Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: Ape on September 18, 2009, 03:02:30 PM

Title: True blood
Post by: Ape on September 18, 2009, 03:02:30 PM
I am probably going to step on someones toes here and I couldn't be arsed to find a topic regarding this tv-series.

Over the past few weeks I've been watching through the two seasons of it with my girlfriend, and to be honest I couldn't stop laughing. This must be one of the most silly series in a long time  :lol: it is a comedy, right :unsure: right?

Now I haven't read the novels that the tv-series is based on so I cannot judge that one wheter it is comedy or something else, but the way the tv-series is written it is starting to feel a little like a 'Buffy' or at least 'Angel' rippoff. Now if it was a parody of 'Buffy' or 'Angel', it would be cool (though why do a parody on a parody is beyond me, a little like 'Scary Movie' that is a parody on 'Scream', which is a parody on generic horror movies)

So I am kinda wondering if anybody actually thinks this series is good or worth watching other then as a comedy?

...and don't get me started on the Swedish viking vampire  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Josquius on September 18, 2009, 03:08:54 PM
I think its pretty damn awesome.
At first I was dubious; crappy pussified twilightesque vampires and people with retarded accents?
But I grew into it.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Grey Fox on September 18, 2009, 03:09:26 PM
It's awesome in the "this show is batshit crazzzzayyyyy" category.

From what I gathered, other then the Lafayette survival & Sookie's brother prohiminent role, it's quite loyal to the books.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Queequeg on September 18, 2009, 03:10:57 PM
I like it when it gets further away from the Camp.  I fucking hate Camp. 
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: syk on September 18, 2009, 03:11:02 PM
I liked it. Bill is a sissy though.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: DisturbedPervert on September 18, 2009, 03:20:56 PM
Yeah, the show is pretty ridiculous.  After the first few episodes I really liked it, and ended up reading the 2nd and 3rd books immediately.  Thought they were both pretty bad, and they weren't meant to be a comedy.  Have enjoyed the 2nd season somewhat, but as a comedy. 

Quote from: Grey Fox on September 18, 2009, 03:09:26 PM
From what I gathered, other then the Lafayette survival & Sookie's brother prohiminent role, it's quite loyal to the books.

Well, I'd completely disagree with that.  The storyline is vaguely similar, but that's all.  The Mary Ann storyline for example did not exist at all in the books.  None of the side storylines exist at all, the entire story is told solely through Sookie.  Most of the characters in the series get a few paragraphs in the books when they are around Sookie, and some that are important for an episode or several in the series (like Mary Ann or the vampire who kills himself) don't exist at all or are so changed they are almost unrecognizable.

Although actually, and this is one of the only times I would say this, the tv series is far superior to the book.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Grey Fox on September 18, 2009, 03:24:12 PM
Quote from: DisturbedPervert on September 18, 2009, 03:20:56 PM
Yeah, the show is pretty ridiculous.  After the first few episodes I really liked it, and ended up reading the 2nd and 3rd books immediately.  Thought they were both pretty bad, and they weren't meant to be a comedy.  Have enjoyed the 2nd season somewhat, but as a comedy. 

Quote from: Grey Fox on September 18, 2009, 03:09:26 PM
From what I gathered, other then the Lafayette survival & Sookie's brother prohiminent role, it's quite loyal to the books.

Well, I'd completely disagree with that.  The storyline is vaguely similar, but that's all.  The Mary Ann storyline for example did not exist at all in the books.  None of the side storylines exist at all, the entire story is told solely through Sookie.  Most of the characters in the series get a few paragraphs in the books when they are around Sookie, and some that are important for an episode or several in the series (like Mary Ann or the vampire who kills himself) don't exist at all or are so changed they are almost unrecognizable.

Although actually, and this is one of the only times I would say this, the tv series is far superior to the book.

Yes it does exist, it's in the 2nd book. Mary Ann is the maenad.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Josquius on September 18, 2009, 03:26:48 PM
Weren't the books just trashy, mass produced pulp Mills & Boon meets Anne Rice crap though?
I remember reading the creator of the TV series bought the first one because he thought the title and synopsis so ridiculously stupid he had to.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: DisturbedPervert on September 18, 2009, 03:29:10 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on September 18, 2009, 03:24:12 PM
Yes it does exist, it's in the 2nd book. Mary Ann is the maenad.

Yeah, but she doesn't do even half the stuff she does in the series, it is a minor character.  None of the past several episodes involving her happened in the books.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Caliga on September 18, 2009, 03:29:14 PM
Is this the thing that Anna Paquin is in?
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: ulmont on September 18, 2009, 03:34:11 PM
Quote from: Caliga on September 18, 2009, 03:29:14 PM
Is this the thing that Anna Paquin is in?

Yes.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Grey Fox on September 18, 2009, 03:34:38 PM
Yes, Cal.

We see her boobs all the freaking time.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: DisturbedPervert on September 18, 2009, 03:35:53 PM
Hell, the black chick, Sookie's best friend in the series that hangs out with Mary Ann, barely even exists in the books.  She's a saleswoman at a clothing store owned by Bill that gets a sentence or two.  The maenad storyline was created from a minor event into something larger and actually far more interesting.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Ape on September 18, 2009, 03:37:47 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on September 18, 2009, 03:34:38 PM
Yes, Cal.

We see her boobs all the freaking time.

That is something that annoys me, now I got nothing against sex, or nudity, but are they trying to sell this series with nudity? It'feels as if there is a sexscene every damned epsiode.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: DisturbedPervert on September 18, 2009, 03:43:38 PM
Quote from: Tyr on September 18, 2009, 03:26:48 PM
Weren't the books just trashy, mass produced pulp Mills & Boon meets Anne Rice crap though?
I remember reading the creator of the TV series bought the first one because he thought the title and synopsis so ridiculously stupid he had to.

Yeah, pretty much.  The books aren't very good.  I'm curious to see what they will do with season 3/book 3 though,  given the changes they made and certain other parts they left out.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: viper37 on September 18, 2009, 03:45:50 PM
Quote from: Ape on September 18, 2009, 03:37:47 PM
It'feels as if there is a sexscene every damned epsiode.
that's probably because there is a sex scene in every episode :P
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Josquius on September 18, 2009, 03:49:45 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on September 18, 2009, 03:34:38 PM
Yes, Cal.

We see her boobs all the freaking time.
That does strike me as odd.
At the beginning I got this impression she was a really conservative, never puts out, never going to see anything type. This even extended to the actress.
But then when she finally got with Bill...was that a hint of booby?...rewind...why yes it was.....
By series 2 (or was it the end of 1? I can't remember) though it was just 'damn it all and lets show them all the time, she signed the contract to say it was fine!'


One thing I find cool about the series is it somehow feels real unlike other American TV.
They don't flood it with uber hot people. Many of them look pretty normal.
Take the black girl for instance, it'd be so easy to find a hot actress but instead they have this funny looking one.

And I somewhat feel an affinity for Bill because he has a similar hair style to the one I've always tended towards. Yes. :gay:.
:blush:
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Grey Fox on September 18, 2009, 03:52:22 PM
It's because Vampire blood makes everyone hott.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Viking on September 18, 2009, 04:02:38 PM
Quote from: DisturbedPervert on September 18, 2009, 03:35:53 PM
Hell, the black chick, Sookie's best friend in the series that hangs out with Mary Ann, barely even exists in the books.  She's a saleswoman at a clothing store owned by Bill that gets a sentence or two.  The maenad storyline was created from a minor event into something larger and actually far more interesting.

Tara is white, a fang banger and runs the clothes store in Bills stripmall. She isn't Sookie's best friend, Sookie doesn't have friends because of her "disability".

The producers have pretty much admitted that they abandoned the book. But the characters and universe are still close enough.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Neil on September 18, 2009, 04:33:13 PM
My wife likes this.  I hate it, and all you Twilight-loving fucks.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Barrister on September 18, 2009, 04:36:21 PM
Quote from: Neil on September 18, 2009, 04:33:13 PM
My wife likes this.  I hate it, and all you Twilight-loving fucks.

I liked this, and hated Twilight.  These vampires are more "canon" when it comes to Vampire myths.  Most importantly they don't sparkle in the sun. :bleeding:
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: Martinus on September 18, 2009, 05:29:09 PM
Quote from: Queequeg on September 18, 2009, 03:10:57 PM
I like it when it gets further away from the Camp.  I fucking hate Camp.

Uhm it's a fucking vampire story. With a homo writing the screenplay.
Title: Re: True blood
Post by: The Brain on September 18, 2009, 05:47:56 PM
So Mart, what do you think of SkarsgÄrd's feet?