Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: grumbler on April 12, 2015, 10:10:43 AM

Title: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on April 12, 2015, 10:10:43 AM
Time to get this thread started.  First up is a story Berkut will love:  Rich Rodriguez allows fans to call some of the plays in the Arizona spring game.
QuoteCoaches are always getting second-guessed. Arizona's Rich Rodriguez decided to give the fans an actual chance to make their calls as the Wildcats went through their spring game on Friday.
Rodriguez headed into the stands, mic in hand, and sought out some of the Wildcat faithful.
He made certain the first "play-caller" hadn't been tailgaiting before giving him the opportunity to try and get Arizona into the end zone.
Spring games provide a time for fun. Coach Rodriguez took it to a great new level.
Pictures and a vid at the link.
http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/story/arizona-wildcats-rich-rodriguez-gives-fans-chance-to-call-plays-041115 (http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/story/arizona-wildcats-rich-rodriguez-gives-fans-chance-to-call-plays-041115)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on April 12, 2015, 03:57:34 PM
RichRod really is just awesome. He always shows up at the basketball games, his family is totally into the community, he really buys into being a part of the Arizona family, not just some aloof "God of Football" who isn't willing to mix with the masses.

Maybe it is all part of his scheme, but who cares? It works, and he finally has Arizona football moving in the right direction.

Now, if he could just start landing some blue chip recruits...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on April 12, 2015, 05:27:08 PM
Quote from: Berkut on April 12, 2015, 03:57:34 PM
RichRod really is just awesome. He always shows up at the basketball games, his family is totally into the community, he really buys into being a part of the Arizona family, not just some aloof "God of Football" who isn't willing to mix with the masses.

Maybe it is all part of his scheme, but who cares? It works, and he finally has Arizona football moving in the right direction.

Now, if he could just start landing some blue chip recruits...

Yeah, that's something I've enjoyed about Michigan football since he arrived at Michigan and started the tradition of the coaches all going to each others' games, when possible, and encouraging their players to attend the games in other sports (Denard Robinson was very visible attending basketball, hockey, and softball games).  Lloyd Carr was active in the community, and Bo was big into getting the team involved in charity work, but both were much more the aloof football god than RichRod.  I'm glad he's finding success at AZ, and I'm sure the blue chippers will start to sign.  Pro football is getting more and more friendly with the game he coaches.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on April 12, 2015, 09:20:06 PM
It just feels so much better now that the SEC has been stopped two years in a row. Looking for three.

Feeling really confident Charlie Strong is the man. This season will reflect that I am sure but beyond that I am not sure what to expect.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on April 12, 2015, 09:31:03 PM
God I so want Craig Bohl to be the man.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on April 12, 2015, 09:56:23 PM
Nevada gets Arizona at home on Sept. 12. That could be fun. For Arizona. I might go anyway though. Maybe RichRod will let me call some plays.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on April 13, 2015, 09:11:50 AM
So, what do people think about Aussie-style punting in the NCAA?  Michigan just picked up an Australian punter, and so have OSU, PSU, and Indiana [? - one of those western division non-powers].  Hawaii, of course, had a great one last year, and Utah had the best punting in the country with theirs.

Is this the wave of the future?  Or is it a gimmick that only works because so few people use it?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on April 13, 2015, 09:15:15 AM
Oh is that Aussie style? I was wondering what that is. I don't know if it the wave of the future but I don't think it is a gimmick either, it has its strengths I think. Get the punter moving and it helps boxing in the returner.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: jimmy olsen on April 13, 2015, 09:54:30 PM
I'm starting to think the Rams made a mistake in drafting him.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/04/13/lawrence-phillips-accused-of-murdering-his-prison-cellmate/related/

QuoteLawrence Phillips accused of murdering his prison cellmate

Posted by Michael David Smith on April 13, 2015, 7:18 PM EDT

Lawrence Phillips, the troubled running back who is remembered as one of the great busts in the history of the NFL draft, is accused of murdering his prison cellmate.

Phillips, who is currently serving a 31-year sentence in a California state prison for convictions on charges including auto theft and spousal abuse, has now been named as the suspect in the death of his cellmate, a convicted murderer named Damion Soward.

NBC San Diego reports that prison officials confirmed today that they believe Phillips killed Soward, who was found unresponsive in his cell early Saturday morning and died on Sunday. Soward was one of two inmates murdered in the Kern Valley State Prison over the weekend. The other victim, a 41-year-old man, is also believed to have been killed by his cellmate.

Phillips was a superstar running back at Nebraska who was controversially allowed to keep playing for the Cornhuskers even after multiple run-ins with the law. His NFL career was a disaster: The Rams drafted Phillips with the sixth overall pick in 1996, but he was a constant troublemaker off the field and a bad player on the field, and the team cut him after two disappointing seasons. He briefly played for the Dolphins and 49ers after that; his most notable play was a missed block that led to Hall of Famer Steve Young taking a blindside hit and suffering a career-ending concussion.

Phillips has been incarcerated at Kern Valley State Prison since 2008.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on April 14, 2015, 06:16:49 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 13, 2015, 09:54:30 PM
I'm starting to think the Rams made a mistake in drafting him.

I'm starting to think that you don't know what NCAA football means.  Take your post to one of your many megathreads, please.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on May 02, 2015, 01:31:07 PM
So far, Miami has had 2 first round draft picks, 1 second round draft pick, 2 third round draft picks, and 1 fourth round draft pick.

The team was 6-7 last year in a shitty conference.

My question is this: if you are 6-7 with talent like that, in a conference like the ACC, and you have a coach that has only compiled mediocre records, why should the fans or anyone else have hope for next year? "Maybe if we can get 5 1st round draft picks on the team we can go 8-5?" Is that the hope?

FWIW, Notre Dame was 8-5 and beat LSU in a bowl game, but has yet to have anyone drafted.





Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on May 02, 2015, 06:51:48 PM
Well, it's a question of timing. It's actually a good thing for next year if your team hasn't got many players in the draft. Not so much if there are lots of them but they just don't get drafted.  :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on May 02, 2015, 07:23:01 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on May 02, 2015, 06:51:48 PM
Well, it's a question of timing. It's actually a good thing for next year if your team hasn't got many players in the draft. Not so much if there are lots of them but they just don't get drafted.  :P

You definitely agree though that it's a bad sign if your team sucks, recruiting has fallen off, fans have lost interest to the extent that attendance will probably dip under 20k, and all your best players just got drafted?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on May 02, 2015, 07:48:05 PM
So Miami had one of the best NFL drafts of any college. And yet, 6-7.

Last place in the ACC Coastal.

For those not up on ACC division alignments, the ACC Coastal is the division without FSU, Clemson, or Louisville.

How do you finish in last place in the ACC Coastal with 2 first round draft picks, 6 guys picked in the first 4 rounds, and 7 guys overall? It almost feels like that should violate some fundamental law of the universe.

In fairness, they did tie for last place with 2 other teams. I guess that makes it okay, and justifies bringing Golden back for another year.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Ed Anger on May 02, 2015, 08:03:59 PM
Relax.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: jimmy olsen on May 03, 2015, 03:01:26 AM
I think AR's right to be upset. With that kind of talent they should be going 9-4 or 10-3, not 6-7.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on May 03, 2015, 03:21:13 AM
I suspect Notre Dame does a much better job than Miami of recruiting "team players".
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on May 11, 2015, 08:14:34 PM
Michigan fans won the Every Day Should Be Saturday Charity Day Drive again, so the EDSBS staff put together a list of insults for non-Michigan teams.  It's pretty good: http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2015/5/11/8586037/hatin-ass-spurrier (http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2015/5/11/8586037/hatin-ass-spurrier)
Money Quotes:
QuoteIf Michigan State's the little brother, why didn't he use his family connections to get into a better school?

It's a good idea to play Minnesota football in the cold. You don't wanna smell any of that when it warms up and gets ripe.

They've turned that talent level around. Before 2013, the last team to draft a Minnesota football player was "The Marines".

Notre Dame players hit that "Play Like A Champion Today" sign, and dang if they don't look like a ten dollar sweatshirt you got in 1993.

Don't think Michigan fans should be torn up about the Notre Dame rivalry ending. If they want to play a religious school that goes .500 against USC, Boston College is free.

Rudy and The Lego Movie are basically the same story, except nobody pretends The Lego Movie is a documentary.

Andy Katzenmoyer's never been asked to dot the I because he'd need a map.

It must've killed Woody Hayes to know he'd be remembered for throwing something, not running.

If Urban Meyer wants to coach somewhere with three non-NFL grade quarterbacks and leave a toxic mess where no one will notice, the Cleveland Browns are ready when he is.

If defeating Alabama meant you deserved a playoff spot then obesity gets an automatic three seed at least.

The Terp's a fine mascot since it lays eggs and sleeps through most of the fall.

I'm joking, Maryland's not all bad. They remind me a lot of an SEC fanbase. Mostly the racial slurs, but other things, too.

I'd guess any valley with electricity is a pretty happy one in Pennsylvania, relatively speaking.

The Spartans are doing real well right now. Historically speaking, that run'll end with them going two thousand years without making another bowl game.

Condemned strays at animal shelters pay celebrities to make commercials to get Purdue football adopted.

Hitchcock never released North by Northwestern, the sequel where the crop duster fumbles twice and only scores two field goals.

What do Nebraska football and bad husbands both have in common? Even at their best, they both go down four times a year.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on June 09, 2015, 06:27:40 PM
One of the  :lol: est stories I have seen in a while.  UConn has decided that they now have a rivalry with UCF, problem is UCF has no interest in the rivalry or the shitty trophy.

http://www.underdogdynasty.com/2015/6/1/8701483/uconn-ucf-is-now-a-rivalry-confusion-ensues



QuoteUConn-UCF is Now a Rivalry, Confusion Ensues

Look, the American Athletic Conference is a pretty new league. Apart from perhaps UCF-USF, there really aren't any matchups with any sort of historical significance to them. And hey, those kind of matchups are what college football is all about, right? So it would definitely be cool if a couple of teams developed some kind of...

QuoteFirst day back on campus for #UConnFootball!  And just 130 days until the next Civil Conflict with @UCF_Football !  (https://twitter.com/UConnFootball/status/605453150330470400/photo/1)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGb_HNRWgAAMiEj.jpg)

wait what nooooooooooo UConn that's not how rivalries work

There are a lot of confusing aspects to this, namely the fact that UConn and UCF have no sort of history whatsoever. They've played twice, with the Knights trouncing the Huskies 62-17 in 2013 and UConn pulling a 37-29 upset in 2014. They're also not connected by any sort of geographic ties, and likely never would have played each other ever if not for conference realignment making for some really odd bedfellows. Also, the Civil Conflict sounds like in-laws bickering at a family barbecue.

To be fair, UConn head coach Bob Diaco did mention that he'd like to start some sort of trophy series with the Knights after the Huskies' win last season. It's nice to see Diaco is rewarding his team's one conference win accordingly.

UPDATE: UCF apparently had no idea about any of this. We're getting suspicious, Bob Diaco.

QuoteJust checked w/ @UCF_Football: "We have no involvement with the trophy or creating a rivalry game with UConn." They were surprised by tweet. (https://twitter.com/UCFSports/status/605494774632570880)

The best part is is that the new "rivalry" trophy has UConn's 37-29 score engraved on it but they didn't include UCF's 62-17 ass kicking the previous year.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on June 09, 2015, 06:55:37 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on June 09, 2015, 10:05:51 PM
How about a West Virginia-Texas Tech rivalry? The 'Unbecoming Scuffle'.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Ed Anger on June 11, 2015, 01:15:41 PM
QuoteIt's time to bronze another sweater vest. Ohio State announced Wednesday that former football coach Jim Tressel will be one of the 15 inductees to the university's athletic hall of fame this year.

O H
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 04, 2015, 02:25:52 PM
Dumbest move ever by an athletic department?

The excellent web site Shaggy Bevo has been forced by the Texas athletic department to change their name to shaggytexas.com because they were supposedly  infringing on the name "Bevo."  Talk about making enemies out of your friends.  Just dumb.  Patterson really needs to go (I doubt Plonsky had anything to do with this, since she and shaggybevo.com have co-existed for a decade or so).

http://www.shaggytexas.com/board/showthread.php/161516-Shaggy-name-change (http://www.shaggytexas.com/board/showthread.php/161516-Shaggy-name-change)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 04, 2015, 03:18:49 PM
Apparently it all started pre-Patterson.  Also, they aren't exactly....Bellmont friendly...there.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 15, 2015, 02:47:41 PM
If anyone is interested in reading a really good book about college football in its early years, I just finished "Stagg vs Yost" http://www.amazon.com/Stagg-vs-Yost-Cutthroat-Football/dp/1442248254 (http://www.amazon.com/Stagg-vs-Yost-Cutthroat-Football/dp/1442248254) and highly recommend it.

It is the story about the legendary rvivalry between Amos ALonzo Stagg, head coach at the University of Chicago, and Fielding H. Yost, head coach of the Michigan Wolverines, between 1901 and 1905 (with major digressions int the periods before and after that).  Stagg, Yost, Henry Lane Williams of Minnesota, and Philip King of Wisconsin regularly vied for the championship of the (then) Big Nine and the title "Champions of the West."  The war between Stagg and Yost was especially bitter, as only they met every year.

The book is extremely well-researched, using archives from all the major schools (the Bentley Historical Libray in Ann Arbor is especially rich in "dirt and all" archives), as well as reports from major newspapers across the country, diaries of players and coaches, letters, and the like.  Kryk is able to make this period really come alive.

The thrust of the story is the increasingly frantic attempts by Stagg to derail what became known as "the Yost machine" (now known as the "Point-a-Minute" teams).  Stagg had gone 2-1 against Michigan before Yost's arrival, but fell in his first game against Yost 22-0 in a game not nearly as close as the score.  The Maroons never advanced past half-field.  Yosts's team went on to win the national championship at 11-0, outscoring opponents 550-0 (in fact, the defense was so good that the safety made only one tackle all season, and that was on a punt return).  Michigan was undefeated for four more years before Stagg finally got a 2-0 win at the end of the 1905 season.

Stagg would engage in increasingly dubious recruiting and admissions tactics to try to get the players he needed to defeat Yost's coaching.  That, and Yost's almost-as-dubious (in his cheating system, players got loans that had to be repaid, not cash gifts as in Stagg's cheating system, and at least Yost graduated his players), are pretty much what the book is about.  There's lots of good dirt on how players actually got recruited and retained back before there was an NCAA.

The book is really well-written on top of the excellent research and fascinating story.  It's the best college football book i have read that doesn't have the word "Bo" in the title.  If you are interested in the topic and don't mind the fact that it is a bit pricey I'd say it is a must-read.  Hell, get your local public library to order it if you don't want to spend the coin.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 20, 2015, 11:47:13 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 04, 2015, 03:18:49 PM
Apparently it all started pre-Patterson.  Also, they aren't exactly....Bellmont friendly...there.

I find that hard to believe. It took them more than two years of effort to get that done? Nice use of resources there Bellmont.

Anyway I was not happy with this hire at all when it happened. Time has shown my concerns were greatly insufficient. Steve Patterson is destroying this Athletic Department. Just what we needed after the complacent days of the end of the Dodds era.

He goes out of his way to alienate everybody. It is like he does not understand what his job is. UT basically hired Dan Snyder to be their AD. I am starting to take this personally Football Gods.

The only nice thing is Steve Patterson can be fired so I don't have to just patiently wait for his death.

Here you go: http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/story/texas-longhorns-big-12-steve-patterson-toxic-culture-joel-klatt-audible-clip-081915

Starts at 1:30. If the Fox Sports dudes can see it then surely even the morons on the BOR will eventually.

I understand Michigan hired a similar dude with similar results so I think grumbler will understand a bit.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 20, 2015, 12:17:51 PM
As for this season...I have no idea.

Obviously Charlie Strong was not some immediate magic bullet but we will see how it goes after a season under his belt. I will be watching the offensive line closely and fretting...like I have done for most seasons since 2006.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 20, 2015, 06:41:36 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 20, 2015, 11:47:13 AM
I find that hard to believe. It took them more than two years of effort to get that done? Nice use of resources there Bellmont.

Anyway I was not happy with this hire at all when it happened. Time has shown my concerns were greatly insufficient. Steve Patterson is destroying this Athletic Department. Just what we needed after the complacent days of the end of the Dodds era.

He goes out of his way to alienate everybody. It is like he does not understand what his job is. UT basically hired Dan Snyder to be their AD. I am starting to take this personally Football Gods.

The only nice thing is Steve Patterson can be fired so I don't have to just patiently wait for his death.

Here you go: http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/story/texas-longhorns-big-12-steve-patterson-toxic-culture-joel-klatt-audible-clip-081915

Starts at 1:30. If the Fox Sports dudes can see it then surely even the morons on the BOR will eventually.

I understand Michigan hired a similar dude with similar results so I think grumbler will understand a bit.

Yeah, Michigan had basically the same kinda guy, named Dave Brandon.  Very "brand" aggressive, raised a lot of money, but had a toxic personality and drove off a bunch of people in the department who had been there, doing great work, for decades (like their legendary equipment manager, who'd been there for 40 years).  Eventually, Brandon was driven out of town on a rail after the students staged massive protests to get rid of him.

Get this:  Harbaugh was willing to leave Stanford for Michigan in January 2011, but after talking to Brandon, "didn't feel the love," so he went to the 49ers and Brandon hired the guy he wanted all along, Brady Hoke.  At least Patterson doesn't have anything quite that bad on his resume.

So, good luck with Patterson, Texas.  Ann Arbor Torch and Pitchfork is having a going-out-of-business sale; maybe you can get some needed equipment cheap.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 20, 2015, 07:29:54 PM
And, for Michigan this year, I am calling it 9-3.  I see them losing the road opener to Utah in the first game, to MSU in the middle of the season, and then one more loss between BYU, Penn State, Minnesota, or Maryland.  I'm calling the defeat of OSU on November 28 right now.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 20, 2015, 07:45:05 PM
Val, that's just what one of the admin dudes was saying in the thread about it.  Essentially that it started at toward the end Dodds/Mack "era" and finally reached this point now.  I think blacklab himself only said something along the lines of "fuck patterson" though so vOv.   

Quote from: grumbler on August 20, 2015, 06:41:36 PM
So, good luck with Patterson, Texas.  Ann Arbor Torch and Pitchfork is having a going-out-of-business sale; maybe you can get some needed equipment cheap.

Hell I'll swing by and pick some up before I head back down to Texas (I'm on the other side of the state at the moment at the in-laws place :P).
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on August 21, 2015, 01:21:09 AM
I am at a loss to predict an Arizona record. They should be very good - but the Pac-12 South is just ridiculous. There is going to be a couple very good teams with quite a few losses in that conference this year.

I could see them ending anywhere from first to fourth. Basically, I think predicting the order of USC, UCLA, ASU, and Arizona is basically a crap shoot. And hell, Utah probably has the best defense in the conference, so toss them in the mix while we are at it. Colorado however, is still pretty bad.

I would be pretty happy with 1 9 win season, 10 would be incredible - and that is with a total cupcake non-conference schedule.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 21, 2015, 09:08:39 AM
My "I know next to nothing about the teams!" guess:

UCLA
ASU
Arizona
USC
Utah
Colorado

That's a good division.  Well except Colorado, as you said.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 09:12:44 AM
How about Baylor accepting that abuser transfer and then covering up for his rape? Baylor going to Baylor. It is amazing what they will tolerate over there.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on August 21, 2015, 09:22:20 AM
Colorado's gonna turn it around this year and go to the Rose Bowl.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 11:11:28 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on August 21, 2015, 09:22:20 AM
Colorado's gonna turn it around this year and go to the Rose Bowl.

Yes they will. On October 31st. Be sure to dress up!
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 21, 2015, 01:09:09 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 09:12:44 AM
How about Baylor accepting that abuser transfer and then covering up for his rape? Baylor going to Baylor. It is amazing what they will tolerate over there.

Quite the dark story.  I'm hoping for some lawsuits and shit-cannings over this.  It's disgraceful, even for Baylor.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 01:11:47 PM
Yep. Art Briles may be a little too old school in all the wrong ways. Glad UT didn't bring that shit here.

It is going to be hard for it to get much traction in Waco unless outside forces intervene though.

Ok CNN and company are going in. Justice might be done.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 02:04:41 PM
Ok this is blowing up. Briles has got to be finished. Amazing.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on August 21, 2015, 06:01:52 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 02:04:41 PM
Ok this is blowing up. Briles has got to be finished. Amazing.

Why? Assuming there isn't conclusive evidence that Briles is lying of course.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 07:45:40 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 21, 2015, 06:01:52 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 02:04:41 PM
Ok this is blowing up. Briles has got to be finished. Amazing.

Why? Assuming there isn't conclusive evidence that Briles is lying of course.

Well lets see.

He brought a player on campus who had a history of domestic abuse. Within a few months that player violently raped a female student athlete. No serious investigation is launched. The player stays on campus and is not removed from the team, scholarship intact, despite being charged and indicted. Meanwhile his victim has her scholarship removed (not quite as bad as it sounds but close) and eventually she leaves school. He is ready to bring this guy back on the team so long as he is innocent of the charges as if Briles, the dude 100% responsible for this situation, could not be bothered to make a call based on the evidence himself. Oh and the whole thing is hid from the media for two years obviously so they can bring him back with no fuss.

But really the whole country knows about it. The Waco machine cannot eat it up like they do with normal Baylor shenanigans.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on August 21, 2015, 08:28:41 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 07:45:40 PM
The player stays on campus and is not removed from the team, scholarship intact, despite being charged and indicted... ...He is ready to bring this guy back on the team so long as he is innocent of the charges as if Briles, the dude 100% responsible for this situation, could not be bothered to make a call based on the evidence himself.

While the player's past history makes it worse in this case (and the fact that Petersen allegedly made Briles aware of it), I'm not entirely comfortable with the idea of taking someone's scholarship and kicking them out of school based solely on an accusation.

QuoteOh and the whole thing is hid from the media for two years obviously so they can bring him back with no fuss.

How was it hidden from the media if he was indicted?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on August 21, 2015, 09:18:33 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 07:45:40 PM

Well lets see.

He brought a player on campus who had a history of domestic abuse. Within a few months that player violently raped a female student athlete. No serious investigation is launched. The player stays on campus and is not removed from the team, scholarship intact, despite being charged and indicted. Meanwhile his victim has her scholarship removed (not quite as bad as it sounds but close) and eventually she leaves school. He is ready to bring this guy back on the team so long as he is innocent of the charges as if Briles, the dude 100% responsible for this situation, could not be bothered to make a call based on the evidence himself. Oh and the whole thing is hid from the media for two years obviously so they can bring him back with no fuss.

But really the whole country knows about it. The Waco machine cannot eat it up like they do with normal Baylor shenanigans.

It isn't like he admitted the guy to the school. Normally admissions has the main say in stuff like this, as well as discipline for players that are in trouble with the law. Also, he isn't responsible for whether the player stays on campus. Plus what dps said.

I really don't get the outrage about player crimes and holding coaches responsible. So this guy was bad news--probably a serious risk to rape or otherwise abuse women. Baylor didn't make him such a risk. By bringing him on campus, Baylor kept him from being a risk in some other community and brought the risk to their campus. Had they not done so, the risk would have been left somewhere other than Baylor. Either way, the collective risk to the women of America is unchanged.

Now I can see why members of the Baylor community would be upset, but that doesn't seem to be where a lot of the outrage is coming from.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 09:29:10 PM
Quote from: dps on August 21, 2015, 08:28:41 PM
How was it hidden from the media if he was indicted?

Because it was? It took an investigation by Texas Monthly two years after the incident took place for it to get out. Now granted it was all public record but you have to actually, you know, look it up.

QuoteWhile the player's past history makes it worse in this case (and the fact that Petersen allegedly made Briles aware of it), I'm not entirely comfortable with the idea of taking someone's scholarship and kicking them out of school based solely on an accusation.

I am curious what you saw in my post that led you to think this was the case. We had an incident at UT where a student was raped by two football players. Coach Strong suspended them, looked into it, and kicked them out. That was that in just a couple days.  Did you read my post?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 09:41:37 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 21, 2015, 09:18:33 PM

It isn't like he admitted the guy to the school. Normally admissions has the main say in stuff like this, as well as discipline for players that are in trouble with the law.

Sure lets just pass it around the bureaucracy. The coach is not responsible for making decisions about the football team. It is some nameless bureaucrat. The only reason this dude was on campus was because of Briles. It was Briles decision that he stay on scholarship and maybe play again. I have a hard time thinking such a nonexistent joke of an investigation happens if that guy is not a football player.

QuoteAlso, he isn't responsible for whether the player stays on campus. Plus what dps said.

Really? A coach has no standards or team rules that can remove a player from a team, even if he comes in with a prior record of this sort of behavior? And what did dps say besides make a strawman claim I never made?



QuoteI really don't get the outrage about player crimes and holding coaches responsible. So this guy was bad news--probably a serious risk to rape or otherwise abuse women. Baylor didn't make him such a risk. By bringing him on campus, Baylor kept him from being a risk in some other community and brought the risk to their campus. Had they not done so, the risk would have been left somewhere other than Baylor. Either way, the collective risk to the women of America is unchanged.

:unsure: What now?

QuoteNow I can see why members of the Baylor community would be upset, but that doesn't seem to be where a lot of the outrage is coming from.

Sorry?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on August 21, 2015, 09:44:14 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 09:29:10 PM

I am curious what you saw in my post that led you to think this was the case. We had an incident at UT where a student was raped by two football players. Coach Strong suspended them, looked into it, and kicked them out. That was that in just a couple days.  Did you read my post?

Let me point out there are two approaches to discipline.

There is the Charlie Strong method, which is lauded by everyone, that has a current win / loss record at UT that is going to result in a rather short tenure if it doesn't improve.

Then there is the Jimbo Fisher method, which involves Jameis Winston QBing the team to a national title and heisman trophy. This method will likely end up with a statue to Jimbo Fisher outside the stadium (which may have a part named for him) if results continue and he sticks around. It might also involve his wife seeing his approach to morality and deciding it is okay to get banged by her personal trainer half her age and a UF grad, though that could be for other unrelated reasons (such as inabilty to perform in the bedroom).
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on August 21, 2015, 09:47:17 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 09:41:37 PM

:unsure: What now?


Bad people are going to do bad things. Whether or not they play football for Baylor is up to Baylor, and ultimately Baylor's problem.

IMO.

Obviously the justice system needs to function and obstruction of justice by a football coach or university is unacceptable.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 09:47:48 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 21, 2015, 09:44:14 PM

Let me point out there are two approaches to discipline.

There is the Charlie Strong method, which is lauded by everyone, that has a current win / loss record at UT that is going to result in a rather short tenure if it doesn't improve.

Then there is the Jimbo Fisher method, which involves Jameis Winston QBing the team to a national title and heisman trophy. This method will likely end up with a statue to Jimbo Fisher outside the stadium (which may have a part named for him) if results continue and he sticks around. It might also involve his wife seeing his approach to morality and deciding it is okay to get banged by her personal trainer half her age and a UF grad, though that could be for other unrelated reasons (such as inabilty to perform in the bedroom).

Well Chuck enabling those dudes to rape that girl wasn't going to get Texas better. None of them play line.

And stealing crab legs and screaming obscenities is not quite the same thing. Though maybe you are right. What was on his rap sheet again?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 09:48:30 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 21, 2015, 09:47:17 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 09:41:37 PM

:unsure: What now?


Bad people are going to do bad things. Whether or not they play football for Baylor is up to Baylor, and ultimately Baylor's problem.

IMO.

Obviously the justice system needs to function and obstruction of justice by a football coach or university is unacceptable.

Well that is the problem that is created in places like Waco where the local government just does whatever the University wants.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on August 21, 2015, 09:52:36 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 09:47:48 PM

And stealing crab legs and screaming obscenities is not quite the same thing. Though maybe you are right. What was on his rap sheet again?

From Wikipedia:

Quote
Sexual assault allegation

In November 2013, State Attorney Willie Meggs of the Second Judicial Circuit opened an investigation into an allegation that Winston had sexually assaulted a classmate the previous year. The initial complaint had been filed with the Tallahassee Police Department (TPD) on December 7, 2012;[33] the TPD had classified the case as open/inactive in February 2013.[34][35][36] On December 5, 2013, Meggs announced the completion of the investigation, filing no charges. He stated: "As prosecutors, we only bring charges for cases where the evidence will result in a likely conviction at trial. In this case, the evidence does not show that."[37]

The New York Times published the conclusions of its own investigation in April 2014, asserting that neither the TPD nor FSU had genuinely investigated the initial report. Though a medical examination of the victim revealed bruised knees and semen on the woman's body—and the victim would identify Winston by name as her attacker a month later, Tallahassee police reportedly never obtained a DNA sample from Winston, never interviewed him, nor attempted to obtain video of the encounter taken by Seminoles teammate Chris Casher. The investigation was conducted by Officer Scott Angulo, who, the Times‍ '​ article notes, did private security work for the Seminole Boosters, the primary financier of Florida State athletics.[38]

The official FSU hearing, presided over by retired Florida Supreme Court Justice Major B. Harding, on December 21, 2014, cleared Winston of violating the student conduct code in the sexual assault allegation.[39][40] An extract from Harding's decision[41] is below.

    I do not find the credibility of one story substantially stronger than that of the other. Both have their own strengths and weaknesses. I cannot find with any confidence that the events as set forth by you, (accuser), or a particular combination thereof is more probable than not as required to find you responsible for a violation of the Code. Therein lies the determinative factor of my decision.

Gun complaint

In 2012, Winston and another FSU player were held by campus police for allegedly bringing a BB gun on campus and firing at squirrels. Officers handcuffed Winston but he was later released when it was noticed he was not on campus and the gun was just a BB gun. No charges were filed against Winston in this incident.[42]
Shoplifting incidents

In July 2013, a Burger King employee called police in July to complain that Winston was stealing soda. According to the police report, Winston came in to the restaurant with three men, but did not order any food. An employee, who recognized him, first saw him using ketchup cups to take some soda. He asked for a water cup after she told him to stop, but he said he would use it for soda and filled it repeatedly with soda over her objections, the report said.[43] On April 29, 2014, Winston was issued an adult civil citation for shoplifting crab legs from a Tallahassee Publix store.[44] Winston was ordered to undergo 20 hours of community service and was suspended from any college baseball activity until he completed his community service.
Vulgar comments

On September 17, 2014, Winston was suspended for the first half of Florida State's upcoming game against Clemson. The Guardian reported that "several students tweeted" that Winston shouted, "Fuck her right in the pussy!" an Internet meme,[45] while standing atop a table in Florida State University's Student Union.[46] Two days later, university president Garnett S. Stokes and athletic director Stan Wilcox, citing results of an "ongoing investigation", announced that Winston would be suspended for the whole game.[47]
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 10:04:08 PM
Wow. Ok then you got me there. I only got the screaming obscenities and the crab legs thing.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on August 21, 2015, 10:24:31 PM
Also he called himself a seminole after the native american tribe, played with a spear on his helmet in some faux reference to the tribe, and led his fans in some "tomahawk chop" warchant that was not only highly offensive but also rather militant for a sporting event. When a student rode a horse into the center of the field dressed up in warpaint and threw down a flaming spear, he said not a word in protest.

The school didn't even criticize him for these actions.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on August 22, 2015, 05:34:31 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 21, 2015, 09:29:10 PM
Quote from: dps on August 21, 2015, 08:28:41 PM
How was it hidden from the media if he was indicted?

Because it was? It took an investigation by Texas Monthly two years after the incident took place for it to get out. Now granted it was all public record but you have to actually, you know, look it up.

Isn't, you know, looking up that sort of thing the media's job?  Saying it was "hid" implies that there was some sort of conspiracy to keep the media from, you know, doing their job and looking it up.

Quote
QuoteWhile the player's past history makes it worse in this case (and the fact that Petersen allegedly made Briles aware of it), I'm not entirely comfortable with the idea of taking someone's scholarship and kicking them out of school based solely on an accusation.

I am curious what you saw in my post that led you to think this was the case. We had an incident at UT where a student was raped by two football players. Coach Strong suspended them, looked into it, and kicked them out. That was that in just a couple days.  Did you read my post?

Did you read mine?  I said I'm not comfortable with taking away a student-athlete's scholarship and kicking them out base just on an accusation.  I don't see how Charlie Strong doing otherwise is supposed to make me more comfortable with it.

The whole issue of college athletes and crime is a tricky area.  "Guilty until proven innocent" is an important legal concept IMO, but OTOH, I don't particularly want to see college teams composed of murderers, thieve, rapists, arsonists, etc.  Where guilt is very clear, I don't think you have to wait for a confession or conviction, but some degree of caution needs to be used, otherwise you end up with a situation like that with that lacrosse team a few years ago, where the entire program was axed based on what turned out to be apparently false charges.
[/quote]
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 22, 2015, 11:44:34 AM
QuoteDid you read mine?  I said I'm not comfortable with taking away a student-athlete's scholarship and kicking them out base just on an accusation.  I don't see how Charlie Strong doing otherwise is supposed to make me more comfortable with it.

The whole issue of college athletes and crime is a tricky area.  "Guilty until proven innocent" is an important legal concept IMO, but OTOH, I don't particularly want to see college teams composed of murderers, thieve, rapists, arsonists, etc.  Where guilt is very clear, I don't think you have to wait for a confession or conviction, but some degree of caution needs to be used, otherwise you end up with a situation like that with that lacrosse team a few years ago, where the entire program was axed based on what turned out to be apparently false charges.

You shouldn't be comfortable with that. I was confused that that was your response to my post since I would never claim we just assume everybody accused is guilty. We all remember Duke Lacrosse. I never said people should be booted off for every accusation. "Guilty until proven innocent" is an important concept but this is not just about making sure your college team doesn't consist of criminals this is about the safety of the other students. So a good faith investigation should be launched to see if the accused student should remain on campus. This did not happen at Baylor, they totally passed the buck to law enforcement on this one. And law enforcement, taking their cue from the school, dragged their feet. One DA took it seriously and only because the victim and her family pushed hard on this thing. In alot of circumstances this goes away.

But the main reason I thought Briles was in trouble was because this had gotten out to the national media circus and the Baylor alumni are not going to like that at all. Ken Starr is getting major pressure to take action. We'll see how this goes.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 22, 2015, 11:45:48 AM
QuoteDan Beebe ‏@DanBeebe  20h20 hours ago
ART BRILES CAREER IS SO DEAD THAT DAVE BLISS IS TRYING TO COVER IT UP AS WE SPEAK

:lol:  Damn.

https://twitter.com/DanBeebe

E:  Dude only ended up with 6 months in jail and 10 years probation?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 22, 2015, 11:47:39 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 21, 2015, 10:24:31 PM
Also he called himself a seminole after the native american tribe, played with a spear on his helmet in some faux reference to the tribe, and led his fans in some "tomahawk chop" warchant that was not only highly offensive but also rather militant for a sporting event. When a student rode a horse into the center of the field dressed up in warpaint and threw down a flaming spear, he said not a word in protest.

The school didn't even criticize him for these actions.

I wore a burgundy t-shirt with an offensive symbol and racist slur on it to school once at Southwestern and at UT and I was not forcibly removed from campus. Nobody even made me change shirts. Disgusting. Everybody at both schools should be fired.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 22, 2015, 12:00:37 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 22, 2015, 11:45:48 AM
QuoteDan Beebe ‏@DanBeebe  20h20 hours ago
ART BRILES CAREER IS SO DEAD THAT DAVE BLISS IS TRYING TO COVER IT UP AS WE SPEAK

:lol:  Damn.

https://twitter.com/DanBeebe

E:  Dude only ended up with 6 months in jail and 10 years probation?


Yep. The Jury recomended 8 years probation. For felony sexual assault? Good thing he did not possess a little weed then he might have been in real trouble.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 22, 2015, 01:14:48 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 22, 2015, 11:44:34 AM
But the main reason I thought Briles was in trouble was because this had gotten out to the national media circus and the Baylor alumni are not going to like that at all.

All responsible college football head coaches prepare their players for the NFL, even if some of them aren't going to make it.  Even if Ukwuachu was never going to be a pro, Briles could use him as an example of what the players could expect from the NFL when they engage in domestic violence or sexual asault.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on August 22, 2015, 02:51:12 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 22, 2015, 11:47:39 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 21, 2015, 10:24:31 PM
Also he called himself a seminole after the native american tribe, played with a spear on his helmet in some faux reference to the tribe, and led his fans in some "tomahawk chop" warchant that was not only highly offensive but also rather militant for a sporting event. When a student rode a horse into the center of the field dressed up in warpaint and threw down a flaming spear, he said not a word in protest.

The school didn't even criticize him for these actions.

I wore a burgundy t-shirt with an offensive symbol and racist slur on it to school once at Southwestern and at UT and I was not forcibly removed from campus. Nobody even made me change shirts. Disgusting. Everybody at both schools should be fired.

They probably didn't act because they expected you to be lynched by angry Cowboy fans.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 24, 2015, 08:35:29 PM
A bit of humor for Big Ten fans, courtesy of EDSBS: http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2015/8/18/9172065/if-you-like-this-youll-love-the-big-ten (http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2015/8/18/9172065/if-you-like-this-youll-love-the-big-ten)

Money quotes:
QuoteIF YOU LIKE: imagining living life as Saved by the Bell's Zach Morris*, in which you never face actual challenges, can skip tests and alienate others, and still have all of your friends, teachers, and principal willing to lie on the ground and die for you for no real reason. Even your best friend, who hates you, seems to simultaneously do nothing but think of things to do for you, when he's not wearing Hammer pants and trying to get to third base with the three women who are apparently allowed to attend your high school. Your school is kind of weird.

YOU'LL LOVE: Ohio State.

QuoteIF YOU LIKE: Alcohol, being really good at many things but never quite the best at anything, alcohol, cheese, alcohol, "Apollo 13," never complaining about the weather, ice fishing, making sausage out of nontraditional meats, sturdy pants, keeping the windows open in sub 20 degree weather, alcohol. God, alcohol is great. Have you ever stood in a snowdrift while wearing shorts and felt nothing at all? That's the good stuff. Also, cheese.

YOU'LL LOVE: Wisconsin.

QuoteIF YOU LIKE: That moment in "Air Force One" when someone spoils Michigan-Notre Dame for the President by telling him that Michigan won by 1, which would definitely happen and would actually cause the President to have that staffer heaved off the plane, which is what he should have done with that film crew who were SO OBVIOUSLY terrorists I mean come ON did no one do a security screening? Was no one like, "wait, who are you with?" Were they even CREDENTIALED? Did you not make some fucking phone calls? Are you EVEN FUCKING TRYING? INACCURATE ACTION MOVIES ARE A BANE ON THIS NATION'S GOOD NAME.

YOU'LL LOVE: Michigan.

QuoteIF YOU LIKE: Defending traditions. They just don't understand, do they? It's a conspiracy, it really is. People telling you that "your offensive line is butt" and "your quarterback went through more emotional upheaval than Drake did after he got shot on that episode of Degrassi" is just MORE anti-you sentiment based on nothing but LIES and PURPOSEFUL MISINTERPRETING OF THE FACTS because YOU CAN'T PROVE ANYTHING and YOU'RE PROBABLY NOT EVEN FROM HERE AND YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT OUR AWESOME ICE CREAM STORE AND PUT THE STATUE BACK UP AND MICHIGAN GOT TWO SECONDS BACK IN 2005 AND EVERYONE IS A CHEATER EXCEPT FOR US BECAUSE WE DO THINGS THE RIGHT WAY RIGHT MATT MILLEN YEAH RIGHT

YOU'LL LOVE: Penn State.

QuoteIF YOU LIKE: Not really being good enough, but that's cool. You've got dreams. And you're not like THOSE assholes. You know the ones. Other side of the state, think they're SO special. They don't even TALK about you, but you know they think about you all the time. I mean, you think about THEM all the time so obviously they think about you EVEN MORE. You've been to Pasadena! You're a winner! No one can tell you what to do! Especially not those douchebags. Bunch of self-obsessed dicks, you say to yourself, carefully making your "scUM" user image for when you comment on MLive.com stories. You comment a lot.

YOU'LL LOVE: Michigan State.

Man, those are so right on!
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Rasputin on August 25, 2015, 12:15:21 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 21, 2015, 10:24:31 PM
Also he called himself a seminole after the native american tribe, played with a spear on his helmet in some faux reference to the tribe, and led his fans in some "tomahawk chop" warchant that was not only highly offensive but also rather militant for a sporting event. When a student rode a horse into the center of the field dressed up in warpaint and threw down a flaming spear, he said not a word in protest.

The school didn't even criticize him for these actions.

This happened. I personally witnessed it many times, and I loved him for it.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 25, 2015, 12:16:27 PM
That goes way beyond microaggressions. That is literal violence Rasputin.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 25, 2015, 12:18:03 PM
Quote from: grumbler on August 24, 2015, 08:35:29 PM
Man, those are so right on!

Sad they were too lazy to write a joke about Penn State instead of just pasting in quotes from their alumni.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 25, 2015, 01:45:04 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 25, 2015, 12:18:03 PM
Sad they were too lazy to write a joke about Penn State instead of just pasting in quotes from their alumni.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs2.quickmeme.com%2Fimg%2F9c%2F9cb11f91cfda4d161c44e5b2c18c242c60411ac42dc8debc58b2e6a4c17efb0c.jpg&hash=cc36c7bd2b55e24f59236252e00156578b9869c1)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 25, 2015, 01:45:56 PM
 :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 25, 2015, 02:35:58 PM
The more I look at this Notre Dame-Texas match-up the more I am convinced I should drink heavily before kickoff.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on August 25, 2015, 03:55:43 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 25, 2015, 02:35:58 PM
The more I look at this Notre Dame-Texas match-up the more I am convinced I should drink heavily before kickoff.

It does seem like, on paper at least, that ND should win this one. However, a big game, on a big stage, in a classic helmet game, that ND should win on paper--I don't know if you have seen the trajectory of ND football the past 2 or 3 decades, but ND's winning percentage is not good in such matchups.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on August 25, 2015, 04:41:39 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 25, 2015, 02:35:58 PM
The more I look at this Notre Dame-Texas match-up the more I am convinced I should drink heavily before kickoff.
That is my plan for each week this season.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Ed Anger on August 25, 2015, 07:48:14 PM
I laughed at Grumble's stuff.  :)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on August 25, 2015, 07:48:46 PM
"Classic helmet game?" :unsure:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on August 25, 2015, 07:57:44 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on August 25, 2015, 07:48:46 PM
"Classic helmet game?" :unsure:

Shorthand for a game between two schools that have lots of history. If someone went into a coma in the 1980s and awoke to see the schools playing, they would think, "this will be a good game."

Louisville vs. Oregon would not be a classic helmet game, even if the teams are awesome.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Rasputin on August 26, 2015, 06:54:13 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 25, 2015, 07:57:44 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on August 25, 2015, 07:48:46 PM
"Classic helmet game?" :unsure:

Shorthand for a game between two schools that have lots of history. If someone went into a coma in the 1980s and awoke to see the schools playing, they would think, "this will be a good game."

Louisville vs. Oregon would not be a classic helmet game, even if the teams are awesome.

Incorrect use of the term. "Classic helmet game" refers to a game where one team is a traditional power that's not as good as its reputation or as good as the team they're facing that week. Nonetheless the better team chokes because of the intimidation factor of the traditional powers reputation (that is they got beat by the traditional guys helmet not the players).

Texas v Norte dame would not be a traditional helmet game because both schools have good traditions and reputations. Notre dame v Louisville would be if Louisville choked despite superior talent.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 26, 2015, 08:50:29 AM
Well the point is that from where I sit Notre Dame looks like a veteran team ready to have a great season.

Texas has a bunch of passionate youngsters who will be entering their first game. Texas' veterans have not provided leadership for years and I am not optimistic about this crowd. Tyrone Swoopes is going to be the starting QB. Rice would have been a better opening game for them this year.

It is going to be ugly. Bad matchups up and down the line for Texas.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 26, 2015, 09:16:04 AM
Notre Dame doesn't look all that good this year.  They are getting their usual over-rating, but they lost some key guys from an 8-5 team that stumbled badly at the end of the year.  They should be weaker against the run than against the pass, and they can be stopped on offense if Texas has a decent space player.  Malik is good, but won't beat you with his arm if the run game can be stopped.

I think ND will win, but I don't think it will be ugly, unless Strong just can't coach.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 26, 2015, 09:29:51 AM
Maybe. But making this flag for the game just seems like we are asking for it.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1123.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fl545%2FBornBurnt%2FUlster%2520Longhorn_zpsnjzxa592.jpg&hash=61e68a36363e084a82b04538c90613873f3f5073)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 26, 2015, 09:30:56 AM
What the hell is that
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 26, 2015, 09:32:56 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 26, 2015, 09:30:56 AM
What the hell is that

Anti-Irish stuff. I thought it was cute, if tempting the Gods a bit.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on August 26, 2015, 10:06:11 AM
Don't worry, the Morrigan aren't interested in a Christian university.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: derspiess on August 26, 2015, 10:18:40 AM
Holy shit I love that flag.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 26, 2015, 10:19:59 AM
Quote from: derspiess on August 26, 2015, 10:18:40 AM
Holy shit I love that flag.

:lol: I knew you would dig it.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: derspiess on August 26, 2015, 10:25:00 AM
Also I have a Texas shirt that Lids sent me by mistake.  Too bad it's long-sleeve or I'd wear it when I'm watching the game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on August 26, 2015, 11:27:39 AM
So apparently the college football experts have the Michigan opener as a gimme, since they have a "cupcake" game against Utah.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 26, 2015, 02:59:18 PM
Quote from: Berkut on August 26, 2015, 11:27:39 AM
So apparently the college football experts have the Michigan opener as a gimme, since they have a "cupcake" game against Utah.

Get new experts.  Michigan is a 6-point underdog in that game, and rightfully so.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Barrister on August 26, 2015, 03:20:31 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 26, 2015, 10:19:59 AM
Quote from: derspiess on August 26, 2015, 10:18:40 AM
Holy shit I love that flag.

:lol: I knew you would dig it.

Yeah, I mean I'd pull for ND ten times out of ten over Texas, but I still think that flag is kind of awesome.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 26, 2015, 03:37:38 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 26, 2015, 09:32:56 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 26, 2015, 09:30:56 AM
What the hell is that

Anti-Irish stuff. I thought it was cute, if tempting the Gods a bit.

:) Yeah it works.  Where'd that come from, are there more, and has Bill in Sinton been heard from in a while? 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on August 26, 2015, 03:39:02 PM
I got it from Shaggy. Who the original maker was I have no idea.

I have not heard from Bill in years.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on August 26, 2015, 04:51:53 PM
Quote from: grumbler on August 26, 2015, 02:59:18 PM
Quote from: Berkut on August 26, 2015, 11:27:39 AM
So apparently the college football experts have the Michigan opener as a gimme, since they have a "cupcake" game against Utah.

Get new experts.  Michigan is a 6-point underdog in that game, and rightfully so.

Who could possibly trump Popular Mechanics as college football experts?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 26, 2015, 05:15:41 PM
Quote from: Berkut on August 26, 2015, 04:51:53 PM
Who could possibly trump Popular Mechanics as college football experts?

The Utah sites are full of the whole "Michigan players are saying this is a cakewalk," but that's obviously a lie because Harbaugh has had the players "in the submarine" since the start of camp.  No press access (except for the one-day B10 Network broadcast they do from each camp), no leaving the facilities (he even has them staying in non-AC dorms to heighten the discomfort) except when necessary for academic preps, nothing.  Total focus on football.  Nobody's heard a peep.  It's kind of an interesting introduction to the Harbaugh culture, but, unlike Bo's intro, nobody is leaving.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: derspiess on August 27, 2015, 02:03:44 PM
Caught a glimpse of an ESPN feature article about all the uniform updates for this year.  Wish I hadn't.  The out of control uniform shit is helping push me away from college football.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on August 27, 2015, 04:32:22 PM
Under the new coach Wyoming went back to basics.  One home set, one away set for uniforms.  If not having Cowboy-Camo jerseys drives off some recruits, having a coach that actually wants to focus on playing better might eventually mean a better team...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 27, 2015, 05:02:04 PM
Harbaugh's done the same: one home uni, one away.  And, for the away uni, he's gone back to the all-whites from the 1970s:
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmvictors.com%2FWordPress%2Fimages%2F2009%2F19762_thumb.jpg&hash=b3136b1c3f9936ac93c675abbc67518d332e877d)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on August 27, 2015, 05:21:07 PM
Quote from: grumbler on August 26, 2015, 05:15:41 PM
he even has them staying in non-AC dorms to heighten the discomfort

I was thinking, "whoa, hardcore" then remembered they are in Michigan. Wtf is up with AC in Michigan being dorm rooms in the first place?

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on August 27, 2015, 05:28:23 PM
Buildings get pretty warm even when it's nice outside. Opening the windows lets a lot of noise in.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 27, 2015, 06:08:36 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 27, 2015, 05:21:07 PM
I was thinking, "whoa, hardcore" then remembered they are in Michigan. Wtf is up with AC in Michigan being dorm rooms in the first place? 

There is a season called "summer" when you need AC.  Its only for three days, but you need AC on those three days.

Not all the dorms have AC.  Just those open during summer term.  As the dorms get renovated, they get modern HVAC units; those come with AC so there's no seperate AC system.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on August 27, 2015, 06:40:43 PM
Man, Michigan turns into a swamp in the summer. You need AC for more than a couple days. I'd be cranking it just to get the humidity down.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on August 27, 2015, 07:01:50 PM
I used to live in Michiana. AC is nice, but it is hardly ubiquitous up there. I don't think that quite qualifies as the junction boys treatment.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on August 27, 2015, 07:03:14 PM
Quote from: grumbler on August 26, 2015, 05:15:41 PM
unlike Bo's intro, nobody is leaving.

Well yeah, but the team Hoke left behind probably doesn't many good transfer options.  :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 28, 2015, 05:57:55 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 27, 2015, 07:03:14 PM
Quote from: grumbler on August 26, 2015, 05:15:41 PM
unlike Bo's intro, nobody is leaving.

Well yeah, but the team Hoke left behind probably doesn't many good transfer options.  :P

Actually, that's what was so frustrating:  Hoke was a terrific recruiter, with classes ranked 7th in 2012 and 5th in 2013 before the wheels fell off in 2014 (34th after having been 6th in October).  Hoke left Harbaugh far more talent than RichRod left him, and far, far more than Carr left RR.

Of the five running backs in contention this year, for instance, two were five-stars and two were four-stars.  With Harbaugh, all those guys will play.  Harbaugh creates a scheme to fit his players, unlike RR and Hoke.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on August 28, 2015, 06:00:10 AM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on August 27, 2015, 06:40:43 PM
Man, Michigan turns into a swamp in the summer. You need AC for more than a couple days. I'd be cranking it just to get the humidity down.
The three days was a joke (in fact, a Michigan joke).  August in AA is hard to take without AC because of, as you say, humidity.  It may only be 95 degrees out, but it is a humid 95 degrees.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: derspiess on August 28, 2015, 07:20:55 AM
Quote from: PDH on August 27, 2015, 04:32:22 PM
Under the new coach Wyoming went back to basics.  One home set, one away set for uniforms.  If not having Cowboy-Camo jerseys drives off some recruits, having a coach that actually wants to focus on playing better might eventually mean a better team...

:worthy:

That's bringing some sanity back to the game. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 29, 2015, 05:51:57 PM
This Montana - NDSU game is pretty entertaining.  Montana just kicked a FG to get it to 35-31 NDSU with less than 3:00 left. 

E:  Haha FOOTBALL IS BACK.  Love that RB basically crowd surfing right near the goal line with 6 seconds left in the game. 

And Montana takes the lead with :02 left in the game.  Great game to start the football season.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Grey Fox on August 30, 2015, 08:17:31 PM
Are all NCAA football players, in the bowl division atleast, tuition-free students?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on August 30, 2015, 08:23:55 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on August 30, 2015, 08:17:31 PM
Are all NCAA football players, in the bowl division atleast, tuition-free students?

No. Almost every team has walk ons--members of the student body that aren't on scholarship. Usually they are used to fill out the practice squad and fill in if there is a rash of injuries. The NCAA limits teams to 85 scholarships, so to the extent you need more warm bodies the walk ons are needed.

Almost everyone you see in a game is on a scholarship. Occasionally a walk on is good enough to get significant playing time--usually he is then given a scholarship. Once in a while a player from a wealthy family or on some other type of arrangement will forego a scholarship to help the team out.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Grey Fox on September 01, 2015, 08:37:14 AM
America! :)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on September 01, 2015, 02:39:46 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on September 01, 2015, 08:37:14 AM
America! :)

These students aren't tuition-free, they are on scholarship.  The athletic department pays the school the amount that the student would normally pay in tuition, and gets the money from athletic revenues.  The school gets as much money from football players as it does from any other students.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: crazy canuck on September 01, 2015, 03:11:17 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on September 01, 2015, 08:37:14 AM
America! :)

It works the same way in Canada  ;). Although the funds athletic departments can attract are much less than in the US and as a result the number of full scholarship rides are rare.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 03, 2015, 11:16:53 AM
Season starts tonight. Everybody enjoy UTSA upsetting Arizona.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on September 03, 2015, 11:21:40 AM
I'm sure Berkut will enjoy that immensely.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 03, 2015, 09:21:34 PM
Welp, Central Michigan couldn't quite get it done vs. Oklahoma State.  24-13 final. 


Quote from: Valmy on September 03, 2015, 11:16:53 AM
Season starts tonight. Everybody enjoy UTSA upsetting Arizona.

:lol:   Hey did you see the "new tradition" that Arizona's AD wants to start?  It's Bill Byrne's kid, yes that Bill Byrnes, and he wants to copy the A&M "saw em off" thing.  Not kidding.  He wants to saw Varsity's horns off in Arizona.

E:  The Gophers are moving the ball on the Toads at the moment, and I totally dig the Michigan unis. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 03, 2015, 09:31:56 PM
So they are sawing off Sparky's horns? Devils are not livestock so it does not exactly invoke the same image.

Man you spend just a few years in College Station and it makes you crazy.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 03, 2015, 09:32:57 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on September 03, 2015, 11:21:40 AM
I'm sure Berkut will enjoy that immensely.

I just wanted to give him a chance to trash talk after an Arizona win. F the haters the Cats are going to the playoff! Berkut will say.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 03, 2015, 09:37:01 PM
I just checked in on that game.  I'm a little shocked it's only 7-0 still (with UTSA missing a FG just now) with 5ish minutes left in the 1st Q. 

Ha the TCU kicker just doinked a really short FG off the upright to keep it at 10-3. 

Super dumbass late hit by a Utah defender lead to a NICE play by Michigan for a TD just now.  Great throw and catch there.  Still 17-10 Utes though.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 03, 2015, 10:44:09 PM
 :hmm:  UTSA just scored to make it 21-20 going into the half.  Impressive to have a bunch of nobodies hanging on like that on the road, but the lack of experience and depth will catch up to them I'm sure.  They only brought back like 5 starters lol.

Michigan looks like they're toast. Yeah they're done after that (second) bad onside kick attempt.  Sorry g.

Goldy is still fighting. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 03, 2015, 11:28:37 PM
Arizona kind of looks like ass.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 03, 2015, 11:41:10 PM
Aw man, Minnesota scored to get within a TD, but the onside kick attempt was shitty. 

E:  Well that was sort of a strange ending to the game.  Minnesota didn't really seem to be moving very fast and there was apparently (they didn't show him) a TCU player down in the backfield, and the clock just ran out.  Toads win by 6.

Midnight football starting as soon as this Duke - Tulane game wraps up.  Colorado @ Hawaii.  Good times.  I should go to bed.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on September 04, 2015, 05:41:11 AM
Quote from: Berkut on September 03, 2015, 11:28:37 PM
Arizona kind of looks like ass.

I didn't see that game, but going by the score, their defense needs to improve a lot if they want to accomplish much this season.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 04, 2015, 09:33:18 AM
Quote from: dps on September 04, 2015, 05:41:11 AM
Quote from: Berkut on September 03, 2015, 11:28:37 PM
Arizona kind of looks like ass.

I didn't see that game, but going by the score, their defense needs to improve a lot if they want to accomplish much this season.


No kidding. That defense is going to be in serious trouble once it starts playing Pac-12 teams. Scooby Wright getting hurt could be season changing.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on September 05, 2015, 04:38:27 PM
Berkut, do you have an actual crew of your own this year, or are things still a mess like last year?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 06:32:16 PM
Rough start there PDH. That is going to make selling Wyoming to the Big 12 harder.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 06:55:49 PM
I just love the hurry up when the O sucks.  :mellow:  Also nice punt, bro.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on September 05, 2015, 07:04:41 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 06:32:16 PM
Rough start there PDH. That is going to make selling Wyoming to the Big 12 harder.

Wyoming sucks.  That is all.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 07:14:12 PM
Secondary: not very good so far
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 07:31:00 PM
I think your Michigan bias was coming through grumbles, these guys look every bit as good as I thought they were. Texas is completely over-matched.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 07:41:19 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 07:14:12 PM
Secondary: not very good so far

But compared to the offensive line they are all Thorpe candidates.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 07:42:33 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 07:41:19 PM
But compared to the offensive line they are all Thorpe candidates.

Those last two plays were pretty incredible.  They didn't even come close to blocking 3 of the 4 guys coming in.  Just straight shots to Heard, who had absolutely no chance.

E:  Hey, at least he didn't fumble.  Progress!
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 08:17:12 PM
You just knew he was going to miss it the third time. What a game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 08:19:26 PM
Should have faked it on the third one.  See what kind of arm the holder has.  :D
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 08:48:46 PM
Texas scored! Man that has not happened since...um...Thanksgiving I think.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 05, 2015, 08:58:51 PM
Quote from: dps on September 05, 2015, 04:38:27 PM
Berkut, do you have an actual crew of your own this year, or are things still a mess like last year?

I have half a crew of my own.

Kind of debating how much longer I want to do this, to be honest.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 09:29:10 PM
Pfft.  I switched back to the Horns game long enough to see some sort of jump pass TD for ND just now.  I like the stat they were showing about the offenses.  3.1 yards per play and 121 total yards?  Yeah that's not going to get anything done at all. 

Looking at the stats, the Texas O has 5 first downs.  5.  1 from a penalty (facemask after a 15 yard loss).  2 of those were from the 4 or 5 plays when Heard was in before he got what looked like a concussion.  Swoopes has played nearly the whole game and has accounted for 2 first downs.  The OL is not good, but Swoopes is even worse.

Time of possession: 30:50 vs 18:15. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 09:37:47 PM
It has gone exactly like I thought it would. Notre Dame is strong on both lines. Veterans all over the place. Texas was inferior at every position. Texas had no chance.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 09:41:42 PM
They had a chance, but it requires an offense than can stay on the field at least a little.  When the QB can't throw, can't run, and can't read the DE on a read option, it doesn't matter how good anyone else is because the ball won't go to them.  The offense going three and out nearly every time they get the ball leads to the D being on the field all freaking day.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 09:42:46 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 09:41:42 PM
They had a chance, but it requires an offense than can stay on the field at least a little.  When the QB can't throw, can't run, and can't read the DE on a read option, it doesn't matter how good anyone else is because the ball won't go to them.

And an offensive line that can block. But Texas lacks those things. But the Notre Dame offensive line is amazing, the defense was going to struggle as well.

This was a horrible match-up for Texas.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 09:45:35 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 09:42:46 PM
And an offensive line that can block. But Texas lacks those things. But the Notre Dame offensive line is amazing, the defense was going to struggle as well.

This was a horrible match-up for Texas.

The OL wasn't a turnstyle the entire game (E: at least not the part that I watched.  Watching Alabama and Wisconsin right now).  Even when they blocked, the play didn't go anywhere most of the time because the read was wrong or the pass was missed.   Most of those 121 yards were on two plays.  The screen to Daje Johnson, and the long pass at the end of the half that got over the double coverage (!).  Seriously, those were like 80 yards total. It's telling that when Heard was in and made the correct read, they gained positive yardage and moved the sticks.  He also managed to complete his only pass. 

I don't understand why Swoopes doesn't keep the ball even when there's nothing but empty space in front of him because the DE is crashing in.  I mean I do understand: it's because he is just not a good QB, but damn.  I wonder if Strong and will consider burning Locksley's redshirt or seeing if Holtz or someone can run the read if Heard is hurt.  Or if he'll just roll with Swoopes all the way back to a DC spot somewhere.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on September 05, 2015, 09:48:17 PM
:( Wyoming and Texas need to form the Big Two.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 10:11:35 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 09:45:35 PM

The OL wasn't a turnstyle the entire game

Sometimes it was merely bad. A few times it stood up and achieved mediocrity, but those were brief moments of glory.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 10:14:26 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 10:11:35 PM
Sometimes it was merely bad. A few times it stood up and achieved mediocrity, but those were brief moments of glory.

So.....better than Swoopes.  A QB that can actually throw a pass and isn't a "mobile QB" who runs like he is wearing lead shoes would help that OL.  The guy got run down from behind by a 300 pound DL for fucks sake.  Sheldon Day is a good player, but the dude runs like a 5 second 40.  If Swoopes can't get away from that AND he can't throw, then....what's the point?

E:  Oh and someone needs to get some white out and remove the jet sweeps from Watson's playbook.  Stop it.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 10:30:39 PM
Yeah Swoopes is about as mobile as I am. Looks like Vince, runs like Major.

But Swoopes is big and take a hit. Heard got obliterated. So I think Swoopes is just there to get beat up. Playing anybody else behind that offensive line is harmful to their health.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 10:38:04 PM
Hell Major with his busted knees and all might be able to run faster than that.  Like, right now, right this second.  If Swoopes is only in to get hit, Strong should be fired before he gets on the bus to the airport.   With two freshmen on the line, it can get better, but it won't matter if Swoopes is in there with them.  If Heard is out for a while, there are still other options.  There's Locksley (freshman), Merrick (freshman), Holtz (I wonder if he has a lisp), and Vinklarek.   Losing with Swoopes is the same as losing with some other QB.  At least you can see what you've got.

Fuck it.  Put that intramural guy, Greenwood, in if redshirts can't be burned.  At least it'll be fun. 

Heard got shaken up when he got blasted in the head while sliding, which wasn't on the OL (he was running and was looking like he was going to puke right after that).  He was looking a little fucked up when he came back in after that, which is when he got sacked twice.  Swoopes wasn't really hit, but also wasn't particularly hard to tackle for the domer D, nor was he really in a position to slide, since he was usually busy getting tripped from behind about a yard from the LOS or running OOB on 3rd and short.  He had that one run with the stiff arm that didn't really get the dude off him and didn't get him very far anyway, but not much otherwise. 

Anyhow, here's a thing:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/COLwC1nWEAAyUSJ.jpg)

http://lostlettermen.com/kansas-state-band-has-kansas-jayhawk-perform-fellatio/

:D
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 10:57:46 PM
Heard looked like he was getting hit hard

Hey where was Jonathan Grey? I thought he was going to be the 'work horse'.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 11:04:41 PM
When was Heard getting hit hard?  He slid, got hit in the head, and looked like he had a concussion.  Other than that run/slide, he handed off and threw a pass.  Did he get blasted on the pass or handoff?  I didn't see.   After that, dude probably shouldn't have been in the game, but he came back in for two more plays that resulted in sacks that were definitely on the OL.  He looked weird when he came back in too.  I'm not confident.  He's probably done for the year.

Grey, man, I don't know.  Maybe they consider 8 carries to be a "workhorse" on this team?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 05, 2015, 11:15:07 PM
Obviously I hope I'm wrong about this, but in the "is Notre Dame that good?" / "is Texas that bad?" debate I think the answer is more of the latter. The O Line of ND especially should be a strength of the team this year, but I was really surprised how ND dominated the lines of scrimmage. Probably no one has an easy time of recruiting as Texas, and while QB is hard to evaluate, Texas of all places should be full of big strong linemen.

There isn't a more misleading game to jump to conclusions than the first game, but ND's schedule suddenly looks rather soft. I wonder if the Texas fans agree that this team is going to struggle to have a winning record without significant improvement. Stanford lost to Northwestern and only put up 6 points. BC let Maine hang around. Crazy upsets happen of course, but I think the only 3 ranked teams on the schedule will be Clemson, Georgia Tech, and USC.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 11:21:45 PM
The reaction is like this because this is exactly what the O looked like at the end of last year as well.  They just kept on doing what they were doing.  The constant seems to be Swoopes.  Even the OL has two freshmen on it, so it has been changed up.

E:  Val, check out the "Last 38 Offensive Drives" thread over on the Shag.  38 drives, 24 3 and outs, 27 first downs, two TDs, two FGs, 3 defensive TDs (lolwtf the opposing Ds scored more TDs than the Texas O), 5 INTs, 2 fumbles.  That's 38 drives over three games.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 11:28:52 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 05, 2015, 11:15:07 PM
Obviously I hope I'm wrong about this, but in the "is Notre Dame that good?" / "is Texas that bad?" debate I think the answer is more of the latter. The O Line of ND especially should be a strength of the team this year, but I was really surprised how ND dominated the lines of scrimmage.

I wasn't.

QuoteProbably no one has an easy time of recruiting as Texas, and while QB is hard to evaluate, Texas of all places should be full of big strong linemen.

Texas is not the lineman treasure trove one might think. So many of our HS teams run Spread offenses. And you might notice none of our College teams have dominant lines. A&M is not shocking anybody in the SEC with their physicality. And why does Texas have an easy time recruiting? Why have we, as a state, been so bad for the last 40 years then? Any one of Florida's top three schools have enjoyed more success since 1970 than all of Texas's College Football teams combined. I doubt any of UT's players would crack the starting line up for Florida State. Maybe Malik Jefferson, presuming they start freshman linebackers. If you want easy recruiting I think Florida is where you want to look. Unless every single coach at every single Texas school has been incompetent for 40 years...which is possible I guess. There have been some stinkers. UT has been down, really down, for long stretches for multiple periods in recent history. Heck you saw what Miami did to one of Texas' best teams in the 1991 Cotton Bowl.

QuoteThere isn't a more misleading game to jump to conclusions than the first game, but ND's schedule suddenly looks rather soft. I wonder if the Texas fans agree that this team is going to struggle to have a winning record without significant improvement. Stanford lost to Northwestern and only put up 6 points. BC let Maine hang around. Crazy upsets happen of course, but I think the only 3 ranked teams on the schedule will be Clemson, Georgia Tech, and USC.

Texas is a 5 or 6 win team. They are rebuilding the defense after losing some top players. The offense is a disaster because Mack Brown let the offensive line talent decay to nothing for some reason. It has not been competent since 2006 and I have been complaining about it for so long I am tired of hearing myself talking about it.

Until they get something going up front and find a QB the offense is hopeless.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 11:30:58 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 11:21:45 PM
The reaction is like this because this is exactly what the O looked like at the end of last year as well.  They just kept on doing what they were doing.  The constant seems to be Swoopes.  Even the OL has two freshmen on it.

E:  Val, check out the "Last 38 Offensive Drives" thread over on the Shag.  38 drives, 24 3 and outs, 27 first downs, two TDs, two FGs, 3 defensive TDs (lolwtf the opposing Ds scored more TDs than the Texas O), 5 INTs, 2 fumbles.  That's 38 drives over three games.

Vahe got abused. But he is a freshman going up against a veteran D-Line.

Yeah Texas' offense is really bad. Everything the pessimists said about Shawn Watson turned out to be true. Swoopes is horrible, one of Mack Browns worst recruiting blunders.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 05, 2015, 11:35:42 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 05, 2015, 11:30:58 PM
Vahe got abused. But he is a freshman going up against a veteran D-Line.

Yeah Texas' offense is really bad. Everything the pessimists said about Shawn Watson turned out to be true. Swoopes is horrible, one of Mack Browns worst recruiting blunders.

Watson seriously seems to just randomly choose plays, like the Ask A Coach thing on Madden.  He really, honestly, doesn't seem to base any of the play calling on the situation or whats going on in the game.  3rd and 1 with guys getting into the backfield all the time?  Super slow developing jet sweep!  2 and 18?  Two dive plays in a row! 

E:  To be fair, he did finally call a couple of screens and shit to get the Domers to back off a little, and that cross where Swoopes overthrew the 7 or 8 yard pass to the wide open guy was just perfect and would have gone for a huge gain.  I think that was to Grey, and he had all sorts of green.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 05, 2015, 11:54:03 PM
Valmy, I wouldn't bemoan the state of Texas recruiting too much. The state has 2 teams in the top five.

It is crazy to me that if you were ranking teams in Texas, the Longhorns would be no better than 4th right now (and I know some people would argue lower). It would be rather epic if they were to beat TCU or Baylor (or aTm if they were to play).

I have more profound thoughts that I will post tomorrow. I am drunk and tired.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: lustindarkness on September 06, 2015, 08:11:08 AM
Looks like Auburn will give us another year of ugly wins. Why do we do this to ourselves? Choose a team to follow and raise our blood pressure.   :D
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on September 06, 2015, 08:17:26 AM
I would take ugly wins...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: lustindarkness on September 06, 2015, 08:18:47 AM
 :nelson:








:blush: I could not help myself.  :hug:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 06, 2015, 08:23:42 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 05, 2015, 11:54:03 PM

I have more profound thoughts that I will post tomorrow. I am drunk and tired.

I don't think defensive minded coaches are going to be getting so many head coaching jobs going forward. The idea of having a head coach focus on the defense and hiring a guru as OC to manage the offense has backfired in too many places. Some really obvious exceptions to this are Gary Patterson, Mark Dantonio, Bob Stoops, and Nick Saban, but those guys have been head coaches a long time and arguably learned to be more generalist head coaches before we got into the current environment (plus there will always be exceptions as some talented coaches will come up through defense).

The way the rules are now, I think a well coached offense with decent players is going to be able to put up points on anyone. If you want to win championships, you have to assume that your offense will be capable of winning shootouts--even with a really good defense, you can't assume that you can keep other good teams from scoring 30 in every game. "Offense sells tickets, defenese wins championships" has never been less true.

I really felt confident going into the ND Texas game, because I saw the matchup as probably:
B grade ND Offense with an offensive genius coach against a A grade texas defense with a defensive genius coach
D- grade Texas offense versus a B grade ND defense

I figured it would be tough for Texas to score 20 against any reasonably competent D with decent athletes, and it is tough to keep a Brian Kelly offense from scoring 20 no matter how good your D is.

In Charlie Strong's defense, he had a good offense at Louisville. But about the first thing he did as head coach was convince Teddy Bridgewater to switch his commitment from Miami to Louisville ( :bleeding: :bleeding: :bleeding:)--and then he left with Bridgewater. All credit to him for recruiting Bridgewater, but can he duplicate that, and soon, at Texas? He looks like he will be on the hot seat next year, so he doesn't have much time.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 06, 2015, 08:24:12 AM
Quote from: lustindarkness on September 06, 2015, 08:11:08 AM
Looks like Auburn will give us another year of ugly wins. Why do we do this to ourselves? Choose a team to follow and raise our blood pressure.   :D

Louisville probably doesn't suck.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on September 06, 2015, 01:06:24 PM
Louisville is one of the better teams in the ACC.  Probably no worse than 4th best in the conference, and maybe as good as 2nd best, depending on how good or bad the new QBs at Florida State and Duke perform.

OTOH, even being 2nd best in the ACC might not put you in the top 25 nationwide.  ;)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 06, 2015, 02:57:00 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 05, 2015, 11:54:03 PM
Valmy, I wouldn't bemoan the state of Texas recruiting too much. The state has 2 teams in the top five.

Neither of them are there for their amazing linemen. Nor do either overwhelm teams with their talent.

QuoteIt is crazy to me that if you were ranking teams in Texas, the Longhorns would be no better than 4th right now (and I know some people would argue lower). It would be rather epic if they were to beat TCU or Baylor (or aTm if they were to play).

Eh that is how things were in the 80s and 90s.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on September 06, 2015, 05:14:35 PM
Texas has the most 3+ star recruits (a bit more than 1300 over the past 5 years), but also the largest # of FBS schools (12). 

Florida has just under 1300 and "only" 7 schools.

New Jersey has had 222 and just one school, but the best of those guys go to Michigan, Ohio State, or Penn State.

http://www.sbnation.com/college-football-recruiting/2015/4/15/8143431/states-most-players-recruits (http://www.sbnation.com/college-football-recruiting/2015/4/15/8143431/states-most-players-recruits)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 06, 2015, 05:29:20 PM
Quote from: grumbler on September 06, 2015, 05:14:35 PM
Texas has the most 3+ star recruits (a bit more than 1300 over the past 5 years), but also the largest # of FBS schools (12). 

Florida has just under 1300 and "only" 7 schools.

New Jersey has had 222 and just one school, but the best of those guys go to Michigan, Ohio State, or Penn State.

http://www.sbnation.com/college-football-recruiting/2015/4/15/8143431/states-most-players-recruits (http://www.sbnation.com/college-football-recruiting/2015/4/15/8143431/states-most-players-recruits)

The recruits / school really is only relevant if your school is lower division. It isn't as though many players in Texas are being offered by UT and turning them down to play for Baylor. In Florida it is exceedingly rare that a player has a big 3 offer and stays instate but doesn't go to a big 3 school.

If there are ~1300 top players in Texas, UT really can pick the guys they want with the only really tough instate competition being aTm. Since schools in Texas taking the leftovers are highly successful, I find it hard to come to a conclusion other than UT is in some combination recruiting the wrong guys, not developing the guys they recruit, and/or not using the guys they recruit very well.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 06, 2015, 05:33:44 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 06, 2015, 05:29:20 PM
The recruits / school really is only relevant if your school is lower division. It isn't as though many players in Texas are being offered by UT and turning them down to play for Baylor. In Florida it is exceedingly rare that a player has a big 3 offer and stays instate but doesn't go to a big 3 school.

If there are ~1300 top players in Texas, UT really can pick the guys they want with the only really tough instate competition being aTm. Since schools in Texas taking the leftovers are highly successful, I find it hard to come to a conclusion other than UT is in some combination recruiting the wrong guys, not developing the guys they recruit, and/or not using the guys they recruit very well.

First of all this is not true, guys UT wants do not come to UT all the time. And finally of course the recruiting was weak combined with terrible development combined with misusing talent. Those things were basically Mack Brown's staple after he won the National Championship. He just lost whatever fire he once had in those areas. It was very evident even in the 2008 and 2009 teams that dark days were ahead. It was very frustrating to watch. Rome does not fall in a day.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 06, 2015, 05:46:22 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 06, 2015, 05:33:44 PM

First of all this is not true, guys UT wants do not come to UT all the time.

But I assume the texas guys that ditch UT are going out of state if not to aTm (for the most part)? I would think that 90% of the lineups for Texas Tech, Baylor, and TCU didn't have UT offers.

Georgia is heavily recruited by out of state schools, but GT has surrendered the in state battle. Before Paul Johnson, GT & UGA would fight over the top guys, and UGA would usually win, but maybe 1/3 to 1/4 would got to UGA. But now, GT doesn't even try. Which makes it all the more hilarious when GT beats them. "None of their guys could play for us and they run a gimmick high school offense, and fire Mark Richt" is awesome to hear over and over.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on September 06, 2015, 05:54:50 PM
 :huh:

Richt is 12-2 vs Georgia Tech. Their gimmicky offense may be hard to play against, but they never have a very good defense.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 06, 2015, 06:04:13 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 06, 2015, 05:46:22 PM
But I assume the texas guys that ditch UT are going out of state if not to aTm (for the most part)? I would think that 90% of the lineups for Texas Tech, Baylor, and TCU didn't have UT offers.

That is probably true but not for the reasons you might think. Mack Brown was key on never offering anybody who had not already accepted. So plenty of players just blew him off and he never offered. Charlie Strong offers everybody he likes whether or not they like Texas so this percentage is likely to go down as time goes on. He has lost to TCU and Baylor and Oklahoma on some players last recruiting cycle.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 06, 2015, 06:08:38 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on September 06, 2015, 05:54:50 PM
:huh:

Richt is 12-2 vs Georgia Tech. Their gimmicky offense may be hard to play against, but they never have a very good defense.

He was 0-1 last year.  :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on September 06, 2015, 10:11:14 PM
God I hate sometimes being a Wyoming fan.  The team loses to a poor FCS team, they look awful, and I still have to summon the hope to root for them next week.  Since the Black 14 (look it up), Wyoming has had a few good, a couple of decent, and a lot of bad teams.  I fear this is one of the latter...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on September 06, 2015, 10:12:15 PM
And no, Tim, you don't get to root for whomever is good at the moment.  A fan is a fan.  Period.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 07, 2015, 10:02:28 AM
Quote from: PDH on September 06, 2015, 10:11:14 PM
God I hate sometimes being a Wyoming fan.  The team loses to a poor FCS team, they look awful, and I still have to summon the hope to root for them next week.  Since the Black 14 (look it up), Wyoming has had a few good, a couple of decent, and a lot of bad teams.  I fear this is one of the latter...

Don't despair too much. You get to play Washington State in a couple weeks, and judging by their week 1 debacle, that could be a win.  :P

I googled the Black 14 and came up with a story on a website, "things black people don't like" with an entry "wyoming football". Considering that about half the talent base in the sport is black, the black 14 incident may not have been the best recruiting gambit.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 07, 2015, 09:02:45 PM
No reason to look at Blacksburg. Nothing is happening there right now. I'm sure Urban Meyer has things under control.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 07, 2015, 10:12:07 PM
Fucking Frank Beamer & the Hokies.  :mad:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Ed Anger on September 08, 2015, 06:50:41 PM
(https://uproxx.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/millertd.gif)

I came
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 09, 2015, 08:48:43 AM
Val, Watson (and Wickline) has been relieved of playcalling duties.  Replaced by Jay Norvell.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/eye-on-college-football/25295015/charlie-strong-names-jay-norvell-new-texas-offensive-play-caller
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 09, 2015, 12:33:50 PM
I feel like a prophet. I predicted that earlier that day on Shaggybevotexas

http://www.shaggytexas.com/board/showthread.php/162687-New-O-Coordinator-Call-Your-Shot?p=8526744#post8526744

QuoteI don't think Watson makes it out of the season. I think he is replaced on an interim basis by Jay Norvell.

I think Charlie will regret not making this move in the offseason, loyalty is great and all but you have to be a bit cold blooded sometimes. Besides canning a terrible OC is how Chuck ended up with Watson to begin with.

:showoff:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 12, 2015, 05:50:42 PM
Hey a banner:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/COu6vYhUYAAaPdp.jpg)

E: Also, go wrong colored UT!  Suck it, Stoops.  E2:  And hey another wrong colored UT just beat the Pigs.   :)


Wow.  I don't know what to say.  They look so.....different....with Heard and the new playcalling.  Now special teams are kicking some ass too.  21-0 already.  Defense needs to work on their tackling though.  Im not sure I like this 3-3-5 thing they seem to like.  There's nothing there against the run.

Yeah, Rice is able to just run right up the middle all they want.  21-14 now, Horns O has only had the ball for like 6 minutes lol.  Averaging 8 yards per play, but can't get the ball because the defense is sucking ass.


Uhhhhh okay well the O got the ball back to start the half.  1 play, 1 TD.  That ended the 3rd Q scoring drought quick-like.  Burt is really fast.  Unfortunately this means Rice gets the ball back and can go back to bitch slapping the UT D on the ground.

Oh yeah, and way to implode, Tennessee.  Congrats.

Horns win.  Been a while.  I don't know how to feel about the damn freshmen looking like the best players on the field a lot of the time.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 12, 2015, 10:44:16 PM
Hey Sparty just took down Oregon.  Good win for them.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 12, 2015, 11:18:52 PM
And not a bad loss for Oregon either.

Arizona took care of business against Nevada. The offense is looking solid.

Scooby Wright's replacement at middle linebacker got hurt himself.

I think I could start for Arizona at LB right now.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 12, 2015, 11:19:27 PM
I think today went a long way toward answering that frequently asked post week 1 question: "Is Notre Dame that good, or Texas that bad?"

Sorry about that, Texas fans.

Also, ND is in really big trouble with Malik Zaire getting hurt. One top QB splits to FSU, an RB is academically ineligible, and then in game 1 the starting RB gets hurt and is out for the season, and in game 2 the same happens to the starting QB. The team is now down to a starting RB that was recruited as a safety and played receiver last year, backed up by a true freshman. And at QB you have a redshirt freshman backed up by a true freshman that was supposed to redshirt.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 12, 2015, 11:23:44 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 12, 2015, 11:19:27 PM
I think today went a long way toward answering that frequently asked post week 1 question: "Is Notre Dame that good, or Texas that bad?"

Sorry about that, Texas fans.

Well considering they essentially fired the OC (he doesn't call plays anymore) and replaced the starting QB, you might have been the only one asking that question.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 12, 2015, 11:24:19 PM
Quote from: Berkut on September 12, 2015, 11:18:52 PM
Scooby Wright's replacement at middle linebacker got hurt himself.

Wow, that's some shitty luck there. 

E:  Hey Berk, weird question:  Why do refs seem to only carry the one flag?  I know it doesn't happen often, but every once in a while, I'll see a hat flying in or a beanbag or something like that because they had already thrown the flag and needed something else.  It's just a yellow...thing...with some sort of weight in it, right?  Why not have a backup?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 12, 2015, 11:32:26 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 12, 2015, 11:23:44 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 12, 2015, 11:19:27 PM
I think today went a long way toward answering that frequently asked post week 1 question: "Is Notre Dame that good, or Texas that bad?"

Sorry about that, Texas fans.

Well considering they essentially fired the OC (he doesn't call plays anymore) and replaced the starting QB, you might have been the only one asking that question.

:huh: Notre Dame leapfrogged two teams in the AP poll and into the top 10, and lots of articles and talking heads predicted they would be really good this year. Clearly lots of people looked at that Texas game and thought Notre Dame was a quality side.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 12, 2015, 11:34:51 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 12, 2015, 11:32:26 PM
:huh: Notre Dame leapfrogged two teams in the AP poll and into the top 10, and lots of articles and talking heads predicted they would be really good this year. Clearly lots of people looked at that Texas game and thought Notre Dame was a quality side.

Texas was awful in that game.  They were that bad.  There was no real question about anything.  Notre Dame's backups could have beaten them last week.  They probably could have shown up shitfaced and pulled out a close W. There's nothing to really say about it other than that.  It might turn into a quality win for ND down the road with the changes Texas made afterwards, but it was basically a bodybag game at the time.  Just with no payout for the losers.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 12, 2015, 11:41:04 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 12, 2015, 11:19:27 PM
I think today went a long way toward answering that frequently asked post week 1 question: "Is Notre Dame that good, or Texas that bad?"

Sorry about that, Texas fans.

Um I said well before the game was played that Texas was going to be destroyed. I know what they are. No need to feel sorry. We are entering the dark time where Mack Brown's last three wretched recruiting classes are the upper classmen. Barely a serviceable player recruited in three seasons. They have energetic Freshmen and Sophomores and loads of dogshit.

Had a ton of fun at the game tonight though. Beautiful evening for football. It was one thing to see the defense be pushed around by Notre Dame but to see Rice totally dominate up front was disheartening :lol:

Jerrod Heard may not be the second coming...but he will do. He looked like a real QB out there now whatever Tyrone Swoopes is.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 12, 2015, 11:42:02 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 12, 2015, 11:24:19 PM
Quote from: Berkut on September 12, 2015, 11:18:52 PM
Scooby Wright's replacement at middle linebacker got hurt himself.

Wow, that's some shitty luck there. 

E:  Hey Berk, weird question:  Why do refs seem to only carry the one flag?  I know it doesn't happen often, but every once in a while, I'll see a hat flying in or a beanbag or something like that because they had already thrown the flag and needed something else.  It's just a yellow...thing...with some sort of weight in it, right?  Why not have a backup?

It varies - I always carry two - one in my belt, and another in my back pocket.

However, to be honest, I think I've thrown two in one play maybe 5 times in my career.

A lot of officials just carry one, because it is very rare that you need more than one - generally your focus on a play is pretty narrow, so it would be very unusual to ever need more than one.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 12, 2015, 11:45:41 PM
Yeah that makes sense.  I see it a lot more (and it's still rare) since I watch a bunch of games, while a ref will only do one game a week.  It's just kinda funny when you see hats and shit flying all over the field due to excessive player dumbassery. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 12, 2015, 11:50:11 PM
The thinking is mostly that the very rare situations you will need more than one flag, you will probably need 4, which you won't have anyway, so yeah, lets just start throwing random shit at that point.

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 12, 2015, 11:51:36 PM
 :lol:  Hey whatever gets the message across, right?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 12, 2015, 11:52:06 PM
I sat on row 10 on the 20 yard line! I paid way under face value but I can probably do better. Also I learned some things about planning.

My quest to attend every home game for pennies on the face value had a kind of rocky start but I am optimistic.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 12, 2015, 11:52:33 PM
Quote from: Berkut on September 12, 2015, 11:50:11 PM
The thinking is mostly that the very rare situations you will need more than one flag, you will probably need 4, which you won't have anyway, so yeah, lets just start throwing random shit at that point.

Just keep your clothes on Berkut.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 12, 2015, 11:53:59 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 12, 2015, 11:52:33 PM
Quote from: Berkut on September 12, 2015, 11:50:11 PM
The thinking is mostly that the very rare situations you will need more than one flag, you will probably need 4, which you won't have anyway, so yeah, lets just start throwing random shit at that point.

Just keep your clothes on Berkut.


Hmmm, that might be one way to stop a bench clearing brawl...

"I WILL FUCKING KILL YOU!! I AM GOING TO....Oh dear lord, my eyes! My eyes!"
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 12, 2015, 11:59:37 PM
^^ stripper ref with the tearaway uniform for when fights happen ^^

Oooooooof that was a big INT by the Boise State QB.

Oh SHIT nice catch for the TD.  Flag down though.  Oh damn, walk it back.  PI on the WR.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 13, 2015, 12:11:05 AM
Cal Poly and Arizona State tied at 21 in the 3rd Q.  I'm sure Berk is all broken up about that.

This BYU - Boise State game is mildly chippy right now.  Bronco Mendenhall doesn't seem to be so good at speeches.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 13, 2015, 12:12:14 AM
There is hating ASU, and then there is just embarassing the conference.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 13, 2015, 12:19:14 AM
Hey Cal Poly is 1-0.  Potential juggernaut right there.  Heh. 

They just picked off ASU in the endzone and now a big run and a 15ish yard pass.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on September 13, 2015, 12:30:07 AM
Oregon didn't play very well, especially Vernon Adams and the rest of the offense, but they were still a barely overthrown ball from beating the #5 team on the road.

This game shouldn't affect the Ducks' chances of getting back to the playoffs, if they win the rest of their games they should make it in.  Hopefully Adams can continue to improve.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 13, 2015, 12:30:43 AM
The thing that makes me nervous is Texas MUST beat Cal. They just have to.

And I don't think they can. These next two games will make the season because I know damn well they are not beating TCU or OU or Kansas State. A 1-5 start is a real possibility.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 13, 2015, 12:32:10 AM
Oh damn.  Touchdown BYU with 45 seconds left.

And a pick 6.  Game over.  Time to go back to that Cal Poly - ASU powerhouse matchup.  Stanford is pounding UCF.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on September 13, 2015, 12:39:22 AM
Wish I could be jazzed with a 49-0 win by UDub, but it was Sac St for crying out loud.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on September 13, 2015, 12:42:24 AM
Georgia needs a QB.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on September 13, 2015, 04:02:57 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 12, 2015, 11:24:19 PM
E:  Hey Berk, weird question:  Why do refs seem to only carry the one flag?  I know it doesn't happen often, but every once in a while, I'll see a hat flying in or a beanbag or something like that because they had already thrown the flag and needed something else.  It's just a yellow...thing...with some sort of weight in it, right?  Why not have a backup?

I thought they threw the hat to mark forward progress or somesuch, not for penalties.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 13, 2015, 09:03:55 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 13, 2015, 04:02:57 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 12, 2015, 11:24:19 PM
E:  Hey Berk, weird question:  Why do refs seem to only carry the one flag?  I know it doesn't happen often, but every once in a while, I'll see a hat flying in or a beanbag or something like that because they had already thrown the flag and needed something else.  It's just a yellow...thing...with some sort of weight in it, right?  Why not have a backup?

I thought they threw the hat to mark forward progress or somesuch, not for penalties.

The only "official" reason to throw a hat is to mark that a player went out of bounds.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 13, 2015, 09:11:44 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on September 13, 2015, 12:42:24 AM
Georgia needs a QB.

You can thank the SEC for that...Everett Golson was leaning toward transferring to UGA or South Carolina, but the SEC was going to make it difficult or impossible to transfer into the conference due to past discipline issues at Notre Dame (he cheated on a test). So off he goes to FSU.

Obviously he couldn't have transferred to both schools, but those are two of the more prominent SEC schools that are going to struggle this year with QB issues.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on September 13, 2015, 10:42:45 AM
During my golf lesson this morning the pro told me that Hawkeye players like to golf on that course because they can hit the sauce away from the watchful eye of their university minders.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 13, 2015, 06:16:47 PM
Auburn fell from 6 to 18 in the AP poll.  :lol:

Don't have a problem with it--there are a lot of 2-0 teams that have looked better than Auburn, and based on the body of work I think an 18 ranking is fair. Really a function of early season polls being stupid. But I wonder if a team has ever fall 12 spots after a win.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 15, 2015, 09:53:23 AM
Something might have happened:

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/eye-on-college-football/25302722/report-texas-has-fired-athletic-director-steve-patterson

That was really fast.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 15, 2015, 09:56:09 AM
Chip Patterson? LOL

Yes it does appear he has been fired. THANK GOD. Horrible hire.

Demoting Shawn Watson, firing Steve Patterson. Damn it is like sanity has been introduced to UT all of the sudden.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 16, 2015, 01:24:02 AM
There is rumbling in Wildcat land that Greg Byrne might be on the UT short list. That would make me somewhat unhappy.

On the other hand, there is also talk that Byrne dad being the AD at A&M would make the younger not as attractive as one might think to UT...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 16, 2015, 08:41:19 AM
Quote from: Berkut on September 16, 2015, 01:24:02 AM
There is rumbling in Wildcat land that Greg Byrne might be on the UT short list. That would make me somewhat unhappy.

On the other hand, there is also talk that Byrne dad being the AD at A&M would make the younger not as attractive as one might think to UT...

It was not the fact that Dollah Bill was AD at A&M it was the fact he gave off the strong impression he was an idiot while doing so that was the problem. His hilarious voicemail threatening to kick a fan's ass, always referring to UT as 'our friends in the state capital', and generally trying to be the most Aggie Ag that ever Ag'd was pretty obnoxious. Then there are the rumors his son is trying to introduce A&M traditions to Arizona.

But that is just us fans sitting over here. UT has an interim AD so they will take their sweet time surveying the country and find the right guy. They fucked it up pretty bad last time so they will be careful.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 16, 2015, 08:54:52 AM
Quote from: Valmy on September 16, 2015, 08:41:19 AM
Quote from: Berkut on September 16, 2015, 01:24:02 AM
There is rumbling in Wildcat land that Greg Byrne might be on the UT short list. That would make me somewhat unhappy.

On the other hand, there is also talk that Byrne dad being the AD at A&M would make the younger not as attractive as one might think to UT...

It was not the fact that Dollah Bill was AD at A&M it was the fact he gave off the strong impression he was an idiot while doing so that was the problem. His hilarious voicemail threatening to kick a fan's ass, always referring to UT as 'our friends in the state capital', and generally trying to be the most Aggie Ag that ever Ag'd was pretty obnoxious. Then there are the rumors his son is trying to introduce A&M traditions to Arizona.

But that is just us fans sitting over here. UT has an interim AD so they will take their sweet time surveying the country and find the right guy. They fucked it up pretty bad last time so they will be careful.

I suspect that the people making decisions at UT are concerned with much more tangible measures than "trying to introduce A&M traditions", whatever the hell that means.

Byrne the younger is probably one of about 5 or 6 ADs in the country right now that are considered to be at the top of the desirability list. The guy who got both Sean Miller and Rich Rod is looking pretty good right now...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 16, 2015, 08:58:50 AM
Quote from: Berkut on September 16, 2015, 08:54:52 AM
I suspect that the people making decisions at UT are concerned with much more tangible measures than "trying to introduce A&M traditions", whatever the hell that means.

Supposedly he wants to bring the 'saw 'em off' thing there.

But FFS Berkut that is what I said :huh: that was just fan babble, that UT held his father's tenure against him, and that should not be taken seriously. UT is not going to rule somebody out just because their father was the AD at A&M. I thought I made that clear in my post.

QuoteByrne the younger is probably one of about 5 or 6 ADs in the country right now that are considered to be at the top of the desirability list. The guy who got both Sean Miller and Rich Rod is looking pretty good right now...

Will you be offended now if UT does not hire him? :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 16, 2015, 09:08:40 AM
I will be offended and enraged either way, and blame you personally.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 16, 2015, 09:19:01 AM
Quote from: Berkut on September 16, 2015, 09:08:40 AM
I will be offended and enraged either way, and blame you personally.

I knew it :weep:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 16, 2015, 09:23:44 AM
Only names I've been seeing from serious places are Mack, Bowlsby, Luck, and Jurich, with Chip coming out and saying the Mack rumors were without merit pretty quickly.  Only time I've seen anything about $Bill's kid has been on intertube message boards, along with the guy at TCU. Del Conte, I think his name is.

Twitter wants Matthew McConaughey.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 16, 2015, 09:29:59 AM
If Luck wants the job it should be his. It should have been his back in 2013.

I bet Charlie Strong hopes it is Jurich  :P

I am having a hard time with this Cal game. I know Texas should lose but they so desperately need to win I am having a hard time being objective enough to get a good feel for it. Like somehow my emotions keep envisioning this miracle where the defensive front pressures Goff.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 16, 2015, 09:34:37 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 16, 2015, 09:23:44 AM

Twitter wants Matthew McConaughey.

In a world where Texas Tech hired Kliff Kingsbury, is it really so crazy?  :hmm:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 16, 2015, 09:41:02 AM
Quote from: Valmy on September 16, 2015, 09:29:59 AM
If Luck wants the job it should be his. It should have been his back in 2013.

I bet Charlie Strong hopes it is Jurich  :P

I am having a hard time with this Cal game. I know Texas should lose but they so desperately need to win I am having a hard time being objective enough to get a good feel for it. Like somehow my emotions keep envisioning this miracle where the defensive front pressures Goff.

Yeah, Luck would clearly be #1, but Jurich is no slouch.  Aside from just team performances, Louisville has done some good things with their facilities, which is pretty relevant to Texas right now.  Speaking of which, apparently a couple days ago Patterson was talking about renovating the Erwin Center and using it for a few more years, ignoring that whole....medical school thing....that is going to be built there.  Supposedly the President was a bit confused by that.

QuoteIn a world where Texas Tech hired Kliff Kingsbury, is it really so crazy?  :hmm:

"Advisor of all things Texas except proper hookem hand orientation" to the AD.  Fire Plonsky and give Matt her salary. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 16, 2015, 09:43:46 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 16, 2015, 09:41:02 AM
Speaking of which, apparently a couple days ago Patterson was talking about renovating the Erwin Center and using it for a few more years, ignoring that whole....medical school thing....that is going to be built there.  Supposedly the President was a bit confused by that.

He was lying to manipulate the City of Austin into paying for part (or all) of the new Arena for Texas. That, I suspect, was the straw that broke the camel's back. But he has been trying to pressure the Austin to do that basically since he got there. To tell such an obviously false lie was...rather poor judgement to say the least.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 16, 2015, 09:45:02 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 16, 2015, 09:41:02 AM
"Advisor of all things Texas except proper hookem hand orientation" to the AD.  Fire Plonsky and give Matt her salary. 

Now there is an AD that needs firing. Having a job in the woman's side of the AD must be nice. You can just suck forever and never win anything and just keep drawing your big fat salary.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 16, 2015, 09:48:39 AM
Quote from: Valmy on September 16, 2015, 09:43:46 AM
He was lying to manipulate the City of Austin into paying for part (or all) of the new Arena for Texas. That, I suspect, was the straw that broke the camel's back. But he has been trying to pressure the Austin to do that basically since he got there. To tell such an obviously false lie was...rather poor judgement to say the least.

Seriously?  It's just more lies?  What a dick.

E:  I just saw some post/article saying Patterson lied to Strong about Fenves wanting to move the football academic stuff out of Moncrief, when Fenves hadn't talked about it at all with Patterson.  The dude apparently has a problem with lying.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on September 18, 2015, 08:00:51 PM
Here's the sort of pregame video you can do when James Earl Jones is an alumnus:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x375fqd_michigan-vs-oregon-state-pregame_sport (http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x375fqd_michigan-vs-oregon-state-pregame_sport)

JEJ wrote the script for this, after Jim Harbaugh asked him to narrate a football video.  Over the top?  Yeah, maybe.  But I'll never admit it.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 19, 2015, 10:01:19 PM
Offense has a pulse.  Defense doesn't. 

Heard is a badass, even following attempted murder.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on September 19, 2015, 10:03:38 PM
Still looking like Pac-12 North > South.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on September 19, 2015, 10:20:18 PM
Iowa just kicked a 57 yarder with 2 seconds left to beat Pitt.

The lovely irony is that Pitt iced the kicker with a timeout just as he was kicking, and he missed that one.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 19, 2015, 10:29:06 PM
Oooh damn, Rose.

Welp, Horns lose by one on a missed PAT.  O put up 44, that should be enough.  Loss is on the D, not Rose.  Jerrod Heard fucking rules: 528 total yards.  Ridiculous.


Texas fight, OU sucks.

E:  Ole Miss is kicking Alabama's ass. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 19, 2015, 11:49:22 PM
Just got back from the game. Very hoarse and tired hehe. Had a blast.

This loss does not worry me that much, it is a non-conference game for a middling team that is not going to compete for anything.

But this game makes me feel they might have something going here. The defense was getting steamrolled and looked pretty deflated but they stepped it up in the fourth quarter and shut Cal out. That was impressive. That Cal offense is elite and that defense is pretty bad, but they gutted it out when they had to.

Jerrod Heard is the real deal. The whole team seems different with him at starting QB, not to mention his crazy yardage production tonight.

Before I figured Texas had no chance against about five teams on the schedule. Now I think they have a chance against any team they play going forward. That is something. This Charlie Strong guy is going to work out. The team showed me something tonight they have no shown in a long time.

Granted it may be because I just screamed my head off and had an amazing time so am not thinking clearly but I was very encouraged.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 19, 2015, 11:55:05 PM
Hey did they mic up the band?  And turn down the volume on the giant TV?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Jaron on September 19, 2015, 11:59:44 PM
BYU is slaughtering the UCLA Bruins!
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 20, 2015, 12:06:42 AM
Well Ole Miss was kicking their asses, but I just switched back from the UCLA - BYU game and it's back to just a 6 point game. 

Ole Miss WR #3 seems gigantic.

E:  And this BYU QB, Mangum, is nails.  They're putting a lot of pressure on him with the 3rd and longs and he just keeps making the throws.  Funky throwing motion though.

He just completed a pass to himself (bounced it off the OL) and gained 4 yards. Wow.

And UCLA just rolled down the field to tie it.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on September 20, 2015, 12:27:54 AM
Quote from: Jaron on September 19, 2015, 11:59:44 PM
BYU is slaughtering the UCLA Bruins!
:yeahright:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 20, 2015, 12:35:51 AM
Oops, he threw a pick there to end the game.  UCLA wins.

Oh nice kick return TD for Utah just now.  Still 9+ minutes left in this one, but at 38-10, I'm thinking Fresno won't be making a comeback.  E: Sweet an onside kick recovery for Fresno.  38-17 THE COMEBACK BEGINS.  Boom TD 38-24.  Arizona is kicking the dogshit out of someone.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 20, 2015, 12:51:18 AM
Arizona looks like they are going to squeak out a win over their rivals from up north.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 20, 2015, 12:54:57 AM
Lots of time left in that one, Berk!  Anything can happen!

I like the Arizona uniforms.  Not so sure about the highlighter yellow NAU is rolling with.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on September 20, 2015, 03:45:25 AM
Lambert did very well against South Carolina. First time Georgia's looked like a playoff contender this season. :thumbsup:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 20, 2015, 09:14:08 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on September 20, 2015, 03:45:25 AM
Lambert did very well against South Carolina. First time Georgia's looked like a playoff contender this season. :thumbsup:

I wonder what is going to happen against Alabama. I'm not sure I think less of Alabama than I did before the game: some crazy bounces and a crucial missed call went the way of Ole Miss, Bama lost the turnover battle 5-0, and still only lost by 6 with a chance to win at the end. They will also be desperate.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on September 20, 2015, 09:35:20 AM
I'm just glad that game is in Athens.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 20, 2015, 11:58:12 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 19, 2015, 11:55:05 PM
Hey did they mic up the band?  And turn down the volume on the giant TV?

They do something bush league with the band, I think they do mic it up. There were three bands at the stadium last night since it was alumni band night. The crowd was great I am amazed really. Two games coming off that Notre Dame steamrolling and really good rowdy crowds.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 20, 2015, 02:44:35 PM
Looking at the slate of games next week, it seems to suck.

UCLA - Arizona
Texas - Okie State
Texas Tech - TCU

Seem to be the big ones. I'm including Texas - Okie State because Okie State is only a 4 point favorite right now.  :hmm:

I think UCLA - Arizona is the only matchup of ranked teams?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on September 20, 2015, 02:50:16 PM
#13 Oregon against #18 Utah
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 20, 2015, 02:59:59 PM
Quote from: sbr on September 20, 2015, 02:50:16 PM
#13 Oregon against #18 Utah

Sorry, I missed that one.

Add it to the list. :)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 20, 2015, 07:38:37 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 20, 2015, 02:44:35 PM
Texas - Okie State

The score will be something like 60-56 so it should at least be entertaining in its way :P

I think Texas can/will win it.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on September 20, 2015, 07:45:28 PM
Wyo is 0-3 so far, the first game they lost a QB to a strained knee at the end.  Week 2 the backup broke his collarbone, and yesterday the Week 1 QB hobbled around in a loss.  So far the boys in Brown and Gold have started the 2nd most freshmen of any team, and they play like it.  A long season is getting longer as the Pokes are now 1 hit away from a 3rd stringer who can barely make a screen pass with his noodle arm.

Being a fan of an awful team is hard...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 20, 2015, 11:24:47 PM
Been there, done that.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Scipio on September 21, 2015, 03:05:02 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 20, 2015, 09:14:08 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on September 20, 2015, 03:45:25 AM
Lambert did very well against South Carolina. First time Georgia's looked like a playoff contender this season. :thumbsup:

I wonder what is going to happen against Alabama. I'm not sure I think less of Alabama than I did before the game: some crazy bounces and a crucial missed call went the way of Ole Miss, Bama lost the turnover battle 5-0, and still only lost by 6 with a chance to win at the end. They will also be desperate.
Ole Miss only got the breaks because they outplayed Alabama in nearly every facet of the game, but they had to just to stay in a position to beat them by luck. Alabama looked a lot less lackluster in the loss than they have in their wins.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 21, 2015, 03:07:39 PM
Quote from: PDH on September 20, 2015, 07:45:28 PM
Wyo is 0-3 so far, the first game they lost a QB to a strained knee at the end.  Week 2 the backup broke his collarbone, and yesterday the Week 1 QB hobbled around in a loss.  So far the boys in Brown and Gold have started the 2nd most freshmen of any team, and they play like it.  A long season is getting longer as the Pokes are now 1 hit away from a 3rd stringer who can barely make a screen pass with his noodle arm.

Being a fan of an awful team is hard...

My bro is a UCF fan...actually maybe their only megafan. He once got me to drive with him to Marshall to watch them play on Wednesday night.

Anyway, they lost the opener to FIU. Okay, crazy upset. Then they got beat by Stanford. Okay, Stanford is good. Then last week they got beat by Furman. LOL.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on September 26, 2015, 06:15:11 PM
Now THAT was domination!  unranked Michigan 31, #22 BYU 0.  Total yards: M 448, BYU 105 (and the century mark was reached with 28 seconds to go).  The game was over by the half, and Michigan started the second half with second-string offensive players coming in.  BYU averaged 311 passing yards against two ranked teams and one team just outside the rankings; they got 55 against Michigan, less than 2 yards per attempt.

This was what Michigan fans were hoping to see from a Harbaugh-coached team:  steady improvement on both sides of the ball and in special teams.  The defense is on the verge of being elite (the line is already elite, but the DBs aren't, yet, though now they've found their best 5 DBs and have them in the right places).  The offense will never be elite this year because they don't have an elite QB, but it won't need to be if the defense keeps the demands on the offense to reasonable levels.  Turnovers have declined every game, and that is the key to keeping the offense effective enough to win some big games.

I was questioning a bit my preseason 9-3 pick after the first three games (even though they all went as I predicted), but this game gives me some confidence that I hit the mark about right.  This game was one of the four I pegged for the possible third loss (after calling Utah and MU losses), and Penn State has pretty much taken themselves out of contention for that spot as well.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 26, 2015, 07:28:51 PM
Ouch Texas.

ND is starting a true freshman kicker, but I have an issue with starting freshman kickers and punters. They are spending the first few weeks living away from home for the first time, starting college classes, and, oh yeah, stepping onto a football field for a few brief moments where they are watched by millions and will be incredibly conspicuous in failure.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: derspiess on September 26, 2015, 07:30:43 PM
WVU obliterated Maryland.  I miss Seedy because no one else here gives a shit :(

edit: ooh, also my kid did so well in his last game that they made him captain for today's game.  His team ended up winning 28-0, bringing them to 4-0 at the halfway point of their season.  They have not allowed a point scored against them so far.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 26, 2015, 07:53:04 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 26, 2015, 07:28:51 PM
Ouch Texas.

ND is starting a true freshman kicker, but I have an issue with starting freshman kickers and punters. They are spending the first few weeks living away from home for the first time, starting college classes, and, oh yeah, stepping onto a football field for a few brief moments where they are watched by millions and will be incredibly conspicuous in failure.

Say what you want about this season for Texas but it has been incredibly entertaining if nothing else. The kicking gaff was far from the biggest LOL moment of that game. The officiating was the worst I have ever seen. It was unbelievable.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 26, 2015, 07:57:04 PM
I thought the one handed fumble recovery by the QB and the DL who got tackled being called for holding on a run play were the biggest LOLWTF moments. 

E:  Arizona seems to have trouble with the snap more than usual.   :hmm:  Announcer dudes said something about the C being "emotional."  What's that all about?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 26, 2015, 08:09:33 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 26, 2015, 07:57:04 PM
I thought the one handed fumble recovery by the QB and the DL who got tackled being called for holding on a run play were the biggest LOLWTF moments. 

Then flagging the coach when he complained about it. Amazing I have never seen that call made. Just a weird day.

And the game went nothing like I thought it would. I thought the offense had it going on and I guess they did for the first half. But then the defense stomped OSU in the second. How weird was that?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 26, 2015, 08:13:50 PM
Yeah it was really strange.  Hey maybe next week the O and D can play well at the same time! 

The O really shut down when Perkins went out. 

Strong said he told the ref he had never seen that called as well, among other things, which is what he was flagged for.  I'm not a big fan doxxing the refs, which is going on on the shag right now though.  Yeah, they sucked real bad and absolutely hosed the horns, but ugh.

Here you go Val: https://vimeo.com/140543803

E:  Ouch.  Solomon just took a knee to the head and is down.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on September 26, 2015, 08:24:11 PM
Texas has a lot more of a pulse than it looked like they would have after the first game. If they win one of the next two, it will be epic, but if not, it will be interesting to see what happens. If they continue to build, they can win games and maybe get bowl eligible, but starting 1-5 may make the wheels come off the bus.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on September 26, 2015, 08:47:56 PM
As shitty as UDub was today looking better than Berkie's Wildcats.  :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 26, 2015, 09:23:55 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on September 26, 2015, 08:24:11 PM
Texas has a lot more of a pulse than it looked like they would have after the first game. If they win one of the next two, it will be epic, but if not, it will be interesting to see what happens. If they continue to build, they can win games and maybe get bowl eligible, but starting 1-5 may make the wheels come off the bus.

Nah this is a throwaway season. It is about putting pieces together and getting better. There is no depth, the upper classmen are worthless thanks to Mack Brown's last few empty classes. They were always a few injuries away from a complete collapse. They could go 3-9 and be ok depending on how the 3-9 looks. After what I have seen the past few weeks I think they win more but it could still happen.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on September 26, 2015, 09:30:10 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 26, 2015, 08:13:50 PM
I'm not a big fan doxxing the refs, which is going on on the shag right now though.  Yeah, they sucked real bad and absolutely hosed the horns, but ugh.

Yeah you probably saw me telling those degenerates to knock it off. The Shag really is a hive of scum and villainy.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 26, 2015, 09:33:51 PM
I didn't see that, but glad you did.  I don't like that shit no matter who it involves. 

A&M just took out Bret "Gonna kick your ass" Bielema's pigs in OT.  Meteor game, but I can honestly say I didn't mind seeing Tech and now A&M beat that douche.  Go Vols next week.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on September 26, 2015, 09:56:07 PM
 Anybody care for roast duck ?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 26, 2015, 10:23:01 PM
LOL at that last punt.  Hits the wire, so they re-do it and the punter runs it for 33 yards.  Oregon apparently can't catch a break.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on September 26, 2015, 10:25:45 PM
Oregon D is looking as bad as Arizona :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 26, 2015, 10:26:14 PM
Wow they just...didn't cover that guy.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on September 26, 2015, 10:30:39 PM
@ Oregon :nelson:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on September 27, 2015, 06:33:52 AM
Utah might be my auxiliary emergency team to cheer for this year.  Their performance since the first game makes me feel a lot better about that opening game seven-point loss by Michigan.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on September 27, 2015, 06:34:43 AM
Quote from: grumbler on September 27, 2015, 06:33:52 AM
Utah might be my auxiliary emergency team to cheer for this year.  Their performance since the first game makes me feel a lot better about that opening game seven-point loss by Michigan.

Yeah If i'm gonna root for a Pac-12 team other than Huskies it is Utes.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on September 27, 2015, 09:43:55 AM
I figured the Ducks would have a rough time this year; no one is going to have much success in the Pac-12 with inexperience at QB and in the defensive backfield.  Now that they have played some games things look even worse than I expected, which wasn't much.  Neither line looks very good; not only is Adams' finger still limiting him, apparently he is having trouble picking up the offense (though he has only been on campus for like 2 months); they are getting out played on special teams.

It will be interesting to see if they can turn things around, and if not how the natives will deal with their absurd expectations.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 27, 2015, 09:52:37 AM
Quote from: katmai on September 26, 2015, 08:47:56 PM
As shitty as UDub was today looking better than Berkie's Wildcats.  :P

You know, I had this kind of feeling that this years Cats may be in trouble. The defense is just...terrible. I mean, really, really bad. Like some of those guys just don't belong on a D1 field bad.

This team will be lucky to go .500 in the Pac-12, unless something radically changes.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: derspiess on September 27, 2015, 10:25:00 AM
Quote from: Berkut on September 27, 2015, 09:52:37 AM
You know, I had this kind of feeling that this years Cats may be in trouble. The defense is just...terrible. I mean, really, really bad. Like some of those guys just don't belong on a D1 field bad.

Getting rid of Casteel may help a bit.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on September 27, 2015, 10:29:32 AM
Quote from: derspiess on September 27, 2015, 10:25:00 AM
Quote from: Berkut on September 27, 2015, 09:52:37 AM
You know, I had this kind of feeling that this years Cats may be in trouble. The defense is just...terrible. I mean, really, really bad. Like some of those guys just don't belong on a D1 field bad.

Getting rid of Casteel may help a bit.

I can't decide - I don't know if Casteel is doing the best with what he has, or if his defense just isn't viable at this level.

The problem is that his defense requires a certain kind of player, and if you recruit that kind of player, you are not recruiting the kinds of players you need for a more traditional defense. So how can you switch once you are down that road?

Plus, it isn't like Arizona is out there contending for 5 star defensive tackles. They don't even consider Arizona, and they certainly don't with Casteel running the defense, and they probably don't even without him.

Casteel's defense supposedly lets the team go after really good, non-traditional (in the size sense) defensive talent. Those 3 star guys who are just not of the right size for their position, but are talented and presumably really fast.

That isn't really working out so great though.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on September 27, 2015, 05:46:41 PM
Quote from: Berkut on September 27, 2015, 10:29:32 AM
I can't decide - I don't know if Casteel is doing the best with what he has, or if his defense just isn't viable at this level.

The problem is that his defense requires a certain kind of player, and if you recruit that kind of player, you are not recruiting the kinds of players you need for a more traditional defense. So how can you switch once you are down that road?

Plus, it isn't like Arizona is out there contending for 5 star defensive tackles. They don't even consider Arizona, and they certainly don't with Casteel running the defense, and they probably don't even without him.

Casteel's defense supposedly lets the team go after really good, non-traditional (in the size sense) defensive talent. Those 3 star guys who are just not of the right size for their position, but are talented and presumably really fast.

That isn't really working out so great though.

We know Casteel's defense "works at this level" because it has worked.  At WV he had a top-ten defense a couple of years.  The problem with his defense is that it requires a lot of substitutions, and so you need backups that are as good as the starters.  It took him five years to build that at WV.  During the first few years, his defenses stunk.  As you say, though, his defense works with 3-star-type guys.  Reed Williams was a thee-star who became conference DPOY, IIRC.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on September 29, 2015, 08:40:46 PM
So, what's the closest joy to watching your team demolish a legit team ranked way above your own? 

Watching a team you've already played demolish the rep of a rival.

Last weekend, Michigan eviscerated the #22 team in the country, and vaulted from "no votes" in the rankings to #22 itself.

So, that's a great weekend, no?

It gets better.  #2 Michigan State is #2 by virtue of their three-point win over Orgon, at home.  Michigan has been unranked, no votes, due to its seven-point loss to Utah, on the road.

Utah destroys Oregon, on the road, by forty-two points! ESPN flips its prediction, and now argues that the #22 team in the country is the favorite over the #2 team in the country for their game on Oct 17.  Sparty goes berserk.  Sparty does not yet burn couches, but the moderator of the Rivals Sparty board predicts that "Harbaugh is going to ruin my life." No respect, etc.

Now, THAT's a weekend!

Don't sleep on Michigan because their offense is limited.  I said that their defense was near-elite, but I was wrong.  It is elite.  Against the 4th-hardest OOC schedule among the big 5, it ranks #2 in scoring defense, #3 in yards allowed, #2 in passing yards allowed, and #2 in rushing yards allowed.  If the offense can just stay decent, the team will win those 9 games I predicted.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 01, 2015, 10:03:32 PM
I can't get too upset about Miami losing to Cincinnati. Miami isn't rebuilding, Cincinnati isn't very good, and the game isn't really a surprise.

It is just that Miami sucks. You can't say Miami isn't bringing in talent with 7 NFL draft picks last year. It isn't even that the old school Cane way doesn't work--Cincinnati is coached by an ex Cane coach from the glory days of the program.

95% of the fanbase would be thrilled if Al Golden was fired before coming back to campus. The other 5% are probably undercover Noles and Gators. Fuck that guy.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on October 02, 2015, 07:55:13 AM
I can't wait for college basketball to start!
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: lustindarkness on October 02, 2015, 08:47:57 AM
This year, Auburn is making it real easy to be a fan, I don't even have to watch the games! :lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 02, 2015, 09:58:05 AM
The last two weeks have left a deep hunger in me to see Texas breakthrough. I want it so bad now I can barely stand it. So sad since I have zero control over the outcome :P

Pumped for tomorrow's game. Beat TCU!
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 11:57:08 AM
Quote from: Valmy on October 02, 2015, 09:58:05 AM
The last two weeks have left a deep hunger in me to see Texas breakthrough. I want it so bad now I can barely stand it. So sad since I have zero control over the outcome :P

Pumped for tomorrow's game. Beat TCU!

LOL well how wrong was I? That might be the worst quarter of football I have ever seen. Coach Strong is going to be in serious trouble if this thing continues.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 11:59:54 AM
Problem:  The punt team can't seem to get that done, so they have to go for it, but if they get first downs and eventually touchdowns, the kicker is going to launch it out of bounds.

E: Also PATs and FGs are questionable.  Go for it every time in every situation.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 12:07:00 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 11:59:54 AM
Problem:  The punt team can't seem to get that done, so they have to go for it, but if they get first downs and eventually touchdowns, the kicker is going to launch it out of bounds.

Well that and the offense and defense are being dominated. This is unbelievable. I had high hopes obviously but I was realistic enough to know a decisive loss was certainly in the cards. But they are totally outclassed, which is amazing after TCU struggled with Tech and SMU. This is a program destroying type loss. Amazing.

And of course Rose missed the kick. It is like he forgot how.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 12:13:39 PM
Well let's see if they can recover and make this thing respectable somehow.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 12:19:00 PM
Is the punter hurt or something? 

E: Okay that's like the 5th punt the D has forced.  If the O would stop being a bunch of bitches, they could have actually been in this.  Special teams strikes again though.   :rolleyes:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 12:23:32 PM
No part of the team is competitive right now in this game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 12:31:27 PM
Haha Mike Finger: "Boy, you gotta think burning that timeout here might come back to haunt Texas later."
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 12:33:05 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 12:31:27 PM
Haha Mike Finger: "Boy, you gotta think burning that timeout here might come back to haunt Texas later."

It has been five years since Texas was worth a shit. Piling on years later just seems weak.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 12:37:28 PM
......

He missed another one.   Not sure why they were even trying it there.  Foreman should have caught that on the previous play, but you gotta go for it at that point.  I like the D just giving up on the TD by TCU too.    <_<
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 01:19:29 PM
Down 30-0 there is absolutely no reason to kick either of those Field Goals with a kicker who is ice cold. You have to try to get back in the game when it is that early. Did not get those decisions.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 01:26:12 PM
Yeah, I'm not really a fan of either of those attempts.  The first one, MAYBE, just to get on the board and all that (remember Rose made his kicks against OSU), but after he shanked that and time is running out in the half, you just have to go for it.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 01:33:04 PM
Clearly those last two games were a mirage or Cal and OSU just played down to UT's level. This is even worse than I thought it was during the off-season.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 03, 2015, 01:39:05 PM
I wonder if this isn't going to be the post WWII high point of TCU football.

Historically Texas has owned the series, and long term they will go back to that. TCU has won bigger games, but short of a national title, I just imagine an old dude watching TCU close out another 3-9 season with his grandson saying, "You know, it wasn't always like this. I remember way back in 2015 when we were top 5 and Texas came in here a huge underdog; Texas knew they had no hope. We were up 30-0 in the first quarter, could have beat them by a hundred if we had tried. If Trevone Boykin didn't tear his ACL against Baylor we would have won the national title that year. Back then you missed the rest of the season with an ACL tear and needed surgery, that was before they came up with an instant spray on cure for ligament damage."
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 01:41:30 PM
Well he might also mention what TCU did to Texas last year as well  :lol:

I am starting to lose any faith this turnaround is going to happen anytime soon. This program has been wretched this entire decade and it seems the decline is still ongoing.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on October 03, 2015, 02:01:53 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 03, 2015, 01:39:05 PM
I wonder if this isn't going to be the post WWII high point of TCU football.

Historically Texas has owned the series, and long term they will go back to that. TCU has won bigger games, but short of a national title, I just imagine an old dude watching TCU close out another 3-9 season with his grandson saying, "You know, it wasn't always like this. I remember way back in 2015 when we were top 5 and Texas came in here a huge underdog; Texas knew they had no hope. We were up 30-0 in the first quarter, could have beat them by a hundred if we had tried. If Trevone Boykin didn't tear his ACL against Baylor we would have won the national title that year. Back then you missed the rest of the season with an ACL tear and needed surgery, that was before they came up with an instant spray on cure for ligament damage."

By then football will have been outlawed by the scared mommy brigades.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 02:04:23 PM
Hey if we have ligament repair spray, maybe we'll also have concussion spray so the scared mommy brigades won't have to worry.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 03, 2015, 02:41:32 PM
My god...Wyoming is the worst 1A team in the country.  Seriously.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 02:55:23 PM
Quote from: PDH on October 03, 2015, 02:41:32 PM
My god...Wyoming is the worst 1A team in the country.  Seriously.

If only the Texas series had a game this year we could have determined who truly held this title hehe.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 03, 2015, 03:04:23 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 02:55:23 PM
Quote from: PDH on October 03, 2015, 02:41:32 PM
My god...Wyoming is the worst 1A team in the country.  Seriously.

If only the Texas series had a game this year we could have determined who truly held this title hehe.
After App State's 1st drive and Wyoming's 1st drive the score was 14-0 App state...sigh
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 03, 2015, 03:45:30 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 01:41:30 PM
Well he might also mention what TCU did to Texas last year as well  :lol:

I am starting to lose any faith this turnaround is going to happen anytime soon. This program has been wretched this entire decade and it seems the decline is still ongoing.

Well, Michigan had the same thing going, and it came back after "only" eight years.  It took time for the stars to align, though (new president = new athletic director = new coach).

I don't think Strong is the answer for Texas.  He needs more experience before getting a job with that kind of pressure.  But I also don't think you can get rid of him for another year.  The stars will align, though.  Texas just has too much going for it to stay like this for long.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 03, 2015, 03:48:30 PM
21-7 at the half.  Wyoming looks like shit warmed over.  0-12 here they come...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 03, 2015, 04:06:29 PM
Quote from: PDH on October 03, 2015, 03:48:30 PM
21-7 at the half.  Wyoming looks like shit warmed over.  0-12 here they come...
Well, at least they look warmed over.  Could be worse.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on October 03, 2015, 04:22:41 PM
OSU-Indiana will be close. Damn.

I'm headed to the stadium for the cannon game shortly too.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 03, 2015, 04:26:12 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 03, 2015, 04:06:29 PM
Quote from: PDH on October 03, 2015, 03:48:30 PM
21-7 at the half.  Wyoming looks like shit warmed over.  0-12 here they come...
Well, at least they look warmed over.  Could be worse.

28-7 now.  Afraid the shit is now stale...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 03, 2015, 04:45:25 PM
Quote from: PDH on October 03, 2015, 04:26:12 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 03, 2015, 04:06:29 PM
Quote from: PDH on October 03, 2015, 03:48:30 PM
21-7 at the half.  Wyoming looks like shit warmed over.  0-12 here they come...
Well, at least they look warmed over.  Could be worse.

28-7 now.  Afraid the shit is now stale...
Told ya it could be worse!  :lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 03, 2015, 04:46:36 PM
Oh worse is what Wyoming fans get.  And I am stuck, there ain't no changing now - I will go to my grave an embittered Wyoming fan that never seems to get anything good.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on October 03, 2015, 04:52:56 PM
Quote from: uwyo.eduCompeting at the NCAA Division I-A level and as a member of the Mountain West Conference, the Cowboys and Cowgirls regularly contest regional and national powers in basketball, cross-country, golf, soccer, swimming, track, tennis, volleyball, and wrestling.

Sounds like you just picked the wrong sport.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 03, 2015, 05:09:02 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on October 03, 2015, 04:52:56 PM
Quote from: uwyo.eduCompeting at the NCAA Division I-A level and as a member of the Mountain West Conference, the Cowboys and Cowgirls regularly contest regional and national powers in basketball, cross-country, golf, soccer, swimming, track, tennis, volleyball, and wrestling.

Sounds like you just picked the wrong sport.

Well, the good news is almost every sport except football is on the uptick.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 03, 2015, 05:43:34 PM
LOL--the Texas Rangers apparently tweeted out "Fire Charlie #bye" -- the tweet was deleted and the guy responsible fired.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: lustindarkness on October 03, 2015, 06:21:25 PM
Well,  Auburn got a win somehow,  and Navy beat Air Force.  :)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 06:27:46 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 03, 2015, 05:43:34 PM
LOL--the Texas Rangers apparently tweeted out "Fire Charlie #bye" -- the tweet was deleted and the guy responsible fired.

The Rangers then promptly blew a four run 9th inning lead that would have clinched the division. Bad day for Rangers/Longhorns fans.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on October 03, 2015, 06:52:55 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/texas-db-kris-boyd-retweets-a-m-fan-saying-he-should-transfer-185441076.html

QuoteAfter Texas was destroyed 37-0 by TCU in the first half Saturday in an eventual 50-7 loss in Fort Worth, Texas defensive back Kris Boyd apparently found a bit of time to check his Twitter feed in the locker room during halftime.

And what did he do? The freshman retweeted a fan saying he and linebacker Malik Jefferson should transfer to Texas A&M. Yikes.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fl.yimg.com%2Fbt%2Fapi%2Fres%2F1.2%2FKcwL9X5jIDk9BN3hwFm2Ug--%2FYXBwaWQ9eW5ld3NfbGVnbztxPTg1%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fl.yimg.com%2Fos%2Fpublish-images%2Fsports%2F2015-10-03%2Fcc878a80-69ff-11e5-bb17-794549198f8b_Screen-Shot-2015-10-03-at-2-32-05-PM.png&hash=df049882241f5757839170c945f1673ada6dc6e1)

That's not what Texas fans want to see as the program struggles in Year Two under Charlie Strong. And Strong was not happy when he was asked about Boyd's halftime tweet.

Boyd, a four-star recruit, narrowed his choices down to the Longhorns and Aggies, but committed to Texas before signing day. Despite receiving plenty of playing time early this season, it looks like Boyd is having second thoughts about his decision to play at Texas, which is now 1-4.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 03, 2015, 06:53:27 PM
Quote from: PDH on October 03, 2015, 04:46:36 PM
Oh worse is what Wyoming fans get.  And I am stuck, there ain't no changing now - I will go to my grave an embittered Wyoming fan that never seems to get anything good.

Any former Wyoming QBs coaching pro teams?  You get one of those guys, and watch shit turn around in a hurry.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 07:33:44 PM
Boyd's antics are the least of Chuck's problems unfortunately.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on October 03, 2015, 07:37:36 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 06:27:46 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 03, 2015, 05:43:34 PM
LOL--the Texas Rangers apparently tweeted out "Fire Charlie #bye" -- the tweet was deleted and the guy responsible fired.

The Rangers then promptly blew a four run 9th inning lead that would have clinched the division. Bad day for Rangers/Longhorns fans.

I was gonna ask if the Texas Rangers he was referring to was the baseball team or the law enforcement organization.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 03, 2015, 08:22:08 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 03, 2015, 06:53:27 PM
Quote from: PDH on October 03, 2015, 04:46:36 PM
Oh worse is what Wyoming fans get.  And I am stuck, there ain't no changing now - I will go to my grave an embittered Wyoming fan that never seems to get anything good.

Any former Wyoming QBs coaching pro teams?  You get one of those guys, and watch shit turn around in a hurry.

Well Chuck Pagano was a 4 year letterman at UWyo... is a former DB good enough?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 08:35:58 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 06:27:46 PM
The Rangers then promptly blew a four run 9th inning lead that would have clinched the division. Bad day for Rangers/Longhorns fans.

:hide:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 03, 2015, 08:40:45 PM
Bruins are looking Beatable.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 03, 2015, 09:29:35 PM
Quote from: PDH on October 03, 2015, 08:22:08 PM
Well Chuck Pagano was a 4 year letterman at UWyo... is a former DB good enough?

It's worth a shot.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 03, 2015, 09:30:29 PM
Quote from: katmai on October 03, 2015, 08:40:45 PM
Bruins are looking Beatable.

And Ol Miss goes down in flames.  Couldn't happen to a dirtier school (on account of there is no dirtier school)..
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 09:56:54 PM
Hell there was a whole movie celebrating Ole Miss recruiting violations.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on October 03, 2015, 10:15:16 PM
Arizonas backup QB isn't very good.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 10:32:01 PM
Backup?  Solomon end up having a concussion or something from that knee to the head?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 10:34:19 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 03, 2015, 09:56:54 PM
Hell there was a whole movie celebrating Ole Miss recruiting violations.

But it was such a heartwarming story!
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on October 03, 2015, 10:35:58 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 10:32:01 PM
Backup?  Solomon end up having a concussion or something from that knee to the head?

Yep. Not that Arizona looked much better with Solomon.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 10:47:11 PM
That Clemson - Domer game had a pretty fun ending.  I don't like celebration penalties in situations like that (or at all, tbh) though.  "You stopped the game tying two point conversion with 8 seconds left and are celebrating?  Fuck you, they'll be kicking the onside kick into damn near FG range."

Quote from: Berkut on October 03, 2015, 10:35:58 PM
Yep. Not that Arizona looked much better with Solomon.

Maybe not, but that still sucks.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on October 03, 2015, 11:13:24 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 10:47:11 PM
That Clemson - Domer game had a pretty fun ending.  I don't like celebration penalties in situations like that (or at all, tbh) though. 

I don't mind seeing choreographed celebration dances and the like flagged, but I agree a penalty for a spontaneous celebration in a situation like that is just stupid.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 03, 2015, 11:16:04 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 10:47:11 PM
That Clemson - Domer game had a pretty fun ending.  I don't like celebration penalties in situations like that (or at all, tbh) though.  "You stopped the game tying two point conversion with 8 seconds left and are celebrating?  Fuck you, they'll be kicking the onside kick into damn near FG range."

Yeah, I would have taken the outcome, but ACC officials suck and that was a really weak call.

ND has a kicker that was supposed to be really hot shit out of high school. Still a true freshman, but if ND got the onside kick, he definitely had the leg to make the kick, and the wind was at his back. I figure a kick would have been close to a 50-50 proposition, probably 50-55 yards.

Losing the turnover battle 4-1 was probably a bad strategy for ND. Losing 3 fumbles = not winning a lot of games.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 03, 2015, 11:22:54 PM
UTSA lookin good in their all whites, also lookin good up 18-6 @ UTEP with 5ish minutes left in a game that's running late due to weather delays.  Their QB is named Sturm, and he seems to be able to run.  Handjob Mountain currently appears to be unoccupied. 

E:  Hey touchdown UTSA on an interception + lateral.  Good times.  25-6.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 04, 2015, 12:52:39 PM
Wow.  Talk about bad officiating.  B12 officials decided the  OSU-KSU game by awarding OSU a first down they clearly didn't earn (they were awarded a first down when it should have been 4th and four).  http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/13803765/officiating-error-leads-oklahoma-state-cowboys-touchdown-win-kansas-state-wildcats (http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/13803765/officiating-error-leads-oklahoma-state-cowboys-touchdown-win-kansas-state-wildcats)

Meanwhile, the explanation for the incredibly shitty B12 officiating was revealed (also in that article):
QuoteBig 12 officiating supervisor Walt Anderson defended the calls after reviewing the game, telling ESPN.com he was "generally pleased" with the officiating.
"Houston, we have a problem."  Anderson has his head so far up his ass he is using his belly button as a peep sight.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 04, 2015, 12:55:46 PM
The WV-OU crew was horrible. Disgraceful.

After the Texas-OSU game last week to. Officiating in this league is bad. Anderson is making himself look like a clown.

I kind of wish Berkut was a Big 12 fan so he could give me some perspective but from the layman's view this season has been brutal.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on October 05, 2015, 08:25:27 AM
Well, I ripped my calf muscle in the opening kickoff of the second half of my game on Saturday, so I am done for a couple weeks at least.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: lustindarkness on October 05, 2015, 08:42:53 AM
Quote from: Berkut on October 05, 2015, 08:25:27 AM
Well, I ripped my calf muscle in the opening kickoff of the second half of my game on Saturday, so I am done for a couple weeks at least.

Dafuq? That sucks. Hope you recover quick.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 05, 2015, 09:05:15 AM
Quote from: Berkut on October 05, 2015, 08:25:27 AM
Well, I ripped my calf muscle in the opening kickoff of the second half of my game on Saturday, so I am done for a couple weeks at least.

Ouch.  Get well soon.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on October 05, 2015, 09:07:44 AM
The home team had an ortho at the game, so he was checking me out. Said it was a "typical middle aged injury". That hurt more than the POP it made when it went. :(
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 05, 2015, 09:23:34 AM
Berkut, you gonna redshirt this year?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on October 05, 2015, 09:24:44 AM
Well, this was my third game, so I will probably have to appeal to the NCAA...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 05, 2015, 09:28:23 AM
I was glad to see UCLA lose, because it irritated me whenever I saw them picked to win the NC (which was quite often).  It wasn't hat the pick was UCLA, it was that no one could explain why they picked UCLA.  Certainly, their play didn't warrant NC predictions (though they are a very good team this year, just not that good).  UCLA isn't out of the picture, but at least the bandwagon hit a speed bump and knocked everyone off.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 05, 2015, 12:58:59 PM
I hate to defend UCLA, but they have lost three starters on D during season including their best player so this team playing now isn't like the one from first few games. (Of course that doesn't excuse losing to BYU at home for most of the game)

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 05, 2015, 01:15:55 PM
Oh is losing at home to BYU bad?

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.bleacherreport.net%2Fimg%2Fimages%2Fphotos%2F003%2F052%2F620%2Fhi-res-b956082beb13545fad0ce09a3459a193_crop_north.jpg%3Fw%3D630%26amp%3Bh%3D420%26amp%3Bq%3D75&hash=346dad0a12db7c16d33663c6ffbe6ef1a732f1d6)

:weep:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 05, 2015, 01:57:40 PM
Quote from: katmai on October 05, 2015, 12:58:59 PM
I hate to defend UCLA, but they have lost three starters on D during season including their best player so this team playing now isn't like the one from first few games. (Of course that doesn't excuse losing to BYU at home for most of the game)

The ESPN guys I was referring to were projecting UCLA to play OSU for the natty.  This prediction was made last week.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 05, 2015, 02:01:19 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 05, 2015, 01:15:55 PM
Oh is losing at home to BYU bad?

:weep:

This guy apparently thought so.
(https://usatftw.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/ap_aptopix_byu_michigan_football_76247332.jpg?w=1000&h=640)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 05, 2015, 02:54:01 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 05, 2015, 01:57:40 PM
Quote from: katmai on October 05, 2015, 12:58:59 PM
I hate to defend UCLA, but they have lost three starters on D during season including their best player so this team playing now isn't like the one from first few games. (Of course that doesn't excuse losing to BYU at home for most of the game)

The ESPN guys I was referring to were projecting UCLA to play OSU for the natty.  This prediction was made last week.

Well reason i don't listen to those talking heads :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on October 05, 2015, 02:57:14 PM
I generally watch games with the TV muted.  :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 05, 2015, 03:01:02 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 05, 2015, 02:57:14 PM
I generally watch games with the TV muted.  :P

Yeah but they still post graphics mathematically proving this is the worst Texas team since 1956. That really gets annoying.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on October 05, 2015, 03:04:27 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 05, 2015, 03:01:02 PM

Yeah but they still post graphics mathematically proving this is the worst Texas team since 1956. That really gets annoying.

The first game they kept talking about how they were going to shift their offense more to the spread because all the high schools in Texas are running it and they wanted to make the transition and recruiting easier.

Continuing the dumbing-down of the game from bottom to top. It was depressing.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on October 05, 2015, 03:13:16 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 05, 2015, 02:57:14 PM
I generally watch games with the TV muted.  :P

I like knowing who made the plays, and I'm certainly not going to memorize their numbers.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 05, 2015, 05:56:11 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on October 05, 2015, 03:13:16 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 05, 2015, 02:57:14 PM
I generally watch games with the TV muted.  :P

I like knowing who made the plays, and I'm certainly not going to memorize their numbers.

And you can't listen to the radio for it, because the radio is tape-delayed for 4 seconds.  Dan Dierdorf does the Michigan radio broadcast, and I can't use it. :bleeding:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 05, 2015, 05:58:52 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 04, 2015, 12:52:39 PM
Wow.  Talk about bad officiating.  B12 officials decided the  OSU-KSU game by awarding OSU a first down they clearly didn't earn (they were awarded a first down when it should have been 4th and four).  http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/13803765/officiating-error-leads-oklahoma-state-cowboys-touchdown-win-kansas-state-wildcats (http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/13803765/officiating-error-leads-oklahoma-state-cowboys-touchdown-win-kansas-state-wildcats)

Meanwhile, the explanation for the incredibly shitty B12 officiating was revealed (also in that article):
QuoteBig 12 officiating supervisor Walt Anderson defended the calls after reviewing the game, telling ESPN.com he was "generally pleased" with the officiating.
"Houston, we have a problem."  Anderson has his head so far up his ass he is using his belly button as a peep sight.

Oh, and this happened on the 25th anniversary of the conference's worst officiating blunder, the granting of 5 downs to Colorado so they could beat Missouri.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 05, 2015, 07:22:57 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 05, 2015, 01:15:55 PM
Oh is losing at home to BYU bad?


Come to think of it, the Mormons are nothing but trouble. Valmy has bad memories of losing to them, Nebraska loses to them in a new coach's debut, in 1990 Miami lost to the Ty Detmer version and lost a probable shot at a national title, PDH taught us how the Wyoming Black14 were sparked by a BYU visit and the aftereffects have severely wounded the program...Can anyone think of a really memorable big win against BYU?

Also, that Jimmer Fredette dude was annoying.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 08, 2015, 11:09:17 PM
Bow down to Washington!
UW 17
USC 12
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 09, 2015, 07:24:37 PM
Unlike Randy Edsal, Harbaugh understands Forrest Gump.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FHbkDtwr.jpg&hash=dcd72a886075b17b04b72cc35898f0ea2fe63700)

Best Harbaugh photoshop yet, though, is:
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FQlx6R3q.jpg&hash=ac58aa44aac2e5f3095b3bd39c35421e2c95f4d4)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 10, 2015, 02:17:44 AM
Hmmmm Do i get tickets to Arizona vs UW or Utah vs UW?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 10, 2015, 11:04:36 AM
Quote from: katmai on October 10, 2015, 02:17:44 AM
Hmmmm Do i get tickets to Arizona vs UW or Utah vs UW?

If Utah beats Cal, the Utah tickets are gonna be the ones you want.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on October 10, 2015, 12:52:54 PM
Quote from: katmai on October 10, 2015, 02:17:44 AM
Hmmmm Do i get tickets to Arizona vs UW or Utah vs UW?

Do you want to see the best team (Utah) or see the Huskies win (Arizona)?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 10, 2015, 02:23:03 PM
:punk:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: FunkMonk on October 10, 2015, 02:27:01 PM
Lmao Oklahoma. Get Fucked.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 10, 2015, 02:31:45 PM
Hell yeah! FUCK OKLAHOMA!

Sorry Mom...

But seriously Fuck Oklahoma. That was UT's biggest win in years. Probably since beating Nebraska in 2009. They kicked the hell out of OU up front. Joe Wickline worked a miracle this week.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 10, 2015, 02:49:14 PM
Michigan houses the opening kickoff against Northwestern.  That might be all the scoring in the game, what with the two top scoring defenses in the country playing.

Yep.  NW goes three and out (zero yards gained) in their first drive.

Who'd have thought pre-season that this would be a marquee game?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on October 10, 2015, 03:03:09 PM
Except only one of those marquee defenses has showed up today so far.  :lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 10, 2015, 03:08:42 PM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FqSGbBHf.png&hash=496f23ae8840c5aba23f5521d9fd26f0dbad8efa)

Not quite Gameday -_-

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1328.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fw525%2FTwoPete%2FMobile%2520Uploads%2Fimage_zpsjforinpz.jpeg&hash=35e28fc3944e5d56eb54cb09bae844cd24b309ac)

Longhorns! We are pleased with you. On the day of the Red River Shootout, you lived up to all of our expectations of your bravery and boldness; you have decked Bevo with a glory that shall never die. In less than four hours, a top 10 Sooner team, commanded by the Brothers of Stoops, has either been cut to pieces or dispersed. All UT fans will welcome you back with delight, and all you will have to say is "I was at the 2015 Red River Shootout", for them to reply, "There goes a brave man".
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: FunkMonk on October 10, 2015, 03:24:24 PM
I loled
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 10, 2015, 03:37:20 PM
Quote from: FunkMonk on October 10, 2015, 03:24:24 PM
I loled

Napoleon sent his secret reserve up the middle. Strong sent D'onta Foreman up the middle. It is basically the same.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 10, 2015, 05:19:08 PM
Wow Michigan is back.

Look out Michigan State and Ohio State.

Will little brother be put back in his place next week? I look forward to seeing it. Sorry Charliebear.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 10, 2015, 05:48:05 PM
Some coaches are worth $5 million a year.  Harbaugh has already been responsible for more than $5 million in increased season ticket sales.

And Sparty has been shitting themselves for a week now since Michigan shifted to the favorite's position.  DSRESPKT
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 10, 2015, 05:58:58 PM
I just cannot get over 14 points in five games. I did not think such a thing was possible in modern football. That is 1940s stuff.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 10, 2015, 06:34:10 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 10, 2015, 05:58:58 PM
I just cannot get over 14 points in five games. I did not think such a thing was possible in modern football. That is 1940s stuff.

Part of it is talent, but a big part of it is that this is the best coaching staff in college football.  Maybe in all of football.  Harbaugh knows how to hire coaches, and coaches love to coach with him.  He has former NFL defensive coordinators serving as position coaches.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 10, 2015, 09:49:00 PM
If you value your eyes you will not watch Wyoming play tonight.  The Pokes are three TD dogs at Air Force tonight...I sniff 0-6 in the air.

Geez, it is tough this season...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 10, 2015, 09:50:53 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 10, 2015, 11:04:36 AM
Quote from: katmai on October 10, 2015, 02:17:44 AM
Hmmmm Do i get tickets to Arizona vs UW or Utah vs UW?

If Utah beats Cal, the Utah tickets are gonna be the ones you want.
Probably  game I'll get tickets, as very well may be in Vancouver the day of the 'Zona game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 06:18:36 AM
So, Gameday will be in Ann Arbor for the MSU game next week.  But, if things go as expected, won't they really want to be there for the OSU game Nov 28?  Does Gameday ever repeat at a location in a season?  Or, are they just taking the bird in hand?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 06:21:25 AM
Oh, and Valmy, you will be pleased to see that CFN now ranks Texas #20 in their "resume-only" rankings. (https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcollegefootballnews.com%2F2015%2Fcollege-football-news-rankings-week-6-no-1-128&hash=867409d67e5836b5b5b495defd957928d927c50c)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on October 11, 2015, 07:23:53 AM
Quote from: Valmy on October 10, 2015, 05:58:58 PM
I just cannot get over 14 points in five games. I did not think such a thing was possible in modern football. That is 1940s stuff.

Michigan, Duke, and Boston College are all averaging less than 10 points allow per game, which is pretty amazing--as you say, 1940s stuff.  BC only has a 3-3 record to show for it, but when you lose 9-7 and 3-0, well, obviously it doesn't take many points to beat you, and playing 2 FCS opponents will help keep your PA low, too.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 08:49:52 AM
Michigan State looks to be the most overrated team in the country right now. They have had a number of close games, and their early ranking was based on beating Oregon at home in a rather exciting game. But in hindsight that Oregon win doesn't look so impressive, but even so that is probably the most quality win they have had.

PS: fire fat albert.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 08:58:15 AM
Quote from: dps on October 11, 2015, 07:23:53 AM
Michigan, Duke, and Boston College are all averaging less than 10 points allow per game, which is pretty amazing--as you say, 1940s stuff.  BC only has a 3-3 record to show for it, but when you lose 9-7 and 3-0, well, obviously it doesn't take many points to beat you, and playing 2 FCS opponents will help keep your PA low, too.

Duke is the one among those that surprises me.  Yeah, one of their games is against SC Central, but two were against what were (at least then) top-20 teams.  Cutcliffe has been building towards this, but I didn't expect them to be nearly this (apparently) good this season.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 08:59:48 AM
Also, there are a fuckton of good games next weekend.

UCLA Stanford
FSU Louisville
Baylor West Virginia
Miami Virginia Tech (nope, it isn't 2000 anymore)
Alabama aTm
Oklahoma Kansas State (nope, it isn't last weekend anymore)
Michigan Michigan State
Florida LSU
Notre Dame USC
Ohio State Penn State
Utah Arizona State
Oregon Washington (to answer the question: how hard can you beat a corpse infected with dysentery without contracting it?)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on October 11, 2015, 01:25:06 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 06:18:36 AM
So, Gameday will be in Ann Arbor for the MSU game next week.  But, if things go as expected, won't they really want to be there for the OSU game Nov 28?  Does Gameday ever repeat at a location in a season?  Or, are they just taking the bird in hand?

As of now, it's the game between highest-ranking opponents. At air time, it may not be.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 04:28:29 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 11, 2015, 01:25:06 PM
As of now, it's the game between highest-ranking opponents. At air time, it may not be.
How can the rankings change between now and air time?  Don't all of the ones they use for these things come out on Sundays?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 04:35:32 PM
Sark is going on a leave of absence from USC.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on October 11, 2015, 04:37:24 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 04:28:29 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 11, 2015, 01:25:06 PM
As of now, it's the game between highest-ranking opponents. At air time, it may not be.
How can the rankings change between now and air time?  Don't all of the ones they use for these things come out on Sundays?

Between now and Nov. 28th I meant.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 11, 2015, 04:47:42 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 04:35:32 PM
Sark is going on a leave of absence from USC.

Alcoholism is an ugly thing.

USC really has to rethink its screening and vetting process for football coaches.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 04:55:27 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 11, 2015, 04:47:42 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 04:35:32 PM
Sark is going on a leave of absence from USC.

Alcoholism is an ugly thing.

USC really has to rethink its screening and vetting process for football coaches.

Random internet rumor I've seen is that he showed up to the football offices hammered and in no condition to coach.

The thing is, he coached there as a coordinator. He should have been a known quantity. If this is really the deal, USC probably should and probably will fire him. His wins and losses already had him on something like a hot seat, and he was never a popular hire. What will it do to recruiting to have a limbo type of situation if he isn't fired?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 11, 2015, 05:03:52 PM
Lane Kiffin was an assistant there as well. One would think they knew what a douchebag he was.

Both of those hires were manifestly stupid. I don't get what they are doing there.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 11, 2015, 05:28:35 PM
Dorsey,

He is going through divorce, and there to my knowledge was never any issues with him and being drunk while at UDub, so either he hid it really well or it is something that has become an issue since moving down to 'SC
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 05:30:20 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 11, 2015, 04:37:24 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 04:28:29 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 11, 2015, 01:25:06 PM
As of now, it's the game between highest-ranking opponents. At air time, it may not be.
How can the rankings change between now and air time?  Don't all of the ones they use for these things come out on Sundays?

Between now and Nov. 28th I meant.

Oh.  Yeah, that's the "bird in the hand" part I mentioned.

And it turns out that Gameday went to FSU twice last year (Clemson and Notre Dame) so my earlier impression was incorrect.  They'll be back for The Game, I am sure.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 05:48:58 PM
Quote from: katmai on October 11, 2015, 05:28:35 PM
Dorsey,

He is going through divorce, and there to my knowledge was never any issues with him and being drunk while at UDub, so either he hid it really well or it is something that has become an issue since moving down to 'SC

Dunno.  There were some rumblings on some of the Husky sites that he was getting a lot of strange and had an alcohol problem (those only coming to wider light since the news he was shitcanned... er, suspended).  While they are totally unsubstantiated, they indicate a possible problem while Sark was at UDub. 

I don't think any team has done less with more than USC since he got there (although in that he was just carrying on recent USC tradition).
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on October 11, 2015, 07:04:55 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 05:48:58 PM
Quote from: katmai on October 11, 2015, 05:28:35 PM
Dorsey,

He is going through divorce, and there to my knowledge was never any issues with him and being drunk while at UDub, so either he hid it really well or it is something that has become an issue since moving down to 'SC

Dunno.  There were some rumblings on some of the Husky sites that he was getting a lot of strange and had an alcohol problem (those only coming to wider light since the news he was shitcanned... er, suspended).  While they are totally unsubstantiated, they indicate a possible problem while Sark was at UDub. 

I don't think any team has done less with more than USC since he got there (although in that he was just carrying on recent USC tradition).

Yep, it seems to be a pretty well known secret that Sark was a hard drinker and partier, and had been for a while.  I didn't hear anyone who was surprised at his Salute to Troy banquet shenanigans, maybe the magnitude but not that he showed up so smashed he had an ass of himself.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 11, 2015, 07:14:47 PM
I've never read any such reports, so would love links to such things.
Biggest complaint was what was reiterated this past week, good at recruiting, but on game day was out coached too often, didn't have team prepped.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 07:43:52 PM
Here's some stuff from 2013.  Take it for what it's worth, which isn't much other than to show that rumors did exist. http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/4114/the-official-sark-s-nights-on-the-town-thread (http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/4114/the-official-sark-s-nights-on-the-town-thread)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 11, 2015, 07:57:07 PM
Thanks Grumbles, hadn't seen that site.

Glad to see Harbaugh hasn't lost the coaching touch, hope Michigan keeps him for more than three years :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 11, 2015, 08:02:48 PM
QuoteLinebacker Daelin Hayes, a five-star recruit, has pulled his commitment to USC in light of coach Steve Sarkisian's leave of absence for reported substance abuse.


Hayes is the No. 1 ranked player in the state of Michigan, the No. 3 player at his position and the No. 13 player overall.

He was scheduled to wear No. 55 next year, the number famed USC linebacker Junior Seau wore for the Trojans.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 08:38:11 PM
Quote from: katmai on October 11, 2015, 07:57:07 PM
Thanks Grumbles, hadn't seen that site.

Glad to see Harbaugh hasn't lost the coaching touch, hope Michigan keeps him for more than three years :P

As someone commented on the MGoBlog board, "it's a lot more fun when the mindfuck is going the other way."  Harbaugh and Drevno have had a new formation or three for every game, and they seem to have anticipated every opponent's adjustments and prepared counters to them. 

But what is really impressive is how disciplined these players are, after eight years of hero ball (where players think they have to win games on their own, because the team won't).  Probably the best measure of that on defense is third down conversions.  Utah was 3 of 13, Oregon St 1 of 11, UNLV 5 of 15, BYU 4 of 15, Maryland 1 of 18, Northwestern 2 of 13.  The NCAA median is 40%.  Michigan is allowing less than 19%.  That's because everyone has bought into Harbaugh's conviction that, if everyone just does their own job well, the defense will strike home. 

And you have to remember that Harbaugh is more than just a Michigan alum.  He is an Ann Arbor kid.  His own kids are enrolled in the same elementary school he went to. His parents live next door.  He grew up wanting to be Bo Schembechler, whom he knew very well.  There's a true story that, when Harbaugh was like 10 years old, Bo came into his office to find Jim sitting at his desk, with his feet on the desktop.  Bo, of course, yells at Jim, demanding to know what he thinks he is doing, and Harbaugh replies that he is just seeing what it feels like, because someday he's going to be sitting at that desk for real.

I'm not concerned that Harbaugh is leaving any time soon.  Maybe after his parents pass, and his kids finish school, but Harbaugh and his wife have talked repeatedly about how they want their kids to grow up in Ann Arbor, and to have access to their grandparents.  We're talking ten years, minimum.  If Harbaugh wants to leave after ten years, I'll wish him well and will be confident that he'll leave the program in great shape.  He'll only leave even then for a really good NFL gig, though.

And I'll bet that, when he leaves, he will leave as the dean of B10 coaches.  OSU is the one who has to wonder how long their coach will be there.  Meyer has none of the glue that will keep Harbaugh at Michigan.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 11, 2015, 08:48:18 PM
Quote@A-Jude
Fair questions. Lots of rumors, but former UW players I've talked to say Sark's issues didn't show up in locker room
QuoteRogervanoo @Rogervanoo
@A_Jude Adam did you get a sense of this at UW? Hard to believe it just showed up. Have you held back from writing about it?

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 08:48:50 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 07:43:52 PM
Here's some stuff from 2013.  Take it for what it's worth, which isn't much other than to show that rumors did exist. http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/4114/the-official-sark-s-nights-on-the-town-thread (http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/4114/the-official-sark-s-nights-on-the-town-thread)

I believe every word there is the truth. Sark is a stud for picking up Erin Andrews. I see the winningness that Haden saw in him. However, getting other coaches to apply a plunger to his butthole while on the road allows me a glimpse into his sickness that Haden must have seen today.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 08:49:43 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 08:38:11 PM
Quote from: katmai on October 11, 2015, 07:57:07 PM
Thanks Grumbles, hadn't seen that site.

Glad to see Harbaugh hasn't lost the coaching touch, hope Michigan keeps him for more than three years :P

As someone commented on the MGoBlog board, "it's a lot more fun when the mindfuck is going the other way."  Harbaugh and Drevno have had a new formation or three for every game, and they seem to have anticipated every opponent's adjustments and prepared counters to them. 

But what is really impressive is how disciplined these players are, after eight years of hero ball (where players think they have to win games on their own, because the team won't).  Probably the best measure of that on defense is third down conversions.  Utah was 3 of 13, Oregon St 1 of 11, UNLV 5 of 15, BYU 4 of 15, Maryland 1 of 18, Northwestern 2 of 13.  The NCAA median is 40%.  Michigan is allowing less than 19%.  That's because everyone has bought into Harbaugh's conviction that, if everyone just does their own job well, the defense will strike home. 

And you have to remember that Harbaugh is more than just a Michigan alum.  He is an Ann Arbor kid.  His own kids are enrolled in the same elementary school he went to. His parents live next door.  He grew up wanting to be Bo Schembechler, whom he knew very well.  There's a true story that, when Harbaugh was like 10 years old, Bo came into his office to find Jim sitting at his desk, with his feet on the desktop.  Bo, of course, yells at Jim, demanding to know what he thinks he is doing, and Harbaugh replies that he is just seeing what it feels like, because someday he's going to be sitting at that desk for real.

I'm not concerned that Harbaugh is leaving any time soon.  Maybe after his parents pass, and his kids finish school, but Harbaugh and his wife have talked repeatedly about how they want their kids to grow up in Ann Arbor, and to have access to their grandparents.  We're talking ten years, minimum.  If Harbaugh wants to leave after ten years, I'll wish him well and will be confident that he'll leave the program in great shape.  He'll only leave even then for a really good NFL gig, though.

And I'll bet that, when he leaves, he will leave as the dean of B10 coaches.  OSU is the one who has to wonder how long their coach will be there.  Meyer has none of the glue that will keep Harbaugh at Michigan.

This isn't good for Urban Meyer's heart.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on October 11, 2015, 08:53:31 PM
You really want to save the toilet plunger for home games.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 08:54:27 PM
Quote from: katmai on October 11, 2015, 08:02:48 PM
QuoteLinebacker Daelin Hayes, a five-star recruit, has pulled his commitment to USC in light of coach Steve Sarkisian's leave of absence for reported substance abuse.


Hayes is the No. 1 ranked player in the state of Michigan, the No. 3 player at his position and the No. 13 player overall.

He was scheduled to wear No. 55 next year, the number famed USC linebacker Junior Seau wore for the Trojans.

Unfortunately, due to reported home conditions (specifically, an abusive father) Hayes apparently needs to get out of the state, so isn't interested in Michigan (or, at least, his mother isn't).  He's going to end up at ND according to the tea leaf readers.  Good luck to him.  He's had a tough life (moved around so much he's only played something like 12 games his whole high school career) and deserves better.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 08:55:18 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 11, 2015, 08:53:31 PM
You really want to save the toilet plunger for home games.

If you read the thread, the toilet plunger was used for road games because he didn't want to make his pool boy jealous.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 08:58:34 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 08:55:18 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 11, 2015, 08:53:31 PM
You really want to save the toilet plunger for home games.

If you read the thread, the toilet plunger was used for road games because he didn't want to make his pool boy jealous.

Was the pool boy gig before your ND gig, or just during the summer?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on October 11, 2015, 08:59:01 PM
Quote from: katmai on October 11, 2015, 08:48:18 PM
Quote@A-Jude
Fair questions. Lots of rumors, but former UW players I've talked to say Sark's issues didn't show up in locker room
QuoteRogervanoo @Rogervanoo
@A_Jude Adam did you get a sense of this at UW? Hard to believe it just showed up. Have you held back from writing about it?


I was just about to post that.  None of the other Seattle media members I follow have said anything.  Yet.

@InsideUSC is saying that coaches (and maybe players) think he was drunk on the sideline during the Arizona State game.

https://twitter.com/InsideUSC/status/653347087208153088

QuoteInsideUSC ‏@InsideUSC  3h3 hours ago
BREAKING: #USC assistants pulled Steve Sarkisian out of player huddle on sideline during Arizona State game. Believed he was not sober

EDIT:  Though the Seattle media is way to busy cutting themselves over the Seachickens choke job to worry about much else at the moment.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 09:07:17 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 08:58:34 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 08:55:18 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 11, 2015, 08:53:31 PM
You really want to save the toilet plunger for home games.

If you read the thread, the toilet plunger was used for road games because he didn't want to make his pool boy jealous.

Was the pool boy gig before your ND gig, or just during the summer?

We had an intense and passionate physical relationship, but we never had vaginal sex. Sark told me in the eyes of god it was okay because only vaginal sex counted. This meant we could do everything because neither of us had a vagina. I knew what Sark told me was true because as a kid my priest told me the same thing.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on October 11, 2015, 09:19:38 PM
That's pretty trippy Fredo.

Did you come out and tell him no one else was allowed to stick a toilet plunger up his ass?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 09:31:10 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 11, 2015, 09:19:38 PM
That's pretty trippy Fredo.

Did you come out and tell him no one else was allowed to stick a toilet plunger up his ass?

I played along with the grumbler fantasy for a post, but you seem to be getting into it a bit too much.  :P

ND - USC line is up to ND -4.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 12, 2015, 07:55:21 AM
LA Times story about Sark at UDUB

QuoteDocuments, former players point to Steve Sarkisian's alcohol use at Washington

Steve Sarkisian's strange behavior in the days surrounding high-pressure, high-profile college football games isn't unique to his time at USC.

Some regarded the coach's conduct, specifically the use of alcohol, as an issue during his five seasons leading the University of Washington's program.

Sarkisian's lone court record in Washington state is a routine speeding ticket and he wasn't publicly disciplined by the university. But his actions raised concern among some of his players and others closely associated with Washington's program.

One former Huskies player said he smelled alcohol on Sarkisian at team meetings, an allegation that bears some resemblance to reports by USC players that their coach "didn't seem right" during a meeting Sunday morning, and statements by others close to the Trojans football program that he seemed unstable during a recent game at Arizona State.

After Sarkisian's outburst in August at USC's "Salute to Troy" event where he slurred his words, insulted opponents and added an expletive to the university's "Fight on!" rallying cry, The Times interviewed more than two dozen people knowledgeable about Sarkisian's time at Washington, and reviewed hundreds of pages of documents.

What emerged is a portrait of a man who favored Patron Silver tequila or Coors Light and frequented a handful of Seattle-area bars, typically accompanied by staff members, and didn't hesitate to drink — early — while traveling.

During a stop at a rib joint in Nashville in January 2013, for example, Sarkisian and three assistants ordered four shots of Patron Silver, four shots of an unspecified liquor and five beers. The coach cashed out at 11:53 a.m.

Some associated with Washington's football program remain unabashed supporters. But Sarkisian's use of alcohol became a running joke among some Washington players, some of whom spoke about the topic on the condition they not be named because of the personal nature of the issue.

One ex-player said that in 2009, Sarkisian's first season with the Huskies, the coach sometimes arrived at morning team meetings "smelling like booze and [with] eyes all red, like he's been on a bender."

Another former player said he smelled alcohol on Sarkisian during team meetings on "one or two" occasions and, other times, noted that the coach's eyes appeared to be bloodshot and glazed while he seemed unusually confrontational.

Two other former players said Sarkisian and other coaches regularly consumed alcohol in offices — one said the coach typically kept an 18-pack of Coors Light stashed near his desk — and that he appeared uncharacteristically loud and unsteady on some team flights.

After the August incident at USC, which Sarkisian blamed on inadvertently mixing alcohol and unspecified medication, some former Washington players didn't sound surprised.

"Coach Sark is still having fun at USC!" former Huskies tight end Michael Hartvigson wrote on Twitter at the time. He added the hashtag #ThingsHaventChanged.

Two of Sarkisian's highest-profile players at Washington, defensive lineman Danny Shelton and linebacker Shaq Thompson, both high NFL draft picks this year, joined in the social media quips.

Shelton tweeted a sarcastic #shocked hashtag in reference to the incident. Thompson responded with an emoji laughing and shedding tears.

"I would've made him run the stadium carrying a 6 pack since he wanna drink so much lol," Shelton tweeted.

The former players didn't respond to messages seeking further comment.

Despite several requests in September, USC didn't make Sarkisian available to speak with The Times about his alcohol use at Washington. Athletic Director Pat Haden said the university vetted Sarkisian extensively before hiring him as coach in December 2013.

Seattle sports radio host Dave Mahler, whose involvement in Washington's football program included hosting recruiting banquets and pregame and postgame shows, saw the August incident as part of a pattern.

"The idea that this was the first time that something like this happened for Steve Sarkisian ... it's not," Mahler said in August during his show on 950 KJR. "It's not the first time."

However, the host did not specifically say what he was referring to on air and declined to elaborate on the record to a reporter.

At least one incident during Sarkisian's time at Washington bore some similarity to what happened in August at USC.

At the Duchess Tavern in Seattle, Sarkisian jumped up on the bar, drink in hand, for a speech to dozens of former players at their annual alumni gathering the night before Washington's spring football game in 2012.

"[He] looked adrenalized, hollering what football coaches do to get their guys going," said Bill Resler, a longtime university professor who witnessed the event.

The gesture seemed to fit the moment at the neighborhood bar less than a mile from campus, but some people in the room wondered whether something more than the coach's usual enthusiasm fueled the display.

"You could tell he was in the moment, but he wouldn't have done that if he wasn't drinking," said a former player in attendance.

One of the event's organizers said Sarkisian didn't appear to be under the influence, but Resler wasn't so sure.

"When he got off the bar, he was unsteady, looked like he had been over-served, and sat down, looked a little embarrassed that he was in that state," Resler said.

When Sarkisian arrived at Washington after seven years as a USC assistant, he inherited a moribund program that was 0-12 in 2008 under straightlaced coach Tyrone Willingham. Sarkisian assembled a young, energetic staff that frequently implored the players to have fun.

More than 800 pages of receipts, hotel folios and expense reports obtained by The Times from Sarkisian's tenure at Washington show alcohol was a constant presence.

In 2011, for example, Sarkisian picked up a bill at Suncadia Resort in Cle Elum, Wash., that included 83 beers and 12 shots of Grey Goose vodka. Twenty Washington coaches and their spouses are listed as attending.

During a one-night stay at the JW Marriott at L.A. Live in May 2011 for a speaking engagement, Sarkisian's hotel folio shows room service delivered a $90 bottle of Veuve Clicquot champagne and a chocolate amenity, then six beers.

At the Arizona Biltmore in Phoenix for a Pac-12 Conference head coach meetings, Sarkisian ran up $106 in minibar charges in one day in May 2012 and spent more than $1,600 over two days at the Renaissance Indian Wells Resort and Spa's pool bar in 2013.

Two receipts from Washington retreats in Indian Wells in 2012 and 2013 showed Sarkisian expensed $1,023 worth of alcohol at a restaurant. That included 91 shots of tequila, much of it Patron Silver. At least 16 people attended one of the gatherings; the attendance for the other wasn't clear.

Even some routine trips resulted in steep bar tabs, like a one-night recruiting visit by Sarkisian to Long Beach in 2010 that included $125.01 worth of unspecified beverages in one visit to the lobby bar and $104.01 in beverages at the same establishment a few months later. Another stay, this one at the Hollywood Roosevelt hotel in July 2011, resulted in a one-day beverage tab of $170.47.

Patrons and staff recognized Sarkisian at Seattle-area establishments such as The Ram near campus, Edgewater Hotel, 520 Bar and Grill, Roanoke Inn, Joey Bellevue as well as the Duchess. He was also said to be a frequent presence at two establishments that are now closed: Citrus and Joey Lake Union.

Two former Washington players said they encountered Sarkisian at the Edgewater on Seattle's waterfront during a 2011 concert by local musician Tess Henley.

One of the players, who worked as a bartender at another establishment, said they bumped into Sarkisian and a team staffer in the packed bar. The player described the coach as "clearly ... wasted." The other player said Sarkisian hugged him, offered to buy him a drink and was "definitely drunk."

The same player said Sarkisian drank "copious amounts of Patron" amounting to "between eight and 10 shots" over several hours during weekly visits to Citrus on Lake Union.

Others around the Washington program say they saw Sarkisian drink, but never in excess or in a setting they considered inappropriate.

Erik Wilson, a former reserve quarterback, described a father-son relationship with a coach he viewed as a role model.

"He was always in complete control," Wilson said, "and I have never seen nor heard him getting out of control."

A former director of Washington's club for letter winners, John Otness, traveled to public appearances and events with Sarkisian and never noticed any concerning conduct.

"We all knew he was a Trojan at heart, but he became a Husky and made our program tick when we didn't have a lot going on," Otness said. "I never felt he was doing something another coach wouldn't do.

There is one exception. Chris Petersen, who replaced Sarkisian as Washington's coach, won't do events that involve drinking, Otness said.

Resler, who thought Sarkisian was unsteady at the 2012 event, has taught at Washington for more than 35 years. He described Sarkisian as "a perfectly nice guy" and said he became a season-ticket holder because of the coach's commitment to young people and to revitalizing the Husky football program.

Still, Resler "wasn't surprised" by Sarkisian's incident in August.

"Someone who could get over-served [here]," Resler said, "could get over-served at any function."
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on October 12, 2015, 02:40:21 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 08:38:11 PM

And I'll bet that, when he leaves, he will leave as the dean of B10 coaches.  OSU is the one who has to wonder how long their coach will be there.  Meyer has none of the glue that will keep Harbaugh at Michigan.

Fitzgerald's probably at Northwestern for the long haul.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on October 12, 2015, 02:55:55 PM
Michigan up six places to #12. Also helping Utah.  :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 12, 2015, 03:01:16 PM
"Two other former players said Sarkisian and other coaches regularly consumed alcohol in offices — one said the coach typically kept an 18-pack of Coors Light stashed near his desk — and that he appeared uncharacteristically loud and unsteady on some team flights."

Siege = Sark?  :hmm:

Siege, the armenian jew?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 12, 2015, 03:43:57 PM
Quote from: dps on October 12, 2015, 02:40:21 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 08:38:11 PM

And I'll bet that, when he leaves, he will leave as the dean of B10 coaches.  OSU is the one who has to wonder how long their coach will be there.  Meyer has none of the glue that will keep Harbaugh at Michigan.

Fitzgerald's probably at Northwestern for the long haul.

Until he flames out or doesn't flame out and so gets an irresistible contract offer.  One of those will happen in the next ten years.  NW just doesn't have the money to keep a top-level coach.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 12, 2015, 03:44:38 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 12, 2015, 02:55:55 PM
Michigan up six places to #12. Also helping Utah.  :P

Both teams have done well for the other since the opening game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on October 12, 2015, 04:50:13 PM
Sark's out at USC.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 12, 2015, 05:09:16 PM
Quote from: sbr on October 12, 2015, 04:50:13 PM
Sark's out at USC.

Least surprising firing ever.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on October 12, 2015, 09:11:05 PM
Ole Ball Coach just up and retired.  Not shocking, but surprising.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/reports--south-carolina-head-coach-steve-spurrier-plans-to-retire-012729392.html

QuoteSouth Carolina head coach Steve Spurrier has retired, according to multiple reports.
According to Gamecock Central, Spurrier informed his team and coaching staff of his decision after practice on Monday night while Football Scoop is reporting that an interim head coach will be named at 8:30 ET on Tuesday morning. Thayer Evans of Sports Illustrated was the first to report the news.

Spurrier, 70, was in his 11th season at South Carolina. He led the Gamecocks to an SEC East title in 2010 and three straight 11-win seasons from 2011 to 2013, but the team trudged to a 7-6 record in 2014 and has struggled to a 2-4 (0-4 SEC) mark through six games this season.

Overall during his tenure in Columbia, Spurrier registered an 86-49 record with a 44-40 mark in SEC play and five bowl wins. He is South Carolina's all-time winningest coach.

Before his time at South Carolina, the Head Ball Coach spent 12 years at Florida, his alma mater, where he won six SEC titles and the 1996 national championship. He also spent three seasons as the head coach at Duke and two seasons leading the Washington Redskins in 2002 and 2003.

Spurrier, who compiled a 228-89-2 overall record as a collegiate head coach, played quarterback at UF from 1963 to 1966 and won the Heisman Trophy in 1966.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on October 12, 2015, 09:23:33 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 12, 2015, 05:09:16 PM
Quote from: sbr on October 12, 2015, 04:50:13 PM
Sark's out at USC.

Least surprising firing ever.

Yeah, well ... erm ... I guess.  After not even a slap on the wrist after the Salute to Troy disaster, then starting off with a "leave of absence" yesterday I wouldn't have been fall-on-the-ground shocked if they hadn't fired Sark, but then the shit hit the fan and everyone on Twitter started telling their Drunk Sark stories and he was cooked.  There is talk that the worst hasn't even come out yet and Haden wanted to make sure he was out in front of that.

I wonder how much heat is on Haden down there.  He hired Layne Kiffin and Sark back-to-back; anyone who had any desire to know would have been able to find out about Sark's booze culture at U Dub; he let him off without anything after embarrassing the entire school at the booster/alum banquet in August.  I wouldn't be very confident in his ability to run the department given his current record so far.

I heard an incredible thing this morning, when USC and Notre Dame play on Saturday it will be the fourth consecutive meeting where USC has a new coach.

2012 - Layne Kiffin
2013 - Ed Orgeron (interim after Kiffin fired 2 games prior)
2014 - Sark
2015 - Clay Helton (interim after Sark fired 1 game prior)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 12, 2015, 09:26:22 PM
Quote from: sbr on October 12, 2015, 09:23:33 PM

I wonder how much heat is on Haden down there.  He hired Layne Kiffin and Sark back-to-back; \

He didn't hire Lane Kiffin. That was on Mike Garrett. Missing on one hire usually doesn't get an AD fired.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on October 12, 2015, 09:26:37 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 08:38:11 PM
I'm not concerned that Harbaugh is leaving any time soon.  Maybe after his parents pass, and his kids finish school, but Harbaugh and his wife have talked repeatedly about how they want their kids to grow up in Ann Arbor, and to have access to their grandparents.  We're talking ten years, minimum.  If Harbaugh wants to leave after ten years, I'll wish him well and will be confident that he'll leave the program in great shape.  He'll only leave even then for a really good NFL gig, though.

And I'll bet that, when he leaves, he will leave as the dean of B10 coaches.  OSU is the one who has to wonder how long their coach will be there.  Meyer has none of the glue that will keep Harbaugh at Michigan.

You are obviously more dialed into the situation, but I personally would be very surprised if he wasn't back in the NFL within 5 years.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on October 12, 2015, 09:30:00 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 12, 2015, 09:26:22 PM
Quote from: sbr on October 12, 2015, 09:23:33 PM

I wonder how much heat is on Haden down there.  He hired Layne Kiffin and Sark back-to-back; \

He didn't hire Lane Kiffin. That was on Mike Garrett. Missing on one hire usually doesn't get an AD fired.

Hmm, I wonder where I heard he hired Kiffin.

I agree that one miss usually doesn't get an AD fired, but that was a big, terrible and relatively unsurprising miss.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 12, 2015, 09:41:45 PM
Quote from: sbr on October 12, 2015, 09:26:37 PM

You are obviously more dialed into the situation, but I personally would be very surprised if he wasn't back in the NFL within 5 years.

I really have no clue, but I'll put in my two cents anyway. I agree with grumbles. He could have gotten a prime NFL job if he wanted it. He has coached in college and the NFL. I think he wants to coach college, and at Michigan. I hope I'm wrong because I hate agreeing with grumbler, especially when he is such a full on homer for Michigan. I hate Ohio State and Urban Meyer a lot more than Michigan, so hopefully he at least beats the shit out of them.

 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 12, 2015, 09:46:15 PM
Quote from: sbr on October 12, 2015, 09:30:00 PM

I agree that one miss usually doesn't get an AD fired, but that was a big, terrible and relatively unsurprising miss.

I don't disagree, but Foley at UF hired Ron Zook and followed it up with Urban Meyer.

Ron Zook might be the worst and most bizarre big time coaching hires of our era.

I don't really have a point in this, but any discussion of college coach hiring is likely to have me bring up Florida hiring Ron Zook, because it not only brings me great joy to reflect upon that but also genuine confusion as to how the fuck that happened.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 13, 2015, 06:43:03 AM
Quote from: sbr on October 12, 2015, 09:26:37 PM
You are obviously more dialed into the situation, but I personally would be very surprised if he wasn't back in the NFL within 5 years.

This is a very popular opinion (used to be the second-most-popular opinion, right behind "Harbaugh would never ever leave the NFL for college" but now in first), but I've never heard any rationale for it, other than "he's a competitor."  He is a competitor, but college football is competitive, too.  Plus, he is insanely "rah-rah" in his leadership, which he knows is a blessing in a college coach and generally a curse in a pro coach Carroll makes it work, somehow, but nobody else that I can think of). 

Now, Harbaugh may decide at some point that the Michigan job is "mission accomplished," and move on (back to the pros), but that seems highly unlikely in the next five years.  Why would you think Harbaugh is more likely to leave his destination job than is, say, Meyer likely to leave OSU?  Because Harbaugh has been pulled into better gigs after three or four years up to this point?  Urban Meyer left Bowling Green after two years, Utah after two years, and Florida after five years (quitting in the last case, rather than being drawn into a better job).  Meyer entered his fourth job in his eleventh year coaching, just like Harbaugh.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 13, 2015, 06:43:29 PM
Of course I am a full-on homer for Michigan!  It's my alma mater, and I grew up in Ann Arbor.

Looks like Sam Monson of ProFootballFocus is a full-on homer for Michigan, too, though he mostly does NFL analysis
QuoteJIM HARBAUGH HAS BUILT A TERRIFYING MICHIGAN DEFENSE
Here's how.

SAM MONSON | 7 HOURS AGO   

The University of Michigan is rolling right now. After suffering a Week 1 loss to Utah — a loss which is looking increasingly understandable as the weeks go by and Utah remains legit — the Wolverines have notched five straight wins. The last three have been shutouts, and they have scored 97 points while conceding none in those games. In their five-game winning streak they have outscored opponents 160-14 and haven't allowed more than one score in any of the games.

Scoring that many points is reasonably impressive, but this is college football, where points fall out of the sky and touchdowns grow on trees. What is far more impressive is the defensive display — especially notching three straight total shutouts while understanding the point just made about offensive production.

The average number of points conceded (or scored) in this week's FBS schedule was 29.5, including Michigan's shutout-featuring game. Almost all of the other games featuring single-digit scores involved bad teams with losing records, but Michigan did this to a Northwestern team that was 5-0 coming into the game and ranked higher than Michigan in the AP Top 25.

You don't need to look much further than the opening Northwestern drive to see what the Michigan defense is all about. In 34 seconds of game time they forced a three and out, showing quality play at every level of the defense.

1st down: With just six men in the box they stuffed an inside zone run, winning all across the line of scrimmage and just squeezing the holes, leaving the runner with nowhere to go.
2nd down: Jabrill Peppers covers a slant and breaks the pass up as it arrives to force an incompletion.
3rd down: Michigan brings the blitz and the pressure forces an early, off-target pass to come out (Peppers again was in tight coverage even if it had been accurate).
This was all as Michigan was already sitting on a 7-0 lead with the offense yet to take the field after the opening kickoff had been taken back to the house. Games don't begin much better than this if you're a Wolverines fan.

He has an image there that just about says it all:
(https://www.profootballfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/2015-10-12_10-55-26.jpg)

Northwestern tries a sweep, and by the time the ball carrier reaches the edge, there are five Wolverines waiting for him.  Also note #69 keeping the cutback lane closed.
QuoteThat should not happen, and does not happen with most defenses. There wasn't even a catastrophic breakdown in blocking assignments to create it. The Wolverines just read, diagnose and attack the football like a pack of hungry dogs chasing after a wayward ribeye steak.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2015/10/13/harbaugh-has-built-a-terrifying-michigan-defense/ (https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2015/10/13/harbaugh-has-built-a-terrifying-michigan-defense/)

It's great to be a Michigan Wolverine.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on October 13, 2015, 09:09:48 PM
Quote from: sbr on October 12, 2015, 09:11:05 PM
Ole Ball Coach just up and retired.  Not shocking, but surprising.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/reports--south-carolina-head-coach-steve-spurrier-plans-to-retire-012729392.html

QuoteSouth Carolina head coach Steve Spurrier has retired, according to multiple reports.
According to Gamecock Central, Spurrier informed his team and coaching staff of his decision after practice on Monday night while Football Scoop is reporting that an interim head coach will be named at 8:30 ET on Tuesday morning. Thayer Evans of Sports Illustrated was the first to report the news.

Spurrier, 70, was in his 11th season at South Carolina. He led the Gamecocks to an SEC East title in 2010 and three straight 11-win seasons from 2011 to 2013, but the team trudged to a 7-6 record in 2014 and has struggled to a 2-4 (0-4 SEC) mark through six games this season.

Overall during his tenure in Columbia, Spurrier registered an 86-49 record with a 44-40 mark in SEC play and five bowl wins. He is South Carolina's all-time winningest coach.

Before his time at South Carolina, the Head Ball Coach spent 12 years at Florida, his alma mater, where he won six SEC titles and the 1996 national championship. He also spent three seasons as the head coach at Duke and two seasons leading the Washington Redskins in 2002 and 2003.

Spurrier, who compiled a 228-89-2 overall record as a collegiate head coach, played quarterback at UF from 1963 to 1966 and won the Heisman Trophy in 1966.

Not surprised that he's retiring, but I'm a bit surprised he isn't going to finish out the season.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on October 13, 2015, 09:25:01 PM
Quote from: dps on October 13, 2015, 09:09:48 PM
Not surprised that he's retiring, but I'm a bit surprised he isn't going to finish out the season.

I thought the same.  Unless it's health related.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: jimmy olsen on October 13, 2015, 09:33:03 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 11, 2015, 08:48:50 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 11, 2015, 07:43:52 PM
Here's some stuff from 2013.  Take it for what it's worth, which isn't much other than to show that rumors did exist. http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/4114/the-official-sark-s-nights-on-the-town-thread (http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/4114/the-official-sark-s-nights-on-the-town-thread)

I believe every word there is the truth. Sark is a stud for picking up Erin Andrews. I see the winningness that Haden saw in him. However, getting other coaches to apply a plunger to his butthole while on the road allows me a glimpse into his sickness that Haden must have seen today.

I can't believe it.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 13, 2015, 09:43:40 PM
Quote from: dps on October 13, 2015, 09:09:48 PM

Not surprised that he's retiring, but I'm a bit surprised he isn't going to finish out the season.

The easy thing, and accurate thing, is to say he is quitting when the going is getting tough.

It also doesn't serve a purpose. He almost certainly doesn't want a fairwell tour while getting beat. I guarantee he doesn't want to roll into Florida, Clemson, and Tennessee a heavy underdog that gets beat down. It also doesn't help South Carolina to have an old retiring coach hanging around.

I remember when he went to the NFL from Florida. After the season he just up and quit without warning. I don't think he had an NFL job lined up, but he knew he would get one. He said it did no one any good to drag the process out, and he had a point.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 14, 2015, 09:32:02 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 13, 2015, 09:25:01 PM
Quote from: dps on October 13, 2015, 09:09:48 PM
Not surprised that he's retiring, but I'm a bit surprised he isn't going to finish out the season.

I thought the same.  Unless it's health related.

That's what I thought of, as well.  There must be a reason he can't finish.

Interesting that speculation has Dantonio as one of the candidates.  I'd have thought SC was tired of old coaches.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 14, 2015, 09:50:17 AM
Quote from: grumbler on October 14, 2015, 09:32:02 AM
I'd have thought SC was tired of old coaches.

The Holtz / Spurrier years are the golden era of South Carolina football.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 14, 2015, 09:51:22 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 14, 2015, 09:50:17 AM
Quote from: grumbler on October 14, 2015, 09:32:02 AM
I'd have thought SC was tired of old coaches.

The Holtz / Spurrier years are the golden era of South Carolina football.

I hear Mack Brown is available.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on October 14, 2015, 09:52:15 AM
Good timing on Rich Rod dropping a couple critical Pac-12 games.

Surely they don't want some coach who just lost any chance at winning the Pac-12 south...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on October 14, 2015, 03:51:07 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 14, 2015, 09:32:02 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 13, 2015, 09:25:01 PM
Quote from: dps on October 13, 2015, 09:09:48 PM
Not surprised that he's retiring, but I'm a bit surprised he isn't going to finish out the season.

I thought the same.  Unless it's health related.

That's what I thought of, as well.  There must be a reason he can't finish.

Interesting that speculation has Dantonio as one of the candidates.  I'd have thought SC was tired of old coaches.

I'm not sure what this means, or even if it's accurate, but I heard on the radio today that he didn't retire, as was first reported, but instead resigned.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 14, 2015, 04:09:47 PM
Quote from: dps on October 14, 2015, 03:51:07 PM

I'm not sure what this means, or even if it's accurate, but I heard on the radio today that he didn't retire, as was first reported, but instead resigned.

He said he might coach as a coordinator in high school. Which would be awesome.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 15, 2015, 10:13:49 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 14, 2015, 04:09:47 PM
Quote from: dps on October 14, 2015, 03:51:07 PM

I'm not sure what this means, or even if it's accurate, but I heard on the radio today that he didn't retire, as was first reported, but instead resigned.

He said he might coach as a coordinator in high school. Which would be awesome.

He said he hadn't retired, but was not likely to head coach again.

I'm starting to think that it was recruiting, not play on the field, that governed his timing here.  He hated recruiting and this year that was really showing.  By saying "fuck it, I quit" now, he doesn't leave the school scrambling to find a coach while the recruits are committing to places with less uncertainty surrounding them.  By the time recruits are finalizing their decisions, they will know who their coach will be.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on October 15, 2015, 11:40:57 AM
I took it as a big F you to SC.  He knew he would be fired after the season, and said ' you think someone else can do better? Go for it'
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Malthus on October 15, 2015, 11:45:47 AM
Heh, just learned that my 9 year old niece in Iowa is now a cheerleader; also, that they have a cheerleading section of girls that young doing cheerleading at university football games. All of which struck me as slightly strange.  :huh:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 15, 2015, 11:49:31 AM
Quote from: Malthus on October 15, 2015, 11:45:47 AM
Heh, just learned that my 9 year old niece in Iowa is now a cheerleader; also, that they have a cheerleading section of girls that young doing cheerleading at university football games. All of which struck me as slightly strange.  :huh:

Nah they are just involving the community. The football program probably has football camps for kids as well.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on October 15, 2015, 12:33:29 PM
Quote from: sbr on October 15, 2015, 11:40:57 AM
I took it as a big F you to SC.  He knew he would be fired after the season, and said ' you think someone else can do better? Go for it'

I dunno, he may have done enough to earn one shitty season grace period.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 15, 2015, 12:36:23 PM
Yeah, I'm not convinced South Carolina was going to shitcan the coach with the most wins all time in school history after his first losing season.

E:  They should hire Mack.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 15, 2015, 12:49:13 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on October 15, 2015, 12:33:29 PM
Quote from: sbr on October 15, 2015, 11:40:57 AM
I took it as a big F you to SC.  He knew he would be fired after the season, and said ' you think someone else can do better? Go for it'

I dunno, he may have done enough to earn one shitty season grace period.

I doubt he would have been fired, but Spurrier would be flirting with the death spiral where negativity about the coach keeps the team from being able to recruit effectively. I doubt he wanted to deal with that.

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 15, 2015, 12:50:59 PM
True but it does suggest he did not do it to say F you to SC.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on October 15, 2015, 12:52:16 PM
Yeah, Spurrier isn't exactly a "up and coming' coach - a terrible season isn't something you can chalk up to rebuilding or something.

Leaving now is kind of odd, but largely understandable. He has always coached on his own terms, and I respect him for that - I don't think sticking it out to the end of the season would have been better for USC, or for Spurrier, so why do it?

Indeed, if he was just looking out for No 1, he would have stayed, collected his paychecks, and then some negotiated buy out at the end of the year.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 16, 2015, 12:11:33 PM
Gentlemen I bring sad news. Bevo XIV, the beloved mascot for the University of Texas since 2004, has passed away. :cry:

He was a Bevo of legend.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 16, 2015, 12:39:42 PM
Quote from: Berkut on October 15, 2015, 12:52:16 PM
Yeah, Spurrier isn't exactly a "up and coming' coach - a terrible season isn't something you can chalk up to rebuilding or something.


There seems to be this myth that a the formula "Quality of Coach * Quality of Program = Number of Wins Per Season".

There is a lot of randomness that isn't appreciated. You miss on a couple of QBs in recruiting, maybe have some arrests, and a bad year will happen to the best coaches.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 16, 2015, 01:02:37 PM
Well unless you are Bobby Bowden between the years of 1987 and 2000.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 16, 2015, 01:21:23 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 16, 2015, 01:02:37 PM
Well unless you are Bobby Bowden between the years of 1987 and 2000.

Actually, look at the QBs Bowden had in that era. Brad Johnson, Danny Kanell, Peter Tom Willis, Charlie Ward, Chris Wienke...the difference between 2000 and 2001 was that he went from Chris Weinke to Chris Rix.

It also helped having a first tier program in a second tier conference with a bunch of recruiting rivals in chaos/probation.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 16, 2015, 01:24:04 PM
Poor Casey Weldon. Nobody remembers him.

Chris Rix was the very model of a mediocre QB.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 16, 2015, 02:21:46 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 16, 2015, 01:24:04 PM
Chris Rix was the very model of a mediocre QB.

He was not mediocre. He was really bad. A program destroying player.

Physically, enormously talented. Started as a freshman. I remember telling people, "shit, he sucks now because he doesn't know what he is doing, but once he figures it out he is going to be unstoppable." Thing is, he never got smarter.

2001-2005 is a long time to have a starter that never figures out the position at QB. By that time the program had deteriorated.

I have two favorite memories with Chris Rix:

-playing in Miami, in classic Chris Rix fashion with not much sense, around midfield he scrambles and goes airborne for some unknown reason. The Miami guy goes for his legs and flips him over, and Rix lands on his head. The crowd cheers. Chris Rix starts jogging to the sideline, I think it was 3rd down and FSU needed to punt, and he suddenly collapses. The crowd lets out a much more massive cheer.
-During the Chris Rix era, Miami and FSU played in the Orange Bowl, so they met 5 times. As Chris Rix lost the last meeting, the camera showed Chris Rix and had the note on the screen, "Chris Rix - first starting quarterback in NCAA history to lose to the same team 5 times".
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on October 16, 2015, 06:13:54 PM
Stanford's Kevin Hogan just beat ucla for the fifth time last night
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 16, 2015, 06:24:54 PM
Quote from: sbr on October 16, 2015, 06:13:54 PM
Stanford's Kevin Hogan just beat ucla for the fifth time last night

The anti chris rix.

Another thing I remember from the Chris Rix era...I was consuming a lot of college football related to media, and thus saw a lot of Bowden interviews. Early in Chris Rix's career, Bowden would make the point that Rix was just a freshman, and as a California guy adopting to a very different culture while learning to be a college student and FSU QB. Grossman from Indiana was the UF QB at the time, and he frequently made the statement

"Our guy is from California, and their guy is from Indiana, and those places are so different than here, it is like coming from another country."

Only one time he was giving an interview and I guess he slipped up telling the same dumb line for the 100th time, and said something like:

"Our guy is from California, and there guy is from Indiana, those guys came from another country."

There were headlines, "Bobby Bowden thinks that California and Indiana are different countries."

:lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 16, 2015, 08:34:28 PM
I am sure there is some FCS QB out there who went 6-0 or something against some archrival they kept meeting in the playoffs.

But that is pretty awesome.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on October 17, 2015, 12:26:34 PM
Those football playoff adds with the Dr Pepper vendor must be the most annoying commercials ever.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on October 17, 2015, 12:48:41 PM
Not unless he's started shouting "Directly to the forehead!" repeatedly.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 17, 2015, 12:54:25 PM
Best Gameday sign:
https://twitter.com/CollegeGameDay/status/655388555959795712/photo/1 (https://twitter.com/CollegeGameDay/status/655388555959795712/photo/1)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on October 17, 2015, 02:48:55 PM
Hmm.  Figured today would be a reality check for Memphis.  Turned out not to be much of one.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 17, 2015, 04:15:35 PM
Quote from: dps on October 17, 2015, 02:48:55 PM
Hmm.  Figured today would be a reality check for Memphis.  Turned out not to be much of one.

That's not amazing, more like astonishing.  How did they get so good?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 17, 2015, 04:17:30 PM
And, of course, the worst call in college sports:  the ejection for  targeting on Michigan's Joe Bolden.  The offensive lineman was holding him, and basically threw him onto Cook.  And the penalty goes against Boden.  What a shit call, and a shit job of video reviewing.  Look at the videos.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 17, 2015, 04:41:48 PM
I don't want to brag or anything, but WINLESS Wyoming is up 21-7 at the half.


Of course, they will lose, but still - WYOMING WINS THE FIRST HALF!!!!
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 17, 2015, 04:42:49 PM
Ok Memphis to the Big 12! :P

Man the refs really want Michigan to score a TD here  :lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 17, 2015, 04:56:08 PM
The classy Michigan fanbase being infiltrated by douchebag Pats fans:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F15%2F10%2F17%2F3ce64ce9093744b8bd836280a017a914.jpg&hash=384c32beb48a6d690d7cd85ecf92194af1b3e37d)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 17, 2015, 05:13:19 PM
Wyoming is somehow leading by three TDs in the 3rd quarter.  I don't know what to think.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 17, 2015, 05:16:09 PM
Quote from: PDH on October 17, 2015, 05:13:19 PM
Wyoming is somehow leading in the 3rd quarter.  I don't know what to think.

Fire Nevada's coach!

Seriously hang in there Pokes.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 17, 2015, 05:25:42 PM
K-State is making UT's loss to TCU look competitive.

Watch them beat Texas next week :bleeding:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 17, 2015, 05:56:05 PM
Wyoming now leads 28-21 with 6 and a half left in the 4th...I somehow feel the boys will find a way to lose.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 17, 2015, 06:14:52 PM
Fucking victory formation!
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 17, 2015, 06:16:06 PM
1-6 never seemed sweeter.  Jesus, Wyoming DOES avoid an 0-12 season.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 17, 2015, 06:21:17 PM
OMFG

E:  (https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fv0UfSTE.jpg&hash=d3acbbdf63642d6d7bd2d9848b6e92b0047703c3)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 17, 2015, 06:40:06 PM
I'm sorry Grumbler.  The football gods had to use up so much karma to let Wyoming win...

I feel bad now.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 17, 2015, 06:40:51 PM
Fuck that was not what I wanted. Stupid Sparty.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Kleves on October 17, 2015, 06:45:25 PM
Awesome finish. Though I do feel bad for the poor punter.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 17, 2015, 07:24:59 PM
That was Miracle in the Meadowlands type shit. Un-fucking believable.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 17, 2015, 07:34:22 PM
Sparty's hero has a busted hip.  Had to be carted off the field, apparently.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on October 17, 2015, 07:47:05 PM
Had to see what all the hoopla was about, so after googling the Mich/St ending I got a link to this, which I had never heard of before.

The one point "try safety."

http://deadspin.com/5973048/only-two-one-point-safeties-have-ever-happened-in-ncaa-football-history-and-brad-nessler-called-them-both
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on October 17, 2015, 08:20:29 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on October 17, 2015, 07:34:22 PM
Sparty's hero has a busted hip.  Had to be carted off the field, apparently.

Dislocation only. Thank god.


Buckeyes black uniforms look like crap.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Ed Anger on October 17, 2015, 08:42:42 PM
I like the Buckeye Waffen SS uniforms.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 17, 2015, 09:50:44 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 17, 2015, 07:47:05 PM
Had to see what all the hoopla was about, so after googling the Mich/St ending I got a link to this, which I had never heard of before.

The one point "try safety."

http://deadspin.com/5973048/only-two-one-point-safeties-have-ever-happened-in-ncaa-football-history-and-brad-nessler-called-them-both

Yeah they had one of those in the Texas A&M-Texas game back in like 2002 or something.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 17, 2015, 10:13:18 PM
Quote from: PDH on October 17, 2015, 06:40:06 PM
I'm sorry Grumbler.  The football gods had to use up so much karma to let Wyoming win...

I feel bad now.

It was a game Michigan should have won, but Cook was just too "on" with his throws. As a consolation, I still look like a genius for having called this (and the Utah loss, and the four victories) before the start of the season, which means my predicted M win over OSU is going to come true, as well.  This year is pretty much identical in trajectory to Bo's first campaign in 1969 (he lost to MSU halfway through the season, too).
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on October 17, 2015, 10:16:08 PM
Another targeting ejection. They're going a bit crazy with those.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on October 17, 2015, 11:42:48 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 17, 2015, 10:16:08 PM
Another targeting ejection. They're going a bit crazy with those.

The way the targeting rule works irritates me.  Too many of the targeting infractions happen when the defender is set up to hit the ball carrier in the midsection, but then the ball carrier lowers his head.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 18, 2015, 12:19:29 AM
Quote from: dps on October 17, 2015, 11:42:48 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 17, 2015, 10:16:08 PM
Another targeting ejection. They're going a bit crazy with those.

The way the targeting rule works irritates me.  Too many of the targeting infractions happen when the defender is set up to hit the ball carrier in the midsection, but then the ball carrier lowers his head.

"Target—to take aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with an apparent intent that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball."

http://www.afca.com/article/article.php?id=2342

I wonder if at some point a player doesn't sue a conference for slander or libel for applying the targeting rule and upholding it after the game. So many times it seems like the players being ejected are hitting players that are dropping their own heads, resulting in contact.

The rule as written is basically accusing a player called for the infraction of illegally trying to cause serious injury to the opponent, and I don't think that in a lot of the calls that is really the case.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on October 18, 2015, 05:38:33 AM
Georgia narrowly keeps alive its shot at getting pulverized by LSU or Alabama(again). Yay.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on October 18, 2015, 08:30:21 AM
It's amazing the difference a talented healthy QB can make.  Adams finally played like the stud play maker he was up at Eastern Washington and led the Ducks to their 12 win in a row against the puppies up in Seattle.

At least the second half of the season has the potential to be interesting now, even though a Pac-12 North title is mostly out the window.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on October 18, 2015, 08:35:42 AM
Did anyone see Owusu's catch Thursday night?

http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/93199/stanford-still-in-disbelief-after-francis-owusus-spectacular-catch
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 18, 2015, 08:52:05 AM
Quote from: sbr on October 18, 2015, 08:35:42 AM
Did anyone see Owusu's catch Thursday night?

http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/93199/stanford-still-in-disbelief-after-francis-owusus-spectacular-catch

Its funny hearing Tessitore and Palmer declare it the play of the week. Not this week...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 24, 2015, 02:53:34 PM
I've felt a great disturbance in the force. As if millions thousands hundreds dozens of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. I feel something terrible has happened.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 24, 2015, 04:26:06 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 24, 2015, 02:53:34 PM
I've felt a great disturbance in the force. As if millions thousands hundreds dozens of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. I feel something terrible has happened.

The Miami alumni were sure all over twitter. I won't be surprised if the big story later today is Miami looking for the next Schnellenberger.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 24, 2015, 04:27:14 PM
Well Texas beat K-State in a very wet game. It was kind of fun since nobody wanted to sit down, because their pants would get soaked. Everybody had to keep moving because it was cold. So the crowd was rocking. Pity the stadium was only half full.

3-4. Iowa State and Kansas are must wins coming up.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 24, 2015, 07:30:38 PM
i recently ran across a couple of videos by John U. Bacon that I thought worth sharing here.  They describe the quintessential Bo Schembechler, which i believe was the quintessential  "old school football."  Woody and Bear could easily be substituted for Bo here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WXJMEuxkZE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WXJMEuxkZE)
and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FuYSFCI-Cc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FuYSFCI-Cc)

Worth your time.  John U. Bacon is the guy I mentioned during the UM coaching search as The Guy Who Knew.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 12:49:18 AM
Wherever Rocky Horror is, I hope he was watching his team tonight.  :cheers:

Is Washington State actually a quality side? After losing to a FCS school to start the season  :huh:, they have gone 5-1. I hesitate to bring this up, because I'm really not trying to troll berkut at the moment, but with them playing Stanford next week, it might be the last time I can bring it up for a while.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 10:52:29 AM
They have the Pirate. They should always be feared.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on October 25, 2015, 10:53:12 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 12:49:18 AM

Is Washington State actually a quality side?

Probably not.  Look who those wins have come against:  a Rutgers team in disarray, a really bad Wyoming team, the worst Oregon team in years (though Oregon isn't exactly bad, just "meh"), an Oregon State team that hasn't won a conference game, and an Arizona team that has been very inconsistent.  By my count, that's 3 wins over bad teams and 2 wins over mediocre teams, and the only wins that weren't close were against the 2 worst teams they played.  That doesn't really say "quality" to me.  Despite their record, they didn't receive a single vote in last week's AP poll, and IMO they shouldn't this week either.  My opinion on that wouldn't change if they had beaten Portland State and were 6-1 instead of 5-2.  Now, if they were to beat Stanford next week, that changes things.  At that point, their resume would be about as good as most teams in the lower half of the top 25.

On a completely different note, did anyone else see the VT-Duke game?  Terrible, terrible clock management by the Hokies at the end of regulation.  They got the ball with 1:04 left, and only managed to get off 3 plays and then try a 67 yard FG.  Even worse, of the 3 plays they ran, 1 resulted in a 1st down, stopping the clock, and one was an incomplete pass that also stopped the clock, and they had a time out left that they never used.  Given just decent clock management, they should have been able to run at least 3 more plays, potentially giving them a much more reasonable field goal attempt to win it.

Granted, it they were tied, not trailing, so they knew that as long as they didn't turn it over, they were at worst going to OT, but I can't see any reason not to make more of an effort to win in regulation, especially when you're the underdog.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 12:43:38 PM
I am wondering when somebody in the PAC 12 is going to decide they want to be good. Each school has flirted a bit with the idea and decided in the negative.

I guess Stanford is the last hope for a playoff appearance for the league this year.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on October 25, 2015, 12:46:22 PM
The Wyoming game was on ESPN. :)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 12:48:08 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 25, 2015, 12:46:22 PM
The Wyoming game was on ESPN. :)

I watched the first half it was...well...actually I am just not going to say anything.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 03:17:20 PM
Quote from: dps on October 25, 2015, 10:53:12 AM


Probably not.  Look who those wins have come against:  a Rutgers team in disarray, a really bad Wyoming team, the worst Oregon team in years (though Oregon isn't exactly bad, just "meh"), an Oregon State team that hasn't won a conference game, and an Arizona team that has been very inconsistent.  By my count, that's 3 wins over bad teams and 2 wins over mediocre teams, and the only wins that weren't close were against the 2 worst teams they played.  That doesn't really say "quality" to me.  Despite their record, they didn't receive a single vote in last week's AP poll, and IMO they shouldn't this week either.  My opinion on that wouldn't change if they had beaten Portland State and were 6-1 instead of 5-2.  Now, if they were to beat Stanford next week, that changes things.  At that point, their resume would be about as good as most teams in the lower half of the top 25.

Fair enough. They got 2 votes this time. I haven't seen them play at all this year, but when I saw they lost to Portland State in the first week of the season I thought "Uh Oh, looks like the pirate may soon walk the plank." This is way better than expected.

QuoteOn a completely different note, did anyone else see the VT-Duke game?  Terrible, terrible clock management by the Hokies at the end of regulation.  They got the ball with 1:04 left, and only managed to get off 3 plays and then try a 67 yard FG.  Even worse, of the 3 plays they ran, 1 resulted in a 1st down, stopping the clock, and one was an incomplete pass that also stopped the clock, and they had a time out left that they never used.  Given just decent clock management, they should have been able to run at least 3 more plays, potentially giving them a much more reasonable field goal attempt to win it.

Granted, it they were tied, not trailing, so they knew that as long as they didn't turn it over, they were at worst going to OT, but I can't see any reason not to make more of an effort to win in regulation, especially when you're the underdog.

This really should be the season old coaches who time has passed by must face the reaper. It has already seen the demise of Spurrier, Edsall, and O'Leary. Beamer should be on the list too.

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on October 25, 2015, 03:42:10 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 12:48:08 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 25, 2015, 12:46:22 PM
The Wyoming game was on ESPN. :)

I watched the first half it was...well...actually I am just not going to say anything.

Hey now!  Wyoming only lost 34-14!
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Ed Anger on October 25, 2015, 06:43:09 PM
Goodbye Al Golden.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 06:49:36 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 24, 2015, 04:26:06 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 24, 2015, 02:53:34 PM
I've felt a great disturbance in the force. As if millions thousands hundreds dozens of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. I feel something terrible has happened.

The Miami alumni were sure all over twitter. I won't be surprised if the big story later today is Miami looking for the next Schnellenberger.

What I meant is I wouldn't be surprised if the big story later Sunday is Miami looking for the next Schnellenberger.

Hey any Miami recruits want to play for Charlie Strong?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 06:53:00 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on October 25, 2015, 06:43:09 PM
Goodbye Al Golden.

Praise Jesus.

I almost felt bad for the guy. Basically everyone wanted him fired at the end of last year. Then this season has been such a clusterfuck, it has to be incredibly difficult to live in Miami when no one likes you. He doesn't have ties to the school or to South Florida, so he doesn't really have a support base to lean on. I'd watch his recent press conferences just to see if he was going to be able to keep a brave face up. Firing him was probably part mercy killing.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Ed Anger on October 25, 2015, 06:56:05 PM
I watched that game against Clemson and I was feeling sorry for the U. A team I never liked. Other than watching that bit about the cotton bowl against Texas in that 30 for 30 film.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on October 25, 2015, 06:59:10 PM
Not too many Schnellenbergers out there.  But Miami doesn't really need another Schellenberger--the program doesn't need to be totally rebuilt the way it was when Schnellenberger got there.  They'd probably be happy enough with another Jimmy Johnson.

George O'Leary retired at UCF, so it you're a coach who'd like to live in Florida, Miami isn't the only HC job open there.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 07:03:24 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 06:49:36 PM

Hey any Miami recruits want to play for Charlie Strong?

Well, I was starting to reply that you probably don't want them, understandably recruiting is kind of meh at this point, and the committed guys were either really stupid to think that Golden wouldn't get fired or were just committed to the U regardless of the coach. Most of the really top guys that have committed are going to the Gators or Noles.

But then I checked out Texas, who is way down the rankings. Either Strong is struggling to recruit, or he is enabling recruits to hold off until the end to announce their commitments.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 07:08:37 PM
Quote from: dps on October 25, 2015, 06:59:10 PM
Not too many Schnellenbergers out there.  But Miami doesn't really need another Schellenberger--the program doesn't need to be totally rebuilt the way it was when Schnellenberger got there.  They'd probably be happy enough with another Jimmy Johnson.


Wait a second. :P

Jimmy Johnson started in 1984. His first year the team was kind of meh, like 7-5, with one of the losses being the Hail Flutie.

His second year the team was better, they lost the Sugar Bowl to Tennessee.

1986 was an 11-1 juggernaut: the team that lost to Penn State in the Fiesta.

1987 was undefeated national champs.

1988 was 11-1, with the loss being to Notre Dame 31-30 with really poor officiating that got a critical call egregiously wrong at the end.

He departed that season, and the team he left behind won the 1989 and 1991 national titles.

Jimmy Johnson is the gold standard of UM coaches. I think most fans would put him ahead of Schnelly, though those guys are clearly 1 & 2.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on October 25, 2015, 07:18:42 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 07:08:37 PM
Quote from: dps on October 25, 2015, 06:59:10 PM
Not too many Schnellenbergers out there.  But Miami doesn't really need another Schellenberger--the program doesn't need to be totally rebuilt the way it was when Schnellenberger got there.  They'd probably be happy enough with another Jimmy Johnson.


Wait a second. :P

Jimmy Johnson started in 1984. His first year the team was kind of meh, like 7-5, with one of the losses being the Hail Flutie.

His second year the team was better, they lost the Sugar Bowl to Tennessee.

1986 was an 11-1 juggernaut: the team that lost to Penn State in the Fiesta.

1987 was undefeated national champs.

1988 was 11-1, with the loss being to Notre Dame 31-30 with really poor officiating that got a critical call egregiously wrong at the end.

He departed that season, and the team he left behind won the 1989 and 1991 national titles.

Jimmy Johnson is the gold standard of UM coaches. I think most fans would put him ahead of Schnelly, though those guys are clearly 1 & 2.

Johnson may have had a better overall record, but he took over a much stronger program than Schnellenberger.  Pre-Schnellenberger, the team was so bad, they considered shutting down the program.  Obviously, you're in a better position than I am to speak for the fans, but from outside, it's clear that Schnellenberger built the program and Johnson just maintained and improved it.  Not that the latter isn't impressive;  after all, lots of guys have taken over good programs and seen them slip on their watch.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 07:37:13 PM
Quote from: dps on October 25, 2015, 07:18:42 PM
Johnson may have had a better overall record, but he took over a much stronger program than Schnellenberger.  Pre-Schnellenberger, the team was so bad, they considered shutting down the program.  Obviously, you're in a better position than I am to speak for the fans, but from outside, it's clear that Schnellenberger built the program and Johnson just maintained and improved it.  Not that the latter isn't impressive;  after all, lots of guys have taken over good programs and seen them slip on their watch.

Yeah, that is basically the crux of it.

If you look at the team's history though, it wasn't that bad pre Schnellenberger--the 70s were not great, but prior to that the program was at parity if not a bit ahead of UF and FSU. What was killing Miami and the reason they were considering shutting down the program was a problem that continues to exist today: lack of fan support. (of course it was dramatically worse before the program had so much success)

Miami has had two runs of greatness that the fan base associates itself with: the late 80s/early 90s, and the late 90s/early 2000s.

The first stretch was all Jimmy Johnson. Schnellenberger won a national title, but it was a bit flukey--the team went into the game against Nebraska heavy underdogs and ranked #4. The team won 3 that were clearly not flukes under Johnson and Dennis Erickson, but Dennis Erickson doesn't get much love since the program was in a constant decline on his watch as the Jimmy Johnson players ran out.

No coach gets great love for the second run, since Butch Davis built the juggernaut, but went to the NFL before the title and Larry Coker got the national title but suffered from Dennis Erickson syndrome on steroids.

Schnellenberger definitely laid the foundation. In the pantheon of Miami coaches, it is definitely Johnson and Schellenberger in some order of #1 and #2.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 08:00:47 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 07:03:24 PM
But then I checked out Texas, who is way down the rankings. Either Strong is struggling to recruit, or he is enabling recruits to hold off until the end to announce their commitments.

This is just how he recruits. He gets his commitments really late. He encourages guys to look around and commit late. I expect another top 10 recruiting class when all is said and done.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 08:02:53 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 07:37:13 PM
No coach gets great love for the second run, since Butch Davis built the juggernaut, but went to the NFL before the title and Larry Coker got the national title but suffered from Dennis Erickson syndrome on steroids.

I wonder if Butch would make a different decision if he had to do it all over again.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 25, 2015, 08:05:19 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 08:00:47 PM
This is just how he recruits. He gets his commitments really late. He encourages guys to look around and commit late. I expect another top 10 recruiting class when all is said and done.

He's pretty much the exact opposite of Mack.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 08:51:25 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 08:02:53 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 07:37:13 PM
No coach gets great love for the second run, since Butch Davis built the juggernaut, but went to the NFL before the title and Larry Coker got the national title but suffered from Dennis Erickson syndrome on steroids.

I wonder if Butch would make a different decision if he had to do it all over again.

When he left Miami, there were probably issues that would have the NCAA come back. His stint at North Carolina totally melted down in NCAA chaos. Not sure how well he would last as a long term college coach, which might be a consideration when thinking about rehiring him.  :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on October 25, 2015, 09:57:29 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 07:08:37 PM
1986 was an 11-1 juggernaut: the team that lost to Penn State in the Fiesta.


Heh. Wasn't that the camo douchebag bowl?  :lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 10:42:43 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 25, 2015, 09:57:29 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 07:08:37 PM
1986 was an 11-1 juggernaut: the team that lost to Penn State in the Fiesta.


Heh. Wasn't that the camo douchebag bowl?  :lol:

That was awesome. :)

Penn State obviously won the game 14-10, but it was one of those games that if they played a dozen times, Penn State would probably only win that one. Miami outgained Penn State 445-162, and had 22 first downs vs. 8 for Penn State. The difference was that Miami turned the ball over 7 times. Testaverde kept audibling into plays during which he would throw interceptions, Jimmy Johnson told him to stop audibling, but Testaverde kept audibling and throwing interceptions anyway. From what I understand they have basically refused to speak after the game, blaming each other for the debacle.

Lots of Miami fans have noted that Al Golden played for Penn State during that era. There was the whole "Paterno versus Johnson" aspect to the game with the sportsmanlike Nittany Lions contrasting with the camo geared thugs from Miami. Hiring Al Golden has been complained about as the Miami administration trying to transplant the Penn State culture onto Miami. During this last offseason there was a photographer that did some shots with the team and a number of them involved faux gay poses with the Miami players. Those pictures were not only contrasted with the camo pictures in how the players are presented to the world, but also have gotten some unfortunate remarks about the Sandusky / Penn State influence making its way into the program.  :lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 10:45:17 PM
Yeah well we sure know now who the real outlaw program was.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 10:50:54 PM
Four years ago Texas A&M hoped to return to the rankings when they hired the head coach of the undefeated Houston Cougars.

Four years later Texas A&M is still unranked and the Houston Cougars are still undefeated. Maybe it was just Houston and Texas A&M and not the coach?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 25, 2015, 11:01:39 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 10:50:54 PM
Four years ago Texas A&M hoped to return to the rankings when they hired the head coach of the undefeated Houston Cougars.

Four years later Texas A&M is still unranked and the Houston Cougars are still undefeated. Maybe it was just Houston and Texas A&M and not the coach?

:lol:

According to the Sagarin Projections, aTm would be about a half point favorite if they met on a neutral field.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 25, 2015, 11:37:05 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 25, 2015, 10:50:54 PM
the undefeated Houston Cougars.

Houston got skullfucked by Larry Fedora's Southern Miss team in the C-USA championship game that year.  That was a helluva game.  They would have gone to the Fiesta Bowl or something like that if they had won. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on October 26, 2015, 02:07:28 PM
With Arizona kind of imploding this year, I am wondering how Rich Rod is going to weather this - for now, I am guessing he is very safe. Arizona has been bad for a long time, so winning the Pac-12 south last year gives him a lot of room for error. Or at least some room for error.

I am wondering if there won't be a lot of pressure to ditch the 335 and Casteel though - which would be ironic considering NOT having Casteel is supposedly one of the reasons he could not succeed at Michigan...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 26, 2015, 02:44:38 PM
Quote from: Berkut on October 26, 2015, 02:07:28 PM
I am wondering if there won't be a lot of pressure to ditch the 335 and Casteel though - which would be ironic considering NOT having Casteel is supposedly one of the reasons he could not succeed at Michigan...

I have a hunch he will never go for that. RR has his offense and his 335 defense. Pressuring a coach to switch assistants is one thing, but their core coaching philosophy is another.

I know it would be hard to quantify because there are usually euphemisms when assistants are pushed out, but it would really be interesting to see the future outcomes when a head coach is pushed into staff changes. My guess is that rarely are changes made that result in the program taking off and everyone living happily ever after.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on October 26, 2015, 02:47:41 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 26, 2015, 02:44:38 PM
Quote from: Berkut on October 26, 2015, 02:07:28 PM
I am wondering if there won't be a lot of pressure to ditch the 335 and Casteel though - which would be ironic considering NOT having Casteel is supposedly one of the reasons he could not succeed at Michigan...

I have a hunch he will never go for that. RR has his offense and his 335 defense. Pressuring a coach to switch assistants is one thing, but their core coaching philosophy is another.

I know it would be hard to quantify because there are usually euphemisms when assistants are pushed out, but it would really be interesting to see the future outcomes when a head coach is pushed into staff changes. My guess is that rarely are changes made that result in the program taking off and everyone living happily ever after.

Yeah, that is actually a pretty good point.

That doesn't seem like a formula for anything but eventual failure.

If RR decides that it is time to retire the 335, he can do so himself in some fashion. Trying to force the issue cannot really have a good outcome. At best, it just means he starts listening to those east coast schools who are calling.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 26, 2015, 05:12:22 PM
Vegas has released odds on the next Miami coach:

Butch Davis - 7/4
Mario Cristobal - 7/2
Rob Chudzinski - 5/1
Justin Fuente - 11/2
Greg Schiano - 8/1
Doc Holliday - 8/1
Frank Wilson - 9/1
Tom Herman - 9/1
Tommy Tuberville - 10/1

http://lsu.247sports.com/Bolt/Las-Vegas-releases-odds-for-next-Miami-coach-40570253

Butch!!!!

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on October 26, 2015, 07:13:17 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 26, 2015, 05:12:22 PM
Doc Holliday - 8/1

That would be OK with me.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 26, 2015, 07:48:23 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on October 26, 2015, 07:13:17 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 26, 2015, 05:12:22 PM
Doc Holliday - 8/1

That would be OK with me.

But what would derspeiss think?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on October 26, 2015, 08:34:39 PM
He probably roots for the Clantons.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 26, 2015, 09:01:48 PM
Quote from: Berkut on October 26, 2015, 02:47:41 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 26, 2015, 02:44:38 PM
I have a hunch he will never go for that. RR has his offense and his 335 defense. Pressuring a coach to switch assistants is one thing, but their core coaching philosophy is another.

I know it would be hard to quantify because there are usually euphemisms when assistants are pushed out, but it would really be interesting to see the future outcomes when a head coach is pushed into staff changes. My guess is that rarely are changes made that result in the program taking off and everyone living happily ever after.

Yeah, that is actually a pretty good point.

That doesn't seem like a formula for anything but eventual failure.

If RR decides that it is time to retire the 335, he can do so himself in some fashion. Trying to force the issue cannot really have a good outcome. At best, it just means he starts listening to those east coast schools who are calling.

One of the ironies is that Michigan's elite defense this year is a 3-3-5 defense.  That's the scheme they have the players* for, so that's what Harbaugh and Durkin are running.  I'd give the 3-3-5 some time to recruit for before scrapping it.  If Casteel is making a mistake, it's probably not recruiting the right guys for the line.  He always preferred smaller, faster guys, and that's not what Michigan has, so he's probably doing it a bit wrong.

*Jabrill Peppers as the HSP makes a big difference, admittedly
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on October 26, 2015, 09:08:17 PM
I would say that losing Scooby Wright in the first game probaby doesn't help things much.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 26, 2015, 09:18:37 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on October 26, 2015, 07:13:17 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on October 26, 2015, 05:12:22 PM
Doc Holliday - 8/1

That would be OK with me.

The only thing he will find at Miami will be his tombstone.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 26, 2015, 09:20:45 PM
Quote from: Berkut on October 26, 2015, 09:08:17 PM
I would say that losing Scooby Wright in the first game probaby doesn't help things much.

It was fated.  The guy wins the Nagursky Trophy as a sophomore.  Where can he go but down from there?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 28, 2015, 10:01:40 AM
Wait there is a Big 12 game on Thursday night? In know TCU and WV recently were in conferences that did that on a regular basis but it sure is weird. Or at least I cannot remember the last time that happened.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 28, 2015, 11:18:51 AM
Minnesota's Jerry Kill retires effective immediately, for health reasons. 
QuoteCoach Kill announced today that he is retiring effective immediately due to health reasons. Tracy Claeys has been named interim head coach.

You gotta know this is something bad and immediate, given that Minny plays to defend The Jug on Saturday, and he's not even going to pretend to coach.

It's really a crying shame.  Kill has been one of the most effective coaches in college the last few years, while still being a class act.  CFB will miss him.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 28, 2015, 11:21:19 AM
Quote from: Valmy on October 28, 2015, 10:01:40 AM
Wait there is a Big 12 game on Thursday night? In know TCU and WV recently were in conferences that did that on a regular basis but it sure is weird. Or at least I cannot remember the last time that happened.

I think the weakest Power 5 conference has to play one on Thursdays once the conference season starts.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on October 28, 2015, 11:56:35 AM
Quote from: Valmy on October 28, 2015, 10:01:40 AM
Wait there is a Big 12 game on Thursday night? In know TCU and WV recently were in conferences that did that on a regular basis but it sure is weird. Or at least I cannot remember the last time that happened.

There have been occasional Thursday B12 games for at least a couple of years (not including T-day).   The Pokes and Tech played on a Thursday in September last year.  I think there was more than one the year before.

E:  I assume this one is getting more attention than usual because of where TCU is ranked.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 28, 2015, 12:12:58 PM
I think I remember seeing Thursday night games from every conference but the big 10.  :hmm:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 28, 2015, 01:51:32 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 28, 2015, 11:21:19 AM
Quote from: Valmy on October 28, 2015, 10:01:40 AM
Wait there is a Big 12 game on Thursday night? In know TCU and WV recently were in conferences that did that on a regular basis but it sure is weird. Or at least I cannot remember the last time that happened.

I think the weakest Power 5 conference has to play one on Thursdays once the conference season starts.

Well that might explain a Thursday game by the PAC 12 but I don't see how that is relevant to this situation :P

Speaking of West Virginia where is Spicey? He hardly comments here anymore. Losing faith in Holgorsen?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on October 28, 2015, 02:52:11 PM
It would be sad for Jerry to die in the middle of the season like this.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 28, 2015, 03:14:48 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 28, 2015, 02:52:11 PM
It would be sad for Jerry to die in the middle of the season like this.

Yeah sorry to hear about that. I hope he recovers.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 28, 2015, 03:21:30 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 28, 2015, 02:52:11 PM
It would be sad for Jerry to die in the middle of the season like this.

He's had a number of epileptic seizures over the last couple of years.  I get the feeling he was just informed of a more serious development.  I sure hope resigning from the stress of coaching turns the tide on whatever it is.

Bo had to quit because of his ticker, and lived for 27 more years.  Let's hope Jerry is as lucky.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on October 28, 2015, 06:13:59 PM
Quote from: grumbler on October 28, 2015, 03:21:30 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on October 28, 2015, 02:52:11 PM
It would be sad for Jerry to die in the middle of the season like this.

He's had a number of epileptic seizures over the last couple of years.  I get the feeling he was just informed of a more serious development.  I sure hope resigning from the stress of coaching turns the tide on whatever it is.

Bo had to quit because of his ticker, and lived for 27 more years.  Let's hope Jerry is as lucky.

Might have lived longer if he hadn't gone to work for the Tigers.

If what I have heard about his firing from Detroit is true, it was a shitty way to be let go.  Not that there is a good way to be fired.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 29, 2015, 10:55:18 PM
Well I guess we now know who Dana thinks should win the Heisman

https://mtc.cdn.vine.co/r/videos/09156743FC1271702145993162752_4356ca0e88d.2.1.9351736659339216081.mp4?versionId=lNjTcE0X.hIdt18OHX6xqotmNgMnA95j

I cannot give WV too much shit for that though. They did 13 points better than Texas did.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on October 29, 2015, 11:40:49 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 29, 2015, 10:55:18 PM
Well I guess we now know who Dana thinks should win the Heisman


That is awesome.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on October 31, 2015, 12:27:12 PM
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/14015177/jt-barrett-ohio-state-buckeyes-arrested-operating-vehicle-intoxicated


:rolleyes:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 31, 2015, 12:32:06 PM
Wow. Some people just cannot stand success.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 31, 2015, 05:39:05 PM
This Texas Tech vs. Oklahoma State game is a Big 12 classic.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on October 31, 2015, 06:09:44 PM
Maybe it's time i start rooting a bit for Ioway.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 31, 2015, 06:49:08 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 31, 2015, 06:09:44 PM
Maybe it's time i start rooting a bit for Ioway.

There are defenses that can shut them down, but their offense, along with that defense, can take on most anybody. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 31, 2015, 06:54:40 PM
Lovin' me some Harbaugh manball.  Tight ends, fullbacks, six offensive linemen... and trickery.

Too bad Rudock threw the ball that cost them the shutout.  This offense isn't playoff-caliber, but I still think they'll get their nine wins.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 31, 2015, 08:24:48 PM
Texas is pissing their season away tonight in Iowa. Pretty rough to watch.

Still some time if they want to save themselves.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 31, 2015, 09:37:28 PM
Nice catch Gophers.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on October 31, 2015, 09:41:57 PM
What a dumbass call.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 31, 2015, 09:44:08 PM
Nope. Another disaster. Ah well. At least they beat OU.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on October 31, 2015, 11:04:25 PM
So Dorsey did you catch the ending of the Miami-Duke game?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on October 31, 2015, 11:12:06 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 31, 2015, 11:04:25 PM
So Dorsey did you catch the ending of the Miami-Duke game?

That replay official was as awful as the one in the UM-MSU game.  One of the Miami players tackled a Duke player, #1's knees hit the ground before he threw the ball away, there were two blocks in the back (one somewhat questionable, the other blatant), and a helmet-to-helmet hit on one of the blocks.  Other than that, it looked like a good play.  I mean, fuck Duke, but that replay official was grossly incompetent and should never work another game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 01, 2015, 12:06:50 AM
Well passed on getting tickets to tonight UW-Arizona game as weather is windy and rainy and game didn't start till 8pm local time.
The Huskies just scored out of halftime to make it 28-3 lead.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 12:11:24 AM
Quote from: grumbler on October 31, 2015, 11:12:06 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 31, 2015, 11:04:25 PM
So Dorsey did you catch the ending of the Miami-Duke game?

That replay official was as awful as the one in the UM-MSU game. 

:lol: You seem to be having as hard a time letting go of the UM - MSU game as the App State game a few years back.

QuoteOne of the Miami players tackled a Duke player, #1's knees hit the ground before he threw the ball away, there were two blocks in the back (one somewhat questionable, the other blatant), and a helmet-to-helmet hit on one of the blocks.  Other than that, it looked like a good play.  I mean, fuck Duke, but that replay official was grossly incompetent and should never work another game.

FYI, none of those are reviewable save the one about whether the player was down before lateraling the ball (which on the field was not called dead--and I've seen people arguing that the ball was coming out by the time his knee touched--so not indisputable?). Lets review the rule book before sending the replay guy to the unemployment line.  :)

Also, if you want to call a penalty for every play a forensic inspection of a replay shows helmets touch during a block, or possibly someone blocked in the back, we will never again have a play without a penalty. Which, considering that Miami had 23 penalties in the game, would create games somewhat like this one.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 12:13:49 AM
Quote from: Valmy on October 31, 2015, 11:04:25 PM
So Dorsey did you catch the ending of the Miami-Duke game?

I have a hard time caring. It is hard to get excited about needing a miracle finish to beat Duke coming off a 58-0 beatdown by Clemson. Also, 23 penalties are a new school record. Hooray for new records each week (last week worst lost, this week most penalties)!
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 01, 2015, 12:37:53 AM
RichRod is looking shellshocked. 42-3 Huskies late in 3rd.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 12:38:33 AM
I don't know if it will become a story or not, but Brian Kelly went after an assistant strength coach on the sidelines, and put his hands on the guy. Really not a good look. Has me worried he is going to have a Woody Hayes moment. To this point you could rationalize his explosions on his players and refs as motivation or intimidation tactics, but actually going after a coach is neither of those.

Also, the officiating in the 2nd half of that game came really close to determining the outcome--there were 3 straight drives--2 for ND and 1 for Temple--that were basically determined by officiating in favor of Temple (officials from the AAC). I know Berkut disagrees, but it is such a clear conflict of interest to have officials officiating out of conference games for one of their conference members, it would be nice if the practice was ended.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 01, 2015, 12:42:14 AM
WazZu just went up 28-27 on the fighting Garbons in 4th.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 01:17:23 AM
Missed 43 yard field goal at the end. Congrats garbon, you can exhale now.   :)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 01, 2015, 01:17:40 AM
Washington St loses with last second fg miss over Stanford 30-28
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 01, 2015, 01:56:49 AM
My google fu utterly failed, but if yo guys haven't seen the UMass/Ball State kick return you absolutely have to see this.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 07:34:42 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 12:11:24 AM
:lol: You seem to be having as hard a time letting go of the UM - MSU game as the App State game a few years back.

:lol: I didn't harp on the App State game in 2007.  That was Timmay.  And the officials in the M-MSU game were objectively awful.  Not on the last play, where nothing was called, but on a whole host of other plays.

QuoteFYI, none of those are reviewable save the one about whether the player was down before lateraling the ball (which on the field was not called dead--and I've seen people arguing that the ball was coming out by the time his knee touched--so not indisputable?). Lets review the rule book before sending the replay guy to the unemployment line.  :)

The play was reviewed, and the egregious block in the back was called on the field (and over-ruled on review).

QuoteAlso, if you want to call a penalty for every play a forensic inspection of a replay shows helmets touch during a block, or possibly someone blocked in the back, we will never again have a play without a penalty. Which, considering that Miami had 23 penalties in the game, would create games somewhat like this one.

I think that you are foolish to want "to call a penalty for every play a forensic inspection of a replay shows helmets touch during a block, or possibly someone blocked in the back," because we will never again have a play without a penalty.  Yeah, Miami is an incredibly undisciplined team, but you have to learn to let that go.  Nothing you can do about it.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 07:38:06 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 01, 2015, 01:56:49 AM
My google fu utterly failed, but if yo guys haven't seen the UMass/Ball State kick return you absolutely have to see this.

It's not one of ESPN's highlights for the game (here: http://espn.go.com/college-football/video?gameId=400787342 (http://espn.go.com/college-football/video?gameId=400787342)

Sure you have the right game?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 07:40:11 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 12:38:33 AM
I know Berkut disagrees, but it is such a clear conflict of interest to have officials officiating out of conference games for one of their conference members, it would be nice if the practice was ended.
I agree with this.  Some conferences use third-conference refs for OOC games, and I think that's a good practice.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 09:40:01 AM
Quote from: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 07:34:42 AM

The play was reviewed, and the egregious block in the back was called on the field (and over-ruled on review).


If that is what happened, then the replay official, the head referee, and any other official that was aware of what was happening and didn't vehemently protest should be fired. You can't review a penalty.

But the officials never said that is what happened, or why they didn't call a penalty. They ran off the field because Miami had won and never gave anyone an explanation. I would guess that when an explanation is given, it will be that they officials decided to pick up the penalty without using replay.

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: OttoVonBismarck on November 01, 2015, 10:04:51 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 12:38:33 AM
I don't know if it will become a story or not, but Brian Kelly went after an assistant strength coach on the sidelines, and put his hands on the guy. Really not a good look. Has me worried he is going to have a Woody Hayes moment. To this point you could rationalize his explosions on his players and refs as motivation or intimidation tactics, but actually going after a coach is neither of those.

Also, the officiating in the 2nd half of that game came really close to determining the outcome--there were 3 straight drives--2 for ND and 1 for Temple--that were basically determined by officiating in favor of Temple (officials from the AAC). I know Berkut disagrees, but it is such a clear conflict of interest to have officials officiating out of conference games for one of their conference members, it would be nice if the practice was ended.

Some of these out of shape little Napoleon coaches need laid out. I remember the Clemson player Woody Hayes hit later said in an interview that he found the whole thing hilarious, he wasn't hurt at all by some fat out of shape senior citizen trying to flail at him--Woody was rightfully fired, but some of these coaches confuse being in charge with being Billy Bad Ass.

I heard an interview awhile back with Kevin Nash (pro wrestling fame), who played college basketball at Tennessee. He said there was an incident maybe his 2nd or 3rd year there where his head coach slapped him in the face in front of multiple witnesses. In Nash's words, he wasn't a "college kid" he was a 6'11" man that had grown up in a rough area near Detroit and nobody was slapping him in the face without getting it back. So Nash bitch slaps the coach and knocks him off his feet. That's the kind of thing I think some of these coaches need. Nash also immediately got an attorney because he knew they'd try to kick him off the team or expel him from school, and basically wasn't punished at all--the school was in an awkward position because the coach had struck a student athlete first in front of witnesses, so they knew they were opening themselves to a lot of civil liability if they didn't just make the whole thing go away. (Nash was expelled for other stuff the next year, including assaulting an RA and doing drugs in the dorms.)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on November 01, 2015, 10:24:33 AM
Quote from: katmai on November 01, 2015, 12:06:50 AM
Well passed on getting tickets to tonight UW-Arizona game as weather is windy and rainy and game didn't start till 8pm local time.
The Huskies just scored out of halftime to make it 28-3 lead.

Kind of incredible how fast a team can go from a conference contender to a doormat.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on November 01, 2015, 10:27:59 AM
Quote from: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 07:40:11 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 12:38:33 AM
I know Berkut disagrees, but it is such a clear conflict of interest to have officials officiating out of conference games for one of their conference members, it would be nice if the practice was ended.
I agree with this.  Some conferences use third-conference refs for OOC games, and I think that's a good practice.

I don't really disagree, I just don't agree that there is a "conflict of interest".

The officials do not have an interest in the outcome of the game, regardless of what conference they work for - but if it makes people feel better to have a third conference provide the officials, that is fine as well.

The idea, however, that officials have some idea in their head that since they work for the AAC, they really should try to see if they can make the AAC team win, is kind of tin-foil.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 11:11:24 AM
Quote from: Berkut on November 01, 2015, 10:27:59 AM

I don't really disagree, I just don't agree that there is a "conflict of interest".


I wonder if you have the same point of view in the thread discussing arbitration.  :hmm:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 12:15:53 PM
Quote from: Berkut on November 01, 2015, 10:27:59 AM
I don't really disagree, I just don't agree that there is a "conflict of interest".

The officials do not have an interest in the outcome of the game, regardless of what conference they work for - but if it makes people feel better to have a third conference provide the officials, that is fine as well.

The idea, however, that officials have some idea in their head that since they work for the AAC, they really should try to see if they can make the AAC team win, is kind of tin-foil.

Okay, "conflict of interest" goes to far, but remember that this is AR, and if we ignored those statements of his that went to far, we would be ignoring him.  :P

I think that there probably is an unconscious bias in favor of the guys you work with multiple times in your career, and against guys you've never seen before and won't see again.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 01:20:58 PM
QuoteACC SUSPENDS MIAMI-DUKE OFFICIATING CREW

Of the two-game suspension of the on-field officiating crew as well as the replay official and communicator, the league said in a statement: "The replay official erred in not overturning the ruling on the field that the Miami player had released the ball prior to his knee being down. If called, this would have ended the game." The league cited three other uncalled penalties.

Uh, Dorsey, you might want to rethink your position vis-a-vis mine!  :lol: 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 01, 2015, 02:12:06 PM
Frank Beamer is going to retire at the end of the season. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 03:32:05 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 01, 2015, 02:12:06 PM
Frank Beamer is going to retire at the end of the season.

A alum friend of mine who is pretty connected told me this was coming.  This wasn't Beamer's choice.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 03:33:32 PM
Oh, and the Kelly thing was the most over-reacted-to event of the weekend.  He was right to shove his coach away from the official.  Only the head coach gets to argue calls.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 04:02:04 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 01:20:58 PM
QuoteACC SUSPENDS MIAMI-DUKE OFFICIATING CREW

Of the two-game suspension of the on-field officiating crew as well as the replay official and communicator, the league said in a statement: "The replay official erred in not overturning the ruling on the field that the Miami player had released the ball prior to his knee being down. If called, this would have ended the game." The league cited three other uncalled penalties.

Uh, Dorsey, you might want to rethink your position vis-a-vis mine!  :lol:

Exactly what did I say that makes you think this in any way contradicts what I wrote?

You wrote:

"That replay official was as awful as the one in the UM-MSU game.  One of the Miami players tackled a Duke player, #1's knees hit the ground before he threw the ball away, there were two blocks in the back (one somewhat questionable, the other blatant), and a helmet-to-helmet hit on one of the blocks.  Other than that, it looked like a good play.  I mean, fuck Duke, but that replay official was grossly incompetent and should never work another game."

I pointed out that the only component of that which was reviewable was the player's knee being down (which I parenthetically and with a ? at the end to indicate I was clearly not personally arguing that point said people were disputing). The ACC did not indict the replay official for any of the other things you mentioned in the post.

Then, you bizarrely went on to post this, without any evidence:

"The play was reviewed, and the egregious block in the back was called on the field (and over-ruled on review)."

I pointed out that while it was not clear what happened during to the penalty call because it was not explained on the field and the officials ran off the field immediately after the game concluded, it could not have been over ruled on review, because that is outside of the scope of the replay official.

And in fact the ACC clarified that in fact the penalty was not overturned on review, but overturned based on consultations among the officials without using replay. Which is what I posted I guessed is what happened.

So no, I do not think I should rethink my position, because I never said it was a clean play, never said a penalty shouldn't/couldn't have been called during the play, and never said that the runner wasn't down at some point. Part of what I did allude to, was while I am glad Miami won, I don't care all that much, because needing a miracle to beat Duke is not some great memory I will relish. Duke sucks, Miami sucks, the whole ACC Coastal sucks. Miami has already lost to FSU and been humiliated by Clemson. Baring somehow winning the ACC, nothing good will come from this season (save a better coach), and really going to the ACC championship game to play Clemson or possibly FSU again isn't all that appealing. If tomorrow the NCAA announces that it is overturning the result of the game because of shitty officiating on that play and giving the game to Duke, I really won't care, but will welcome the concept of reexamining past games and overturning outcomes when shitty officiating determined them. I have a few suggestions of games they could start with.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 04:05:53 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 03:33:32 PM
Oh, and the Kelly thing was the most over-reacted-to event of the weekend.  He was right to shove his coach away from the official.  Only the head coach gets to argue calls.

Brian Kelly is a good coach, and I'm glad he is at Notre Dame, but he put his hands on another man with some aggression behind it. That isn't cool.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 01, 2015, 04:40:55 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 03:32:05 PM
A alum friend of mine who is pretty connected told me this was coming.  This wasn't Beamer's choice.

Sucks for Beamer, but it really seems like it's about that time. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 01, 2015, 05:53:59 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 01, 2015, 01:56:49 AM
My google fu utterly failed, but if yo guys haven't seen the UMass/Ball State kick return you absolutely have to see this.

It was the Duke/Miami game.  They must have been running the Mass/Ball score on the ticker.  D'oh.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 06:50:16 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 04:02:04 PM

Then, you bizarrely went on to post this, without any evidence:

"The play was reviewed, and the egregious block in the back was called on the field (and over-ruled on review)."

I pointed out that while it was not clear what happened during to the penalty call because it was not explained on the field and the officials ran off the field immediately after the game concluded, it could not have been over ruled on review, because that is outside of the scope of the replay official. 

Why is the flag for a block in the back not subject to review?  Most penalties are not reviewable, but this was clearly was reviewable because it was reviewed, and the flag picked up.  I don't know what is "bizarre" about it.


QuoteAnd in fact the ACC clarified that in fact the penalty was not overturned on review, but overturned based on consultations among the officials without using replay. Which is what I posted I guessed is what happened.

Edit: I see the later statement, which says that the on-field officials fucked that up, and the referee didn't make it clear that no review of that penalty was conducted.  The ACC also didn't make that clear in their earlier statement, which specifically mentioned the block in the back but didn't note that it was on-field incompetence, not booth incompetence, that caused the refs to blow that call.

In any case, the ACC seems to reject your contention that my position was the equivalent of wanting "to call a penalty for every play a forensic inspection of a replay shows helmets touch during a block, or possibly someone blocked in the back, we will never again have a play without a penalty."  Rather, they agreed with my assessment of the refereeing and suspended the refs for two games.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 08:49:35 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 06:50:16 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 04:02:04 PM

Then, you bizarrely went on to post this, without any evidence:

"The play was reviewed, and the egregious block in the back was called on the field (and over-ruled on review)."

I pointed out that while it was not clear what happened during to the penalty call because it was not explained on the field and the officials ran off the field immediately after the game concluded, it could not have been over ruled on review, because that is outside of the scope of the replay official. 

Why is the flag for a block in the back not subject to review?  Most penalties are not reviewable, but this was clearly was reviewable because it was reviewed, and the flag picked up.  I don't know what is "bizarre" about it.


QuoteAnd in fact the ACC clarified that in fact the penalty was not overturned on review, but overturned based on consultations among the officials without using replay. Which is what I posted I guessed is what happened.

Edit: I see the later statement, which says that the on-field officials fucked that up, and the referee didn't make it clear that no review of that penalty was conducted.  The ACC also didn't make that clear in their earlier statement, which specifically mentioned the block in the back but didn't note that it was on-field incompetence, not booth incompetence, that caused the refs to blow that call.

Yep, you were wrong. The penalties were not reviewable.

QuoteIn any case, the ACC seems to reject your contention that my position was the equivalent of wanting "to call a penalty for every play a forensic inspection of a replay shows helmets touch during a block, or possibly someone blocked in the back, we will never again have a play without a penalty."  Rather, they agreed with my assessment of the refereeing and suspended the refs for two games.

Uh, the ACC did not and does not reject my contention that penalties such as blocking in the back can not be called by the replay official, and to make them subject to review would result in absurd numbers of penalties. That was the point I was discussing. ACC officials didn't specifically respond to any contention I made because they probably aren't reading this thread.

FWIW, I've always felt the officials were shitty--and based on the overall performance in the game should be suspended for much longer than 2 games.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on November 01, 2015, 08:55:24 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 01:20:58 PM
QuoteACC SUSPENDS MIAMI-DUKE OFFICIATING CREW

Of the two-game suspension of the on-field officiating crew as well as the replay official and communicator, the league said in a statement: "The replay official erred in not overturning the ruling on the field that the Miami player had released the ball prior to his knee being down. If called, this would have ended the game." The league cited three other uncalled penalties.

Uh, Dorsey, you might want to rethink your position vis-a-vis mine!  :lol: 

Wow. That is pretty harsh.

I actually know the new AAC director of officiating - I've worked several games with him in the past, and he came up through my D3 organization. Awesome guy.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 08:55:53 PM
My favorite part of this is that a Duke dumbass started a thread on their board about how he hopes Miami will do the classy/sportsmanlike thing and request the NCAA to vacate the last play and declare Duke the winner.  :lol:

Lets just say the chances of that are rather low. When the ACC announced the suspensions of the officials, the Miami twitter feed responded with a smiling emoticon shrugging his shoulders.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 09:21:53 PM
Quote from: Berkut on November 01, 2015, 08:55:24 PM

Wow. That is pretty harsh.


It really strikes me as politics.

The ACC seems to be saying there were three errors on the play:

#1: The ballcarrier was down, and the replay official didn't call it. This seems to be the only thing on the replay official. There are lots of still shots with the Miami player with his knee on the ground and the ball touching his hand, but he was in the process of tossing/fumbling the ball backward. Not the most egregious thing I've seen.

#2: Block in the back penalties. So in a 46 second play they missed some blocks in the back. Not the first time a crew has missed block in the back penalties.

#3: poor communication. Clearly, but not the first time for that either.

I've definitely seen worse replay mistakes than #1, and suspending a crew for 2 games for missing blocks in the back and poorly communicating the rationale for a play seems harsher than normal. My guess: Duke is screaming bloody murder that the game should be overturned, and this is a way for the conference office to at least toss Duke a bone while not overturning the game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on November 01, 2015, 10:19:18 PM
Well, I don't buy that Duke is asking for the game to be "overturned". There is no such thing in college football, no matter how egregious the screwup.

I am actually rather curious, since I know Denny Hennigan, the new AAC head of officiating. I know he was hired to bring a much higher level of professionalism and accountability to AAC officiating. I have to assume this is his call (although I cannot be certain of that of course).

But I know Denny - he is incredibly, almost ridiculously, straight and by the book. He is a really, really nice guy while at the same time holding himself (and presumably others) to an incredibly high set of standards.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 01, 2015, 10:32:06 PM
Quote from: Berkut on November 01, 2015, 10:19:18 PM
Well, I don't buy that Duke is asking for the game to be "overturned". There is no such thing in college football, no matter how egregious the screwup.


Results of games have been changed--I read an article a long time ago on the history of this. It has only happened a few times, and it has been a long time. But it has happened.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on November 02, 2015, 03:43:22 AM
Quote from: grumbler on November 01, 2015, 12:15:53 PM
Quote from: Berkut on November 01, 2015, 10:27:59 AM
I don't really disagree, I just don't agree that there is a "conflict of interest".

The officials do not have an interest in the outcome of the game, regardless of what conference they work for - but if it makes people feel better to have a third conference provide the officials, that is fine as well.

The idea, however, that officials have some idea in their head that since they work for the AAC, they really should try to see if they can make the AAC team win, is kind of tin-foil.

Okay, "conflict of interest" goes to far, but remember that this is AR, and if we ignored those statements of his that went to far, we would be ignoring him.  :P

I think that there probably is an unconscious bias in favor of the guys you work with multiple times in your career, and against guys you've never seen before and won't see again.

The practice simply creates a perception that there might be bias or a conflict of interest.  Simply from a PR standpoint, there's no reason to do that.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 02, 2015, 07:30:03 AM
Quote from: Berkut on November 01, 2015, 10:19:18 PM
Well, I don't buy that Duke is asking for the game to be "overturned". There is no such thing in college football, no matter how egregious the screwup.

I am actually rather curious, since I know Denny Hennigan, the new AAC head of officiating. I know he was hired to bring a much higher level of professionalism and accountability to AAC officiating. I have to assume this is his call (although I cannot be certain of that of course).

But I know Denny - he is incredibly, almost ridiculously, straight and by the book. He is a really, really nice guy while at the same time holding himself (and presumably others) to an incredibly high set of standards.

They need to clone him and put the clone in charge of Big Ten officiating.  They desperately need someone there with high standards.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on November 04, 2015, 08:02:12 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EwSP_yPa0w


Rebuttal:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQnYfkDO5Ks
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 04, 2015, 08:12:19 PM
 :lol:

Nice line about Vanderbilt.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 04, 2015, 08:42:09 PM
Quote from: sbr on November 04, 2015, 08:02:12 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EwSP_yPa0w


Rebuttal:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQnYfkDO5Ks

The first video loses me by having a dad in an Alabama shirt talking to kids in Auburn gear. Wtf?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 04, 2015, 08:47:55 PM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg1.southernliving.timeinc.net%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimage%2F2008%2F08%2Fhouse-divided%2Fauburn-alabama-m.jpg&hash=437ee3b2b2e29496af8d12576777392b4596dc04)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 04, 2015, 08:58:51 PM
That house divided stuff annoys me. If you really cared that much, why wouldn't you marry another spouse? And if you don't, why are you advertising that you are a "house divided"?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on November 04, 2015, 09:01:14 PM
Are you seriously suggesting that college team fandom should be a factor in who you marry?  :lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 04, 2015, 09:12:41 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on November 04, 2015, 09:01:14 PM
Are you seriously suggesting that college team fandom should be a factor in who you marry?  :lol:

Not really, but a marriage is at the end of a long process of asking out, dating, meeting family, etc. There are 300m people in the country, you have options: if you are a die hard Alabama fan, why would you start down that process with a die hard Auburn fan?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on November 04, 2015, 09:18:12 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 04, 2015, 09:12:41 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on November 04, 2015, 09:01:14 PM
Are you seriously suggesting that college team fandom should be a factor in who you marry?  :lol:

Not really, but a marriage is at the end of a long process of asking out, dating, meeting family, etc. There are 300m people in the country, you have options: if you are a die hard Alabama fan, why would you start down that process with a die hard Auburn fan?

Because lots of future football bets resulting in bedroom punishment sessions?

Though I'd hope the Auburn fan is the sub.  :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Ed Anger on November 04, 2015, 09:24:38 PM
Roll damn tide
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 04, 2015, 09:29:17 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 04, 2015, 09:12:41 PM
There are 300m people in the country, you have options:

Why limit yourself to other Americans?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 04, 2015, 09:57:32 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 04, 2015, 08:47:55 PM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg1.southernliving.timeinc.net%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimage%2F2008%2F08%2Fhouse-divided%2Fauburn-alabama-m.jpg&hash=437ee3b2b2e29496af8d12576777392b4596dc04)

The girl went with Bama while the boy went with Auburn. How Oedipal.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 04, 2015, 09:58:37 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 04, 2015, 08:58:51 PM
That house divided stuff annoys me. If you really cared that much, why wouldn't you marry another spouse? And if you don't, why are you advertising that you are a "house divided"?

Because it is fun? I presume the sort of Bama fan that would marry an Auburn fan is not the type that is poisoning trees. My mother went to OU so my parents are a house divided. Though actually she got her Masters at Texas so I guess she is a person divided.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 04, 2015, 10:00:12 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 04, 2015, 09:57:32 PM
The girl went with Bama while the boy went with Auburn. How Oedipal.

Alternatively, in that family Auburn is butch and Bama is fem.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 04, 2015, 10:03:03 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 04, 2015, 10:00:12 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 04, 2015, 09:57:32 PM
The girl went with Bama while the boy went with Auburn. How Oedipal.

Alternatively, in that family Auburn is butch and Bama is fem.

That is a pretty girlie looking butch woman but hey who am I to judge?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on November 04, 2015, 10:03:39 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 04, 2015, 10:00:12 PM
Alternatively, in that family Auburn is butch and Bama is fem.

Yeah maybe junior knows more than we do.  :lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 04, 2015, 10:21:27 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 04, 2015, 09:58:37 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 04, 2015, 08:58:51 PM
That house divided stuff annoys me. If you really cared that much, why wouldn't you marry another spouse? And if you don't, why are you advertising that you are a "house divided"?

Because it is fun? I presume the sort of Bama fan that would marry an Auburn fan is not the type that is poisoning trees. My mother went to OU so my parents are a house divided. Though actually she got her Masters at Texas so I guess she is a person divided.

My father went to FSU and my mother to Miami.

Anyway, let me start over. A big part of the fun (at least for me) is going to a Miami tailgate and having a group of strangers sharing food and drinks, and becoming elated watching FSU struggle on some shitty TV someone brought with occasional comments about how FSU is some sort of corrupt and sham institution. Us vs. them, goodguys vs. badguys. A rival fan walking by will probably get mild heckling, and if they hang around to give some back, they will get heckled a bit more and probably leave with a free beer and a request to "take it easy on us".

A couple wandering in to the tailgate "a house divided" is putting themselves front and center while also breaking down the suspension of disbelief. Whichever tailgate you go to, the rival spouse should wear neutral or cover up and generally stay low key regarding supporting the rival.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Ed Anger on November 04, 2015, 10:28:09 PM
I'd never marry a Penn State gal. Yuck.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on November 04, 2015, 10:28:46 PM
Dorsey is a mamma's boy.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 04, 2015, 10:41:16 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on November 04, 2015, 10:28:46 PM
Dorsey is a mamma's boy.

My father only went their for law school. My mother went to Miami for undergrad and law, and on her side of the family, my grandfather went there, he sent all 5 of his kids there undergrad, 3 went there for grad also, and several married other Miami grads. The large extended family had season tickets to the games together, so the games were sort of family reunions. I never really had a choice.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 04, 2015, 10:44:05 PM
Miami is fem.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 04, 2015, 11:15:08 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 04, 2015, 10:44:05 PM
Miami is fem.

Sadly, these days I can't argue.

How the team presented itself under Jimmy Johnson:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs16.postimg.org%2Fwod1wjwtx%2Fhurricanescamo.jpg&hash=fcbf65a5711b5c549dce389baea4b6437a06a8ee) (http://postimage.org/)

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs15.postimg.org%2Fs2a4qstwb%2Fbrown.jpg&hash=88fa906bb249d04230929f9af7e069db367cb746) (http://postimage.org/)

After the team was turned over to Al Golden, the Sandusky/Paterno protege:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs24.postimg.org%2F8ko47u8f9%2FCNrw75_KXAAEZld5.jpg&hash=cc0a1f676bce2f4c7687ba55d4d03ce5b50744f0) (http://postimage.org/)

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs14.postimg.org%2F4yldu0xcx%2FCNra_Zx4_WUAAR9rw.jpg&hash=435be10cc174d5c98b3b10127f03e8a06641f452) (http://postimage.org/)

Bring back Butch!!!


Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 04, 2015, 11:16:36 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 04, 2015, 11:15:08 PM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs10.postimg.org%2Fczz6wviu1%2Fbrown.jpg&hash=7d2f3d77d0c1e200bb2188051845cd31c58a6dc8) (http://postimage.org/)

There's other Village People they could have done.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 04, 2015, 11:21:14 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 04, 2015, 11:16:36 PM

There's other Village People they could have done.

Don't think Jerome Brown was a member of the village people.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 04, 2015, 11:23:48 PM
Poor Jerome Brown. Oh what might have been.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 08, 2015, 12:56:57 AM
Okay, so Kansas is really really bad. 

Berks guys are beating USC right now but it's close.  They need to hurry up and kick some Trojan ass.  Making odd decisions about going for it though.

E:  Wow Arizona has two guys limping around on defense right now.
   :mad: USC gonna win
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on November 08, 2015, 11:34:26 AM
Arizona is just a horror show this year. At one point they had some guy at 185lbs playing middle linebacker last night.

I think I could make the team.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 08, 2015, 03:15:56 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 08, 2015, 12:56:57 AM
Okay, so Kansas is really really bad. 

Yes they are. And wow so was Texas for the first half. That play by Jerrod was the worst play he has ever made. It was like a weird conflagration of all of his shortcomings in one epic shit show. Amazingly though the team actually made halftime adjustments.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 14, 2015, 11:57:29 AM
Ok Spicey if you care anymore here we go. Neers vs Steers IV
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Ed Anger on November 14, 2015, 01:16:54 PM
Ohio State continues to look like warm oatmeal. Meh.

Or cream of wheat. Bleh.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 14, 2015, 05:30:38 PM
Spicey if you are fed up with the Holgorsen regime, and you never coming here suggests you might be, I apologize if Texas just saved his job.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 14, 2015, 06:11:36 PM
Good trivia question during Cyclones game: who is the only true freshman to win a national championship since freshmen eligibility was reintroduced in 1972?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 14, 2015, 10:44:19 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 14, 2015, 06:11:36 PM
Good trivia question during Cyclones game: who is the only true freshman to win a national championship since freshmen eligibility was reintroduced in 1972?
:huh:  In what sport?  Football is a team sport, so a freshman couldn't win a national championship in it.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 14, 2015, 10:46:03 PM
Correction: only true freshman quarterback.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on November 14, 2015, 11:03:12 PM
Oregon probably just knocked the Pac-12 out of the National Playoffs, but I'll take the win against Stanford.  :showoff:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 15, 2015, 08:52:00 AM
Quote from: sbr on November 14, 2015, 11:03:12 PM
Oregon probably just knocked the Pac-12 out of the National Playoffs, but I'll take the win against Stanford.  :showoff:

Yeah, that probably helped out Michigan a lot (along with the win by the Fighting Berkuts).  Odds against Michigan in the playoffs are still probably about 30:1 (MSU must lose to OSU and then OSU lose to UM, Notre Dame must lose, and Michigan must win out and look like the best 2-loss team).  Unless the Big 12 cannibalizes itself, I see the fourth spot going to the B10 champ if it's not Michigan, but, if M wins the Big 10, then it's between them and a two-loss ND (a one-loss ND will clearly be the better choice).

I think that I don't want Michigan to play in the championship.  They aren't good enough on offense, and their defense is so crippled by injury that they are a shadow of their earlier selves.  I think that it would be better for team-building and recruiting to end the season with a competitive bowl than a blowout loss in the championship series.  So, I want UM to win the B10 but get passed over for the tournament.

I do appreciate the efforts of Oregon and Arizona to open the way for Michigan, though.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on November 16, 2015, 01:00:35 AM
I am just glad the Cats finally got a freaking win.

They still are a mess though.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: jimmy olsen on November 16, 2015, 02:25:41 AM
Notre Dame! :w00t:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 16, 2015, 07:39:18 PM
Reason #65,768 why I love having Harbaugh as our coach:  this exchange in today's presser:

QuoteQ: You mentioned the run game. The last three games, teams have had a little more success running the football on you than they have previously. Is there something you've seen from your group that you want to change immediately? Something other teams are starting to pick up on?

JH: "We're looking at it. We're looking at all those ways. We have some ideas, but why say them to you? Tell you and you're liable to go tell somebody else, so will probably will just keep that to ourselves. That'd be the best course of action."

And the philosopher-king exchange:
QuoteQ: Some of the guys said a couple weeks ago that you told them the rest of the way has to be a playoff-like mentality, a playoff-like attitude after that Michigan State loss. What does that mean when you say that?

JH: "Well, I mean, I just think back to any playoff situation that you've ever been in or that you know about, your own experience. I can draw on coaching teams in playoffs, being in playoffs as a player. When we were young and living over on Anderson Street in the summer we'd all get together in the morning and go play basketball at Pattengill Elementary School. Concrete basketball floor, two rims with the chains as the nets. You picked your team and you started playing. The team that won got to play the next game. If you lost you had to go to the side and pick a new team, and the goal was to play all the way to lunch. Didn't want to miss any games. To me, that's what- when you're in playoff situations you're going to play more games if you win. If you don't win then you've got to watch. We're in that kind of situation. If you win you get to keep playing after the next two games. If we don't, we don't; we watch. So...that's it. Facts are stubborn things."

Q: Lunch would be Indianapolis?

JH: "Lunch...what?"

Q: You said play to lunch.

JH: "Yeah."

Q: What's lunch for you?

JH: "Yeah, that would be having the opportunity to play in the championship game and the playoffs. Playoff situation, it's limited. It's limited in college football. Really, they have a four team playoff with a national championship, which is unlike any other sport in college athletics that I'm aware of, but at least we have one. Have it on a limited basis. I-AA subdivision, they have a 16-team playoff. I think if you looked at basketball, hockey, all the other sports in college, there's a playoff. So yeah, I personally love the playoff-type of situation and atmosphere. If you win you get to keep playing, you know."

Q: Unlike the Pattengill playground, you need someone else to win on the other court. Are you going to be rooting for Ohio State to beat Michigan State?

JH: "There was only one court at Pattengill."
:lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 16, 2015, 08:37:17 PM
Mind blown
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on November 21, 2015, 05:04:29 PM
Sparty defense looking really good today.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on November 21, 2015, 06:48:01 PM
Nice game Fuckeyes  :nelson:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 21, 2015, 06:51:21 PM
Oregon St is very young, and isn't very good.
UDub up 28-0 in 1st quarter.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 21, 2015, 07:08:34 PM
35-0  now, let's see if Huskies can do better this weekend and not fuck it up in 2nd half.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 21, 2015, 08:14:37 PM
52-0 mid through 3rd. :o
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 21, 2015, 10:37:19 PM
Georgia wins in OT against Georgia Southern. So Desmond Howard's got egg all over his face right now.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 22, 2015, 12:01:52 AM
The SEC takes criticism every year about scheduling the week before rivalry week, but look at some of the OOC matchups this week:

The Citadel 23
South Carolina 22

Georgia over Georgia Southern in OT.

Florida over FAU in OT.

Three super competitive and nail biting outcomes. Proof that SEC schedules better than anyone else.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 22, 2015, 01:51:28 AM
Yeah, that's what it shows....
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 22, 2015, 08:57:44 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 22, 2015, 12:01:52 AM
The SEC takes criticism every year about scheduling the week before rivalry week, but look at some of the OOC matchups this week:

I actually think it was a great decision. How many teams run triple option? For once, Georgia Tech won't be the first time in the season they're playing one of them.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on November 22, 2015, 10:10:51 AM
Quote from: katmai on November 21, 2015, 08:14:37 PM
52-0 mid through 3rd. :o

Yeah, the Beavers are bad.  And not even in a fun, mock your Beaver friends kind of way.  Supposedly Anderson is just killing it on the recruiting trail so far so we'll see how quickly they can get this turned around.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 22, 2015, 10:43:44 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 22, 2015, 08:57:44 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 22, 2015, 12:01:52 AM
The SEC takes criticism every year about scheduling the week before rivalry week, but look at some of the OOC matchups this week:

I actually think it was a great decision. How many teams run triple option? For once, Georgia Tech won't be the first time in the season they're playing one of them.

If they wanted a warm up triple option game before the tough one, I'm not sure Georgia didn't schedule the two games in the wrong order.

But yeah, I agree, if you are going to try to schedule a scrimmage for the second to last game of the year, scheduling Georgia Southern was a really good move. However, the issue is with scheduling a scrimmage in the second to last game of the year. Look at UGAs OOC schedule this year: Louisiana Monroe, Southern, Georgia Southern, and Georgia Tech. That is weak, especially in a year the SEC East sucks.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 22, 2015, 01:00:00 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 22, 2015, 10:43:44 AM
But yeah, I agree, if you are going to try to schedule a scrimmage for the second to last game of the year, scheduling Georgia Southern was a really good move.

No, they're too good. Almost beat Georgia, and did beat Florida two years ago.  :sleep:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 23, 2015, 07:20:15 AM
Of all the times for OSU to fuck up and lose a game...  :(

I hate the idea that Michigan's chances in the B10 no depend on Penn State beating the Spartans at home.

Still the OSU meltdown was glorious to see.  I wonder if Meyer will have the guts to suspend Elliot for a game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 23, 2015, 01:33:00 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 23, 2015, 07:20:15 AM

Still the OSU meltdown was glorious to see.  I wonder if Meyer will have the guts to suspend Elliot for a game.

The thing about Urban Meyer is that he is a great recruiter and does a great job of getting his teams ready to play. But as an authority figure? He has never hung around for very long at any school as a head coach, his longest tenure as head coach was at Florida, and by the time he left UF the wheels were completely coming off the bus.

His tenure at Ohio State is now closing in on the length of his tenure at UF. Time will tell if this is the beginning of an unraveling like at UF, where the lunatics took control of the asylum.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on November 23, 2015, 03:25:13 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 23, 2015, 07:20:15 AM
Of all the times for OSU to fuck up and lose a game...  :(

I hate the idea that Michigan's chances in the B10 no depend on Penn State beating the Spartans at home.

Still the OSU meltdown was glorious to see.  I wonder if Meyer will have the guts to suspend Elliot for a game.

It's going to be interesting to see where Elliot goes in the draft.  I don't see too many NFL head coaches wanting to embrace a guy who puts the blame on the coaching staff for a big loss.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 23, 2015, 10:18:16 PM
Quote from: dps on November 23, 2015, 03:25:13 PM
It's going to be interesting to see where Elliot goes in the draft.  I don't see too many NFL head coaches wanting to embrace a guy who puts the blame on the coaching staff for a big loss.

I wonder if the fact that it is painfully obvious that Elliot was right will have an impact.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 23, 2015, 11:46:28 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 23, 2015, 10:18:16 PM
Quote from: dps on November 23, 2015, 03:25:13 PM
It's going to be interesting to see where Elliot goes in the draft.  I don't see too many NFL head coaches wanting to embrace a guy who puts the blame on the coaching staff for a big loss.

I wonder if the fact that it is painfully obvious that Elliot was right will have an impact.

Considering the first article i read asking scouts about his outburst, none of them thought it would hurt his status.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 24, 2015, 01:24:52 PM
Counting down to The Game, here's another pretty good Michigan hype vid:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBwefQkeL1A (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBwefQkeL1A)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 25, 2015, 10:12:19 PM
Another vid on my countdown list (made by a Buckeye, but balanced even so; pretty long in the tooth by this point, though):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTPQR7RTrz4 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTPQR7RTrz4)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 26, 2015, 06:29:08 PM
Hate Week continues; this time, The Taiwanese Animators get involved:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zHeLCDtQVo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zHeLCDtQVo)

Note that even the Taiwanese can tell the good guys from the bad guys in this game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 27, 2015, 05:12:33 PM
As a lifelong, fervent fan of the Hawkeyes I'm amped about their unbeaten record and #4 ranking.  :w00t:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 27, 2015, 06:10:43 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 27, 2015, 05:12:33 PM
As a lifelong, fervent fan of the Hawkeyes I'm amped about their unbeaten record and #4 ranking.  :w00t:

If Michigan doesn't make the B10 title game, I'll be happy to see Iowa be the B10 team that gets slaughtered in the first round of the playoffs.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 27, 2015, 06:25:35 PM
The Friday of Hate Week is like Christmas Eve for Michigan or Ohio State fans.

My prediction:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F3SyDoQi.jpg&hash=23b48a82a140472ba06f663b618452ff9d049706)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 27, 2015, 06:35:06 PM
Huskers down by 11, 7 to play, 4th and 1 on the Iowa 20(ish), Nebraska runs a fade. Estupido.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 27, 2015, 06:45:46 PM
Huskies crushing Cougs 45-10 in 4th.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 27, 2015, 06:55:08 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 27, 2015, 06:35:06 PM
Huskers down by 11, 7 to play, 4th and 1 on the Iowa 20(ish), Nebraska runs a fade. Estupido.

That was the call that let Michigan beat Notre Dame in the 90s.  It's not a stupid call, if your offense has been struggling, because the struggles will only intensify as the field shortens.  The play needs play action to pull up the defense, but then it should be a one-on-one with your guy knowing the route.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on November 27, 2015, 07:07:57 PM
Quote from: katmai on November 27, 2015, 06:45:46 PM
Huskies crushing Cougs 45-10 in 4th.

That's not as surprising as it probably should be.  Houston crushing Navy was a surprise, though.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 27, 2015, 07:40:20 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 27, 2015, 06:55:08 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 27, 2015, 06:35:06 PM
Huskers down by 11, 7 to play, 4th and 1 on the Iowa 20(ish), Nebraska runs a fade. Estupido.

That was the call that let Michigan beat Notre Dame in the 90s.  It's not a stupid call, if your offense has been struggling, because the struggles will only intensify as the field shortens.  The play needs play action to pull up the defense, but then it should be a one-on-one with your guy knowing the route.

That fails to take into account how full of fail the nebraska QB and WRs are. Dudes can't even hook up without a rape investigation.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 27, 2015, 07:54:53 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 27, 2015, 07:07:57 PM
Quote from: katmai on November 27, 2015, 06:45:46 PM
Huskies crushing Cougs 45-10 in 4th.

That's not as surprising as it probably should be.  Houston crushing Navy was a surprise, though.

Well with starting Wazzu QB out with concussion i was hoping for good performance as Huskies has best Defense in Pac-10 (15th in nation in scoring D) But the 7 turnovers forced, 3 returned for TD's was nice surprise.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 27, 2015, 08:21:29 PM
What cockeyed world are we in where TCU and Baylor are the marquee teams from Texas??
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 12:40:49 AM
Quote from: katmai on November 27, 2015, 08:21:29 PM
What cockeyed world are we in where TCU and Baylor are the marquee teams from Texas??

The same one we have been in for the past three or four years?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 28, 2015, 01:04:54 AM
Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 12:40:49 AM
Quote from: katmai on November 27, 2015, 08:21:29 PM
What cockeyed world are we in where TCU and Baylor are the marquee teams from Texas??

The same one we have been in for the past three or four years?

I know that Valmy, but in the grand old days of the SWC would this even be contemplated?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 12:15:27 PM
Quote from: katmai on November 28, 2015, 01:04:54 AM
I know that Valmy, but in the grand old days of the SWC would this even be contemplated?

Yes?  Hey even Rice got a conference championship in 1994!
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 01:10:42 PM
Quote from: katmai on November 27, 2015, 08:21:29 PM
What cockeyed world are we in where TCU and Baylor are the marquee teams from Texas??

Texas Tech ran what may have been the stupidest trick play I've ever seen in college football (Chuck Pagano established a class by himself). With 3 minutes to go in a one score game, they lined up in the victory formation. 100% give away it is a trick play--why would you ever kneel down with that much time left? It is also a highly ineffective formation to actually run a play out of.

As dumb as that was, Texas responded to sticking its thumb up its ass and surrendering a 50+ yard touchdown.

I think that may be a low moment in Texas football history.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: derspiess on November 28, 2015, 01:38:21 PM
Quote from: katmai on November 27, 2015, 08:21:29 PM
What cockeyed world are we in where TCU and Baylor are the marquee teams from Texas??

Whatever you do, DO NOT blame Texas's head coach.  It is 0% his fault.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 28, 2015, 01:42:35 PM
Well I figured it is 100% Valmy's fault, so...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 01:47:13 PM
Quote from: derspiess on November 28, 2015, 01:38:21 PM
Quote from: katmai on November 27, 2015, 08:21:29 PM
What cockeyed world are we in where TCU and Baylor are the marquee teams from Texas??

Whatever you do, DO NOT blame Texas's head coach.  It is 0% his fault.

Well, it was the state of affairs when he took over.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: derspiess on November 28, 2015, 01:50:45 PM
But it's not his fault for not turning things around despite the enormous resources he has available to him.  Right???
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 28, 2015, 01:53:53 PM
Tuscaloosa wasn't built in a day.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:05:11 PM
Quote from: derspiess on November 28, 2015, 01:50:45 PM
But it's not his fault for not turning things around despite the enormous resources he has available to him.  Right???

I don't have statistics, but my gut feeling is that for coaches taking over major programs and posting losing records their first two years, the prognosis is not good for the rest of their tenure. Which tends to be short.

Eddie--Saban's records in his second year:

Michigan State: 6-6
LSU: 10-3
Alabama: 12-2
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 28, 2015, 02:07:06 PM
Enjoyed watching Baylor and TCU flail around in the rain yesterday.

Even accounting for domes, isn't it weird how few games are played in heavy rain?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 02:11:35 PM
Quote from: derspiess on November 28, 2015, 01:50:45 PM
But it's not his fault for not turning things around despite the enormous resources he has available to him.  Right???

The former AD was a penny pincher so refused to pay for quality control coaches, refused to pay for the offensive coordinators he wanted, and fired his PR guy. Then he cut benefits to the coaches and refused to pay for walkon's meals. So I suspect at most schools he would have had more resources actually. Nobody was winning at Texas when Patterson was in charge, dude was the worst AD ever.

But I have no idea what you are bitching about. Strong's seat is pretty scorching hot.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 28, 2015, 02:12:40 PM
Quality control coaches?? :unsure:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 02:13:46 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 28, 2015, 02:12:40 PM
Quality control coaches?? :unsure:

Yeah coaches who help with scouting and such but do not actually interact with the players.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on November 28, 2015, 02:14:33 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 28, 2015, 02:07:06 PM
Enjoyed watching Baylor and TCU flail around in the rain yesterday.

Even accounting for domes, isn't it weird how few games are played in heavy rain?

Or snow. This is supposed to be a bad weather game. It's just wrong in the sunshine with perfect traction.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 02:16:01 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 01:10:42 PM
I think that may be a low moment in Texas football history.

LOLZ if only. MAYBE bottom 10 this season. Actually I was not entirely bummed about that, it meant Tech couldn't run any time off the clock and gave Texas another chance. But they were not able to recover the onside kick so there we are.

But that is what happens when you hire one of those defensive hacks from the State of Florida. They obviously don't know shit about football in that state.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 02:16:26 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 01:10:42 PM
Quote from: katmai on November 27, 2015, 08:21:29 PM
What cockeyed world are we in where TCU and Baylor are the marquee teams from Texas??

Texas Tech ran what may have been the stupidest trick play I've ever seen in college football (Chuck Pagano established a class by himself). With 3 minutes to go in a one score game, they lined up in the victory formation. 100% give away it is a trick play--why would you ever kneel down with that much time left? It is also a highly ineffective formation to actually run a play out of.

As dumb as that was, Texas responded to sticking its thumb up its ass and surrendering a 50+ yard touchdown.

I think that may be a low moment in Texas football history.

I'm not sure you actually watched that play.  They lined up like that specifically to hide the guy they wanted to run the ball, and he scored not because everyone was standing around doing nothing because of the victory formation or whatever, but because they just couldn't make a tackle despite being in position to do so, which is a continuing problem with the Texas defense regardless of the formation the O lines up in.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 02:22:30 PM
Compared to Texas Tech's tackling they looked like pros.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:23:55 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 02:16:01 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 01:10:42 PM
I think that may be a low moment in Texas football history.

LOLZ if only. MAYBE bottom 10 this season. Actually I was not entirely bummed about that, it meant Tech couldn't run any time off the clock and gave Texas another chance. But they were not able to recover the onside kick so there we are.

But that is what happens when you hire one of those defensive hacks from the State of Florida. They obviously don't know shit about football in that state.

I actually wasn't trying to run down the University of Texas, but the state of texas.  :P Not sure if that is better from your point of view, but things get ambiguous when your school goes by the same name as the state.

I'm just dumbfounded that Texas Tech ran that play, and even more dumbfounded it worked.  :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 02:24:55 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 02:22:30 PM
Compared to Texas Tech's tackling they looked like pros.

THAT is true.  Holy shit.  I knew they had a bad defense but damn. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 02:27:17 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:23:55 PM
I'm just dumbfounded that Texas Tech ran that play, and even more dumbfounded it worked.  :P

I wasn't. Our team is not very bright.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:27:36 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 02:16:26 PM

I'm not sure you actually watched that play.  They lined up like that specifically to hide the guy they wanted to run the ball, and he scored not because everyone was standing around doing nothing because of the victory formation or whatever, but because they just couldn't make a tackle despite being in position to do so, which is a continuing problem with the Texas defense regardless of the formation the O lines up in.

I of course watched the play.  :)

I still don't get it though. If Texas couldn't make a tackle, why not just line up and run a normal play? Why line up in a formation that should fool no one, and effectively only play with 10 people (because the RB lined up as a safety in the play is out of the play before it even begins)?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 02:29:45 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 02:27:17 PM

I wasn't. Our team is not very bright.

I liked how, I didn't catch the numbers, the two DBs that were directly in front of him ended up taking each other out of the play.  Well the one to the inside of the field took the guy who was on the sidelines out by essentially blocking him instead of staying a bit out and not allowing the tiny dude to just run by.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 02:31:16 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:27:36 PM
I of course watched the play.  :)

I still don't get it though. If Texas couldn't make a tackle, why not just line up and run a normal play? Why line up in a formation that should fool no one, and effectively only play with 10 people (because the RB lined up as a safety in the play is out of the play before it even begins)?

It seems to be confusing you quite a bit for something so simple.  It's a trick running play.  Even if it gets stopped, which it should have been, it still runs the clock.  Trick plays can have big upside though.  Everyone rolled to the opposite side, but it didn't clear everyone out like they probably hoped since it left him with no blockers out front and there were defenders there pretty quickly.  A DL couldn't catch little dude, two DBs dumbassed their way out of the play.  No one else could catch him. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 02:33:57 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 02:29:45 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 02:27:17 PM

I wasn't. Our team is not very bright.

I liked how, I didn't catch the numbers, the two DBs that were directly in front of him ended up taking each other out of the play.  Well the one to the inside of the field took the guy who was on the sidelines out by essentially blocking him instead of staying a bit out and not allowing the tiny dude to just run by.

They always are running around clueless. Texas is such a poorly coached team. The funny thing is they shattered the team record for GPA so Strong at least has that going for him. If he didn't no way he could survive this year.

On the plus side I never paid more than $25.00 for any ticket this year and went to every home game. I had a shit load of fun this year at least.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 02:40:57 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 02:33:57 PM
They always are running around clueless. Texas is such a poorly coached team. The funny thing is they shattered the team record for GPA so Strong at least has that going for him. If he didn't no way he could survive this year.

On the plus side I never paid more than $25.00 for any ticket this year and went to every home game. I had a shit load of fun this year at least.

Some very derpy moments.  I never did get to get up there for a game this year.  The crowd that showed up to the games seemed much better than what it used to be like, even with the lower attendance numbers due to suckage and whatnot. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:43:13 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 02:31:16 PM

It seems to be confusing you quite a bit for something so simple.  It's a trick running play.  Even if it gets stopped, which it should have been, it still runs the clock.  Trick plays can have big upside though.  Everyone rolled to the opposite side, but it didn't clear everyone out like they probably hoped.  A DL couldn't catch little dude, two DBs dumbassed their way out of the play.  No one else could catch him.

This is what is confusing me.

Texas Tech wants to run a misdirection running play? I totally get that. Hide a tiny running back behind some massive dudes to make it tough to pick up on the misdirection? I totally get that too.

Line up in victory formation with a deep safety? That I don't get. What is the purpose of the deep safety?
-if you think Texas will be fooled into thinking you will take a knee, that is stupid. Texas should know that won't happen.
-if you think Texas won't be fooled, get the guy up on the line so he can help block. Or line him up as a WR on the right side of the formation, so Texas has to cover him and shift the defense to that side, while you run to the left.

It seems to me that Texas Tech effectively ran a 10 man play, that would deserve massive ridicule had Texas stuffed it as the rightfully should have, but somehow it went for a touchdown.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 02:46:07 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:43:13 PM

This is what is confusing me.

Texas Tech wants to run a misdirection running play? I totally get that. Hide a tiny running back behind some massive dudes to make it tough to pick up on the misdirection? I totally get that too.

Line up in victory formation with a deep safety? That I don't get. What is the purpose of the deep safety?
-if you think Texas will be fooled into thinking you will take a knee, that is stupid. Texas should know that won't happen.
-if you think Texas won't be fooled, get the guy up on the line so he can help block. Or line him up as a WR on the right side of the formation, so Texas has to cover him and shift the defense to that side, while you run to the left.

It seems to me that Texas Tech effectively ran a 10 man play, that would deserve massive ridicule had Texas stuffed it as the rightfully should have, but somehow it went for a touchdown.

It was to cause confusion, dude.  They put the guys back there to fuck with the defenders and give them something else to look at, then clustered up everyone else against the C.  When they all took off in the opposite direction that the midget was going to go, it looked like it was going to be some fucked up weirdo option type play, then tiny dude that is hard to see in the mess comes running out of there with the ball (too late for the DL who saw him after getting through the OL), and the DBs that got back in front of him fucked themselves up.  Even if Texas stuffed it, it's still just a running play and burns some clock.  It's not like they tried some crazy flea flicker throw that would have stopped the clock.

You have to ask Kliff why he decided to run it vs. just a regular running play.  Probably because there is no real difference vs just a regular run.  The Texas D was giving up like 7-8 on the ground with regular runs anyway.  Maybe he just wanted to do something different.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on November 28, 2015, 02:46:38 PM
Ezekiel Elliot can say whatever the hell he wants.  :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 02:57:17 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 02:46:07 PM
Probably because there is no downside

I give up.  :lol:

How can you not see the downside? They ran a play in which only 10 offensive players could contribute? Texas Tech basically went a man down on that play in order to try to confuse Texas before the snap, with a ruse that never should have confused them.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:00:06 PM
If you don't understand that the downsides for that play at that time are the exact same as for every other running play, maybe it's best that you give up.

E:  Seriously, this is not complicated.  It gets stuffed.  Okay 2nd down, clock is still rolling.  Any other running play gets stuffed and the same thing happens.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 03:04:26 PM
The humiliating part was that Texas had the ball down by 3 with a few minutes left against possible the most inept defense in NCAA history, with a running back averaging over 12 yards a carry and failed to score. Of course they did. Because they are losers and they find ways to lose.

The bumbling embarrassment on the trick play was just icing on the cake. Of course after that THEN they went right down and scored.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:06:16 PM
I think it was Strong who said that 4th down call was supposed to be a slant, but then Norvell said it wasn't or some such.  Kind of weird.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 03:07:19 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:06:16 PM
I think it was Strong who said that 4th down call was supposed to be a slant, but then Norvell said it wasn't or some such.  Kind of weird.

The fact that was anything but Swoopes (or Warren) up the middle is just sad. Texas Tech wasn't stopping anything on the ground. Swoopes is inaccurate and horrible throwing the ball on top of that. But hey there is a reason Strong and company are 10-14 through 24 games.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:08:51 PM
Meh, I'm not too worried about pass vs run there, just that particular pass to Daje Johnson of all receivers.   They had just completed a pass (to Burt, I think, who is legitimately good) for what would have been a first down that got negated by OL down the field. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 03:09:14 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:00:06 PM
If you don't understand that the downsides for that play at that time are the exact same as for every other running play, maybe it's best that you give up.

I generally believe that if the rulebook allows you to use 11 guys on a play, you maximize your chances by using all 11. As a coach, if you only use 10 because one has lined up in a position that will make it difficult to contribute, you have increased the risk of a negative play and decreased the chance of a positive one. Ie: there is downside to the formation.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:10:27 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 03:09:14 PM
I generally believe that if the rulebook allows you to use 11 guys on a play, you maximize your chances by using all 11. As a coach, if you only use 10 because one has lined up in a position that will make it difficult to contribute, you have increased the risk of a negative play and decreased the chance of a positive one. Ie: there is downside to the formation.

Oh noes they lose a yard!  That has never happened in the history of ever on running plays!  I don't know how they could have overcome such a crushing blow.  And the clock is still rolling btw. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 03:15:45 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:08:51 PM
Meh, I'm not too worried about pass vs run there, just that particular pass to Daje Johnson of all receivers.   They had just completed a pass (to Burt, I think, who is legitimately good) for what would have been a first down that got negated by OL down the field. 

It is Swoopes. He is maybe 50% when the receiver is wide open. He is an unstoppable monster when he runs though and Tech cannot tackle. But it hardly matters. Texas finds ways to lose.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 03:17:12 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 02:40:57 PM
The crowd that showed up to the games seemed much better than what it used to be like, even with the lower attendance numbers due to suckage and whatnot. 

It is so true. The crowds were great (small but great...) all year. I had a blast. So weird they were never this into it when Texas was blowing everybody out. Probably because middle class slobs like me got priced back into being able to attend the games and rich tea sipping snobs all stayed home.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:17:41 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 03:15:45 PM
It is Swoopes. He is maybe 50% when the receiver is wide open. He is an unstoppable monster when he runs though and Tech cannot tackle. But it hardly matters. Texas finds ways to lose.

Yeah they would have found a way to lose anyway, but calling a pass on 4th and 7 isn't crazytown type stuff even if it is Swoopes (hell Heard has trouble throwing the ball too ugh). 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:19:46 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 03:17:12 PM
It is so true. The crowds were great (small but great...) all year. I had a blast. So weird they were never this into it when Texas was blowing everybody out. Probably because middle class slobs like me got priced back into being able to attend the games and rich tea sipping snobs all stayed home.

:D Tea sipping snobs.  But yeah, I think when it starts getting like this is when you have the more enthusiastic type fans showing up instead of the olds who sit there and nod smugly at every TD then bail at the end of the 3rd Q.  Getting everyone beered up can't hurt either. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 03:20:07 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:17:41 PM
Yeah they would have found a way to lose anyway, but calling a pass on 4th and 7 isn't crazytown type stuff even if it is Swoopes (hell Heard has trouble throwing the ball too ugh). 

Texas is great at finding QBs who cannot throw the ball. That strikes me as a pretty important thing to recruit for but hey I guess Mack kept hunting for the next VY, as if that guy is a proto-type that can be repeated. We will get Strong's first QBs next year we will see if he actually found somebody who can be confused with a College QB when he throws the ball.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 03:20:54 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:10:27 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 03:09:14 PM
I generally believe that if the rulebook allows you to use 11 guys on a play, you maximize your chances by using all 11. As a coach, if you only use 10 because one has lined up in a position that will make it difficult to contribute, you have increased the risk of a negative play and decreased the chance of a positive one. Ie: there is downside to the formation.

Oh noes they lose a yard!  That has never happened in the history of ever on running plays!  I don't know how they could have overcome such a crushing blow.  And the clock is still rolling btw.

All of which would be true if they ran the Chuck Pagano fake punt as well.

My point was that it was a poor play call because the formation should not have confused Texas and, absent that confusion, left Texas Tech poorly positioned to generate a successful play. Yeah, that just means they lose a yard. That doesn't make it smart.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:22:44 PM
Can Locksley throw?  I know nothing about the guy.  Merrick is still around too, I think.  Surely out of the four, they can find a damn QB who can throw, right? Right?????
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:27:56 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 03:20:54 PM
All of which would be true if they ran the Chuck Pagano fake punt as well.

My point was that it was a poor play call because the formation should not have confused Texas and, absent that confusion, left Texas Tech poorly positioned to generate a successful play. Yeah, that just means they lose a yard. That doesn't make it smart.

So, let's just be clear here:  You don't like it and don't think this running play on first down with 3:00 left in a game they have the lead is smart just because you don't like the odd formation and you somehow think it takes a player out of the play.  It doesn't mean they're playing 10 v 11 or whatever you're talking about (is this something you believe occurs when the QB hands the ball off and does nothing else?), it just didn't use blockers out front of the play, it instead used them to pull defenders away.  There are "regular" plays that exist where this happens too, you know.  They probably hoped this one would draw more defenders further away, but even when it didn't, he still got by them.

I'm also not sure why you don't think defenders wouldn't be at least momentarily confused by that formation and that motion.  This was a weird victory formation type thing with 3:00 in a game that, once snapped, had nearly everyone in the backfield running to the right.  If a playaction fake handoff routinely sucks defenders in, why wouldn't something like that pull defenders along with it?  They weren't standing there acting like Tech just took a knee or whatever you are attempting to imply by bringing up the formation over and over, they were just moving to one side of the field the way the play appeared to be flowing.  When they saw where the ball was, they got in front of it.  After that it was just a matter of making a tackle, which they didn't do. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on November 28, 2015, 03:37:24 PM
Just watched WVU defeat their traditional rival, Iowa State.

I hate it that WVU is in the Big 12.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 03:52:10 PM
Quote from: dps on November 28, 2015, 03:37:24 PM
Just watched WVU defeat their traditional rival, Iowa State.

I hate it that WVU is in the Big 12.

In a few decades it will be your traditional rival. Hey we wanted to take Pitt as well but they leveraged their invite into getting an ACC invite.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 03:53:27 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 03:27:56 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 03:20:54 PM
All of which would be true if they ran the Chuck Pagano fake punt as well.

My point was that it was a poor play call because the formation should not have confused Texas and, absent that confusion, left Texas Tech poorly positioned to generate a successful play. Yeah, that just means they lose a yard. That doesn't make it smart.

So, let's just be clear here:  You don't like it and don't think this running play on first down with 3:00 left in a game they have the lead is smart just because you don't like the odd formation and you somehow think it takes a player out of the play.  It doesn't mean they're playing 10 v 11 or whatever you're talking about (is this something you believe occurs when the QB hands the ball off and does nothing else?), it just didn't use blockers out front of the play, it instead used them to pull defenders away.  There are "regular" plays that exist where this happens too, you know.  They probably hoped this one would draw more defenders further away, but even when it didn't, he still got by them.

The problem with the formation is that the RB is lined up in the "safety" position in the victory formation--to tackle guys in the random event of a fumbled snap that could be picked up by the defense--and is too far off the ball to be effective at the start of the play.

Obviously that wasn't fatal to the play--the entire reason I brought this play up was the combination of: a) it being (imo) a stupid call, and b) it working.

QuoteI'm also not sure why you don't think defenders wouldn't be at least momentarily confused by that formation and that motion.  This was a weird victory formation type thing with 3:00 in a game that, once snapped, had nearly everyone in the backfield running to the right.  If a playaction fake handoff routinely sucks defenders in, why wouldn't something like that pull defenders along with it?  They weren't standing there acting like Tech just took a knee or whatever you are attempting to imply by bringing up the formation over and over, they were just moving to one side of the field by the way the play was flowing.  When they saw where the ball was, they got in front of it.  After that it was just a matter of making a tackle, which they didn't do.

You want to get everyone on the right? Why not run a similar formation but split the RB way off the ball to the right, so at the start of the play a CB is way out to the right and a safety lines up a few steps further in that direction?

The point of being in the victory formation, as far as I can tell, was to confuse the defense into thinking, what exactly? That you were going to kneel down?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 04:01:11 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 03:53:27 PM
The problem with the formation is that the RB is lined up in the "safety" position in the victory formation--to tackle guys in the random event of a fumbled snap that could be picked up by the defense--and is too far off the ball to be effective at the start of the play.

Obviously that wasn't fatal to the play--the entire reason I brought this play up was the combination of: a) it being (imo) a stupid call, and b) it working.

This is why I don't think you watched this play, or at least don't know what you were looking at.  That guy back there immediately ran to the right with his hands up like he was expecting a toss from the WR who was in a jet sweep type motion and who the QB had just faked a handoff to.  That guy back there was part of the misdirection to draw defenders over.  He's not missing from the play or whatever.

QuoteYou want to get everyone on the right? Why not run a similar formation but split the RB way off the ball to the right, so at the start of the play a CB is way out to the right and a safety lines up a few steps further in that direction?

The point of being in the victory formation, as far as I can tell, was to confuse the defense into thinking, what exactly? That you were going to kneel down?

What?  Seriously?  The point is they have never seen anything run out of that formation before and don't know what to expect.  It's pretty obvious that no one was thinking they were just going to take a knee, but they had no idea what play was going to be run, especially one where they hid a small guy behind the OL while running other players to the opposite side and faking handoffs and tosses.  That formation is a way to have a little guy right behind the OL without it being out of place.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on November 28, 2015, 04:05:01 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 03:52:10 PM
Quote from: dps on November 28, 2015, 03:37:24 PM
Just watched WVU defeat their traditional rival, Iowa State.

I hate it that WVU is in the Big 12.

In a few decades it will be your traditional rival. Hey we wanted to take Pitt as well but they leveraged their invite into getting an ACC invite.

I don't get that decision. Why beat up on Miami when you can beat up on Texas?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 04:10:47 PM
I have seen the play and I am aware that the dude way off the ball was running to the right.

The bottom line is that I don't think the victory formation is an effective one to run plays out off. The formation is designed to minimize the chance of a catastrophe while voluntarily taking  one yard loss--not to maximize chances of generating offense. It is a formation that defenses are used to lining up against (eg, at the end of halves) when you need to be alert for trick plays.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 04:11:43 PM
Virginia Tech is going to replace Beamer with Fuente from Memphis.

http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2015/11/28/9082809/justin-fuente-virginia-tech-football-coach

ESPN also saying that Foster will stay on the staff.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 04:13:37 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on November 28, 2015, 04:05:01 PM

I don't get that decision. Why get beat up on by Miami when you can beat up on Texas?

Fixed your post, as you may not have seen the triumphant result from yesterday.  :)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 04:14:30 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 28, 2015, 04:10:47 PM
I have seen the play and I am aware that the dude way off the ball was running to the right.

The bottom line is that I don't think the victory formation is an effective one to run plays out off. The formation is designed to minimize the chance of a catastrophe while voluntarily taking  one yard loss--not to maximize chances of generating offense. It is a formation that defenses are used to lining up against (eg, at the end of halves) when you need to be alert for trick plays.

And yet they ran a neat little play out of it that was quite effective even when the defense wasn't standing around like they typically do in V formation situations, and even if it had been stopped by one of the two DBs.  They needed more points with the way the game was going, but just running clock at that point isn't a bad thing for them either.  They would have still had two more shots at a first down even if it didn't work (unless shit happens and they fumble which is a risk on every play) and they weren't exactly hurting for offense.  No one is saying they should run their whole offense out of the V formation or whatever silliness, but there's nothing wrong with crazy trick plays every now and then, and there certainly wasn't anything wrong with this one.

They almost got unlucky with the penetration by the DL, he just happened to come through the line next to the little dude instead of right in his face.  He saw him and turned to chase him immediately but obviously isn't fast enough to run a speed guy like that down.  That would have been maybe a yard loss.  The way it was run, they would have lost maybe 2 or 3 yards max if he had been caught when trying to run around the OL unless he started running backwards or something. It wasn't a high risk play, especially as far as trick plays go.

E:  USC just got the lead back.  Auburn leading Bama early. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 28, 2015, 04:51:12 PM
Hadn't noticed 'til now what a crap season Georgia Tech's had.  :D

Shame Ganus bailed them out of getting shut out with that stupid taunting penalty.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 05:02:29 PM
They started out in the top 15 of the stupid preseason polls, didn't they?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on November 28, 2015, 05:05:24 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 03:52:10 PM
Quote from: dps on November 28, 2015, 03:37:24 PM
Just watched WVU defeat their traditional rival, Iowa State.

I hate it that WVU is in the Big 12.

In a few decades it will be your traditional rival. Hey we wanted to take Pitt as well but they leveraged their invite into getting an ACC invite.

You really think the current conference lineup is going to last a few decades?  I don't give it half a dozen years.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 28, 2015, 05:13:05 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 05:02:29 PM
They started out in the top 15 of the stupid preseason polls, didn't they?

Close. 16 in AP, 17 in Coaches poll.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on November 28, 2015, 05:16:13 PM
Cocks making Clemson look bad.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 07:30:49 PM
Quote from: dps on November 28, 2015, 05:05:24 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 03:52:10 PM
Quote from: dps on November 28, 2015, 03:37:24 PM
Just watched WVU defeat their traditional rival, Iowa State.

I hate it that WVU is in the Big 12.

In a few decades it will be your traditional rival. Hey we wanted to take Pitt as well but they leveraged their invite into getting an ACC invite.

You really think the current conference lineup is going to last a few decades?  I don't give it half a dozen years.

We'll see.

When our grandchildren are asked why Iowa State plays West Virginia the Saturday after Thanksgiving the answer shall be:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F15%2F11%2F28%2Fc4a01f4572fd93b7c0d48ea894d3789c.jpg&hash=c4c7a26b1ba0e456239ff37ded681e392cabc1fc)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on November 28, 2015, 08:33:21 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 07:30:49 PM

When our grandchildren are asked why Iowa State plays West Virginia the Saturday after Thanksgiving the answer shall be:


Because tornadoes vs hillbillies is too funny a matchup to not make annual.

Because the scheduling committee thought they were Southern Cal.

Because Pitt decided to start going to Florida for the winter. Pussies.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 08:40:18 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on November 28, 2015, 08:33:21 PM
Because Pitt decided to start going to Florida for the winter. Pussies.

I don't know if they can take the intimidating crowd playing Da U after all those years of playing West Virginia:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fd3f5994kvuwcz1.cloudfront.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F11%2FMiami-senior-day.png&hash=8b62cffa75e23ec926b4bb816461ea963f15bdf5)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 08:41:13 PM
Kansas became the first major conference team since Udub in 2008 to go winless.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: derspiess on November 28, 2015, 08:43:12 PM
Quote from: dps on November 28, 2015, 03:37:24 PM
Just watched WVU defeat their traditional rival, Iowa State.

I hate it that WVU is in the Big 12.

For football I'm not crazy about it, but where else would you put them?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 28, 2015, 09:44:39 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 28, 2015, 08:41:13 PM
Kansas became the first major conference team since Udub in 2008 to go winless.

Remember when they won the damn Orange Bowl and finished in the top 10?  Not even a decade ago.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on November 28, 2015, 10:20:45 PM
Quote from: derspiess on November 28, 2015, 08:43:12 PM
Quote from: dps on November 28, 2015, 03:37:24 PM
Just watched WVU defeat their traditional rival, Iowa State.

I hate it that WVU is in the Big 12.

For football I'm not crazy about it, but where else would you put them?

A non-emasculated Big East was fine.  Since we don't have that anymore, the ACC would be the logical choice.  Even with Maryland gone to the Big Ten, they could still have the Backyard Brawl with Pitt, and be in a conference with some other teams that they have history with, like Syracuse, VT, BC, and to a lesser extent Louisville and Miami.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: derspiess on November 28, 2015, 10:59:59 PM
That's fine but IIRC the ACC didn't want WVU.  I think the Big12 was the only Power 5 conference that wanted them.  If they hadn't taken that offer they'd be stuck in the All American Conference most likely.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on November 28, 2015, 11:12:00 PM
Quote from: derspiess on November 28, 2015, 10:59:59 PM
That's fine but IIRC the ACC didn't want WVU.  I think the Big12 was the only Power 5 conference that wanted them.  If they hadn't taken that offer they'd be stuck in the All American Conference most likely.

Yeah, that's probably right, but it doesn't mean I have to like it.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 29, 2015, 12:48:45 AM
Quote from: dps on November 28, 2015, 11:12:00 PM
Quote from: derspiess on November 28, 2015, 10:59:59 PM
That's fine but IIRC the ACC didn't want WVU.  I think the Big12 was the only Power 5 conference that wanted them.  If they hadn't taken that offer they'd be stuck in the All American Conference most likely.

Yeah, that's probably right, but it doesn't mean I have to like it.

I don't think anybody is particularly happy about the current arrangements. Do the ACC, Big 10, and SEC fans like their new bloated monstrosities? Eh maybe. I vastly prefer the old fashioned playing everybody every year in football and home and home in Basketball. The current Big 12 seems like the least shitty deal to me.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: jimmy olsen on November 29, 2015, 03:53:46 AM
Notre Dame :weep:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on November 29, 2015, 01:30:14 PM
Mark Richt has been fired:

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/eye-on-college-football/25393920/reports-georgia-fires-coach-mark-richt-after-15-seasons

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 29, 2015, 01:52:50 PM
We won't have Mark Richt to kick around anymore  :(
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 29, 2015, 01:53:15 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on November 29, 2015, 03:53:46 AM
Notre Dame :weep:

Yeah thanks for handing a playoff spot to OU. Bastards.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 29, 2015, 02:34:34 PM
Well... :mellow:

I would have loved a championship, but Richt was a great recruiter and always put together teams that could compete. Had a few near misses. Beat Georgia Tech 13 times. I'm sorry to see him go, and I don't hold out much hope the next coach will be more successful.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 29, 2015, 02:56:24 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 29, 2015, 01:53:15 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on November 29, 2015, 03:53:46 AM
Notre Dame :weep:

Yeah thanks for handing a playoff spot to OU. Bastards.

Nd was 6 in the last playoff poll, and ou 3. With ou blowing out osu to win the big 12, i dont think anything would have gotten nd ahead of ou.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 29, 2015, 03:40:14 PM
So assuming the spots are set to go to Clemson, Bama, OU, and the Sparty-Iowa winner, who do you all think gets in if NC or Florida get an upset?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 29, 2015, 04:07:45 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 29, 2015, 03:40:14 PM
So assuming the spots are set to go to Clemson, Bama, OU, and the Sparty-Iowa winner, who do you all think gets in if NC or Florida get an upset?

Interesting question, with the caveat that UF won't beat Alabama. UF doesn't have the offense, and while it has a great defense, is vulnerable to the run. The more likely scenario may be: what if North Carolina beats Clemson?

If Stanford beats USC, I think it is Stanford. They are 9th in the latest rankings, and the only team ahead of them that they would need to leapfrog without is Ohio State. Stanford beating ND (higher ranked than Michigan), and USC, with a Pac 12 championship, should be enough to do that. There is of course the chance that Alabama hangs on--but the strength of schedule argument is close between Stanford and Alabama, they would have the same record, and Stanford won its division.

If Stanford loses...Alabama stays in the playoff, or it goes to Ohio State? What if Iowa wins a nail biter? It might be tough to give the spot to Ohio State ahead of Michigan State, given that Michigan State played a better regular season schedule, had the same record as Ohio State, beat them head to head, and won the division.

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on November 29, 2015, 04:59:34 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 29, 2015, 03:40:14 PM
So assuming the spots are set to go to Clemson, Bama, OU, and the Sparty-Iowa winner, who do you all think gets in if NC or Florida get an upset?

If Florida beats Alabama (extremely unlikely) then my guess would be that Sanford gets in if they win the PAC 10.  If Sanford loses the Pac 10 title game, then Ohio State might slip back in, but more likely it would be Florida.

Even if NC beats Clemson (more likely than Florida beating Alabama, but still very unlikely), NC isn't getting into the top 4.  My guess would be that Ohio State gets in then, though I don't think that they deserve to.

If NC and Florida both should somehow manage to win then the top 4 would likely be Oklahoma, the MSU/Iowa winner, Stanford (if they win the PAC 10) and Florida.  I guess if Stanford loses in this scenario, that might be the only way NC gets in, but even then, I think Ohio State would get in ahead of them, though then it might make a difference who wins the Big 10 title game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 29, 2015, 06:33:25 PM
Quote from: dps on November 29, 2015, 04:59:34 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 29, 2015, 03:40:14 PM
So assuming the spots are set to go to Clemson, Bama, OU, and the Sparty-Iowa winner, who do you all think gets in if NC or Florida get an upset?

If Florida beats Alabama (extremely unlikely) then my guess would be that Sanford gets in if they win the PAC 10.  If Sanford loses the Pac 10 title game, then Ohio State might slip back in, but more likely it would be Florida.

Even if NC beats Clemson (more likely than Florida beating Alabama, but still very unlikely), NC isn't getting into the top 4.  My guess would be that Ohio State gets in then, though I don't think that they deserve to.

If NC and Florida both should somehow manage to win then the top 4 would likely be Oklahoma, the MSU/Iowa winner, Stanford (if they win the PAC 10) and Florida.  I guess if Stanford loses in this scenario, that might be the only way NC gets in, but even then, I think Ohio State would get in ahead of them, though then it might make a difference who wins the Big 10 title game.

The problem with florida getting in is that they are a 2 loss team that did not play an especially difficult schedule (given the softness of the SEC East). Against that schedule they did not look especially strong--see the last two weeks--dominated by FSU and overtime against FAU. Their starting quarterback is out on a drug suspension.

If North Carolina wins, not only do I think North Carolina will be ahead of them, I think Clemson may be as well. In fact, I'd say it is almost 100% UNC will be ahead of them--right now UNC is 14 and UF 12--considering what happened last weekend, UNC will be ahead of them in this week's poll, and UNC will have beaten the #1 team in the country-I don't see an opportunity for UF to get ahead of UNC without a UNC loss.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Ed Anger on November 29, 2015, 07:06:12 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 26, 2015, 06:29:08 PM
Hate Week continues; this time, The Taiwanese Animators get involved:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zHeLCDtQVo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zHeLCDtQVo)

Note that even the Taiwanese can tell the good guys from the bad guys in this game.

Huh.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 29, 2015, 09:18:15 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 29, 2015, 04:07:45 PM
Interesting question, with the caveat that UF won't beat Alabama. UF doesn't have the offense, and while it has a great defense, is vulnerable to the run. The more likely scenario may be: what if North Carolina beats Clemson?

In my opinion it will be that one loss conference champ who just bumped off the #1 team. So North Carolina.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 29, 2015, 10:33:46 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 29, 2015, 09:18:15 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 29, 2015, 04:07:45 PM
Interesting question, with the caveat that UF won't beat Alabama. UF doesn't have the offense, and while it has a great defense, is vulnerable to the run. The more likely scenario may be: what if North Carolina beats Clemson?

In my opinion it will be that one loss conference champ who just bumped off the #1 team. So North Carolina.

That could be. But I think UNC gets passed over for Stanford--and if they do it is justice imo.

UNC out of conference schedule: South Carolina, NC A&T, Illinois, Delaware
Stanford out of conference schedule: Northwestern, UCF, Notre Dame

First, take note that Stanford only plays 3 out of conference games, because the Pac 12 plays a 9 game schedule. That should be a big bonus to them. Also, while UCF is putrid this year, they are an FBS team that won the Fiesta Bowl a couple years ago, and both Northwestern and Notre Dame are 10-2 power conference teams.

UNC played 2 FCS teams, and the playoff committee took note--they cited this as a reason they ranked them down in the polls earlier this year. Neither of the other two teams are anything to write home about--between the two of them they won 8 games this year.

So Stanford wins the Pac 12, which on balance is generally considered better than the ACC, and schedules a monster out of conference schedule on top of playing an extra conference game.

That should offset an extra loss, considering UNC played one of the worst out of conference schedules you can set up, plus even played in the really weak side of the ACC and didn't draw FSU or Clemson (or Louisville) in the regular season (ie, the ACC teams with a pulse).
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 29, 2015, 10:52:07 PM
Northwestern is 10-2?  How the hell did that happen?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 29, 2015, 11:39:01 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 29, 2015, 10:52:07 PM
Northwestern is 10-2?  How the hell did that happen?

Pat Fitzgerald is a good coach, his team is solid, and the Big Ten West blows.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on November 30, 2015, 04:09:07 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 29, 2015, 10:33:46 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 29, 2015, 09:18:15 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 29, 2015, 04:07:45 PM
Interesting question, with the caveat that UF won't beat Alabama. UF doesn't have the offense, and while it has a great defense, is vulnerable to the run. The more likely scenario may be: what if North Carolina beats Clemson?

In my opinion it will be that one loss conference champ who just bumped off the #1 team. So North Carolina.

That could be. But I think UNC gets passed over for Stanford--and if they do it is justice imo.

UNC out of conference schedule: South Carolina, NC A&T, Illinois, Delaware
Stanford out of conference schedule: Northwestern, UCF, Notre Dame

First, take note that Stanford only plays 3 out of conference games, because the Pac 12 plays a 9 game schedule. That should be a big bonus to them. Also, while UCF is putrid this year, they are an FBS team that won the Fiesta Bowl a couple years ago, and both Northwestern and Notre Dame are 10-2 power conference teams.

UNC played 2 FCS teams, and the playoff committee took note--they cited this as a reason they ranked them down in the polls earlier this year. Neither of the other two teams are anything to write home about--between the two of them they won 8 games this year.

So Stanford wins the Pac 12, which on balance is generally considered better than the ACC, and schedules a monster out of conference schedule on top of playing an extra conference game.

That should offset an extra loss, considering UNC played one of the worst out of conference schedules you can set up, plus even played in the really weak side of the ACC and didn't draw FSU or Clemson (or Louisville) in the regular season (ie, the ACC teams with a pulse).

Yeah, NC has 2 problems.  The first is the 2 FCS teams on their schedule, as you alluded to.  The other is that their 1 loss is a bad loss--South Carolina was a bad team this year.  Nobody else in the conversation really has a bad loss.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 30, 2015, 09:23:40 AM
Also, they just haven't beaten anyone. The best team they beat is: Miami, at 8-4 (Pittsburgh is also 8-4). That is a really thin resume to get into the playoff with a loss.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 30, 2015, 12:12:07 PM
Well sure, but in this hypothetical they've also beat 12-0 Clemson.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on November 30, 2015, 12:14:46 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 30, 2015, 12:12:07 PM
Well sure, but in this hypothetical they've also beat 12-0 Clemson.

Which South Carolina nearly did this weekend.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 30, 2015, 12:42:55 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 30, 2015, 12:12:07 PM
Well sure, but in this hypothetical they've also beat 12-0 Clemson.

Yeah, so the committee will have to weigh which is more impressive. Stanford going 11-2 against a schedule with the following ranked teams (based on current AP poll): Notre Dame, Northwestern, Oregon, Utah, USC (2x), and no FCS teams.

Or UNC going 12-1 against a schedule with only one ranked team: Clemson, and 2 FCS teams.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on November 30, 2015, 12:44:33 PM
Quote from: dps on November 30, 2015, 04:09:07 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 29, 2015, 10:33:46 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 29, 2015, 09:18:15 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 29, 2015, 04:07:45 PM
Interesting question, with the caveat that UF won't beat Alabama. UF doesn't have the offense, and while it has a great defense, is vulnerable to the run. The more likely scenario may be: what if North Carolina beats Clemson?

In my opinion it will be that one loss conference champ who just bumped off the #1 team. So North Carolina.

That could be. But I think UNC gets passed over for Stanford--and if they do it is justice imo.

UNC out of conference schedule: South Carolina, NC A&T, Illinois, Delaware
Stanford out of conference schedule: Northwestern, UCF, Notre Dame

First, take note that Stanford only plays 3 out of conference games, because the Pac 12 plays a 9 game schedule. That should be a big bonus to them. Also, while UCF is putrid this year, they are an FBS team that won the Fiesta Bowl a couple years ago, and both Northwestern and Notre Dame are 10-2 power conference teams.

UNC played 2 FCS teams, and the playoff committee took note--they cited this as a reason they ranked them down in the polls earlier this year. Neither of the other two teams are anything to write home about--between the two of them they won 8 games this year.

So Stanford wins the Pac 12, which on balance is generally considered better than the ACC, and schedules a monster out of conference schedule on top of playing an extra conference game.

That should offset an extra loss, considering UNC played one of the worst out of conference schedules you can set up, plus even played in the really weak side of the ACC and didn't draw FSU or Clemson (or Louisville) in the regular season (ie, the ACC teams with a pulse).

Yeah, NC has 2 problems.  The first is the 2 FCS teams on their schedule, as you alluded to.  The other is that their 1 loss is a bad loss--South Carolina was a bad team this year.  Nobody else in the conversation really has a bad loss.

Oklahoma has a terribad loss.

Sorry about not cropping on phone.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 30, 2015, 12:57:19 PM
Re: FCS teams. Who cares? Everybody has a couple free wins, whether they're teams you should beat by 20 or teams you should beat by 50 doesn't matter over much.

Looking over Stanford's record, I see a lot of very close games. I'm not so sure eking out a 2 point victory over Notre Dame makes up for an extra loss. Also, NC's loss was the first game of the season, so they'd have won 12 straight. That should count for something too.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 30, 2015, 01:00:37 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 30, 2015, 12:57:19 PM
Re: FCS teams. Who cares? Everybody has a couple free wins, whether they're teams you should beat by 20 or teams you should beat by 50 doesn't matter over much.


I don't think a Pac 12 opponent can ever be scheduled as a free win. I'd say Stanford has one free win: UCF. And arguably UCF was a bit dangerous at the start of the year, before they quit.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 30, 2015, 01:08:01 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 30, 2015, 01:00:37 PM
I don't think a Pac 12 opponent can ever be scheduled as a free win. I'd say Stanford has one free win: UCF. And arguably UCF was a bit dangerous at the start of the year, before they quit.

Ok, but if we just throw those games out, 10-1 is still better than 11-2.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 30, 2015, 01:19:14 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 30, 2015, 01:08:01 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 30, 2015, 01:00:37 PM
I don't think a Pac 12 opponent can ever be scheduled as a free win. I'd say Stanford has one free win: UCF. And arguably UCF was a bit dangerous at the start of the year, before they quit.

Ok, but if we just throw those games out, 10-1 is still better than 11-2.

If the committee followed that logic, or no one would want to play a 9 game conference schedule or schedule anyone decent out of conference, to maximize chances of getting in the playoffs. Stanford has played the 16th ranked schedule, while North Carolina's is at 63. At a certain point, such a disparity in schedule needs to compensate for a 1 loss difference in record.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on November 30, 2015, 01:24:55 PM
Balanced by the coaches who view wins uber alles, and you can understand why they feel that way.  :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 30, 2015, 02:09:22 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 30, 2015, 01:19:14 PM
If the committee followed that logic, or no one would want to play a 9 game conference schedule or schedule anyone decent out of conference, to maximize chances of getting in the playoffs.

Perhaps. If North Carolina had followed that guideline, they'd be undefeated now and we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 30, 2015, 02:17:18 PM
Quote from: sbr on November 30, 2015, 12:44:33 PM
Oklahoma has a terribad loss.

Yes. Yes they do  :menace:

But how shitty is this season for Texas that even when they upset their national title contender arch-rival they did not even succeed in ruining OU's season?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 30, 2015, 04:56:57 PM
I think firing Mark Richt was a bad move.

Realistically, how often do you expect a good coach to win the SEC East at Georgia? Say 1 year in 3?

So if winning half of SEC Championship games, that means an SEC title 1 year in 6?

Mark Richt was 6 for 15 for SEC East titles, and 2 for 15 in SEC titles.

He was 9-3 this year--in a year they didn't have a good QB, although he has produced a ton of them in recent years.

Supposedly Kirby Smart is going to be the guy at UGA, but coordinators without head coaching experience are a crapshoot--the guy basically has the resume that Richt did when Richt left FSU, only Richt has proven to be a competent head coach. Maybe he will be the next Nick Saban, but I think it is more likely he is the next Will Muschamp.

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on November 30, 2015, 05:16:47 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 30, 2015, 04:56:57 PM
I think firing Mark Richt was a bad move.

Realistically, how often do you expect a good coach to win the SEC East at Georgia? Say 1 year in 3?

So if winning half of SEC Championship games, that means an SEC title 1 year in 6?

Mark Richt was 6 for 15 for SEC East titles, and 2 for 15 in SEC titles.

He was 9-3 this year--in a year they didn't have a good QB, although he has produced a ton of them in recent years.

Supposedly Kirby Smart is going to be the guy at UGA, but coordinators without head coaching experience are a crapshoot--the guy basically has the resume that Richt did when Richt left FSU, only Richt has proven to be a competent head coach. Maybe he will be the next Nick Saban, but I think it is more likely he is the next Will Muschamp.

100% agree. The Georgia boosters must just be in a playoff frenzy or something. It makes no sense. But hey, Jim Tressel is available.  :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on November 30, 2015, 09:26:03 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on November 30, 2015, 05:16:47 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 30, 2015, 04:56:57 PM
I think firing Mark Richt was a bad move.

Realistically, how often do you expect a good coach to win the SEC East at Georgia? Say 1 year in 3?

So if winning half of SEC Championship games, that means an SEC title 1 year in 6?

Mark Richt was 6 for 15 for SEC East titles, and 2 for 15 in SEC titles.

He was 9-3 this year--in a year they didn't have a good QB, although he has produced a ton of them in recent years.

Supposedly Kirby Smart is going to be the guy at UGA, but coordinators without head coaching experience are a crapshoot--the guy basically has the resume that Richt did when Richt left FSU, only Richt has proven to be a competent head coach. Maybe he will be the next Nick Saban, but I think it is more likely he is the next Will Muschamp.

100% agree. The Georgia boosters must just be in a playoff frenzy or something. It makes no sense. But hey, Jim Tressel is available.  :P

I think it's a situation where the perception is that the team has hit its ceiling with Richt, and that the team has very often not performed up to its talent level under him.  It may be the case that they've hit their ceiling with him, but I think the reason they've seemed to underperform is that they've been consistently over-rated heading into the season.

And as far as hitting a ceiling under a given coach, well, the track record of schools firing the coach because 9-3 wasn't good enough isn't encouraging.  Look at WVU.  Three seasons of 9-3 under Bill Stewart got him ridiculed as being Luther van Dam, and then replaced in a very messy transition, and while that wasn't entirely without reason, 9-3 probably looks pretty good in Morgantown about now.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 30, 2015, 09:45:49 PM
Quote from: dps on November 30, 2015, 09:26:03 PM

I think it's a situation where the perception is that the team has hit its ceiling with Richt, and that the team has very often not performed up to its talent level under him.  It may be the case that they've hit their ceiling with him, but I think the reason they've seemed to underperform is that they've been consistently over-rated heading into the season.

And as far as hitting a ceiling under a given coach, well, the track record of schools firing the coach because 9-3 wasn't good enough isn't encouraging.  Look at WVU.  Three seasons of 9-3 under Bill Stewart got him ridiculed as being Luther van Dam, and then replaced in a very messy transition, and while that wasn't entirely without reason, 9-3 probably looks pretty good in Morgantown about now.

I think it was 3 years ago that the team was in the SEC championship game against Alabama, winner going to the national title game against Notre Dame, UGA down by 4, maybe 15 seconds on the clock, UGA with a first down at the Alabama 5.

At that point, odds are that UGA wins the game, the SEC, and considering how Notre Dame played in the actual game, the national title.

What happens? The ball is slightly deflected at the line, goes right to a UGA player short of the goal line that was not the intended receiver, he is tackled short of the goal line, and Alabama wins. Total fluke play, had nothing to do with whether Saban or Richt was the better coach.

He could win a national title--it is just a matter of getting the breaks. There are 130 teams in college football and only one wins the national title each year. Unless you are a good enough coach to establish a truly dominant program--and very few are--you aren't going to win a national title without a few breaks. Most years UGA has been competitive for an SEC title--that basically means competitive for a national title as well.

I'll be happy if Richt ends up coaching at Miami, even if he isn't my number one choice.

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 30, 2015, 09:51:31 PM
Hell Texas has never won the national title without getting breaks.

A&M fumbling the game winning interception in 1963
The bomb on 4th and short against Arkansas in 1969
The Hail Mary to beat UCLA in 1970
Ohio State missing the critical field goal (and the Tight End dropping a TD) in 2005, and then somehow stopping USC on 4th and 2.

Though I guess those two 4th down plays were just good execution but they sure felt like luck at the time.

Very rarely does anybody just roll down easy street like DA U used to. Haha just kidding they had to rely on Florida State's inexplicable special teams failures.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on November 30, 2015, 09:56:43 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 30, 2015, 09:51:31 PM
Hell Texas has never won the national title without getting breaks.

A&M fumbling the game winning interception in 1963
The bomb on 4th and short against Arkansas in 1969
The Hail Mary to beat UCLA in 1970
Ohio State missing the critical field goal (and the Tight End dropping a TD) in 2005, and then somehow stopping USC on 4th and 2.

Very rarely does anybody just roll down easy street like DA U used to. Haha just kidding they had to rely on Florida State's inexplicable special teams failures.

UM national titles:

1983: Nebraska 2 point play was no good, if Nebraska just kicked the extra point they were champs
1987: UM came back from 16 down at FSU in the fourth quarter, it came down to an FSU 2 point conversion that FSU didn't get
1989: Don't remember any decisive close calls (Miami did lose to FSU by 14)
1991: FSU wide right on a 30 something yard field goal as time expired, won by a point
2001: A shitty BC team was driving for the win with less than a minute to go and were inside the 20, when Ed Reed ran back an interception for a touchdown
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 30, 2015, 10:19:59 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on November 30, 2015, 09:56:43 PM
1991: FSU wide right on a 30 something yard field goal as time expired, won by a point

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fview3%2F1746790%2Fbobby-bowden-o.gif&hash=5ce897d53a6f0ab43fc3613716a2c8a2da939e09)

Still makes me giggle
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on November 30, 2015, 10:20:28 PM
1991 UDub only beat California by 7, rest of the games they won by at least 11. In fact besides the Cal and USC game (14-3 win) the avg score was 45-9.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on November 30, 2015, 10:22:22 PM
Quote from: katmai on November 30, 2015, 10:20:28 PM
1991 UDub only beat California by 7, rest of the games they won by at least 11. In fact besides the Cal and USC game (14-3 win) the avg score was 45-9.

I like the FU to Desmond Howard at the end of the Rose Bowl. I didn't realize how much until he flaked out on the Redskins a few years later.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on December 02, 2015, 05:07:04 PM
woops
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on December 02, 2015, 05:32:31 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on December 02, 2015, 05:07:04 PM
woops

???
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on December 02, 2015, 05:42:10 PM
Celery Vikinged a fodbol post then Mongered it.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: celedhring on December 02, 2015, 05:48:53 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on December 02, 2015, 05:42:10 PM
Celery Vikinged a fodbol post then Mongered it.

I saw "football" and posted in the wrong thread  :blush:

Or actually the right thread, you just should move all the handegg talk somewhere else.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on December 02, 2015, 07:55:48 PM
Mark Richt to Miami: http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/writer/dennis-dodd/25398542/mark-richt-agrees-to-become-miamis-next-coach
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on December 02, 2015, 08:47:55 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on December 02, 2015, 07:55:48 PM
Mark Richt to Miami: http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/writer/dennis-dodd/25398542/mark-richt-agrees-to-become-miamis-next-coach

Parts of the fan base will never be happy that a coach who previously took over the team facing severe NCAA penalties and built one of the all time great NCAA teams just got passed over.

But for the first time in a long time, Miami has a really solid head coach. Things should get better.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on December 02, 2015, 09:30:19 PM
Quote from: celedhring on December 02, 2015, 05:48:53 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on December 02, 2015, 05:42:10 PM
Celery Vikinged a fodbol post then Mongered it.

I saw "football" and posted in the wrong thread  :blush:

Or actually the right thread, you just should move all the handegg talk somewhere else.

Take your headball talk somewhere else.  Or learn what the "foot" in "football" refers to.  Hint:  it's not part of the human body.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on December 02, 2015, 11:35:54 PM
Hey Grumbles,

Thoughts

QuoteMichigan defensive coordinator D.J. Durkin will be the next head coach at Maryland, according to several reports.

Durkin, 37, has a stellar resume as a defensive assistant. He's worked with Jim Harbaugh at both Stanford and Michigan, and Urban Meyer and Will Muschamp at Florida. He served as Florida's interim for the Birmingham Bowl following the 2014 season and led the Gators to a 28-20 win over East Carolina.

Michigan currently ranks fourth nationally in total defense.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on December 03, 2015, 06:13:34 AM
Quote from: katmai on December 02, 2015, 11:35:54 PM
Hey Grumbles,

Thoughts

QuoteMichigan defensive coordinator D.J. Durkin will be the next head coach at Maryland, according to several reports.

Durkin, 37, has a stellar resume as a defensive assistant. He's worked with Jim Harbaugh at both Stanford and Michigan, and Urban Meyer and Will Muschamp at Florida. He served as Florida's interim for the Birmingham Bowl following the 2014 season and led the Gators to a 28-20 win over East Carolina.

Michigan currently ranks fourth nationally in total defense.

He's only 37.  He could have waited for a better job.  He kinda pissed off a lot of Michigan fans by interviewing and whatnot during the week he was supposed to be getting the team ready for The Game, and then his defense stunk up the place, but I think that he wasn't in control of the timing.

I think Maryland would have been better off getting an offensive guy.  Their offense is offensive.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on December 03, 2015, 02:09:51 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on December 02, 2015, 08:47:55 PM
But for the first time in a long time, Miami has a really solid head coach. Things should get better.

Will Richt be bringing the rest of the 1982 Miami QBs with him?

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CVRTui-WoAEZTv6.png)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on December 03, 2015, 05:35:27 PM
Quote from: Valmy on December 03, 2015, 02:09:51 PM

Will Richt be bringing the rest of the 1982 Miami QBs with him?


Is #1 Bernie Kosar? If so, he was on the Board of Trustees for UM.

Realistically, he could bring in Ken Dorsey as OC, who is the Carolina Panthers QB Coach.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on December 03, 2015, 08:00:46 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on December 03, 2015, 05:35:27 PM
Is #1 Bernie Kosar? If so, he was on the Board of Trustees for UM.

Yeah. Vinny Testaverde is #18 (I guess he changed to #14 later), Jim Kelly is #12, and Richt is #9.

No idea who #13 is.

Some people consider that the greatest College Football QB depth chart of all time. So of course UM went 7-4.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on December 03, 2015, 08:35:40 PM
Google says Kyle Vanderwende is his name.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on December 03, 2015, 08:38:21 PM
Quote from: Valmy on December 03, 2015, 08:00:46 PM
Some people consider that the greatest College Football QB depth chart of all time.

That is pretty amazing.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on December 03, 2015, 10:51:31 PM
Quote from: Valmy on December 03, 2015, 08:00:46 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on December 03, 2015, 05:35:27 PM
Is #1 Bernie Kosar? If so, he was on the Board of Trustees for UM.

Yeah. Vinny Testaverde is #18 (I guess he changed to #14 later), Jim Kelly is #12, and Richt is #9.

No idea who #13 is.

Some people consider that the greatest College Football QB depth chart of all time. So of course UM went 7-4.

Who would have guessed that Mark Richt would make the most money out of football when all was said and done?

Living in Atlanta, I sometimes listen to the Mark Richt radio shows, and once a caller asked him his greatest athletic disappointment. He said he had a goal to bench 300, and he was really close, I think he mentioned an odd number like 298 that was really close but not quite there, but never could get 300 up.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on December 05, 2015, 04:58:08 PM
Texas just upset Baylor in Waco. The biggest upset win in Texas history. Beat OU earlier this year which is now the 3rd biggest upset win ever.

The upset that is sandwiched these two wins is the 1996 Big 12 title game against Nebraska.

Hell how many of the teams in the playoff have two top 12 wins? What a weird freaking season.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on December 05, 2015, 11:49:21 PM
We're going to have 3 5-7 teams in bowl games this season. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on December 05, 2015, 11:57:01 PM
Hawkeyes lose!  Hawkeyes lose!

Pretty dull game.  Gus Johnson gamely tried to sell it as a pitcher's duel.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on December 06, 2015, 12:04:00 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on December 05, 2015, 11:57:01 PM
Hawkeyes lose!  Hawkeyes lose!

Pretty dull game. 
yeah it actually put me to sleep.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on December 06, 2015, 12:14:09 AM
Quote from: dps on December 05, 2015, 11:49:21 PM
We're going to have 3 5-7 teams in bowl games this season. 

So glad Texas is not one of them. Too much work to do this offseason for the toilet bowl.

Anyway that McCaffery kid seems like he is pretty good.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on December 06, 2015, 11:36:19 AM
Quote from: Valmy on December 06, 2015, 12:14:09 AM


Anyway that McCaffery kid seems like he is pretty good.

Well, he's really good.  His brother Max plays for Duke, and he's just pretty good.  As a player, Christian isn't really much like their dad, but Max is really similar to Ed, but not quite as good.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Rasputin on December 09, 2015, 01:31:51 PM
I declare this season a good one. We've beaten the gators soundly. We've beaten Miami. We should beat them both again next year. The sun shines on Tallahassee.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on December 18, 2015, 08:58:00 PM
I'm getting a real sense of deja vu all over again reading about the Charlie Strong situation at Texas.  Just yesterday,  I saw this: http://www.texasmonthly.com/the-daily-post/is-there-an-internal-struggle-to-oust-charlie-strong/ (http://www.texasmonthly.com/the-daily-post/is-there-an-internal-struggle-to-oust-charlie-strong/).  The comparison to Akers in the 80s is interesting, but the comparison to RichRod at Michigan is near-exact.

Of course, when it was down, Michigan never got to see OSU or ND self-destruct like A&M has.  That situation's gotta be some consolation to Longhorns fans.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on December 19, 2015, 12:07:00 AM
Quote from: grumbler on December 18, 2015, 08:58:00 PM
I'm getting a real sense of deja vu all over again reading about the Charlie Strong situation at Texas.  Just yesterday,  I saw this: http://www.texasmonthly.com/the-daily-post/is-there-an-internal-struggle-to-oust-charlie-strong/ (http://www.texasmonthly.com/the-daily-post/is-there-an-internal-struggle-to-oust-charlie-strong/).  The comparison to Akers in the 80s is interesting, but the comparison to RichRod at Michigan is near-exact.

Of course, when it was down, Michigan never got to see OSU or ND self-destruct like A&M has.  That situation's gotta be some consolation to Longhorns fans.

I thought of Akers immediately. But then the whole plot turned out to possibly be hot air. Lots of rumors being reported as news down here.

But that is mostly UTs fault. The Soviet Union was more transparent, so rumors just fly and who can say what is true and what isn't?

However what is a consolation is that UT finally has a real Big 12 Offensive Staff and have 3 true freshman all Americans. The President and AD rallied to Strong (of course the extent that the people supposed to be in charge actually run things at UT is always a matter of speculation). Things seem to be looking up. Their #1 recruiting rival imploding has not hurt. Though damn if Jim Harbaugh has not been annoying us all by seeming to recruit everybody in the country. Fortunately Michigan's class seems close to full now.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on December 19, 2015, 12:16:33 PM
The bowl games have started.  Sort of.  Alcorn State and NC A&T.  It's a new 1AA thing called the Air Force Reserve Celebration Bowl.  Hey, two 9 win teams. 

Anyway, the first 1A one is after this with Arizona - New Mexico.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on December 19, 2015, 01:31:16 PM
Quote from: Valmy on December 19, 2015, 12:07:00 AM
I thought of Akers immediately. But then the whole plot turned out to possibly be hot air. Lots of rumors being reported as news down here.

But that is mostly UTs fault. The Soviet Union was more transparent, so rumors just fly and who can say what is true and what isn't?

However what is a consolation is that UT finally has a real Big 12 Offensive Staff and have 3 true freshman all Americans. The President and AD rallied to Strong (of course the extent that the people supposed to be in charge actually run things at UT is always a matter of speculation). Things seem to be looking up. Their #1 recruiting rival imploding has not hurt. Though damn if Jim Harbaugh has not been annoying us all by seeming to recruit everybody in the country. Fortunately Michigan's class seems close to full now.

You seem a lot more confident about Strong than most observers.  I wouldn't take what the President and AD say too seriously -  they are saying the same things that Michigan's president and AD were saying a year before RR got canned. 

Texas recruiting, though, has been pretty horrendous by Texas standards. Even when not Harbaughed (and I think they'll be Harbaughed one more time), LSU and Ole Miss (plus the other Texas schools) are killing Texas for the top-level in-state recruits.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on December 19, 2015, 04:18:09 PM
Utah is wracking up the points off turnovers 21-0 half way though the 1st quarter :lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on December 19, 2015, 04:22:02 PM
Quote from: katmai on December 19, 2015, 04:18:09 PM
Utah is wracking up the points off turnovers 21-0 half way though the 1st quarter :lol:
Wow Another pick 6 for Utes.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on December 19, 2015, 04:27:56 PM
I just switched back from the New Mexico Bowl (which is actually competitive) in time to see another BYU turnover on a handoff.  That's 5 now in the first Q. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on December 19, 2015, 04:30:36 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on December 19, 2015, 04:27:56 PM
I just switched back from the New Mexico Bowl (which is actually competitive) in time to see another BYU turnover on a handoff.  That's 5 now in the first Q.
Yep perfect 5 for 5. :lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on December 19, 2015, 04:34:51 PM
What is record for points in a game? 35-0 with 4 mins left in 1st.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on December 19, 2015, 04:34:58 PM
Damn that's brutal.  35-0 now. 

Musburger talking about drinking.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on December 19, 2015, 04:37:33 PM
Quote from: katmai on December 19, 2015, 04:34:51 PM
What is record for points in a game? 35-0 with 4 mins left in 1st.

Looks like Georgia Tech dropped 222 on someone.  :lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on December 19, 2015, 05:17:45 PM
Yeah, a century ago.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on December 19, 2015, 05:54:25 PM
Quote from: grumbler on December 19, 2015, 01:31:16 PM
Texas recruiting, though, has been pretty horrendous by Texas standards. Even when not Harbaughed (and I think they'll be Harbaughed one more time), LSU and Ole Miss (plus the other Texas schools) are killing Texas for the top-level in-state recruits.

Not really. This is just how Strong recruits. We were in the same boat last year and ended up with the #10 class. We shall see. I mean we did go 5-7 and all. None of the people who cover UT recruiting closely are very concerned.

QuoteYou seem a lot more confident about Strong than most observers.  I wouldn't take what the President and AD say too seriously -  they are saying the same things that Michigan's president and AD were saying a year before RR got canned.

It is rather simply grumbler. If he doesn't have a good season next year he is gone. I just think he will.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on December 19, 2015, 07:49:17 PM
Hey BYU made a game of it but couldn't come all the way back. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on December 27, 2015, 07:14:42 AM
A little bit of EDSBS http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2015/12/23/10644796/jim-harbaugh-has-gifts-for-you (http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2015/12/23/10644796/jim-harbaugh-has-gifts-for-you)

Quote[December 29th]

JIM: Okay, I've listened to your complaints, and I assure you, no more birds today.

SARAH [cautiously]: what's the trick

JIM: open the box!

SARAH: oh, five golden rings! Jim, this is lovely, I'm so-

JIM [grabs box, hurls it into pond]: RINGS ARE EARNED ON THE FIELD, NOW LET'S RUN STAIRS


[December 31st]

SARAH [getting ready to go to a party] [looks out window]: are those swans swimming in our pond new?

JIM [pretending not to hear, focused on Castlevania on his Game Boy]

SARAH: I will divorce you if you get any more birds, Jim

JIM: look I bought all of the birds at once, my bird guy sells in bulk

SARAH: why do you have a bird guy

JIM [throws Game Boy against wall, storms out]: BECAUSE BO HAD A BIRD GUY

[January 1st]

JIM: Okay, I'm really done with birds.

SARAH: Our house is covered in shit, Jim. Two of the swans got into my car. Have you seen what a swan can do to the inside of a car?

JIM: Of course I have. I respect their energy. Now let's start the new year on a better note. [offers large glass of milk] It's like natural steroids!

SARAH: [peering over Jim's shoulder at eight milkmaids in the kitchen] Dammit, Jim they sell milk at the store! We don't need to run a dairy farm. And aren't you coaching a bowl today?

JIM: I trained the geese to coach in my place, I'm really focused on this gift-giving season.

Editor's note: The geese held Florida to 112 offensive yards in a 17-10 victory.

[January 2nd]

[they're both just staring, arms crossed, as nine ladies dance around their living room]

JIM: I- I'm sorry, I don't even know where I was going with this one...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on December 28, 2015, 02:53:27 PM
Navy has their weird position specific "ship" helmets on for the bowl game today vs. Pitt.  They don't seem to wear their regular blue/white + gold uniforms for any games I see anymore. 

E:  The backs look to have the Independence LCS on there.  They appear to have not accurately depicted the rust. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on December 28, 2015, 04:20:22 PM
They wore the same helmets for the Army game as well iirc.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on December 28, 2015, 04:26:23 PM
Quote from: katmai on December 28, 2015, 04:20:22 PM
They wore the same helmets for the Army game as well iirc.

Yeah they did.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on December 31, 2015, 04:36:36 PM
Trevone Boykin (TCU QB) attacked some bike cops down on the Riverwalk, punched one, and is being charged with a felony.  Good call, dude. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on December 31, 2015, 11:08:00 PM
Pulling for Sparty tonight is like pulling for the rat trapped in a small enclosure with an anaconda.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on December 31, 2015, 11:09:30 PM
They're holding up fairly well, but the luck is really against them.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on December 31, 2015, 11:09:43 PM
Sparty shit the bed in this one. 

Update on Boykin: he might have been so shitfaced that he was just swinging at anyone and just happened to blast a bike cop. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on December 31, 2015, 11:13:09 PM
Clemson vs Bama....'ugh.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on December 31, 2015, 11:13:33 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on December 31, 2015, 11:09:30 PM
They're holding up fairly well, but the luck is really against them.

They are down 31-0, we have different opinions of holding up well. Total yards at this point are 353 - 170.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on December 31, 2015, 11:14:14 PM
Quote from: katmai on December 31, 2015, 11:13:09 PM
Clemson vs Bama....'ugh.

Clemson is good. They will have a shot.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on December 31, 2015, 11:19:33 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on December 31, 2015, 11:14:14 PM
Quote from: katmai on December 31, 2015, 11:13:09 PM
Clemson vs Bama....'ugh.

Clemson is good.

Wasn't my intention to imply they aren't.

Just not interested in either team.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on December 31, 2015, 11:19:50 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on December 31, 2015, 11:09:43 PM
Sparty shit the bed in this one. 

Update on Boykin: he might have been so shitfaced that he was just swinging at anyone and just happened to blast a bike cop.

I haven't really followed it but the impression I got was that he swung at someone else and accidentally hit the cop.

He also apparently snuck back out after being in bed for the midnight curfew.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on December 31, 2015, 11:20:32 PM
So how about that 'Bama defense?  :cool:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on December 31, 2015, 11:22:15 PM
Quote from: katmai on December 31, 2015, 11:19:33 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on December 31, 2015, 11:14:14 PM
Quote from: katmai on December 31, 2015, 11:13:09 PM
Clemson vs Bama....'ugh.

Clemson is good.

Wasn't my intention to imply they aren't.

Just not interested in either team.

Clemson, unlike Alabama, is actually an interesting team to watch. I'm not a fan of either team either, but I'm interested to see what Clemson can do.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on December 31, 2015, 11:23:29 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on December 31, 2015, 11:20:32 PM
So how about that 'Bama defense?  :cool:

It is amazing what you can do with 5 star recruits at basically every position.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on December 31, 2015, 11:24:11 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on December 31, 2015, 11:23:29 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on December 31, 2015, 11:20:32 PM
So how about that 'Bama defense?  :cool:

It is amazing what you can do with 5 star recruits at basically every position.
Tell that to USC :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on December 31, 2015, 11:25:07 PM
I was really hoping that Sparty would blast this out. Looks like it won't happen though.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on December 31, 2015, 11:26:01 PM
Quote from: sbr on December 31, 2015, 11:19:50 PM
I haven't really followed it but the impression I got was that he swung at someone else and accidentally hit the cop.

He also apparently snuck back out after being in bed for the midnight curfew.

I think the cops are saying right now that it might have been unintentional, or at least hitting the cop was unintentional.  But yeah, supposedly he was there for bed check, then took off to go to the local branch of Pat O'Brien's. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on December 31, 2015, 11:28:16 PM
I don't recall, but didn't TCU have to play without him already this year? Curious how it effects game vs Ducks.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on December 31, 2015, 11:30:42 PM
Yeah he missed the Oklahoma game this year (they lost by 1).
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on December 31, 2015, 11:31:57 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on December 31, 2015, 11:25:07 PM
I was really hoping that Sparty would blast this out. Looks like it won't happen though.

So was most of the country excluding Alabama fans and maybe some MIchigan fans. Even the non Alabama SEC homers have had enough of them.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on December 31, 2015, 11:41:35 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on December 31, 2015, 11:31:57 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on December 31, 2015, 11:25:07 PM
I was really hoping that Sparty would blast this out. Looks like it won't happen though.

So was most of the country excluding Alabama fans and maybe some MIchigan fans. Even the non Alabama SEC homers have had enough of them.

Eh, was hoping Kirby Smart's squad performed exceptionally, and they did.  :P

Could have done with a few less touchdowns though.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on January 01, 2016, 12:01:20 AM
Clemson vs Alabama: not really that great a draw frankly.

I don't know. Maybe some people like it.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 01, 2016, 12:09:35 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on December 31, 2015, 11:41:35 PM

Eh, was hoping Kirby Smart's squad performed exceptionally, and they did.  :P

Could have done with a few less touchdowns though.

That doesn't seem so strategic in terms of thinking. We are a month from national signing day, and you are going to be without a full time coach for another week and a half.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 01, 2016, 12:14:32 AM
That shit is out of my control.

I'm just hoping he's got the goods.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 01, 2016, 12:15:52 AM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on January 01, 2016, 12:01:20 AM
Clemson vs Alabama: not really that great a draw frankly.

I don't know. Maybe some people like it.

I may be biased because I live in the middle of it all and know lots of supporters from both schools, but I think it is awesome. Alabama is the death star of college football and has been for a while, and while Clemson is led by an Alabama guy and tries to mimic its program organizationally, Dabo Swinney in terms of personality and style of offense is basically the anti nick saban. Clemson is really good this year, but for a generation or two is best known for blowing golden opportunities. They are two really different programs.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on January 01, 2016, 02:46:35 AM
Bama-State looked real good on the TV in a bar.  Football looks better with those super-amped lights.

Those two highlight plays--the interception by Bama on the stop and go from around the 20, and that TD run by that scat back that broke two tackles with hard core jukes--were world class.

All the camera closeups on the Bama players made me think that team is a bunch of hard men doing serious work.  Loved the sweat and the dirt.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on January 01, 2016, 03:53:10 AM
One of my earliest memories of Bama football is a national championship game against Miami, must have been in the 80s.  End of the game, Miami is trailing by like 4 or 7.  Miami has two out wide, everyone else staying home to block.  Bama has 9 stacked on the line with one on one press coverage on the wideouts.  No safety help.  That was a hellacious statement about faith in their corners to cover.

Seems to me like Bama always has outrageous corners.  Do you guys concur? 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on January 01, 2016, 05:25:36 PM
Boring games this morning, and looks like Yi's team can't stop the garbons
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on January 01, 2016, 05:39:50 PM
Ouch.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: citizen k on January 01, 2016, 05:41:42 PM
Quote from: katmai on January 01, 2016, 05:25:36 PM
Boring games this morning, and looks like Yi's team can't stop the garbons

21-0 1st quarter, embarassing. :Embarrass:

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on January 01, 2016, 06:01:45 PM
Quote from: citizen k on January 01, 2016, 05:41:42 PM
Quote from: katmai on January 01, 2016, 05:25:36 PM
Boring games this morning, and looks like Yi's team can't stop the garbons

21-0 1st quarter, embarassing. :Embarrass:
uff da
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 01, 2016, 06:18:06 PM
It sucks that the Rose Bowl took Iowa. Ohio State Stanford would have been awesome, and ND could have beat Iowa.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on January 01, 2016, 06:19:59 PM
Clearly the best teams were not in Big Ten Championship game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on January 01, 2016, 06:23:58 PM
 :lol: Massacree.  When does Stanford start suiting up their trainers?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on January 01, 2016, 06:32:52 PM
Does McCaffery have what it takes to make it in the NFL?

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 01, 2016, 06:33:33 PM
Quote from: katmai on January 01, 2016, 06:19:59 PM
Clearly the best teams were not in Big Ten Championship game.

If you look at the F/+ rankings, which use advanced statistics looking at play by play and drive data from the season, the rankings were:

1. Alabama
2. Clemson
3. Oklahoma
4. Ohio State

Iowa was way down at 25.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 01, 2016, 06:35:04 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 01, 2016, 06:32:52 PM
Does McCaffery have what it takes to make it in the NFL?

A fast RB that is effective as a receiver and a really good return man? Hell yeah.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 01, 2016, 06:38:06 PM
Quote from: katmai on January 01, 2016, 06:19:59 PM
Clearly the best teams were not in Big Ten Championship game.

They should have brought their best when they played Sparty then.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on January 01, 2016, 06:40:35 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 01, 2016, 06:33:33 PM
Quote from: katmai on January 01, 2016, 06:19:59 PM
Clearly the best teams were not in Big Ten Championship game.

If you look at the F/+ rankings, which use advanced statistics looking at play by play and drive data from the season, the rankings were:

1. Alabama
2. Clemson
3. Oklahoma
4. Ohio State

Iowa was way down at 25.

You have to get through the regular season first. OSU is basically a southern style team built to win bowls now. There's nothing wrong with that, but it's a gamble up north.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 01, 2016, 06:44:57 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on January 01, 2016, 06:40:35 PM

You have to get through the regular season first. OSU is basically a southern style team built to win bowls now. There's nothing wrong with that, but it's a gamble up north.

Those rankings were based on the regular season--not bowl performances.

I don't know how you would change OSU to win in northern climates...an awesome running game with a solid defense seems to be what you want and is what OSU has. I'm not sure why they decided not to run the ball against MSU, but then I think the OSU coaches also think that was a mistake.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 01, 2016, 07:02:21 PM
If I was an Iowa fan, I'd give the Stanford fans something to remember by walking amongst them and commenting to a friend, "The worst part of this isn't just losing the game. It is that after the game we have to leave California and go back to live in Iowa."
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Scipio on January 02, 2016, 09:17:26 AM
Hotty Toddy. HYDR.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on January 02, 2016, 10:18:37 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 01, 2016, 06:44:57 PM
Those rankings were based on the regular season--not bowl performances.

I don't know how you would change OSU to win in northern climates...an awesome running game with a solid defense seems to be what you want and is what OSU has. I'm not sure why they decided not to run the ball against MSU, but then I think the OSU coaches also think that was a mistake.

The reason OSU didn't run the ball against MSU was that they couldn't.  They certainly tried (29 rushing plays to 16 passes), but they couldn't get the job done (3 YPC).  They only got 45 plays and 132 yards total because they tried for too long to try to get a running game going.  They needed to pass against that feeble MSU defensive backfield to open up the run game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 11:23:14 AM
Quote from: grumbler on January 02, 2016, 10:18:37 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 01, 2016, 06:44:57 PM
Those rankings were based on the regular season--not bowl performances.

I don't know how you would change OSU to win in northern climates...an awesome running game with a solid defense seems to be what you want and is what OSU has. I'm not sure why they decided not to run the ball against MSU, but then I think the OSU coaches also think that was a mistake.

The reason OSU didn't run the ball against MSU was that they couldn't.  They certainly tried (29 rushing plays to 16 passes), but they couldn't get the job done (3 YPC).  They only got 45 plays and 132 yards total because they tried for too long to try to get a running game going.  They needed to pass against that feeble MSU defensive backfield to open up the run game.

The criticism is that of all their plays, only 12 were runs by running backs. So yes, they did have lots of QB and WR runs that add up to a large percentage of run plays, but the running backs were not given much of a chance to get going.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on January 02, 2016, 03:26:59 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 11:23:14 AM
The criticism is that of all their plays, only 12 were runs by running backs. So yes, they did have lots of QB and WR runs that add up to a large percentage of run plays, but the running backs were not given much of a chance to get going.

YThe criticism doesn't take into  account the system Urban Meyer runs.  In his spread-to-run system, there are very few plays that are designed with only a single running candidate; the vast majority of plays option off the defense.

And Elliot (the only RB to get the ball, IIRC) averaged worse than anyone else; if he had gotten the ball more, they'd have gotten fewer yards.  What OSU needed to do was push those MSU safeties back with a downfield passing game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 03:56:42 PM
Quote from: grumbler on January 02, 2016, 03:26:59 PM


YThe criticism doesn't take into  account the system Urban Meyer runs.  In his spread-to-run system, there are very few plays that are designed with only a single running candidate; the vast majority of plays option off the defense.

And Elliot (the only RB to get the ball, IIRC) averaged worse than anyone else; if he had gotten the ball more, they'd have gotten fewer yards.  What OSU needed to do was push those MSU safeties back with a downfield passing game.

Elliott averaged 2.8 yards a carry, JT Barrett 2.9, and when passing the ball they completed 9/16 passes for 46 yards, or 2.9 yards an attempt.

This is an odd argument. I'm saying they didn't feed Elliott the ball enough, and you are responding that I am not taking into account Urban Meyer's system, but Urban Meyer has said that they didn't feed him the ball enough.

Elliott was a heisman candidate and probably would have been in NY for the ceremony if not for the MSU game. When you have a guy like that, it is tough not to wonder why he only got the ball 3 times a quarter.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on January 02, 2016, 04:16:10 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 03:56:42 PM
Elliott averaged 2.8 yards a carry, JT Barrett 2.9, and when passing the ball they completed 9/16 passes for 46 yards, or 2.9 yards an attempt.

This is an odd argument. I'm saying they didn't feed Elliott the ball enough, and you are responding that I am not taking into account Urban Meyer's system, but Urban Meyer has said that they didn't feed him the ball enough.

I don't believe that he actually said that.   Elliot said that, and Meyer just agreed that he wasn't going to dispute Elliot's comments. 

All I did was note that Elliot was their least effective weapon, so I fail to see how that is an "odd argument"  that their problem wasn't that they didn't get him the ball more, and was, instead, that they needed to stop MSU from stacking the box and so get everyone more plays.  Meyer DID address that.

QuoteElliott was a heisman candidate and probably would have been in NY for the ceremony if not for the MSU game. When you have a guy like that, it is tough not to wonder why he only got the ball 3 times a quarter.

Elliot got the ball in 50% of the rushes against ND, and only three less than 50% in the MSU game.  I don't think shifting three rushes from Barret to Elliot in the MSU game was going to make a damn bit of difference, either in the score or in Elliot's Heisman candidacy.

If OSU could have sustained drives against MSU, and Elliot could have gotten 25 or so touches (out of 50 or so running plays), yes, that would have turned the game around.  But the problem wasn't that Elliot was not getting the ball enough, it was that the offense wasn't able to run enough plays to win.  The OSU playcalling was bad, but it was bad because it didn't react to what was happening on the field.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 04:43:02 PM
Quote from: grumbler on January 02, 2016, 04:16:10 PM


I don't believe that he actually said that.   Elliot said that, and Meyer just agreed that he wasn't going to dispute Elliot's comments.

All I did was note that Elliot was their least effective weapon, so I fail to see how that is an "odd argument"  that their problem wasn't that they didn't get him the ball more, and was, instead, that they needed to stop MSU from stacking the box and so get everyone more plays.  Meyer DID address that.

"I couldn't disagree with his comments, but that's not the place" is what he said in the post game press conference.

"Elliott carried eight times on the Buckeyes' longest scoring drive of the game — a 32-yard drive in the first half. He carried the ball four times the rest of the game, including only two carries for three yards in the second half."

http://www.news-herald.com/article/HR/20151123/SPORTS/151129811

I don't know where you come up with Elliott being "their least effective weapon". Is it yards per carry? He had a 1 yard TD run--I think we agree that was a highly effective play. That hurt is yards per carry. If you take away that run, he averaged 2.9 yards per carry--that is the same as the QB running the ball and also the same as the yards per pass play. Clearly the bulk of his carries came in the short end of the field where yards are hard to come by and the result of that drive was one of the few bright spots of the day.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on January 02, 2016, 05:09:22 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 04:43:02 PM
I don't know where you come up with Elliott being "their least effective weapon". Is it yards per carry? He had a 1 yard TD run--I think we agree that was a highly effective play. That hurt is yards per carry. If you take away that run, he averaged 2.9 yards per carry--that is the same as the QB running the ball and also the same as the yards per pass play. Clearly the bulk of his carries came in the short end of the field where yards are hard to come by and the result of that drive was one of the few bright spots of the day.

You make my point for me.  Elliot wasn't running effectively, so taking carries away from the (ever-so-slightly) more effective runners was not the answer.  The answer was to be more aggressive about throwing the ball, so everyone could run better.  I think pulling Elliot and substituting Marshall on a few first downs (and then throwing to Marshal) would have done much more to open up the running attack than giving Elliot the ball two or three more times for another five or ten yards. 

And, of course, the passing game suffered from the fact that a six-yard TD pass couldn't go more than six yards, so the argument about Elliot is easily countered by the same argument about passing.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 02, 2016, 05:15:05 PM
I didn't see this game, but it sounds like Sparty won because their defense was playing with more energy than OSU's offense rather than poor play-calling by OSU. 8 runs for 32 yards is not great; it's a matter of luck that it resulted in a touchdown instead of losing the ball on downs(or a field goal this close to end zone). 4 yards every play is sufficient, but it's not gonna get distributed like that.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 05:27:14 PM
Quote from: grumbler on January 02, 2016, 05:09:22 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 04:43:02 PM
I don't know where you come up with Elliott being "their least effective weapon". Is it yards per carry? He had a 1 yard TD run--I think we agree that was a highly effective play. That hurt is yards per carry. If you take away that run, he averaged 2.9 yards per carry--that is the same as the QB running the ball and also the same as the yards per pass play. Clearly the bulk of his carries came in the short end of the field where yards are hard to come by and the result of that drive was one of the few bright spots of the day.

You make my point for me.  Elliot wasn't running effectively, so taking carries away from the (ever-so-slightly) more effective runners was not the answer.  The answer was to be more aggressive about throwing the ball, so everyone could run better.  I think pulling Elliot and substituting Marshall on a few first downs (and then throwing to Marshal) would have done much more to open up the running attack than giving Elliot the ball two or three more times for another five or ten yards. 

And, of course, the passing game suffered from the fact that a six-yard TD pass couldn't go more than six yards, so the argument about Elliot is easily countered by the same argument about passing.

They averaged 2.9 yards per pass attempt, and threw more passes than ran the ball with Elliott.

I'll remove the 6 yard pass play for a TD from the statistics if you want, but since it was longer than the average it would make the average go down.

The team throws more passes than Elliott runs, they average 0.1 yards per play more on the passes than runs - equal if you remove the 1 yard TD run--yet you conclude Elliott wasn't effective and throwing the ball more apparently would be?

As I pointed out, 8 of the 12 runs Elliott had came on a single drive that went for a TD--their best drive of the day. 3 yards and a cloud of dust can still work--espeically when the other team only puts up 17. What a bizarre coaching decision on a day when the offense is generally stymied, to have your best drive fueled by Elliott--a 10 play drive marked by 8 Elliott runs (the other two plays accounted for just 5 yards), and then you only give Elliott 4 more carries the entire game. Way to use your best player.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 05:34:29 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 02, 2016, 05:15:05 PM
I didn't see this game, but it sounds like Sparty won because their defense was playing with more energy than OSU's offense rather than poor play-calling by OSU. 8 runs for 32 yards is not great; it's a matter of luck that it resulted in a touchdown instead of losing the ball on downs(or a field goal this close to end zone). 4 yards every play is sufficient, but it's not gonna get distributed like that.

3 yards and a cloud of dust isn't luck--it is a viable strategy.

ET: let me ask you this:
-you have one TD drive in the game more than 6 yards. On that drive you feature a running back 8 times in 10 plays. This drive is in the first half.
-the entire rest of the game you have 3 first downs.
-The running back in question is a heisman trophy candidate.
-The running back gets 4 carries the rest of the game.

Do you think they probably should have tried running their heisman trophy candidate RB a bit more?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 02, 2016, 06:15:59 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 05:34:29 PM
3 yards and a cloud of dust isn't luck--it is a viable strategy.

Nobody can guarantee 3 yards though. If the running game averages 3 yards, it's just as likely to go 6 yards, 6 yards, first down, 0 yards, 0 yards, 3 yards, punt. I see guys who are averaging 6-8 yards a carry get stuffed on consecutive runs frequently.

Quote
ET: let me ask you this:
-you have one TD drive in the game more than 6 yards. On that drive you feature a running back 8 times in 10 plays. This drive is in the first half.
-the entire rest of the game you have 3 first downs.
-The running back in question is a heisman trophy candidate.
-The running back gets 4 carries the rest of the game.

Do you think they probably should have tried running their heisman trophy candidate RB a bit more?

8 times in 10 plays that netted 32 yards. That is not a solid TD drive, that's lucky distribution of yardage gains.

I feel 12 carries is enough to say that Sparty was doing a decent job of stopping him. Maybe he would have played better given more carries, but it's not a given.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on January 02, 2016, 07:25:48 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 05:27:14 PM
The team throws more passes than Elliott runs, they average 0.1 yards per play more on the passes than runs - equal if you remove the 1 yard TD run--yet you conclude Elliott wasn't effective and throwing the ball more apparently would be?

As I pointed out, 8 of the 12 runs Elliott had came on a single drive that went for a TD--their best drive of the day. 3 yards and a cloud of dust can still work--espeically when the other team only puts up 17. What a bizarre coaching decision on a day when the offense is generally stymied, to have your best drive fueled by Elliott--a 10 play drive marked by 8 Elliott runs (the other two plays accounted for just 5 yards), and then you only give Elliott 4 more carries the entire game. Way to use your best player.

OSU didn't do much downfield passing (and when they did, it tended to work), which is exactly my point.  The problem wasn't that Elliot or Barnett turned into bums, the problem was that MSU sold out on the run, and OSU called plays like they could still run with 9 in the box.  Elliot wasn't gaining enough yardage on first and second downs to maintain drives (nor was barnett, though he was getting more than Elliot).  The solution wasn't switch one ineffective runner's caries to another ineffective runner; if Elliot had had the 15 carries for 44 yards and Barnett the 12 carries for 33, it wouldn't have changed a thing.

The great TD drive you refer to went for 32 yards.  Elliot couldn't even manage 3.5 yards per carry in the best drive they had (8 carries for 27 yards aren't Heisman-winning stats).  In fact, they aren't even game-winning stats.  Way to use your offense.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 08:28:54 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 02, 2016, 06:15:59 PM

Nobody can guarantee 3 yards though. If the running game averages 3 yards, it's just as likely to go 6 yards, 6 yards, first down, 0 yards, 0 yards, 3 yards, punt. I see guys who are averaging 6-8 yards a carry get stuffed on consecutive runs frequently.

8 times in 10 plays that netted 32 yards. That is not a solid TD drive, that's lucky distribution of yardage gains.

I feel 12 carries is enough to say that Sparty was doing a decent job of stopping him. Maybe he would have played better given more carries, but it's not a given.

I get your point, and while there is some truth to it, I'd point out:

-run plays, while they obviously have variation in outcome, have less deviation than pass plays. If you ever see two teams--one is run heavy averaging 5 YPC, while the other is pass heavy and averaging 6 YPA with a completion rate around 55%, bet on the running team. The passing team will struggle to sustain drives.
-Why abandon the run with Elliott because Sparty was doing a decent job of stopping him but not the pass? They had more passes than Elliott runs, and the results were 9/16 passing for 46 yards--2.9 yards per attempt. That is a recipe for only getting 3 first downs besides that one drive we've discussed.
-This ignores that backs like Elliott tend to gain steam as the game goes on.
-On a hunch, I remembered a similar recent game - Derrick Henry was bottled up pretty good in the early going against Florida. On his first 12 carries, Henry had 41 yards, or 3.4 yards per carry. That is a bit better than Elliott, but Henry also lost a fumble, and the passing game for Alabama was more effective. In the end? Saban kept feeding Henry the football, and he finished with 189 yards on 44(!!!!!) carries, won the game and got into the playoff, and the next week Henry picked up the Heisman Trophy.

grumbler, I get that your option is "abandon Elliott like they did, but call more effective plays". Watching on TV, it is really impossible to know that they didn't do that and Barrett didn't just shit the bed. They called plenty of pass plays. Presumably Barrett had options to throw downfield, but for whatever the reason he kept scrambling.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 08:36:04 PM
Fuck Big 12, every day you should praise baby Jesus for Baylor, because pending the WV game all your other bowl teams have been blown out.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on January 02, 2016, 08:49:53 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 08:36:04 PM
Fuck Big 12, every day you should praise baby Jesus for Baylor, because pending the WV game all your other bowl teams have been blown out.

You say this like it's a bad thing.  Too bad about Baylor though.

E:  Well no, the Purple Wizard losing what might be his last game is kinda a bummer.  The rest can suck it though.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on January 02, 2016, 09:40:34 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 08:28:54 PM
grumbler, I get that your option is "abandon Elliott like they did, but call more effective plays".
:huh:  That's not what i proposed at all.  And even if it was, that would be better than your option of "let Elliot run all 29 running plays so he can get the 86 yards and OSU can lose exactly like they did."

QuoteWatching on TV, it is really impossible to know that they didn't do that and Barrett didn't just shit the bed. They called plenty of pass plays. Presumably Barrett had options to throw downfield, but for whatever the reason he kept scrambling.
The pass plays they were calling were all the dinky shit.  Very few even had receivers going downfield.  There was nothing to the passing game that would make MSU reconsider keeping their safeties close to the box, and by running Elliot more OSU would just have been playing into MSU's hands.

I don't buy the "Barnett just turned into a turd and Elliot, though he looked like a turd, was really a tootsie roll."  The problem, as Meyer acknowledged, was play-calling and the OSU staff letting their offense get stuffed in the box.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on January 02, 2016, 10:13:45 PM
Good god, Oregon.  :mad:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 10:19:42 PM
I think the classic thing is Mack Brown as the announcer talking about "Oregon has to kill the clock." And talking about going under the center.

Dude, there is over 3 minutes left and TCU has 2 timeouts. IT is a 3 point game. Don't go in a shell, play football.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on January 02, 2016, 10:21:05 PM
Man, he was talking about that at least one Oregon possession ago too.  Damn, Mack. 

Nice series there, Oregon.  Way to stop the clock twice. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on January 02, 2016, 10:21:21 PM
:nelson: @ Quackers.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 10:23:04 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on January 02, 2016, 10:21:05 PM
Man, he was talking about that at least one Oregon possession ago too.  Damn, Mack. 

Nice series there, Oregon.  Way to stop the clock twice.

We are now receiving  the coaching wisdom that turned him into an announcer.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on January 02, 2016, 10:29:25 PM
This is some bullshit.  :mad:

E:  OO nice return

Welp OT
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on January 02, 2016, 10:30:36 PM
There is no QB in the country that gives the Oregon defense more trouble than Jeff Lockie.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on January 02, 2016, 10:43:46 PM
QuoteESPN Stats & Info ‏@ESPNStatsInfo  4m4 minutes ago
Since Texas Tech's 31-point comeback in the 2006 Insight Bowl, teams are 0-1,463 when trailing by 31 points in any point in the game

:lol:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on January 02, 2016, 11:02:02 PM
Quote from: sbr on January 02, 2016, 10:30:36 PM
There is no QB in the country that gives the Oregon defense more trouble than Jeff Lockie.
Man the Ducks are fucked for next year at QB
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 02, 2016, 11:06:56 PM
I'm glad Oregon put up a good show in OT. To have just rolled over and died in the second half would have been a tough way for the seniors to go out. Not that this wasn't a tough way for the seniors to go out, but it would have been worse.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on January 02, 2016, 11:10:49 PM
I feel bad for Jeff Lockie; the dude doesn't deserve to be on a D-1 roster, much less on the field in a Bowl Game.

The best part though is that the Ducks were lucky he didn't transfer, otherwise they would have no one behind Adams.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on January 03, 2016, 12:23:44 AM
Quote from: sbr on January 02, 2016, 11:10:49 PM
I feel bad for Jeff Lockie; the dude doesn't deserve to be on a D-1 roster, much less on the field in a Bowl Game.

The best part though is that the Ducks were lucky he didn't transfer, otherwise they would have no one behind Adams.
Yeah but who do they have for next season?
Pac-12 north is going to be interesting.
Stanford has McCaffery coming back, but will have new QB
Oregon new QB
WazZu has Falk coming back
Udub has Browning and Gaskin coming back and most of #1 defense.
Cal has to replace Goff who will go in 1st rd
and then well Oregon St is Oregon st.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on January 03, 2016, 01:06:41 AM
That is just an epic, epic choke job.


edit: Vern should have figured out how to slide by now...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: katmai on January 03, 2016, 02:32:53 AM
Fecking Sun Devils.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 03, 2016, 02:48:33 AM
With the TCU comeback, and then the WV win, it seems no conference really shit the bed this bowl season, and I'm not sure one really knocked it out of the park either.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on January 04, 2016, 10:13:56 PM
Oregon football put out a funny press release today, the first part is that "that outside linebackers coach Erik Chinander has accepted a position to become the defensive coordinator at another FBS institution."  He is following Scott Frost to Central Florida.

The second part announced that oh by the way Don Pellum, the defensive coordinator the last 2 years, will be replacing Chinander as LB coach.

By all accounts Pellum is a great guy, and has done a lot of good things for Oregon football over the last 30 years but that collapse in the Alamo Bowl may be one of the best things to happen to this program in a while; assuming they can go out and get a big time DC.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 04, 2016, 10:41:56 PM
Quote from: sbr on January 04, 2016, 10:13:56 PM
Oregon football put out a funny press release today, the first part is that "that outside linebackers coach Erik Chinander has accepted a position to become the defensive coordinator at another FBS institution."  He is following Scott Frost to Central Florida.

The second part announced that oh by the way Don Pellum, the defensive coordinator the last 2 years, will be replacing Chinander as LB coach.

By all accounts Pellum is a great guy, and has done a lot of good things for Oregon football over the last 30 years but that collapse in the Alamo Bowl may be one of the best things to happen to this program in a while; assuming they can go out and get a big time DC.

I don't know if demoting a guy is a good move...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on January 05, 2016, 10:30:55 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 04, 2016, 10:41:56 PM
Quote from: sbr on January 04, 2016, 10:13:56 PM
Oregon football put out a funny press release today, the first part is that "that outside linebackers coach Erik Chinander has accepted a position to become the defensive coordinator at another FBS institution."  He is following Scott Frost to Central Florida.

The second part announced that oh by the way Don Pellum, the defensive coordinator the last 2 years, will be replacing Chinander as LB coach.

By all accounts Pellum is a great guy, and has done a lot of good things for Oregon football over the last 30 years but that collapse in the Alamo Bowl may be one of the best things to happen to this program in a while; assuming they can go out and get a big time DC.

I don't know if demoting a guy is a good move...
Yeah, I can't see how that can work out in the medium or long run.

On the other hand, it is Oregon. They do things their own way.

I am long since over being surprised at their approach, and how often it actually works anyway.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on January 05, 2016, 11:16:06 AM
What are your concerns with the demotion, that he will be unhappy and cause problems?

Pellum has been with Oregon for over 30 years as s player and coach. Also my assumption, based on nothing, is that pellum was relieved of dc duties abd then given the choice of whether he wanted to remain on the staff or look elsewhere.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on January 05, 2016, 11:20:40 AM
I would be more concerned with how a new DC is going to handle the old DC still being around, and with players the old DC likely recruited, etc., etc.

Just sounds like a recipe for problems. But again, Oregon has a pretty unique culture, and they make things work that may not work elsewhere.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on January 05, 2016, 11:39:59 AM
Ah I didn't even consider that angle. That could be a potential problem.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on January 05, 2016, 03:31:45 PM
Greg Mattison was Brady Hoke's DC and was the only staff member retained when Harbaugh came, taking a demotion to DL coach.  It has worked out super well, and when Durkin left to become Maryland's head coach, Matty just moved up, temporarily, to DC for the bowl game against Florida (and, yeah, that seemed to work as well! :) ).  In doing so, Mattison allowed Michigan to hold off hiring Durkin's replacement until they could get the guy they wanted.

Matty has said he actually prefers to be a position coach, and prefers the DL above other positions.  So, these sorts of things can work, and work well.

BTW, Jim Harbaugh just finished his fifth year as a D-1 coach and just sent his sixth coordinator to be a D-1 head coach.  He's not just a quarterback whisperer.  Any rising coordinator's gotta think the road to a head coach job is shortest through Harbaugh.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on January 05, 2016, 03:33:19 PM
Quote from: sbr on January 05, 2016, 11:39:59 AM
Ah I didn't even consider that angle. That could be a potential problem.

It is pretty freaking rare but I might see it happening in a situation like the one grumbler described.

It is the same reason when a new Head Coach comes in he never rehires the old guy as a coordinator.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 05, 2016, 04:08:42 PM
To our Texas contingent...Manny Diaz became Miami's defensive coordinator a few days ago. Awesome hire or really awesome hire?  :P :P :P
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 05, 2016, 04:13:16 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 05, 2016, 03:33:19 PM
Quote from: sbr on January 05, 2016, 11:39:59 AM
Ah I didn't even consider that angle. That could be a potential problem.

It is pretty freaking rare but I might see it happening in a situation like the one grumbler described.

It is the same reason when a new Head Coach comes in he never rehires the old guy as a coordinator.

I would assume this fellow is sufficiently humbled by being fired from the DC position not to cause any problems, but obviously I have no idea. The AD just might, though.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on January 05, 2016, 04:13:36 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 05, 2016, 04:08:42 PM
To our Texas contingent...Manny Diaz became Miami's defensive coordinator a few days ago. Awesome hire or really awesome hire?  :P :P :P

He has been great everywhere where Mack Brown was not his boss so here is hoping it works out. I think assistant coaches need the right chemistry to succeed. Sort of like how Greg Robinson looked like a defensive genius during his 1.75 seasons under Mack.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on January 05, 2016, 04:22:56 PM
Wasn't he at Mississippi State?  56th in overall defense, 53rd against the pass, 65th against the run, according to CBS. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on January 05, 2016, 04:24:41 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on January 05, 2016, 04:22:56 PM
Wasn't he at Mississippi State?  56th in overall defense, 53rd against the pass, 65th against the run, according to CBS. 

I thought he was at La Tech? Either way that is respectable. If his 2012 defense was that good at Texas they would have gone far.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on January 05, 2016, 04:27:05 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 05, 2016, 04:24:41 PM
I thought he was at La Tech? Either way that is respectable. If his 2012 defense was that good at Texas they would have gone far.

He was at LaTech for a year right after being fired by Mack, then ended up back at Miss State.  Only one year at a time everywhere except Texas and Middle Tennessee State.  Hm. 

E:  As DC, I mean.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 05, 2016, 04:36:03 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on January 05, 2016, 04:27:05 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 05, 2016, 04:24:41 PM
I thought he was at La Tech? Either way that is respectable. If his 2012 defense was that good at Texas they would have gone far.

He was at LaTech for a year right after being fired by Mack, then ended up back at Miss State.  Only one year at a time everywhere except Texas and Middle Tennessee State.  Hm. 

E:  As DC, I mean.

But all the moves make sense. Every jump was a big promotion, except after getting fired by Texas of course.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 05, 2016, 04:40:39 PM
And Mississippi St to Miami.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 05, 2016, 05:12:53 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 05, 2016, 04:40:39 PM
And Mississippi St to Miami.

I know it is fun to crap on Miami, but Miami is a good gig. Mississippi State is a decidedly low tier SEC school--probably in the worst position in its division.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 05, 2016, 05:16:51 PM
That makes it a more challenging position, not an inferior one.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on January 05, 2016, 05:18:55 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 05, 2016, 05:16:51 PM
That makes it a more challenging position, not an inferior one.

Being in Starkville as opposed to Miami makes it an inferior position.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 05, 2016, 05:35:24 PM
Quote from: dps on January 05, 2016, 05:18:55 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 05, 2016, 05:16:51 PM
That makes it a more challenging position, not an inferior one.

Being in Starkville as opposed to Miami makes it an inferior position.

You could say the same about Tuscaloosa.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 05, 2016, 06:26:24 PM
Miami has won 5 national titles since 1980 and a bunch of big games. Recent performance notwithstanding, Miami should be competing to win the ACC much more often than Mississippi State competing to win the SEC.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 05, 2016, 06:38:37 PM
SEC schools have unreasonable expectations, so they all expect their coaches to be competing to win the SEC every year. Past titles notwithstanding, I doubt there will be any more pressure put on him at Miami than Mississippi St.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 05, 2016, 06:41:42 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 05, 2016, 06:38:37 PM
SEC schools have unreasonable expectations, so they all expect their coaches to be competing to win the SEC every year. Past titles notwithstanding, I doubt there will be any more pressure put on him at Miami than Mississippi St.

How does that get back to Mississippi State not being an inferior position?
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 05, 2016, 06:51:31 PM
He's no longer got Alabama, LSU and Auburn every year? By some metrics, this is a step down. It may be a more pleasant job, but it's also easier.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 05, 2016, 07:12:45 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 05, 2016, 06:51:31 PM
He's no longer got Alabama, LSU and Auburn every year? By some metrics, this is a step down. It may be a more pleasant job, but it's also easier.

I don't think playing a bunch of elite programs in a second tier program with a fanbase with unrealistic expectations makes the job a better one.

Also, trust me on this, expectations at Miami are not lower than at Mississippi State--they are much higher. There may be empty stadiums, but the fanbase is very quick to turn on coaches. Including the NFL alumni. The fanbase--I think realistically--expects to get back to competing for national titles.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on January 05, 2016, 07:46:20 PM
Larry Coker resigned as head coach of UTSA.  Overall, he went 26-32 with a conference record of 15-15. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on January 06, 2016, 01:45:16 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 05, 2016, 05:35:24 PM
Quote from: dps on January 05, 2016, 05:18:55 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 05, 2016, 05:16:51 PM
That makes it a more challenging position, not an inferior one.

Being in Starkville as opposed to Miami makes it an inferior position.

You could say the same about Tuscaloosa.

You could indeed. I have no idea why kids want to go there.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on January 06, 2016, 01:46:52 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on January 05, 2016, 07:46:20 PM
Larry Coker resigned as head coach of UTSA.  Overall, he went 26-32 with a conference record of 15-15. 

So a new Head Coach will lead UTSA against the might Aggies next season  :ph34r:

I hope they realize they are carrying the honor of the UT system on their shoulders.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on January 07, 2016, 12:45:24 AM
RichRod fired Casteel.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on January 07, 2016, 11:24:18 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 05, 2016, 07:12:45 PMThe fanbase--I think realistically--expects to get back to competing for national titles.

Going to some games would be a good start. Recruiting is harder when the seats are empty.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on January 07, 2016, 11:28:02 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 05, 2016, 07:12:45 PM
The fanbase--I think realistically--expects to get back to competing for national titles.
There's a lot of talk among the Michigan fanbase that next year is the NC year.  Harbaugh belief is hard to resist. I'm getting psyched myself.  It's definitely possible.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on January 07, 2016, 11:29:01 PM
Quote from: Berkut on January 07, 2016, 12:45:24 AM
RichRod fired Casteel.

i think that's a mistake, but he buys himself some time that way.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 07, 2016, 11:44:53 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on January 07, 2016, 11:24:18 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 05, 2016, 07:12:45 PMThe fanbase--I think realistically--expects to get back to competing for national titles.

Going to some games would be a good start. Recruiting is harder when the seats are empty.

I'm not saying it wouldn't help, but it didn't stop Miami from winning national titles before. I had season tickets growing up during the glory days, and the attendance was awful. If it wasn't Florida State or Notre Dame, the stadium would be mostly empty.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 08, 2016, 12:00:13 AM
Why do you think Richt will recruit better teams at Miami than at Georgia? I know the beaches are nice and all, but the SEC's rep is way over the ACC's right now.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 08, 2016, 12:33:17 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 08, 2016, 12:00:13 AM
Why do you think Richt will recruit better teams at Miami than at Georgia? I know the beaches are nice and all, but the SEC's rep is way over the ACC's right now.

Well first Richt fielded some national championship caliber teams at UGA, but that aside...

The most talent rich part of Florida is south florida, and Miami is the only top tier school there. The other two in state schools - UF and FSU - are in the northern part of the state which is a vastly different culture than Miami. All else being equal, that is a huge advantage to get the players to UM.

Conference doesn't matter much. Miami did just fine as an independent and Big East member. It is why Miami has been able to field 5 national titles under 4 coaches in 3 decades despite poor attendance and facilities. Look at Miami's draft performance since 2000, or even last year, when the players coming out committed in the waning days of Randy Shannon, or when the program was facing sanctions after the Nevin Shapiro scandal - 7 players drafted, 2 in the first round. With a competent coach and some stability, recruiting should improve, and certainly a team with as much talent as last year shouldn't be going 6-7.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on January 08, 2016, 12:45:14 AM
Quote from: grumbler on January 07, 2016, 11:29:01 PM
Quote from: Berkut on January 07, 2016, 12:45:24 AM
RichRod fired Casteel.

i think that's a mistake, but he buys himself some time that way.

He doesn't need to buy himself any time - there is no consideration for getting rid of him at this point.

I think it is the right move - for whatever reason, the defense was just not getting better, and not just from a scheme standpoint, but from a recruiting standpoint.

I don't think Casteel could break into the living rooms of the 4-star recruits in meaningful numbers.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 08, 2016, 12:55:48 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 08, 2016, 12:33:17 AM
The most talent rich part of Florida is south florida, and Miami is the only top tier school there. The other two in state schools - UF and FSU - are in the northern part of the state which is a vastly different culture than Miami. All else being equal, that is a huge advantage to get the players to UM.

I think Miami's a pretty unique snowflake and most of southern/central Florida is more like north Florida. Certainly that's the impression I get from Sav's Florida posts, that central Florida is full of dumb rednecks.  :sleep:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 08, 2016, 09:15:15 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 08, 2016, 12:55:48 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 08, 2016, 12:33:17 AM
The most talent rich part of Florida is south florida, and Miami is the only top tier school there. The other two in state schools - UF and FSU - are in the northern part of the state which is a vastly different culture than Miami. All else being equal, that is a huge advantage to get the players to UM.

I think Miami's a pretty unique snowflake and most of southern/central Florida is more like north Florida. Certainly that's the impression I get from Sav's Florida posts, that central Florida is full of dumb rednecks.  :sleep:

Historically, central Florida is prime recruiting ground for UF. Miami's focus has been (post Schnellenberger at least) on the conurbation West Palm - Fort Lauderdale - Miami area. Which is where the bulk of Florida's good players come from.

Southwest Florida is where I went to high school--culturally very different than Miami and Miami hasn't controlled recruiting there (probably UF gets the most players, though FSU and Miami are competitive). But, Southwest Florida is something of a wasteland for football talent--it may have changed, but I'm not sure a Southwest Florida high school has ever won a state championship in Florida at any division.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on January 08, 2016, 11:39:52 AM
Quote from: Berkut on January 08, 2016, 12:45:14 AM
I think it is the right move - for whatever reason, the defense was just not getting better, and not just from a scheme standpoint, but from a recruiting standpoint.

I don't think Casteel could break into the living rooms of the 4-star recruits in meaningful numbers.

I'm not sure Arizona could afford to hire the kind of DC who is going to turn the heads of 4-star recruits in meaningful numbers.  I haven't heard of who is the replacement, though, so maybe I'm missing something.

i mean... Arizona DID have a replacement lined up before they fired Casteel, right?  It would be dumb to do otherwise.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Berkut on January 08, 2016, 11:46:48 AM
I am reasonably confident that RR has a plan, since like you said, the firing makes little sense otherwise.

There doesn't seem to be a lot of outside knowledge as to what that plan is though...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadImmortalMan on January 08, 2016, 11:05:59 PM
Everybody recruits in South Florida. It might be the most competitive place in the country.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 09, 2016, 10:56:13 AM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on January 08, 2016, 11:05:59 PM
Everybody recruits in South Florida. It might be the most competitive place in the country.

There is a massive amount of talent in a small geographic area that can sustain and supplement a number of teams.  :yes: But only one major program has the home field advantage in recruiting South Florida.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 10, 2016, 11:22:05 PM
Saw Harbaugh is looking into moving spring practice to Florida. Points for thinking outside the box, but man...these guys are supposed to be students. Their fall is already fucked from an academic point of view. I'm sure this would be done during spring break, but still...
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on January 11, 2016, 07:46:09 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 10, 2016, 11:22:05 PM
Saw Harbaugh is looking into moving spring practice to Florida. Points for thinking outside the box, but man...these guys are supposed to be students. Their fall is already fucked from an academic point of view. I'm sure this would be done during spring break, but still...

it is always interesting to see how rumors become "facts" that then morph into contentions unrelated to the original rumor.

If Harbaugh is looking to move a couple of days' worth of spring practices to Spring Break and give his kids a free trip to Florida during SB, that sounds like a clever move to get some publicity and give the students a nice break.  The plan would backfire if the students would rather be on break on their own than practicing for a couple of days so they get to Florida for free.

But nothing of this is known - not even that Harbaugh is looking into this.  Remember, this all comes from Mitch Snyder at the Detroit Free Press.  He's not known for being very honest in his coverage of the Wolverines.  He's a massive troll and clickhound.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on January 11, 2016, 08:01:30 PM
Bama is giving 7.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: dps on January 11, 2016, 10:09:08 PM
Good first half.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: alfred russel on January 11, 2016, 10:30:56 PM
Well I'm rather surprised by Urban Meyer at halftime. He said to neutralize the pass rush of Clemson, he would put in an adjustments like he did in 2008, spread the field and give up on the run game...Derrick Henry had 113 yards rushing in the first half...and the whole team 195. Also Coker isn't very good...not sure I'm buying that, but we see the thought process that sank Ohio State against Michigan State.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on January 11, 2016, 11:45:48 PM
Helluva game. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on January 11, 2016, 11:50:33 PM
Great onside kick.  Love the story about the little Polish orphan boy.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: lustindarkness on January 12, 2016, 12:18:31 AM
Great game.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: crazy canuck on January 12, 2016, 12:22:48 PM
That was a very entertaining game.  :)

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on January 14, 2016, 10:49:57 PM
ESPN reporting Frank Wilson from LSU has been hired to replace Coker at UTSA: http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/14572975/utsa-roadrunners-hire-lsu-tigers-assistant-coach-frank-wilson-head-coach

Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on January 15, 2016, 12:09:19 PM
I hope he realizes the vast responsibility entrusted to him next season.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on January 15, 2016, 12:14:15 PM
QuoteBut...but...UTSA's vast fanbase :weep:
QuoteI hope he realizes the vast responsibility entrusted to him next season.


:huh:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on January 15, 2016, 12:18:00 PM
Vast as in fat, perhaps.  :hmm:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on January 15, 2016, 12:21:29 PM
 :hmm:  Maybe. 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on January 15, 2016, 12:24:33 PM
I did not realize I did that. I have no explanation for why I used the word 'vast' twice.

But a responsibility deserving some sort of superlative awaits UTSA on November 19th.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: sbr on January 16, 2016, 07:23:44 PM
The Ducks hired Brady Hoke as DC today.  Not sure how I feel about it, but it has to be better than Pellum.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on January 16, 2016, 07:36:00 PM
Quote from: sbr on January 16, 2016, 07:23:44 PM
The Ducks hired Brady Hoke as DC today.  Not sure how I feel about it, but it has to be better than Pellum.

He's always been a decent defensive coach, but is defenses need a good D-line to prosper.  Good thing he's a good D-line coach.

He's an outstanding recruiter.  They may want him more for that than for defense.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on January 23, 2016, 03:33:35 PM
So Rashan Gary (nation's #1 recruit) and his New Jersey posse (Jordan Fuller, Gatoraide NJ player of the year, and 2 2017 guys) are snowed in in Ann Arbor on their official visits (actually, they are snowed out of new Jersey, but will stay in AA until Monday).  Immediately, news people assume the worst and accuse Harbaugh of causing the freezing weather so he can "cheat" in recruiting.  The picture is admittedly suspicious, but it's hardly concrete proof:
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/37/a8/4e/37a84e081f86444c6e1a651d252cce99.jpg)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on February 02, 2016, 11:54:40 PM
Quote from: Valmy on December 19, 2015, 05:54:25 PM
Quote from: grumbler on December 19, 2015, 01:31:16 PM
Texas recruiting, though, has been pretty horrendous by Texas standards. Even when not Harbaughed (and I think they'll be Harbaughed one more time), LSU and Ole Miss (plus the other Texas schools) are killing Texas for the top-level in-state recruits.

Not really. This is just how Strong recruits. Texas was in the same boat last year and ended up with the #10 class.

Yeah this is happening. Texas has four new commits in the last three days and will get a bunch more tomorrow. Another top 10 class. There is a method to Chuck's madness.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FyHusURd.jpg&hash=07f221fbc4edaf77321f9f4b19a7dd60211197e9)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on February 05, 2016, 04:10:17 PM
Hey Val did you see they moved Texas - TCU to Black Friday?   :) 
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on February 05, 2016, 04:12:01 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on February 05, 2016, 04:10:17 PM
Hey Val did you see they moved Texas - TCU to Black Friday?   :) 

Yes.

Bummer that will make it harder to get tickets. But otherwise that is when I was used to the game occurring. Thanks to A&M being TV banned for much of my youth the "tradition" of the Thanksgiving game has only been a thing since 2007 really for my generation.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: grumbler on February 05, 2016, 07:09:26 PM
This is pretty brilliant:
https://soundcloud.com/siriusxmcollege/rick-neuheisels-musical-tribute-to-jim-harbaugh-on-national-signing-day (https://soundcloud.com/siriusxmcollege/rick-neuheisels-musical-tribute-to-jim-harbaugh-on-national-signing-day)

Neuheisel actually isn't a bad singer.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on February 05, 2016, 09:27:06 PM
Quote from: Valmy on February 05, 2016, 04:12:01 PM
Yes.

Bummer that will make it harder to get tickets. But otherwise that is when I was used to the game occurring. Thanks to A&M being TV banned for much of my youth the "tradition" of the Thanksgiving game has only been a thing since 2007 really for my generation.

Yeah I dig the T+1 day.  As far as tickets go, sure they'll be harder to come by, but hopefully by that game, it'll also be because they've started finally winning again and people actually want to watch them play.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: PDH on February 05, 2016, 10:21:49 PM
Winning swinning.  I know when that giant Chilean flag is displayed and "I've been working on the railroad" song plays I am all about Texas.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on February 05, 2016, 10:35:31 PM
Quote from: PDH on February 05, 2016, 10:21:49 PM
Winning swinning.  I know when that giant Chilean flag is displayed and "I've been working on the railroad" song plays I am all about Texas.

Hey man!

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Frlv.zcache.com%2Fdont_mess_with_texas_w_chilean_flag_t_shirt-r12eaa9212f50477189ec09a47494330d_jg4de_324.jpg&hash=5d1abc3124f9b128a1445bee65cffc05ae171487)

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Falcalde.texasexes.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F10%2Fchileanflagweb.jpg&hash=f979dce7726b74e94654a378b2e5e1b6b1298151)

It just brings a tear to your eye
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on February 05, 2016, 10:38:05 PM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0027%2F6682%2Fproducts%2Fchile_earthquake_relief_t_shirt_1_large.png%3Fv%3D1267674801&hash=f58b701b715ac6a84e2c00bd4404d7a445ac9f85)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Valmy on February 05, 2016, 10:40:04 PM
I don't want my joke shirt to explain the joke.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Eddie Teach on February 05, 2016, 11:20:21 PM
Oh. I didn't realize that yours had the wrong flag.  :sleep:
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on February 06, 2016, 01:21:25 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on February 05, 2016, 11:20:21 PM
Oh. I didn't realize that yours had the wrong flag.  :sleep:

Corps operative.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on February 06, 2016, 02:19:09 AM
Quote from: Valmy on February 05, 2016, 10:35:31 PM
It just brings a tear to your eye

The stripper chaps bring a tear to my eye.  That doesn't do shit.
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on February 06, 2016, 02:54:36 AM
Chaps, you say?

(https://sammyvegas.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/texas-longhorn-chaps.jpg)
Title: Re: NCAA Football 2015
Post by: Admiral Yi on February 06, 2016, 03:33:15 AM
 :weep: