on November 08, 2009, 03:37:38 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 08, 2009, 03:35:01 PM
Evil rich Jew? Isn't that kind of like saying a pale, hairy Caucasian?

Hey, we aren't *all* evil and rich ...  :(

Ahh, who am I kidding.  ;)
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: syk on November 08, 2009, 04:28:06 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on November 08, 2009, 08:26:41 AM
Quote from: Martinus on November 08, 2009, 07:34:43 AM
Quote from: syk on November 07, 2009, 10:28:58 AM
I've already liked vampires as a kid. Spooky, yet pitiful creatures with special powers and the hungry predator lurking right under the surface.
The current sissification of the genre is rather sad. I actually read the first Twilight book after someone recommended it to me.  :bleeding: I valiantly sat through it, until the bitter end hoping to find something worth reading.
The vampires I like best are White Wolf's Tzimisce. Kinski as Nosferatu is also hard to beat.

I watched Twilight recently. It was so painfully bad I really can't imagine why it has such a cult following. The fact that it has absolutely no plot notwithstanding, the vampires in it are a complete joke. "Oh, I am a superhuman with my only problem being that I look like I had bodyglitter in the direct sunlight". What a travesty. Vampires are cool because they are a tragic mix of superpowers and super-weaknesses. The "Twilight" "vampires" are just some Mary-Sue-ish childish fantasy. Gnnnngh.

IT IS FOR TEEN GIRLS. Jesus tapdancing Christ.
Vot can you do, didn't say so on the cover and it was the first I heard of it. Sometimes recommendations like that are really cool, like Let The Right One In. Great book, good film adaption, generally the same genre and at the same time on the shelves.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: The Larch on November 09, 2009, 06:43:26 AM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg33.imageshack.us%2Fimg33%2F2005%2F01myww9m1glekf4ximh0.jpg&hash=6677136f1d5c220375ec4c0f230d055b3f5d2166)

It says:

TWILIGHT
The ending we were all looking for
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Caliga on November 09, 2009, 08:11:10 AM
 :lol:

Actually isn't it "the end we were all hoping for"?  :huh:
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Darth Wagtaros on November 09, 2009, 08:33:05 AM
I've said for a long time that the only way I'd read or watch Twilight is for Blade or Buffy to show up and exterminate them.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: The Larch on November 09, 2009, 08:36:32 AM
Quote from: Caliga on November 09, 2009, 08:11:10 AM
:lol:

Actually isn't it "the end we were all hoping for"?  :huh:

You get the idea.  :P
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Caliga on November 09, 2009, 08:36:43 AM
Quote from: Darth Wagtaros on November 09, 2009, 08:33:05 AM
I've said for a long time that the only way I'd read or watch Twilight is for Blade or Buffy to show up and exterminate them.
:mad: I was always hoping Buffy would get killed actually.

Buffy = :thumbsdown:
Faith = :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Caliga on November 09, 2009, 08:37:26 AM
Quote from: The Larch on November 09, 2009, 08:36:32 AM
You get the idea.  :P
I speak Spanish better than Larchie :yeah:
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Darth Wagtaros on November 09, 2009, 09:31:42 AM
Quote from: Caliga on November 09, 2009, 08:36:43 AM
Quote from: Darth Wagtaros on November 09, 2009, 08:33:05 AM
I've said for a long time that the only way I'd read or watch Twilight is for Blade or Buffy to show up and exterminate them.
:mad: I was always hoping Buffy would get killed actually.

Buffy = :thumbsdown:
Faith = :thumbsup:
The characters were all obnoxious in the final season.  But Faith was always annoying.  Now that she and Giles are an item it is also gross too.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: garbon on November 09, 2009, 12:44:13 PM
Quote from: dps on November 07, 2009, 12:45:45 AM
That's how it should be, but now it's fucked up thanks to Anne Rice.

<_<
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: garbon on November 09, 2009, 12:46:09 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on November 08, 2009, 08:26:41 AM
IT IS FOR TEEN GIRLS. Jesus tapdancing Christ.

Well people tend to suggest Marty is a teenage girl.

Anyway, champagne on an empty stomach + Twilight equals fun times.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: The Brain on November 09, 2009, 12:48:35 PM
I want to pour champagne all over you and lick it off.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: garbon on November 09, 2009, 12:54:13 PM
Show me the money.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: CountDeMoney on November 09, 2009, 08:12:48 PM
SNL's awesome spoof of Twilight this past weekend:

http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/clips/digital-short-firelight/1173548/
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: garbon on November 09, 2009, 08:58:03 PM
For those of us in lesser countries, an alternate link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfIubuTjT1g
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: merithyn on November 09, 2009, 09:04:48 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on November 06, 2009, 07:09:58 AM
Werewolves and lycans fucking rock.

"Werewolf?"
"There wolf."


This
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Faeelin on November 09, 2009, 09:24:56 PM
Incidentally, what's the best clothing to wear against zombies? Leather? Kevlar?
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 09, 2009, 10:12:15 PM
Quote from: Faeelin on November 09, 2009, 09:24:56 PM
Incidentally, what's the best clothing to wear against zombies? Leather? Kevlar?
Lycra for the bleed on you and infect you type of zombies, chainmail for the tear you apart and eat you type.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Korea on November 10, 2009, 10:55:04 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on November 09, 2009, 08:12:48 PM
SNL's awesome spoof of Twilight this past weekend:

http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/clips/digital-short-firelight/1173548/

:lol: I want to go read the books again.
Title: Re: Zombies, Vampires or Werewolves?
Post by: Razgovory on November 10, 2009, 10:58:47 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 09, 2009, 10:12:15 PM
Quote from: Faeelin on November 09, 2009, 09:24:56 PM
Incidentally, what's the best clothing to wear against zombies? Leather? Kevlar?
Lycra for the bleed on you and infect you type of zombies, chainmail for the tear you apart and eat you type.

That body armor they have in prisons to protect against knives would be useful.