Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 02:20:39 PM

Title: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 02:20:39 PM
https://www.animalsasia.org/us/media/news/news-archive/the-tragic-polar-bear-that-suffers-for-selfies.html

What kind of fucked up culture could think this is acceptable?
Title: Re: Chinks are subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 02:24:27 PM
At least it is not being grounded up for alternative medicine.
Title: Re: Chinks are subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 02:26:53 PM
Not sure which is worse. Animals do not have a sense of finity. Every suffering they endure is infinite.
Title: Re: Chinks are subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Razgovory on September 23, 2016, 03:02:46 PM
Could we tone down the racism a bit?
Title: Re: Chinks are subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 23, 2016, 03:03:56 PM
Derspeiß thought the thread title was "Chicks", got all misleading sads.
Title: Re: Chinks are subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 03:05:22 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 23, 2016, 03:03:56 PM
Derspeiß thought the thread title was "Chicks", got all misleading sads.
:lol:
Title: Re: Chinks are subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: celedhring on September 23, 2016, 03:19:03 PM
I know this is languish and we are edgy and all that, but do we need racial slurs in thread titles?
Title: Re: Chinks are subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Jacob on September 23, 2016, 03:22:36 PM
Quote from: celedhring on September 23, 2016, 03:19:03 PM
I know this is languish and we are edgy and all that, but do we need racial slurs in thread titles?

We do not.

Marty you're edging close to another ban :)
Title: Re: Chinks are subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: mongers on September 23, 2016, 03:25:25 PM
Quote from: celedhring on September 23, 2016, 03:19:03 PM
I know this is languish and we are edgy and all that, but do we need racial slurs in thread titles?

Indeed.

And noted that Mods took appropriate action.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:25:56 PM
LOL nice on the thread name change.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 03:26:36 PM
Sorry, I am not too fond of people who abuse animals, and in the Chinese culture this seems to be endemic.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 03:33:23 PM
I would also like to point out that other mods use the word "Chinks" with impunity:

http://languish.org/forums/index.php/topic,8447.msg480862.html#msg480862

So it would be good if we had some sort of list of words I cannot use.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: alfred russel on September 23, 2016, 03:35:03 PM
Quote from: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 03:26:36 PM
Sorry, I am not too fond of people who abuse animals, and in the Chinese culture this seems to be endemic.

Did you know 8 billion chickens are slaughtered every year in the US? Most of these chickens live their lives in factory farms, never permitted to soar in the skies and see the purple mountain's majesty or amber waves of grain.

The Chinese, with a less meat based diet, kill far less animals, even if they take selfies with stranded polar bears.

Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: alfred russel on September 23, 2016, 03:36:03 PM
Quote from: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 03:33:23 PM

So it would be good if we had some sort of list of words I cannot use.

-The racist ones.
-4 letter words that start with cu__.

I think that is a good start.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:36:52 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 23, 2016, 03:35:03 PM
Quote from: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 03:26:36 PM
Sorry, I am not too fond of people who abuse animals, and in the Chinese culture this seems to be endemic.

Did you know 8 billion chickens are slaughtered every year in the US? Most of these chickens live their lives in factory farms, never permitted to soar in the skies and see the purple mountain's majesty or amber waves of grain.

The Chinese, with a less meat based diet, kill far less animals, even if they take selfies with stranded polar bears.

Link? The Chinese have so much less meat that they kill far less animals than a country one fifth their population?

Though I guess that depends on your definition of 'far less'.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: HVC on September 23, 2016, 03:37:26 PM
And pigs are smarter than dogs. Yada Yada. Sucks for them that they're tasty.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: alfred russel on September 23, 2016, 03:39:52 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:36:52 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 23, 2016, 03:35:03 PM
Quote from: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 03:26:36 PM
Sorry, I am not too fond of people who abuse animals, and in the Chinese culture this seems to be endemic.

Did you know 8 billion chickens are slaughtered every year in the US? Most of these chickens live their lives in factory farms, never permitted to soar in the skies and see the purple mountain's majesty or amber waves of grain.

The Chinese, with a less meat based diet, kill far less animals, even if they take selfies with stranded polar bears.

Link? The Chinese have so much less meat that they kill far less animals than a country one fifth their population?

Though I guess that depends on your definition of 'far less'.

I was thinking on a per capita basis. On a gross basis I also doubt it is far less.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:41:15 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 23, 2016, 03:39:52 PM
I was thinking on a per capita basis. On a gross basis I also doubt it is far less.

Gotcha.

Anyway all we need to do is figure out how to 3-D print meat and then all that will be over.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Hamilcar on September 23, 2016, 03:42:42 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:41:15 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 23, 2016, 03:39:52 PM
I was thinking on a per capita basis. On a gross basis I also doubt it is far less.

Gotcha.

Anyway all we need to do is figure out how to 3-D print meat and then all that will be over.

http://www.memphismeats.com/
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Tonitrus on September 23, 2016, 03:46:32 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 23, 2016, 03:39:52 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:36:52 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 23, 2016, 03:35:03 PM
Quote from: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 03:26:36 PM
Sorry, I am not too fond of people who abuse animals, and in the Chinese culture this seems to be endemic.

Did you know 8 billion chickens are slaughtered every year in the US? Most of these chickens live their lives in factory farms, never permitted to soar in the skies and see the purple mountain's majesty or amber waves of grain.

The Chinese, with a less meat based diet, kill far less animals, even if they take selfies with stranded polar bears.

Link? The Chinese have so much less meat that they kill far less animals than a country one fifth their population?

Though I guess that depends on your definition of 'far less'.

I was thinking on a per capita basis. On a gross basis I also doubt it is far less.

The gross shows production vs. consumption, but...meh.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs-images.forbes.com%2Fniallmccarthy%2Ffiles%2F2015%2F08%2F20150805_Meat_Consumption_Fo.jpg&hash=5112967c47dcc0d2ec710b3cc6c6cec3a021fbe9)
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic2.businessinsider.com%2Fimage%2F52d410906bb3f7ca259d890c-1200-%2Fmeat%25201.jpg&hash=f8b2615e5a1ccab13fb4c3b5d1bb464e900a7a84)

It's not good to a good career move to be a pig in China.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: The Minsky Moment on September 23, 2016, 03:48:21 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 23, 2016, 03:36:03 PM
Quote from: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 03:33:23 PM

So it would be good if we had some sort of list of words I cannot use.
-4 letter words that start with cu__.

How cute.
Finally a cure the the forum's dilemma - a way to cuff Martinus and cull his outbursts.  Death by a thousand cuts, taken to the cube. 
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Admiral Yi on September 23, 2016, 03:48:35 PM
Uruguay is an interesting case.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:50:11 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 23, 2016, 03:48:35 PM
Uruguay is an interesting case.

That is production. They probably import the non-beef from Brazil.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:54:50 PM
If you are going to be an animal in the US, best to be a sheep or goat...provided you avoid College Station, Texas.

Very cool link Hami: http://www.memphismeats.com/

I know we will be there in a few decades. What will happen to all the former livestock is another question.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Admiral Yi on September 23, 2016, 03:56:49 PM
Also, why is schweinsteigerflesch consumption in Kiwistan so low?
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: mongers on September 23, 2016, 03:56:54 PM
Uruguay, good grief 5-6 million people get through 500,000 tonnes of beef a year, thats like 100 kg per man women or child.   :hmm:
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:57:47 PM
Quote from: mongers on September 23, 2016, 03:56:54 PM
Uruguay, good grief 5-6 million people get through 500,000 tonnes of beef a year, thats like 100 kg per man women or child.   :hmm:

Which is about right if you check out the per capita consumption.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Tonitrus on September 23, 2016, 03:59:00 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:54:50 PM
If you are going to be an animal in the US, best to be a sheep or goat...provided you avoid College Station, Texas.

Very cool link Hami: http://www.memphismeats.com/

I know we will be there in a few decades. What will happen to all the former livestock is another question.

Petting zoos.  Lots and lots of petting zoos.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: HVC on September 23, 2016, 03:59:21 PM
Wonder how much electricity it would take to replace all the meat consumption from animals to this? Not only the culturing itself, but also making the nutrients and other requirements to grow the meat.

Also, it'd probably taste horrible.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Jacob on September 23, 2016, 04:02:33 PM
Quote from: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 03:33:23 PM
I would also like to point out that other mods use the word "Chinks" with impunity:

http://languish.org/forums/index.php/topic,8447.msg480862.html#msg480862

So it would be good if we had some sort of list of words I cannot use.

Ideally you don't use any words on languish. That would be safest.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 04:04:00 PM
Quote from: Jacob on September 23, 2016, 04:02:33 PM
Quote from: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 03:33:23 PM
I would also like to point out that other mods use the word "Chinks" with impunity:

http://languish.org/forums/index.php/topic,8447.msg480862.html#msg480862

So it would be good if we had some sort of list of words I cannot use.

Ideally you don't use any words on languish. That would be safest.

:)
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Jacob on September 23, 2016, 04:04:38 PM
Quote from: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 04:04:00 PM
:)

:cheers:
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: celedhring on September 23, 2016, 04:10:42 PM
According to government figures Spain's per capita meat consumption is a surprisingly low 112lbs/year.  :huh:
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: The Larch on September 23, 2016, 04:31:22 PM
Quote from: celedhring on September 23, 2016, 04:10:42 PM
According to government figures Spain's per capita meat consumption is a surprisingly low 112lbs/year.  :huh:

Would be quite higher if fish was included.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: celedhring on September 23, 2016, 04:45:48 PM
Quote from: The Larch on September 23, 2016, 04:31:22 PM
Quote from: celedhring on September 23, 2016, 04:10:42 PM
According to government figures Spain's per capita meat consumption is a surprisingly low 112lbs/year.  :huh:

Would be quite higher if fish was included.

Fill yer boots. Fish is 26.4 Kgs/year (58 pounds).

http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/alimentacion/temas/consumo-y-comercializacion-y-distribucion-alimentaria/informeconsumoalimentacion2014_tcm7-382148.pdf

I find it amusing that they tracked Jamón consumption :D

Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: The Larch on September 23, 2016, 04:48:26 PM
Quote from: celedhring on September 23, 2016, 04:45:48 PM
Quote from: The Larch on September 23, 2016, 04:31:22 PM
Quote from: celedhring on September 23, 2016, 04:10:42 PM
According to government figures Spain's per capita meat consumption is a surprisingly low 112lbs/year.  :huh:

Would be quite higher if fish was included.

Fill yer boots. Fish is 26.4 Kgs/year (58 pounds).

http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/alimentacion/temas/consumo-y-comercializacion-y-distribucion-alimentaria/informeconsumoalimentacion2014_tcm7-382148.pdf

I find it amusing that they tracked Jamón consumption :D

And that'd put us much closer to the top of the rankings, since Spain is one of the countries with the higher consumption of fish per capita in the whole world, IIRC only Japan consumed more fish per capita than us.

And the statistics are important, the jamón must flow!  :lol:
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Duque de Bragança on September 23, 2016, 04:51:00 PM
Quote from: The Larch on September 23, 2016, 04:48:26 PM
Quote from: celedhring on September 23, 2016, 04:45:48 PM
Quote from: The Larch on September 23, 2016, 04:31:22 PM
Quote from: celedhring on September 23, 2016, 04:10:42 PM
According to government figures Spain's per capita meat consumption is a surprisingly low 112lbs/year.  :huh:

Would be quite higher if fish was included.

Fill yer boots. Fish is 26.4 Kgs/year (58 pounds).

http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/alimentacion/temas/consumo-y-comercializacion-y-distribucion-alimentaria/informeconsumoalimentacion2014_tcm7-382148.pdf

I find it amusing that they tracked Jamón consumption :D

And that'd put us much closer to the top of the rankings, since Spain is one of the countries with the higher consumption of fish per capita in the whole world, IIRC only Japan consumed more fish per capita than us.

And the statistics are important, the jamón must flow!  :lol:

I would be curious to see your stats about fish consumption. I'd say Portugal (hello bacalhau! ) and Iceland eat more fish per capita.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: The Larch on September 23, 2016, 04:53:08 PM
Quote from: Duque de Bragança on September 23, 2016, 04:51:00 PM
Quote from: The Larch on September 23, 2016, 04:48:26 PM
Quote from: celedhring on September 23, 2016, 04:45:48 PM
Quote from: The Larch on September 23, 2016, 04:31:22 PM
Quote from: celedhring on September 23, 2016, 04:10:42 PM
According to government figures Spain's per capita meat consumption is a surprisingly low 112lbs/year.  :huh:

Would be quite higher if fish was included.

Fill yer boots. Fish is 26.4 Kgs/year (58 pounds).

http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/alimentacion/temas/consumo-y-comercializacion-y-distribucion-alimentaria/informeconsumoalimentacion2014_tcm7-382148.pdf

I find it amusing that they tracked Jamón consumption :D

And that'd put us much closer to the top of the rankings, since Spain is one of the countries with the higher consumption of fish per capita in the whole world, IIRC only Japan consumed more fish per capita than us.

And the statistics are important, the jamón must flow!  :lol:

I would be curious to see your stats about fish consumption. I'd say Portugal (hello bacalhau! ) and Iceland eat more fish per capita.

That was off the top of my head. In the EU Spain and Portugal top the stats by a fair margin ahead of everybody else.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 23, 2016, 04:53:30 PM
Quote from: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 03:33:23 PM
I would also like to point out that other mods use the word "Chinks" with impunity:

http://languish.org/forums/index.php/topic,8447.msg480862.html#msg480862

So it would be good if we had some sort of list of words I cannot use.

An obvious counterfeit.  I would never refer to godless yellow commie heathens with a racial slur.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Ed Anger on September 23, 2016, 06:22:28 PM
I would. Goddamned zipperhead slopes.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: viper37 on September 23, 2016, 08:48:33 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:36:52 PM
Link? The Chinese have so much less meat that they kill far less animals than a country one fifth their population?

Though I guess that depends on your definition of 'far less'.
if you exclude fish and other assorted sea creatures and take it on a per capita basis, it could be true.  Well, they are importing lots of pork from Quebec (and elsewhere), but I think they eat much less beef than the average Americans.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Razgovory on September 23, 2016, 09:10:12 PM
Quote from: viper37 on September 23, 2016, 08:48:33 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:36:52 PM
Link? The Chinese have so much less meat that they kill far less animals than a country one fifth their population?

Though I guess that depends on your definition of 'far less'.
if you exclude fish and other assorted sea creatures and take it on a per capita basis, it could be true.  Well, they are importing lots of pork from Quebec (and elsewhere), but I think they eat much less beef than the average Americans.

Since the US is like the third largest consumer of beef, that isn't saying much.
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: 11B4V on September 24, 2016, 12:38:23 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on September 23, 2016, 06:22:28 PM
I would. Goddamned zipperhead slopes.

http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/157/122/f.gif

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi3.kym-cdn.com%2Fphotos%2Fimages%2Fnewsfeed%2F000%2F157%2F122%2Ff.gif&hash=298f26e947fb720864798a8bc59de302ab0e0b31)
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Josquius on September 24, 2016, 04:38:31 AM
One of the worst places I've ever visited was a zoo in japan.
East Asian nations just don't do animal rights it seems :(
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Monoriu on September 24, 2016, 04:48:55 AM
Quote from: Tyr on September 24, 2016, 04:38:31 AM
One of the worst places I've ever visited was a zoo in japan.
East Asian nations just don't do animal rights it seems :(

https://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_3923309575&feature=iv&src_vid=akGOOxGnclg&v=HsLS9Uzm5Qw
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Syt on September 24, 2016, 04:53:30 AM
I think I'll stick with the Vienna Zoo, thank you. They have a new baby penguin.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffiles.orf.at%2Fslides2%2Fwienmagazin%2F63598%2F1474541752423_sl5lmcwg.jpg&hash=d0f671828f79066a038053aaf4e445099847d18d)

:wub:

And the pandas had twins recently.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages02.weekend.at%2F940Panda2_picdesk.jpg%2FarticleInlineImageLarge%2F29.494.152&hash=418f8841255633847a5ad144e4ace3cc6c2cc129)

:wub:
Title: Re: Marty is subhuman, exhibit no. 3023636
Post by: Liep on September 24, 2016, 05:38:29 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 23, 2016, 03:56:49 PM
Also, why is schweinsteigerflesch consumption in Kiwistan so low?

It's unprofitable to produce pork in most 1st world countries. Without subsidies the Danish pig farmers would go bankrupt at an even faster rate than they do now.