Freaky! :yucky:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/16/science/a-parasite-leopards-and-a-primates-fear-and-survival.html?action=click&contentCollection=science&module=NextInCollection®ion=Footer&pgtype=article&version=column&rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fmatter
Quote
A Parasite, Leopards, and a Primate's Fear and Survival
Carl Zimmer
MATTER FEB. 11, 2016
Many of our primate ancestors probably ended up in the bellies of big cats. How else to explain bite marks on the bones of ancient hominins, the apparent gnawing of leopards or other African felines?
Big cats still pose a threat to primates. In one study of chimpanzees in Ivory Coast, for example, scientists estimated that each chimp ran a 30 percent risk of being attacked by a leopard every year.
A new study suggests that the big cats may be getting some tiny help on the hunt. A parasite infecting the brains of some primates, including perhaps our forebears, may make them less wary.
What does the parasite get out of it? A ride into its feline host.
The parasite is Toxoplasma gondii, a remarkably successful single-celled organism. An estimated 11 percent of Americans have dormant Toxoplasma cysts in their brains; in some countries, the rate is as high as 90 percent. Infection with the parasite poses a serious threat to fetuses and to people with compromised immune systems. But the vast majority of those infected appear to show no serious symptoms. Their healthy immune systems keep the parasite in check.
Mammals and birds can also be infected. But cats in particular play a crucial part in the life cycle of the parasite: When a cat eats an infected animal, Toxoplasma gondii ends up in its gut. It reproduces there, generating offspring called oocysts that are shed in the cat's feces. The oocysts can last for months in the environment, where they can be taken up by new hosts.
In the 1990s, scientists discovered that mice and rats infected with Toxoplasma gondii lose their natural fear of cat odors — and in some cases even appear to become attracted to them. It was possible, researchers speculated, that the parasite had evolved an ability to influence the behavior of its rodent hosts, to raise the chances they might be eaten by cats.
Subsequent studies have shown that the parasite can change the wiring of fear-related regions of the rat brain. Robert M. Sapolsky, a biologist at Stanford University, said that these findings led many researchers to see Toxoplasma gondii as a parasite exquisitely adapted to rodents. According to this view, he said, "Toxo being able to infect a zillion nonrodent species is just some sort of irrelevant evolutionary dead end."
Even so, Toxoplasma gondii can cause intriguing changes in our brains as well. In a 2015 study, for example, researchers found that women infected with the parasite are more aggressive than those without it; infected men behave more impulsively than parasite-free men.
Clémence Poirotte, an evolutionary biologist at the Center for Functional and Evolutionary Ecology in Montpellier, France, wondered if our understanding of Toxoplasma might be limited by the paltry number of species in which its manipulations had been studied. She and her colleagues decided to focus on chimpanzees, running an experiment on 33 apes at a primate research center in Gabon, nine of which had Toxoplasma infections.
Instead of testing the reactions of chimpanzees to the odor of house cats, Ms. Poirotte and her colleagues turned to leopards, their natural predators. A veterinarian at a Gabon zoo supplied them with leopard urine, and they poured drops of it on the fence enclosing the space in which the chimpanzees lived.
Stepping back from the fence, the scientists observed the apes to see how they responded. They also ran the same experiment with urine from three species that are not chimpanzees' natural predators: humans, lions and tigers.
Sometimes, the chimpanzees would approach the fence and investigate the smell; other times, they would ignore it. Ms. Poirotte and her colleagues found that chimpanzees not infected with Toxoplasma investigated the smell of leopard urine less than the smell of humans.
That's the sort of behavior you would expect if the smell of leopard urine alarmed the chimpanzees — a healthy instinct that could keep them out of leopard territory and reduce their chances of getting killed.
The Toxoplasma-infected chimpanzees, on the other hand, checked out the leopard urine more often than that of humans, not less. They appeared to have developed the same recklessness observed in Toxoplasma-infected rodents.
"It's so interesting to see that Toxo seems to have evolved the same manipulation ability in an ape with respect to its natural feline predator," said Dr. Sapolsky, who was not involved in the new study.
Other experts were also intrigued by the report. But Michael B. Eisen, a biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, said he didn't think it was powerful enough to rule out other explanations for how the chimpanzees behaved.
There might be innate differences in how the chimpanzees respond to odors, for example, that have nothing to do with being infected with Toxoplasma. "I'd have to file this, at best, in the 'interesting but nowhere near convincing' file," Dr. Eisen said.
Ms. Poirotte acknowledged that it might be possible to tease apart these different possibilities by testing the chimpanzees before and after being infected with Toxoplasma. That would be a very challenging experiment to set up, however.
But the current study provided another piece of evidence that the parasite really was manipulating the chimpanzees. "It works only with leopard urine, and not with other felines which aren't their natural predator," Ms. Poirotte said.
That's the kind of precision you'd expect from a parasite that has evolved a strategy for getting into one particular animal. "It's so specific that it suggests it's Toxoplasma causing the behavior modification," Ms. Poirotte said.
She added that it would be useful now to study Toxoplasma's effects on other primate species. It may even turn out that our primate ancestors were once the primary targets of the parasite.
When domesticated cats emerged several thousand years ago, the parasite might have expanded into a new host population that favored rodents rather than primates.
"It certainly suggests that Toxo's behavioral effects in humans may be less of an irrelevant dead end than was always assumed," Dr. Sapolsky said.
Leopards FTW. Badass cats.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLsLufGnsek
:lol:
Quote from: jimmy olsen on February 22, 2016, 01:16:24 AM
Big cats still pose a threat to primates.
Pretty sure the Chinese haves shot the shit out of that premise.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 22, 2016, 08:44:25 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on February 22, 2016, 01:16:24 AM
Big cats still pose a threat to primates.
Pretty sure the Chinese haves shot the shit out of that premise.
My thoughts as well :lol:
"This unprecedented lack of precedent has never been seen before by some scientific experts who have declared it to be a calamity of cataclysmic proportions while others call it a cataclysm of calamitous proportions. While there is disagreement among the climate linguists over noun and adjective climate combinations, there is a strong consensus that the best way to grapple with never seen before and unprecedented catastrophic cataclysmic, calamitous, and devastating climate crisis is for our global government messiahs to establish a Global Order of Total Climate Heroism Alliance (GOTCHA). It will collect an international tax that will scientifically frighten nefarious global warming into compliance with international standards and demand the return of the polar ice caps and glacial ice that has been stolen from us.
Further, the Associated Leaders for Global Organized Relief of Earths Faulty Air River and Terrestrial Environment Divisions (ALGOREFARTED) will be established to measure climate emissions and report on its findings to the
Scientific World Incorporation for Newly Developed Levies and Exchange (SWINDLE) which will assess fines, penalties, kickbacks, and bribes when deemed necessary and expedient."
Did you write that, Siege? You should forward it to your friends.
I am confused by Siege insisting all scientists are frauds and yet somehow still expecting them to reach the Singularity.
Or do you still care about that Siege? Or have you been completely brainwashed by the Science haters?
singularity will be reached through the free market science
Quote from: Grinning_Colossus on February 22, 2016, 10:13:04 PM
Did you write that, Siege? You should forward it to your friends.
No, a quick google will tell you that that is actually at least six months old. Right-wing loons* don't like to acknowledge it when they are stealing the intellectual property of others, though. They want to leave the reader with the impression that they are clever when, by definition, they are not.
*including those whose shtick it is to pretend to be right--wing loons
Siege doesn't pretend to be clever. :huh:
Also, I don't think the definition of clever precludes right-wing loons.
Quote from: Grinning_Colossus on February 22, 2016, 10:13:04 PM
Did you write that, Siege? You should forward it to your friends.
Its between ("), meaning I kidnapped it from some dude somewhere in erher land
Quote from: Valmy on February 22, 2016, 10:17:00 PM
I am confused by Siege insisting all scientists are frauds and yet somehow still expecting them to reach the Singularity.
Or do you still care about that Siege? Or have you been completely brainwashed by the Science haters?
Climate change "science" ain't science at all.
Just losers with worthless degrees trying to get gruberment grants to "study" climate.
Quote from: LaCroix on February 22, 2016, 11:22:17 PM
singularity will be reached through the free market science
Free market accelerates the technological singularity, collectivism slows it down.
Quote from: Siege on February 23, 2016, 08:21:39 AM
Quote from: LaCroix on February 22, 2016, 11:22:17 PM
singularity will be reached through the free market science
Free market accelerates the technological singularity, collectivism slows it down.
What is singularity anyway? :unsure:
A point inside a black hole. Also, some bullshit theory Siege believes in about artificial intelligence.
Quote from: Monoriu on February 23, 2016, 08:24:54 AM
Quote from: Siege on February 23, 2016, 08:21:39 AM
Quote from: LaCroix on February 22, 2016, 11:22:17 PM
singularity will be reached through the free market science
Free market accelerates the technological singularity, collectivism slows it down.
What is singularity anyway? :unsure:
Ok. I'll start a thread on it.
Quote from: Siege on February 23, 2016, 08:21:39 AM
Quote from: LaCroix on February 22, 2016, 11:22:17 PM
singularity will be reached through the free market science
Free market accelerates the technological singularity, collectivism slows it down.
Well that is just factually untrue Siege. Science was one of the few things the Soviets were good at. War often advances science quite a bit because of the all the government money being invested. Now the free market does do quite a bit for science but only in fields that are economically viable.
What is your basis for the assertion? Facts? Evidence?
Quote from: Valmy on February 23, 2016, 08:45:03 AM
Quote from: Siege on February 23, 2016, 08:21:39 AM
Quote from: LaCroix on February 22, 2016, 11:22:17 PM
singularity will be reached through the free market science
Free market accelerates the technological singularity, collectivism slows it down.
Well that is just factually untrue Siege. Science was one of the few things the Soviets were good at. War often advances science quite a bit because of the all the government money being invested. Now the free market does do quite a bit for science but only in fields that are economically viable.
What is your basis for the assertion? Facts? Evidence?
Consumer technology is what actually advances society. And the Soviets were behind in absolutely everything related to consumer technology.
What science were the soviets good at which had a global impact? Everything that has made a difference and created the modern world came from the west.
Then the west decided to become socialist. ...
Quote from: Valmy on February 23, 2016, 08:45:03 AM
Quote from: Siege on February 23, 2016, 08:21:39 AM
Quote from: LaCroix on February 22, 2016, 11:22:17 PM
singularity will be reached through the free market science
Free market accelerates the technological singularity, collectivism slows it down.
Well that is just factually untrue Siege. Science was one of the few things the Soviets were good at. War often advances science quite a bit because of the all the government money being invested. Now the free market does do quite a bit for science but only in fields that are economically viable.
The Soviets were behind the West in science. Like you mention science takes money and the Soviets had very little compared to the West, thanks to their retarded system.
Quote from: Siege on February 23, 2016, 08:53:05 AM
Consumer technology is what actually advances society. And the Soviets were behind in absolutely everything related to consumer technology.
What science were the soviets good at which had a global impact? Everything that has made a difference and created the modern world came from the west.
Then the west decided to become socialist. ...
True. But that is engineering and technology, not science.
I have not noticed the rate of technological and engineering development slowing down in the West. In fact I think we are very close to many miraculous breakthroughs. Which is why I think we are on the verge of great things while the rest of this society seems to be convinced we are on the edge of total disaster and collapse. Which I find puzzling.
Quote from: Siege on February 23, 2016, 08:18:09 AM
Quote from: Valmy on February 22, 2016, 10:17:00 PM
I am confused by Siege insisting all scientists are frauds and yet somehow still expecting them to reach the Singularity.
Or do you still care about that Siege? Or have you been completely brainwashed by the Science haters?
Climate change "science" ain't science at all.
Just losers with worthless degrees trying to get gruberment grants to "study" climate.
so, climatologists are losers? Ok.
So are oceanographers? Ok.
Physicists? Mathematicians? Statisticians? Ok.
Add marine biologists and biologists too, bunch of losers.
Economists, no doubt about it.
What are we left that ain't loser? Since everything a loser touches will be contaminated and maths and stats are part of nearly all serious studies, I guess we're left with... theology? Philosophy? Archelogy? History? Yeah, that's about it. But given the fact that archelogy and history can not support your world view as explained by your theology and philosophy often rejects theology, are they losers too?
So, in the end, we are left with... a bunch of guys using sticks with stone points that are true men with adequate skills?
Reduces fear and increases aggression?
Sounds useful for the creation of super soliders.
Quote from: viper37 on February 23, 2016, 11:20:35 AM
Quote from: Siege on February 23, 2016, 08:18:09 AM
Quote from: Valmy on February 22, 2016, 10:17:00 PM
I am confused by Siege insisting all scientists are frauds and yet somehow still expecting them to reach the Singularity.
Or do you still care about that Siege? Or have you been completely brainwashed by the Science haters?
Climate change "science" ain't science at all.
Just losers with worthless degrees trying to get gruberment grants to "study" climate.
so, climatologists are losers? Ok.
So are oceanographers? Ok.
Physicists? Mathematicians? Statisticians? Ok.
Add marine biologists and biologists too, bunch of losers.
Economists, no doubt about it.
What are we left that ain't loser? Since everything a loser touches will be contaminated and maths and stats are part of nearly all serious studies, I guess we're left with... theology? Philosophy? Archelogy? History? Yeah, that's about it. But given the fact that archelogy and history can not support your world view as explained by your theology and philosophy often rejects theology, are they losers too?
So, in the end, we are left with... a bunch of guys using sticks with stone points that are true men with adequate skills?
archaeology doesn't belong in the left-over list. Archaeology is connected to the hard sciences for it's dating (physics, chemistry, geology), environmental studies(geology,biology, paleontology, etc), population studies (biology, medicine, etc), building and technological studies (engineering, metallurgy, etc). It's not without reason that the discovery over carbon-dating is modern archeology's year 0.
Definately 'loser', in the comparison.